George Stephanopoulos reports on events in politics, Congress and the White House for ABCNews, on the air and online. He interviews top newsmakers, discusses the events of the week and looks to the week ahead each Sunday on 'This Week.'
RECENT POSTS
- Answers To My Health Care Pop Quiz
- Republicans Seek to Impose Purity Test on Candidates
- The Brewing Democratic Civil War
- Monday Morning Pop Quiz—Health Care
- Roundtable: Geithner Isn’t Going Anywhere
- Reich: Palin Populism v Romney Respectability
- Blackburn: Health Care By the Numbers
- Coburn: No Negotiation Over Ensign Affair
- Breast Cancer Controversy: Will Reform Impose Guidelines?
- Ben Nelson: No Health Care if No Change in Public Option and Abortion Funding
- Fireworks? (So Far) Sedate Senate Health Debate Underway
- Sen. Nelson Will Vote Yes on Saturday
- Obama Group Targets 'Dangerous' Palin
- No Thanksgiving Troop Decision
- Coming Up on 'This Week': Exclusive Health Care Debate
- Obama May Extend TARP Beyond Expiration Date
- Reid Rules Out Reconciliation?
- Report: Rudy Giuliani Rules Out NY Gov Bid
- Ben Nelson Ready to Let Health Debate Begin
- Sebelius says Ignore Mammogram Rec, GOP Attacks Health Reform Bill
GEORGE REPORTS
- 2016
- Afghanistan
- Barack Obama
- Books
- Capitol Hill
- Caught My Eye
- Current Affairs
- Daily Show
- Democrats
- Democrats Vote 2008
- Environment
- Financial Bailout
- Games
- George Personal
- Health Care
- Hillary Clinton
- Iran
- Iraq
- Joe Biden
- John McCain
- Music
- Nobel Prize
- North Korea
- Pakistan
- Polls
- Question of the Day
- Republicans
- Republicans Vote 2008
- Sarah Palin
- Supreme Court
- Ted Kennedy
- Television
- The Economy
- This Week with George Stephanopoulos
- Washington
- What I'm Reading
- White House
- World News
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Caught My Eye: TARP Watchdog: 'We Do Not Seem To Be A Priority For The Treasury'
March 31, 2009 1:13 PM
The watchdog for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the government's financial rescue plan, said today that the Treasury Department has not been cooperating with oversight efforts up to this point.
"We do not seem to be a priority for the Treasury Department," the Congressional Oversight Panel's Elizabeth Warren told a Senate Finance Committee hearing today.
"We have sent letters. We have requested that there be someone named so that we can get technical information. And so far, we have not been a first priority," Warren said. "We use what you give us, and we will exercise the leverage given to us by Congress. In part, that's why I'm here today. I'm here to talk to you about what's happened so far, what we have discovered so far, the inquiries that we have in mid-stream and for which we continue to await responses."
Warren, visibly frustrated with a lack of cooperation from the administration, emphasized, "This problem starts with Treasury."
Neil Barofsky, Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, voiced similar concerns.
He noted that his office just conducted a survey of all 364 TARP recipients on their use of government funds, something they had requested Treasury do, only for the Department to decline to do so except in the cases of Citigroup and Bank of America.
"One thing is clear: complaints that it was impractical, impossible, or a waste of time to require banks to detail how they used TARP funds were unfounded," Barofsky said.
"The survey strongly supports my earlier recommendation to Treasury," he emphasized. "Banks can and should be required to report on their use of taxpayer money to provide maximum transparency and not simply be asked to report on the possible impact of the funds, such as giving only lending activity."
Ranking member Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said the administration needs to start living up to its promise to increase the program's transparency.
"Unfortunately, despite saying all the right things about open government, the new administration has not made any major changes aimed at making TARP more transparent," he said. "Moreover, I have heard about potential problems with access to information from all three of the oversight bodies testifying."
At this morning's hearing, such problems were emphasized time and time again by Warren. Her Congressional Oversight Panel will release their fifth report on TARP next week.
"As I see it, you really have two options here: either you get Treasury to get some religion on this point -- and put their own standards in place, or Congress is forced to step in," Warren said. "We will do everything we can on your behalf, as your congressional oversight panel, but what we can best do for you now is to identify and pinpoint that this is precisely where the problem starts. And then the problem has roll down effects all the way through the system of lack of accountability, complexity that no one can figure out what's going on, so that we never identify the place where we need to start the solution."
ABC News has asked the Treasury Department for a response and will update when and if they get back.
--ABC's Matt Jaffe
UPDATE 6:27pm:
Treasury spokesman Andrew Williams just sent along three letters between Treasury and GAO, as well as the following statement:
"Transparency and accountability are central to ensuring that taxpayer
funds are spent wisely. Treasury is actively engaged with our four
oversight bodies and has made significant progress in implementing
every GAO recommendation, including the following important measures:
Treasury hired more staff across the Office of Financial Stability,
strengthened its internal controls framework to ensure program
objectives are met, improved procedures to oversee contractor
performance, and published and expanded its survey on the lending and
intermediation activities of banks.
Over the last month, Treasury has rolled out five core components of
our Financial Stability Plan, and we will continue communicating to the
oversight bodies, the Congress, and the American people as we implement
these programs, open up lending for consumers and businesses, and
achieve economic recovery."
March 31, 2009 in The Economy | Permalink | Share | User Comments (64)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Transparency? This government shoved a "stimulus" package thru congress without allowing time for anyone to read it, citing catastrophe or crises every other word, and the went on vacation. This goverment passed AIG bonuses they knew where in there, and then reneged on the deal with phoney outrage. This government is trying to shove thru a pork laden budget, without advertizing the last 5 years of huge deficit spending, by changing the rules for passage. This administration has done nothing but lie before, during and after the election. This government is not to be trusted on anything.
Posted by: betsy | Mar 31, 2009 1:43:06 PM
Duh? Did they really think they would tell the public what is going on and where all that money is going? Naaaa
Posted by: Carol in Alabama | Mar 31, 2009 1:48:21 PM
Obama looting the country for his banker buddies on Wall St. and the media or congress being allowed to make it public? HAHAHAHAHA!!! No chance in HELL!!! Gotta love the fake indignation though... Priceless, give that woman a medal!
Posted by: hmn... | Mar 31, 2009 2:01:37 PM
George,
How are you doing with those morning talking points from the White House? Still lying about it and trying to hide it?
Posted by: Richton Holmes | Mar 31, 2009 2:01:38 PM
Look like the stinky stuff of Obama administration is going to hit the fan soon.. This will be ugly.
Posted by: Swiftlearner | Mar 31, 2009 2:02:04 PM
I am saddened, but not surprised, that the members of Congress seem so stupid. Take Wells Fargo as an example. They have assets of $1.4 Trillion. They received $25 Billion in TARP funds. Since receiving those funds they have lent or committed to loans exceeding $100 Million and have paid salaries, utilities, rent, insurance, interest on deposits and many other expenses. How can they possibly tell us accurately where the $25 Billion was spent? What a waste of time and effort and expense to try to find out.
Posted by: GrampaB67 | Mar 31, 2009 2:07:13 PM
What is going wrong in this country ??
Bush got blame and hammered with the war in Iraq and this guy has destroyed us in less than a 100 days got us a deficit of nearly a trillion dollars and Obama almost triple that amount with borrowed money!!! and all he says is that is not his fault, he inhereted, BS!! wake up stupid and ignorant people !! This country is going down like the Titanic and you all fools, who voted him into office are the ones to blame !!
Posted by: Frank | Mar 31, 2009 2:07:54 PM
"ABC News has asked the Treasury Department for a response and will update when and if they get back."
So if they just ignore it, story over?
Posted by: ultranaut | Mar 31, 2009 2:07:56 PM
The problem is that there is only one person at Treasury and it is Geithner.
Geithner needs help. He is understaffed.
Posted by: Sara | Mar 31, 2009 2:10:54 PM
George: I find this very troublesome, and reeks of obfuscation on the part of the Treasury. A criminal investigation should ensue if they refuse to provide the information or "slow play." This is the stuff I'd expect from the likes of, say, Jimmy Hoffa, and not my Government. National Security I will refuse as a reason for such delay and would signal "insider trading" within the Banking Complex. Transparency is the only way to root out corruption on these economic issues.
Posted by: Spartan Phoenix777 | Mar 31, 2009 2:12:13 PM
You mean that everything that Obama critics claimed he was going to do during the election IS ACTUALLY happening? Hmm, go figure??
I blame those who campaigned for this man knowing full well what he was going to do to our country. It's yours - you own it.
Posted by: Kim | Mar 31, 2009 2:22:04 PM
Ms Warren is chipping away at a Treasury stonewall, with a teaspoon, to get the transparency that the American public deserves. I'm no politico, but do I hear a whistle? Who runs the 362 other companies that recieved TARP funding? And why are they being protected from public scorn?! If Elizabeth Warren and her congressional oversite panel were given priority, they might catch the criminals who have been robbing the American public since I was born. And no, I am not a really articulate 5th grader.
Posted by: Dianne Yvette | Mar 31, 2009 2:24:07 PM
Check out the meeting notes for the Financial Stability Oversight board: http://www.financialstability.gov/about/oversight.html
Their last meeting was in January. They were created to meet monthly, to oversee TARP. I guess Obama and Geithner have been to busy to meet, even 1 time, on how that $700 Bn is being spent.
Posted by: WSLS-Webguy | Mar 31, 2009 2:27:12 PM
Get out of the way! Where's that checkbook!
Posted by: LongT | Mar 31, 2009 2:31:16 PM
yep. no doubt there IS an “explosion of government” under obama. it falls far short of socialism however because all of these explosions of government spending do NOTHING TO HELP THE MIDDLE CLASS!
sorry — not yelling at you, just talking loudly.
the massive looting of the treasury is COSTING the middle class, NOT benefiting us. In a socialist economy government spends big bucks on systems that HELP us, like:
universal health coverage
free (or almost free) university tuition
long-term and real unemployment benefits
good quality public schools
widespread public safety and low crime
free museums and parks
excellent mass transit and train systems
paid leave for parents
tax deductions and subsidies for day care for working mothers
mandatory vacation, sick leave, disability
pensions and retirement accounts
People can be opposed to that sort of public spending — in fact most Americans probably are (not me — I’d LOVE to see the $40,000 we spend in taxes every year going to most of those programs) but that is NOT AND NEVER WILL BE what obama and his minions want to see.
the massive taxpayer spending going on under obama is flowing directly to:
1. campaign donors
2. very very rich people
3. democratic party machines in cities and states in order to get votes for 2010 and 2012
Shucks, i WISH the looting of our treasury was at least being used on the middle and working classes. nope — it’s going to the very very rich so that they’ll underwrite obama’s next election, and to the politicians and the poor people they scam so that they’ll vote for him and the dems in the next elections.
it’s a banana republic with an oligarchy running banana headquarters in DC, aka the major branch office of Wall Street.
Posted by: The fix is in! | Mar 31, 2009 2:31:21 PM
Madam Watchdog. Now, you know what the AMERICAN PEOPLE knew from the very beginning - bailouts would be a disaster - throwing money into an abyss. WASHINGTON and WALL STREET are too interconnected to allow transparency. Money flows between the two like blood in an UMBILICAL CORD. By the way. If you are going to be a watchdog, you better show some TEETH. You look more like a watch kitten. No wonder you were chosen for the job.
Posted by: Carol | Mar 31, 2009 2:31:58 PM
george s is a propagandist, he helped fool the public into voting for a socialist (obama)
Posted by: stan | Mar 31, 2009 2:37:56 PM
All a bank has to do is run a configured financial report on their computer and they can have the information the investigators want. Financial institutions have many, many report models they run every day. They know exactly where every dollar goes. There is no excuses. So the real question is: is the Treasury Department lazy, corrupt, or under-staffed? Inquiring minds want to know.
Posted by: Wayne | Mar 31, 2009 2:38:10 PM
Obama is good
Obama is great
We surrender our will
As of this date.
Posted by: zom | Mar 31, 2009 2:40:51 PM
I'm not sure what is going on. This is a mess. But I have a problem with a "oversight" committee complaining that the Treasury (or anyone else) is not responsive because THEY will not "over see" TARP money. Isn't that what the committee is for?
I know that a lot of money is going to be wasted. Old and new administrations failed on this point. This is not a Democratic or GOP problem. Both parties are responsible.
Posted by: MG | Mar 31, 2009 2:42:01 PM
"yep. no doubt there IS an “explosion of government” under obama. it falls far short of socialism however because all of these explosions of government spending do NOTHING TO HELP THE MIDDLE CLASS!"
-------------------------
LOL, and you think socialism will ?????
Posted by: Mike_C | Mar 31, 2009 2:47:00 PM
I know she is flustrated but Geitner is the only one working at the treasury so far. Obama has not had time to appoint anyone else because he is working on his new world order and all. If she will just leave Tim a message he will get back with her in a few years.
Posted by: billy bob | Mar 31, 2009 2:47:23 PM
Carol: Your point is hilarious and so true. She has no teeth, because Congress doesn't want her to have teeth. I have to re-post your comments ----- "Madam Watchdog. Now, you know what the AMERICAN PEOPLE knew from the very beginning - bailouts would be a disaster - throwing money into an abyss. WASHINGTON and WALL STREET are too interconnected to allow transparency. Money flows between the two like blood in an UMBILICAL CORD. By the way. If you are going to be a watchdog, you better show some TEETH. You look more like a watch kitten. No wonder you were chosen for the job." ---- Perfect!
Posted by: Karen | Mar 31, 2009 2:49:59 PM
I can tell you where the lion's share of the TARP funds have gone... the funds went in the front door of these financial institutions and was shoveled out the back door to hedge funds just as quickly.
Posted by: ItDoesnotTakeEconorFinance | Mar 31, 2009 2:53:29 PM
Obama is good
Obama is great
We surrender our will
As of this date.
===========================
zom,
Actually.....
You are not of the Body.
You will be absorbed!
It is the will of Landru (Obama).
Posted by: Mike_C | Mar 31, 2009 3:02:22 PM
Post a comment
MY MUST-READS
- Talking Points Memo
- ABC News' The Note
- Jake Tapper's Political Punch
- ABC News' The Numbers
- Mark Halperin's The Page
- The American Prospect
- The Chicago Sun-Times -- Lynn Sweet
- The Huffington Post -- Politics
- Drudge Report
- FiveThirtyEight: Politics Done Right
- National Review -- The Corner
- New York Times -- David Brooks
- The New York Times -- The Caucus
- The New Majority
- Paul Krugman -- The Conscience of a Liberal
- Politico -- Ben Smith
- Politico -- Mike Allen’s Playbook
- Powerline Blog
- Real Clear Politics
- The Washington Post -- The Fix
- Los Angeles Times - Top of the Ticket

