Bizarre Bazaar

Postcards from Around the World

ABC News' Terry McCarthy has been reporting on war, peace, and everything in between from all around the world for 20 years. He writes about daily life in the areas he is reporting from.

RECENT POSTS

September 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

« Previous | Main | Next »

SADDAM’S HANGING -- UNCUT

December 30, 2006 6:34 PM

Several hours after Saddam Hussein was hanged this morning in Baghdad, the state-run television channel, Iraqia, began to run edited video, without sound, of the run-up to the hanging.  The video shows Saddam being guided up the steps to the top of the gallows, a scarf being put around his neck and then the noose placed over his head and tightened on his neck.  Then it stops.  This footage, about a minute long, was played and replayed over and over during the day, and quickly found its way onto all major television stations around the world.

Later this evening, another video of the hanging popped up, this time being shown on Al-Jazeera and Arabiya, two Arabic TV channels based in the Gulf.  The new video was of poor quality, was very jerky, and had clearly been shot on a cell phone or some similar device from below by one of the two dozen witnesses to the event.  It also had sound.  The picture it gave of Saddam’s last moments was very different from the edited, silent version that the Iraqi government had released earlier.

There are five men in black face masks who are visible on the gallows platform around Saddam, acting as guards.  As they guide him towards the trap door and put the noose over his head, they start chanting religious slogans with the names of Moqtada al Sadr (the head of the Mahdi army, accused of organizing death squads against Sunnis) and Baqr al Sadr (the father-in-law of Moqtada).  Saddam, a Sunni, is outraged at this last-minute provocation,  and tells them to “go to hell.”  This is generally where the two TV stations cut the video, but on at least one occasion that we saw, Arabiya allowed the video to keep rolling: The cell phone camera is jerked down to the ground, as if the person holding it had to conceal the camera, then it is slowly raised up to Saddam again, and suddenly his body shoots down through the trapdoor.  At this, the Arabiya anchor came on and made a scissors symbol with two fingers with a mischievous grin on his face, as if to say that they really shouldn’t have shown that, but so be it.  A cynical voyeuristic ploy, nudge nudge wink wink…

However, the impact of this video could be quite significant.  First, it may reinforce Sunni suspicions that the execution of Saddam was merely an act of Shiite revenge for decades of repression under Saddam.  The building where the execution took place was expressly chosen because it was once used as a detention center by a division of Saddam’s secret police that was focused on the Shiite Dawa party.  Some of the witnesses whom the government invited to the execution had themselves once been tortured in that same building.  Indeed, Prime Minister Maliki, who signed the execution order the day before the hanging, is a long-term member of the Dawa party and had himself been sentenced to death by Saddam back in 1980 before fleeing the country.

Worse, it may also reinforce the fears of Sunnis that Maliki’s government is beholden to the Mahdi army, Moqtada’s militia.  Executions are generally expected to be solemn affairs –- certainly not opportunities for thugs to score some final sectarian points before the “enemy” is disposed of.  The video itself seems quite distasteful –- but it is informative to the extent that it reveals the political baggage that the current government carries on its shoulders.  It does not add up to a pretty picture.

December 30, 2006 | Permalink | User Comments (269)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I am sure this has made alot of people happy, and some sad. How can his daughters plead for him a new trial, when he had their husbands killed?

Posted by: diane bruce | Dec 30, 2006 7:31:51 PM

This is an excellent way to help stir up much needed civil war in the Muslim world. I have long believed that instead of Bush/Cheney/Rice/etc we need Richelieu/Fr. Tremblay. The latter were the pair of French notables who manipulated princes/kings/nobles and Popes in the effort to destroy the Hapsburg hegemony over Europe, unite France and engage French hegemony over Europe. They were successful. After the 30 years war all had changed in the way they desired.

This is the future of the Muslim world. Whatever may divide it and contribute to war and chaos is to our benefit


See a book by Aldous Huxley published in 1941

Posted by: Dale | Dec 30, 2006 7:35:06 PM

I'm just shocked that the video originally viewed in the US was even show in its entirety. Not that most are squemish, but based on the fact that anyone on death row in the US would've had their footage shown on tv. But the new video brings up one huge point - the Iraqi Gov't is being led by people with a singular agenda set by a cleric that is just as insane as Hussein ever was. I vote to pull our troops out and let the entire region fight it out amongst themselves. That's what they want to do anyway. Besides, it also helps to have the militant groups dwindle their own numbers for when we go back when we run low on oil supplies again.

Okay, rambling here...good day, Saddam. I said good DAY.

Posted by: JohnyG | Dec 30, 2006 7:57:18 PM

The article is fine until the editorial at the end. Hopefully everyone will realise the difference between reporting the facts and the last 2 paragraphs, which is oppinion and political spin.

I'm not happy that a man is dead, but it's good to put Hussein behind us (and the world).

Some will use this as a rallying point for violence, but the violence would have been there anyways, as it always is in that part of the world, with or without the execution.

When we leave (as we are leaving, most likely) I believe that a large part of the middle east will erupt into war as the powers in the area, both domestic and from the surrounding countries, "pick at the bones" of Iraq. We tried very hard to avoid this by staying and working so long on a new Iraqi government, but overestimated the situation I'm afraid.

Posted by: Rod | Dec 30, 2006 8:03:22 PM

This hanging was done by someone who knew exactly what he was doing. Look at how much slack there was in the rope. It was a "long drop", and there was a pipe hidden in the hangman's knot, so that the rope wouldn't catch. His neck is clearly broken, and witnesses report that he died almost immediately. Definitely, a pro job. The typical Middle East hanging is a slow strangulation.

Posted by: Ray | Dec 30, 2006 8:10:29 PM

Let the Arab/gulf nations go to war, and let America stay at home and watch. They seem to like the whole brother against brother thing.

Posted by: Mr. Ryan | Dec 30, 2006 8:34:15 PM

The Muslims will always have a hate for the USA as long we are trying to talk our way to peace.
We must be more brutal and than the enemy.
This what they believe and respect. Civilians is the Muslim Army. It can be used to accuse that our military are killing civilians, then we put our young men on trialfor murder. Get the government out of running the war and put our generals back in charge. When have we let the civilians keep weapons? If they have a weapon then they must be terrist. The USA have lost the respect for battle back in Vietnam.

Posted by: Jerry | Dec 30, 2006 8:35:19 PM

Interesting....provocitive. But not unexpected. The Iraqi government no doubt had complete control over the environment, and a leak of this sort should come as no suprise. Nor should the fact that these guys were getting last minute jabs in on a man who had persecuted them. I'm no conspiracy theorist, but the fact remains that the death solves nothing. It only reignites more violence and polarization. Iraq has now become a complete mess. The US military isn't to blame. They have their hands tied by weak leadership.

Saddam should have been burned at the stake for what he did to his own people, but he hasn't been America's biggest concern for three years...

Posted by: Danny | Dec 30, 2006 8:35:54 PM

Once again. Over and over. ABC, and all forms of media, have not given us the facts BUT THEIR OPINION OF THE FACTS. New York Times account said that America was dividing up the spoils of Saddam before his execution (as this was a crucification from long ago). Stop! Be fact-relayers and let us form our own opinions. Don't tell us what our opinions should be. We don't need you to be sportswriters that are reporting news.

Posted by: Ken | Dec 30, 2006 8:36:33 PM

Good Riddance!

Posted by: Di | Dec 30, 2006 8:50:29 PM

I only wish that more effort had been made by main stream media to make known the crimes of this mad man.
The same sort of people who would sit by and let this man stay in power, are the same kind of people who would walk by and let a child be molested. "It isn't affecting me."
His death is a good thing, if only for the new airing of his biography.

Posted by: Maggie in Texas | Dec 30, 2006 8:50:53 PM

No one ever talked their way into peace. No peace was ever accomplished without a total military victory. This execution was a long overdue event. If we (the US and our allies) could do this to him (Saddam) we could do it to any other tin pot despot.

Posted by: Rodeny | Dec 30, 2006 8:52:44 PM

I think the execution was premature. Sadam should have stood trial for ALL of the crimes against humanity. If there would have been more trials there would have been official transcripts of his crimes complete with evidence. This would have made a more complete official record of Sadam's regime. Also those who were unable to face their former Dictator in court must feel as though their's was not as important as the other.

Posted by: Michael54 | Dec 30, 2006 8:55:39 PM

he is dead, that is a great thing, LETS MOVE ON!!!!

Posted by: FRA | Dec 30, 2006 9:00:53 PM

Well reported by ABC. Their reporting may not suit some peoples' ideologies. I salute their courage in reporting it the way it happened.

Posted by: dlbarber1954 | Dec 30, 2006 9:04:56 PM

This is the first time i have visited this site.

To the authors comment that executions are supposed to be "solemn occasions", maybe in the US, but in much of the Muslim world they are an occasion for extreme theatrics. In fact, hangings are typically done not with a traditional "old west" trap door (like was performed in Saddam), but rather by a pulley/hoist, that instead of snapping the neck, gradually strangles the individual over a period of minutes.

Posted by: brett | Dec 30, 2006 9:07:27 PM

For those of you who seem to be on the President Hate Wing, are you saying that it was okay then for Saddam to continue as dictator, doing the abhorrant behavior he was doing and gaining ground on future WMD's?

I've been trying to understand this position of people since the start of the war and have not been satisfied to any answer. Anyone want to take a stab at it?

Cheers

Posted by: Greg | Dec 30, 2006 9:08:54 PM

Saddam was also responsible for the greatest waste of natural resources in history. The IMAX version of the burning of Kuwait shows how utterly stupid and purely vengeful his actions were. In addition to burning countless barrels of oil he scarred the atmosphere for years. Why? It caused death, wasted precious resources and gained him nothing. Pure hatred for the world. Glad to see him gone for that alone.

Posted by: Mike | Dec 30, 2006 9:11:10 PM

Pray for his soul, and all others. Love and Compassion is the only way war will end. It is possible.

Posted by: j | Dec 30, 2006 9:12:24 PM

I am surprised at the number of people who think the job of the journalist is to report only the facts. It is context and analysis that give facts meaning. I fear that what I am seeing is the result of the right-wing "attack the messenger" machine in action. Apparently it has worked quite well in persuading the Rush Limbaugh crowd that anything they don't want to hear is the fault of the reporter and not the facts on the ground.

Posted by: Bonnie | Dec 30, 2006 9:14:32 PM

Well, the insainity of Saddam's life is finally over. Saddam is out of the way and the people of Iraq and the rest of the free world is finally smiling. President Bush and President W can breath a little bit easy. The right move was made. James A. "Kentucky"

Posted by: James A. Muncy, Jr. | Dec 30, 2006 9:15:14 PM

Maybe now we can focus on the escalating sectarian violence between Sunnis and Shiites as well as the violence between different Shiite sects. Maybe now we can focus on finding Osama Bin Laden (you know, the guy who started this war) or dealing with the influx of foreign fighters into Iraq. Iraq is now the biggest recruiting ground for terrorists in the world. Maybe with Saddam out of the way we can deal with the many Saudi-backed terrorist organizations (that will never happen, Saudi Arabia gives us too much money and oil).

$300 billion in the drain and what do we have to show for it? An executed dictator? Saddam is dead. Great. Awesome. This is by no means a turning point in the War on Terror.

Posted by: Brett | Dec 30, 2006 9:16:20 PM

just to let you know that all your news report are too negative are JUST TOO NEGATIVE...AND I STILL BELEIVE THAT THERE'S STILL good things that came out of Iraq in some ways..although Idont agree for the prolong stay of the military over there...

Posted by: sfd | Dec 30, 2006 9:19:36 PM

Now that saddam is gone, I wonder if Bush is actually gonig to care about Americans and our invasion in our own country by illegal aliens

Posted by: kathy | Dec 30, 2006 9:20:50 PM

Its amazing. ABC starts out with a news report and then evolves to commentary...where the attitudes of the reporter shine thru... I agree... its BS!

Posted by: TRG | Dec 30, 2006 9:21:12 PM

Post a comment