On the Record
Allan Raible's Take on the New Music Worth a Listen.
Allan Raible writes about music and the music industry. He is based in New York.
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 |
« Previous | Main | Next »
Janet Jackson’s “Discipline”
February 27, 2008 2:56 PM
Janet Jackson, who usually has been known to release an album every four or five years or so, has recently been in one of the most prolific periods in her career. “Discipline” comes just two years after her last album “20 Y.O.,” which followed relatively closely after 2004’s “Damita Jo” which arrived on the heals of the botched Super Bowl halftime “wardrobe malfunction.”
That infamous incident and its negative fallout perhaps sent Jackson into a career re-evaluation mode, perhaps trying to undo the damage. You can’t blame her for wanting to have her new albums match the success of her top-notch pop landmarks “Control” from 1986 and “Rhythm Nation 1814” from 1989.
“Damita Jo” wasn’t a great album by Jackson standards, but had the Super Bowl incident not happened, I have a feeling the rock-edged “Just a Little While” and the Kanye West assisted “Strawberry Bounce” would have been enough to make the album more of a sales success.
“20 Y.O.” was named in honor of the 20th anniversary of her album “Control” and was meant to recall her pop glory days. Yes, it was a clean, crisp pop treat, and yes it was better than “Damita Jo” by leaps and bounds, but it was a little too easily digestible. Its tracks, though infectious during the album’s duration, had little sticking-power otherwise. Although it was entertaining, it felt like a rehash.
Neither “Damita Jo” nor “20 Y.O.” debuted at the top of the charts. It was an unusual loss of form. There was a sense that maybe after that Super Bowl incident that Janet lost a little of her mega-pop-star mojo. This is mojo she should have never lost. She wouldn’t have lost it either if said “wardrobe malfunction” hadn’t happened. After F.C.C. fines and an apology it seemed like she didn’t quite have the same pull.
The part that really makes little to no sense in the matter is how her coconspirator in the incident, Justin Timberlake seemed to get past the incident relatively unscathed. He was after all the one who actually ripped her outfit exposing her breast for a millisecond of nationally broadcast network television. He said he was sorry and the incident was over for him, while Janet suffered the consequences of cultural scorn. A few years later for reasons more confounding than ever, Timberlake is more popular than ever with everyone giving him a pass, with a wink-wink and a nudge-nudge, and a “don’t worry about him, he’s just bringing sexy back!” (Oh, of course! I had no idea it went away! Please!) A few have noted that the disparity in the treatment of these two perhaps says something profoundly disturbing about embedded sexism (and perhaps even issues of racism as well) in our culture. Gender probably played a bigger roll than race, though. Either way, it may point to a double-standard. It’s not the way it should be. Janet should be forgiven.
Yes, it was a mistake. Yes, they shouldn’t have done it. All that really happened though was her breast was exposed for a period of time so quick that if you blinked you missed it. It was just a breast and it caused an outcry. Is it healthy as a culture to really have such an offended reaction to the human body? So, I say it really, finally is time to forgive Janet once and for all.
After “20 Y.O.,” Janet left her label, Virgin, thus making “Discipline” her first album for Island/Def Jam. There has been speculation that the two last albums’ weaker-than-usual sales stats combined with her significant-other/collaborator Jermaine Dupri’s move from Virgin to Island/Def Jam may be among her reasons for the move.
So how does “Discipline” fare? On first look, what’s most obvious is the absence of Jackson’s longtime producers Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis. They have been a part of her hit-making team since she began having hits, so such a move is perhaps a little startling. Jam and Lewis have always known how to make pop records which gleam yet don’t sound completely artificial. But then again, they are masters. As part of the Time, they came from the same Minneapolis scene as Prince. They had the purple one’s pop sense. So, it’s a shame to see Janet part ways with them. For “Discipline” Janet’s left mostly in the hands of Dupri among others.
The album’s first real track beyond the intro is the single “Feedback.” It starts off promising with a marching-band drum beat which recalls the intensity of “Rhythm Nation,” but then gives way to a pop song that sounds factory produced. If the Jackson family is known for anything, it sure isn’t factory-produced pop. She and Michael have always been known for taking musical chances and blending genres whenever possible. This track lacks Janet’s personality. It’s the weakest thing here. It sounds like it could’ve easily been on a number of other pop albums including Britney Spears’ “Blackout.” Like a few of the tracks on the album, it was co-written by Rodney Jerkins, who has written better, more memorable fare for Destiny’s Child and others. It may be on its way to being a hit, but Janet’s done much better. This sounds like machine-generated gloss, down to the disappointing layer of what sounds like computer treatment over her vocals. Janet may not be a belter, but her nice, honey-soaked voice has never ever seemed to need such a boost.
“Luv” is better. Again, her voice sounds treated which is rather upsetting, but this groove actually fits Janet. It is a nice, relaxing jam you can imagine being blasted on beaches. Rhythmically reminiscent of Kanye West’s “Good Life,” it should be a hit.
Maybe the whole CD is meant to sound computerized. It’s as if Janet wants to sound like some sort of sensuous robot. It is an approach which mimics that of the before-mentioned Spears, but where Spears sounded completely cold and artificial, there’s humanity in Jackson’s tracks. “Rollercoaster,” despite the digitized wash seems very warm and personal.
The “ooh-oohs” on Rock with U” sound like they were meant to be the soundtrack to a summer pool party.
“2Nite” is a dance track in the vein somewhere between “Together Again” and “All for You.”
“Can’t B Good” is a slow jam which somehow recalls “Any Time, Any Place” and her brother’s “Thriller” closer “The Lady in My Life.”
Janet has always excelled at the slow songs, especially the slow, melodic ballads like “Again” and “Every Time.” This album’s “Never Letchu Go” attempts to match those tracks. It’s likeable, but it is a bit too cheesy. The capper is the subtle “guitar-like” effect hidden in the mix during the end of the intro. It sounds too over-the-top in a soft-rock-ballad-from-the-eighties sort of way.
“Greatest X” is another ballad. At this point it seems like she’s put too many slow songs too close together.
But then the party picks back up beginning with the cool and trippy “So Much Betta,” and continues with the Missy Elliott collaboration “The 1” which could be a decent hit without sounding calculated.
“What’s Ur Name” is a seductive groove with a crisp bounciness. It could also be another party smash.
The title track is another same-y slice of smooth-loving R&B, but frankly the S&M-like imagery and lyrics like “Daddy, I disobeyed U” probably would cross a line for most people. It’s supposed to be shocking and enticing I suppose, but it just ends up sounding wrong and (dare I say) icky. It’s in the “too much information” category. The same goes with the videotaped private romp described on “Curtains,” but that’s a much better track all around.
Janet plays the roll of the vixen decently, but she plays on it slightly too often. Perhaps “Control” and “Rhythm Nation 1814” worked better as albums because they were more varied in subject-matter. It’s like she’s trying to drill it in that she can be seductive. We get it. Move on. It’s this kind of lame, shameless, in-your-face pandering that has nearly derailed her career. She needs to learn that less is more.
That being said, “Discipline” does indeed outdo its two predecessors in quality. It may be her best album since “All For You” or perhaps even “The Velvet Rope.” Sure, it’s really pop-driven and it lacks a good rock track to equal “If” or “Black Cat,” but that’s a minor point. It’s not a perfect album, but it (sort of) gets the job done. We will all have to see if it reenergizes the buying public.
February 27, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (6)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
I used to be a huge fan of Janet, but her downturn in sales and her music not making an impact these days is not because of the superbowl incident, I believe. She just stopped delivering good music, and it really frustrates me how, since the velvet rope, she started using this whimpering, whispery voice you can barely hear. She does it more and more on every album and it makes my skin crawl. It's not like she's lost her voice - she shows on some tracks she can still sing beautifully, so why she chooses to put that freaky voice on is beyond me. 'So Excited' is a perfect example of how a great track is ruined by her own vocal. Then on 'days gone by' and 'roll witchu' she sound beautiful, but those tracks never made it on to the album! why? And all the sex-stuff is no longer sexy, exciting or sensual, it's just boring and tired. So for me the reason that I didn't run to the store to buy Discipline like I did with her previous albums is because of that distant flimsy vocal technique that sounds like she wasn't actually in the recording studio herself but in the room next door, and a lack of innovation music wise. I love 'feedback', 'luv' and 'let me know' (again, why is this a bonus track?!), but on the whole for someone with so much experience, contacts and talent, I feel Janet has simply not given us her best over the last couple of years. I'd love to see her back on top of the charts more than anyone else but dammit, Janet, SING!
Posted by: menno | Mar 3, 2008 5:58:00 AM
And why they've made her look like Pete Burns on the cover is a mystery to me when she looks so gorgeous in other shots. I give up.
Posted by: menno | Mar 3, 2008 6:04:34 AM
Wow, I totally disagree with this review of "Discipline". First off, I disagree that "Discipline" is a better album than her last two. Of the three, "Damita Jo" is "hands down" the best. Some of the songs that he praises on "Discipline", including "Curtains",
"The 1", and "What's Your Name" are the weakest tracks, in my opinion. In contrast, "Discipline" (musically and vocally)is one of the best tracks, along with "Luv" and "Never Letchu Go". Several of the songs are good, but need some further tweaking in the studio, including the repetitive and monotone "Rock With You", the second half of "2Nite"(which is pretty much a mess), and "So Much Betta" needs a vocal and production overhaul, but it has a lot of potential. I'm disappointed that Janet continues to weigh down her CDs with those ridiculous interludes. This isn't a bad album; it's just certainly nowhere close to her best.
Posted by: Danny | Mar 6, 2008 9:06:04 AM
The Superbowl incident (or Nipplegate) as ending Janet Jackson's career is the most ridiculous yarn sown by her die-hard fans, a lot of whom blame her brother's lack of contemporary relevency to his eccentricity rather than his unwillingness to record new music (as if recording 1 record, lame at that, every 7 years is adequate to stay on top). Janet Jackson got a gift when All For You was a successful record because it was her weakest since before Control. Most people consider her last 3 even weaker. When Nipplegate happened, she was encroaching on 40 and in a creative slump. Damita Jo most likely would have had the same fate had Nipplegate never happened.
Justin Timberlake at the time of Nipplegate, on the other hand, had just had his initial success with his 1st solo record. He was young and had mass appeal. Jackson, on the other hand, has been recording sex records nonstop (except her exceptional Velvet Rope) for 10 years at the time with seemingly nothing new to say. If Madonna, who is still considerably older than Janet Jackson, has managed to stay on top, it's because she's managed to keep her style fresh with working with various producers in a variety of settings with consistent stylistic depth.
Posted by: Joel | May 18, 2008 8:59:29 PM
I must say that i am one of Janet's biggest fan and will ride or die with her as long as she puts out music. I must say that I am disappointed with her vocals lately. She needs to step it up and get out of all the bed whispering sound. Janet we know you fine as hell all you have to do is look at you. I want so bad for Janet to be back on top. I luv luv luv her!!!!
Posted by: jay | Jun 11, 2008 9:36:57 AM
I must say that i am one of Janet's biggest fan and will ride or die with her as long as she puts out music. I must say that I am disappointed with her vocals lately. She needs to step it up and get out of all the bed whispering sound. Janet we know you fine as hell all you have to do is look at you. I want so bad for Janet to be back on top. I luv luv luv her!!!!
Posted by: jay | Jun 11, 2008 9:37:02 AM
Post a comment