George's Bottom Line
Reporting and analysis from ABC News Chief Washington Correspondent and "This Week" Host George Stephanopoulos

George Stephanopoulos reports on events in politics, Congress and the White House for ABCNews, on the air and online. He interviews top newsmakers, discusses the events of the week and looks to the week ahead each Sunday on 'This Week.'

November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

« Previous | Main | Next »

Romney Blasts Obama: '180 Degree' Flip on Iran Nukes

June 14, 2009 11:48 AM

During my exclusive "This Week" interview with former Gov. Mitt Romney, R-Mass., he blasted President Barack Obama's handling of U.S. foreign relations, accusing him of "apologizing for America" and arguing that Obama flipped "180 degree" on Iran's nuclear program.

Here's our exchange: 

    STEPHANOPOULOS:  "What do you think of the administration's response
to the [Iranian] election so far and how would you respond? 

    ROMNEY:  Well, first of all, the comments by the president last week
that there was a robust debate going on in Iran was obviously entirely
wrong-headed.  What has occurred is that the election is a fraud, the
results are inaccurate, and you're seeing a brutal repression of the
people as they protest. 

    The president ought to come out and state exactly those words,
indicate that this has been a terribly managed decision by the
autocratic regime in Iran. 

    It's very clear that the president's policies of going around the
world and apologizing for America aren't working.  North Korea is not
just saber rattling.  They've taken the saber out of the sheath.  Iran
is moving headlong towards nuclearization.  Russia is on the same course
they were on.  And all of the apologies that he provided to the
Europeans have not led any of the European nations to provide additional
support for us in Afghanistan.Look, just sweet talk and criticizing America is not going to enhance freedom in the world. 

    STEPHANOPOULOS:  Others have argued, Governor, that the president's
speech and the president's outreach is one of the things that led to
Hezbollah being defeated in the Lebanese elections last week.  And one
of the things that led to such an outpouring in the streets in
opposition in Iran.  Do you dispute that? 

    ROMNEY:  You know, I can't tell you what led to the people running
into the streets in Iran.  I hope, in fact, that they're very anxious to
see new leadership in that country.  But I can tell you that the results
are what I'm interested in.  Is Iran still pursuing nuclear weaponry? 
And there's no question about at. 

    And one aspect of what the president said may have been well
received in Iran, but I think it was poorly received in Israel and
around the world.  And that's when -- well, actually, he made a
180-degree flip from what he had said during the campaign.  During the
campaign, when he spoke to AIPAC, he said he would do everything in his
power to keep Iran from having a nuclear weapon.  And then he went to
Cairo and said that no single nation should have the ability to deny
another nation the right to have a nuclear weapon.  That is an
180-degree flip of a dangerous nature.  I'm sure it was welcome in many
streets in the Arab world and in the world that's most -- include the
Persian world, Iran as well.  But that's not right for America.  That's
not right for world security. 

    STEPHANOPOULOS:  I believe the administration has said that they
believe that Iran could have the right to nuclear power with appropriate
safeguards, but not a nuclear weapon. 

    But what would you do now then?  If you were president -- you know,
it's not just President Ahmadinejad in Iran who said that he believes
Iran should have a right to nuclear power.  It's the supreme leader.  It
was -- every candidate in the race said that Iran should have a right to
pursue nuclear power.

    ROMNEY:  We don't have any question about nuclear power, and that
was not the statement that the president made that was most offensive. 
It was his statement that no single nation should have the ability to
deny another nation the right to nuclear weaponry. 

    Now, of course with regards to nuclear power, we have no problem
under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty for nations to pursue nuclear
power.  And in the case of Iran, it's pretty clear that's not what
they're doing.  When you sit on a lake of oil, you're not looking for a
new source of energy.  They're obviously developing this technology for
military purposes.  And offers were made, including by Russia, to
provide the necessary nuclear material for nuclear power, and the
Iranians turned that down.  So let's not pretend or give into the
Iranian way of thinking, that somehow this is about nuclear power.  It's
very clearly about nuclear weaponry.  And you also see, of course, the
same kind of outrage coming from North Korea."  

Read my full interview with Romney HERE, including his thoughts on who speaks for the Republican Party. 
 
--George Stephanopoulos

June 14, 2009 in This Week with George Stephanopoulos | Permalink | Share | User Comments (78)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

It should come as no surprise that Mr. Romney used the old political trick of quoting accurately-but-out-of-context. What the President actually said in Cairo was, "No single nation should pick and choose which nations hold nuclear weapons. That is why I strongly reaffirmed America's commitment to seek a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons." Exactly the opposite of what Mr. Romney implied, which was that an apologetic Obama was all for a nuclear-armed Iran. It constantly amazes me that supposedly patriotic public figures like Mr. Romney show such a lack of respect for their President and Commander-in-Chief.

Posted by: Stephen DeWoody | Jun 14, 2009 12:39:50 PM

Who cares what Romney says or thinks. The GOP is irrelevant, nobody pays much attention to their BS.

Posted by: Chigger | Jun 14, 2009 12:44:33 PM

This mornings interview with Mitt Romney was an embarrassment to Mr. Romney but also to 75% of Americans. I used to have so much respect for him and admired his approach to our problems in America but now he is just an embarrassment!!!

Posted by: Dave Pettingill | Jun 14, 2009 12:54:22 PM

What would I have to do to 'think' (if you want to call it that) like a liberal democrat? Nothing short of a complete head and brain transplant. There is no other way for a healthy mind to come to the conclusions the liberals have come to without being in some kind of political stupor or having a dysfunction that requires they be 'led' by the nose. WAKE UP. Snap out of it. The honeymoon is over. This is reality. Can you dig it? (probably not)

Posted by: Banderman | Jun 14, 2009 1:01:47 PM

These comments by Gov. Romney make me think that he has been getting his foreign policy briefings from Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Paul Johnston | Jun 14, 2009 1:26:45 PM

These comments by Gov. Romney make me think that he has received his foreign policy briefings from Sarah Palin. For shame, Governor! Even if we cut you some slack and assume that you were simply misinformed, rather than calculatingly dishonest, you should get the facts before you open your mouth next time.

Posted by: Paul Johnston | Jun 14, 2009 1:33:23 PM

Who's Mitt Romney again?

Seriously, why does anyone care about what some marginalized republican non-entity like Mitt thinks?

Maybe if he keeps this level of rhetoric up, he can be the next John McCain.

Posted by: Bob Neale | Jun 14, 2009 1:34:35 PM

Palin can see Russia from her house and I guess Romney can see Iran from his. They must have either great eyesight or vivid imaginations. I vote for the latter and call it delusion.

Posted by: JR | Jun 14, 2009 1:35:50 PM

Palin can see Russia from her house and I guess Romney can see Iran from his. They must have either great eyesight or vivid imaginations. I vote for the latter and call it delusion.

Posted by: JR | Jun 14, 2009 1:35:50 PM

Mitt. Your money couldn't buy you the primary. Looks like you're investing in the "Chicken Hawk Gun Shop"

Posted by: doug | Jun 14, 2009 1:43:36 PM

He flip flopped pure and simple. Just as he has done on so many other issues. He has kept Bush's wiretapping policies when he said he would ditch them. Five day period to review legislation and he pushed the stimulus bill thru in less than that. Transparency, what a joke that has become. The energy bill is a tax bill on the middle class. He has stated that taxing health benefits is now a viable option which again will be a tax on everybody.The list goes on and on

Posted by: Boxcar | Jun 14, 2009 1:45:14 PM

Sorry Mitt, "NO" no bid contracts for you in Iran. You might as well think of importing rugs and carpets from them. It is more realistic for your ever growing and successful business.

Posted by: Junior111 | Jun 14, 2009 1:46:04 PM

I liked the question about demographics. He has underestimated just how much trouble this party of hate is in. The republican party is a very narrow spectrum of people in this country and to not acknowledge it shows they don't think there is a problem.

Posted by: Andrew | Jun 14, 2009 1:52:10 PM

Politics aside, foreign policy aside...... Obama should have hired Mr. Romney to help with the economic crisis. That's what he does for a living.

Posted by: Jolat | Jun 14, 2009 1:55:35 PM

Romney is a loser and no amount of Obama bashing is going to make the crazy fringe of his Party like him any better. Limbaugh is in control and he loves, Sarah, the clowns on Fox and Chaney. Sorry Mitt but you need to keep your mitts off the President. Nobody cares what you think.

Posted by: V. Brame | Jun 14, 2009 2:13:05 PM

I agree with the guy who said "The only way the GOP can survive is to attract smarter people"

Posted by: disgusted | Jun 14, 2009 2:28:44 PM

"He flip flopped pure and simple" - Romney fliped on some very fundamental issues, such as abortion, in order to try to win the presidential nomination. For him to go on national TV to accuse Obama of flip flopping is hilarious. I am not a Democrat, but the Republicans are starting to become a laugh riot. Do they even take themselves seriously any more?

Posted by: Mark from atlanta | Jun 14, 2009 2:30:06 PM

Mark from atlanta ++++++++During the campaign obama said he wanted to be held to a higher standard. so I guess you are going to give him a pass on that too?

Posted by: Boxcar | Jun 14, 2009 2:38:06 PM

Mitt Romney's bold-face lie misstating Obama's speech, stating what he said was 180 degrees from what he'd agree to, which by the way means he should be there supporting the president since he did in fact say what Romney stated he would agree to, but when given the opportunity to clarify he instead reinforced the lie a second time. Apart from a mild rebuke, George should have called Romney out on why he would purposely lie twice on national TV since he's clearly misstating the president. Is that to be expected from a potential leader of the republican party? Shame on you Mitt. Shame on George for not pursuing him further on his lying.

Posted by: Jamie | Jun 14, 2009 2:46:22 PM

The #1 problem with the Bush administration was dishonesty. The GOP needs a leader that is transparent and honest... and does not distort the facts.

Posted by: Steve | Jun 14, 2009 2:48:37 PM

I was disappointed @ Romney response to George today all he did was criticizing the president he didn't have any ideas or solutions. I hope he get to watch himself & start to adjust his attitude & start making suggestions that people can be interested in.

Posted by: J Poulard | Jun 14, 2009 2:50:33 PM

In fact it is George who should be embarrased in fact Obama did state in Cairo no one country should determine who has nuclear weapons. Every canidate during the primaries stated it not acceptable to have a nuclear Iran. The President did state weapons not energy as George attempted to "correct".

Posted by: Rolly | Jun 14, 2009 2:52:19 PM

Interesting way to twist Obama's speech. Who knows if this will be echoed around talk shows tomorrow or not? To me, Mitt Romney represents some intelligent leadership in the GOP, unlike much of what we've seen recently. Unfortunately, if he's perceived as a liar, then he will step back and run with the pack, along with Limbaugh, Cheney, and Gingrich. It will be interesting to see if Mitt can find a way to distinguish himself.

Posted by: Tim McFarland | Jun 14, 2009 2:56:51 PM

Obama did not say that every country is entitled to a nuclear weapon. It's a flat out lie. While George did push back he was hesitant and perhaps too polite in the face of Romney's demagoguery. While many had hoped that the Republican Party would cooperate and play the role of the loyal opposition, it's clear from Romney's baseless attacks that they intend to distort, mislead and even out right lie whenever and wherever they can. The mainstream media will have to make a choice; either call them out on their misinformation campaign or collude with them. If they are committed to telling the truth, they will do the former.

Posted by: Madame Defarge | Jun 14, 2009 2:59:13 PM

What a clown! Hey Mitt, selling 2 of your many homes still won't get us to support you. You look like a gameshow host with that Brill Cream Hair and those teeth sponsored by Colgate. In the end you're another Republican empty suit and we Dems and Independants. The Republican party has a lot more in common with Ronald Regan than they know. See like Regan, the Republican party is also DEAD and will stay that way for generations to come!

Posted by: roxsteady | Jun 14, 2009 3:05:22 PM

Post a comment