George's Bottom Line
Reporting and analysis from ABC News Chief Washington Correspondent and "This Week" Host George Stephanopoulos

George Stephanopoulos reports on events in politics, Congress and the White House for ABCNews, on the air and online. He interviews top newsmakers, discusses the events of the week and looks to the week ahead each Sunday on 'This Week.'

November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

« Previous | Main | Next »

Clinton Denies Bush Agreement With Israel on Settlements

June 07, 2009 8:31 AM

In her first Sunday show interview as secretary of state, Hillary Clinton argued there is no "official record" of any agreement between Bush administration officials and Israel on exceptions to a settlement "freeze" in the West Bank.

Senior Israeli officials have accused Obama of failing to acknowledge their understanding with the Bush administration that included an exception for the "natural growth" of families already there. Former Bush official Elliott Abrams made similar claims in the Washington Post.

"That was an understanding that was entered into so far as we are told, orally. That was never made a part of the official record of the negotiations, as it was passed on to our administration. No one in the Bush administration said to anyone that we can find in our administration," Clinton told me in an exclusive Sunday show interview for "This Week."

"Nobody in a position of authority at the time that the Obama administration came into office said anything about it. And in fact, there is also a record that President Bush contradicted even that oral agreement," she said. 

Clinton Reminds Israel of "Road Map" Commitment

I asked Clinton about pushback from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who has argued a complete freeze is "unreasonable," reportedly grousing privately of Obama and Clinton,"What the hell do they want from me?"

Echoing comments made by President Barack Obama this week, Clinton denied that Obama was trying to bring down Netanyahu's government, adding, "We are setting forth our views. obviously decisions about how to go forward are up to the Israelis and the Palestinians. But I think it is an appropriate role for the United States, and certainly it is what the president has decided, to make clear some of the obstacles he sees."

"The fact is that the road map which was agreed to officially, adopted by the Israeli government said something very clear about settlements. So, I think that what the president is doing is saying, look, everybody should comply with the obligations you’ve already committed to. And for the Palestinians, let’s not forget. They must end incitement against Israel. They must demonstrate an ability to provide security," she said.

--George Stephanopoulos

June 7, 2009 in This Week with George Stephanopoulos | Permalink | Share | User Comments (11)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

US makes it clear that Iran should not have nuclear weapons but yet never mentions that Israel has nuclear weapons. European nations note that contradiction. When will the US give Israel the same ultimatums. Israel continues settlements and we don't put sanctions on Israel!

Posted by: Mary Palermo | Jun 7, 2009 9:18:47 AM

To be successful in any negotiation, the broker must be fair to both the parties. Here, the broker sides almost 100% with one side and almost 0% with the other. So, the negotiation has failed so far and will continue to fail until the unfair trend on the part of the US continues. Muslim (arab) countries were bombed and citizens of those countries were brutally murdered by the hundreds of thousands and the Israelis cannot be even threatened with sanctions to make up comply with basic agreements? Muslims didn't kill 6 million Jews so they don't know why they were made to pay for it permanently. No actions in the world would make up for that ever!

Posted by: DJ | Jun 7, 2009 12:10:02 PM

Ya these settlements and their ongoing expansions are a major obstacle to peace. The myriad of checkpoints throughout the occupied territories to protect these settlements is also a nightmare for the Palestinians. I can't believe it has taken this long to address this firmly.

Posted by: Huh | Jun 7, 2009 12:31:51 PM

Why is the US not addressing the continued arab "palestinian" occupation of the land of Israel? History shows that in 3,000 years only two independent nations existed in the "west bank", Israel and Judah. Now their Jewish and Israeli descendants are not supposed to live in their homeland? This is outrageous. The arabs arrived from their own homeland of Saudi Arabia, and Trans Jordan is one state of the 2-state solution, finalized in the 1994 treaty.

Posted by: Ronald | Jun 7, 2009 1:18:58 PM

With people continuing to lose their jobs, health insurance, homes, etc., this story is of paramount importance to our existence.

Posted by: jan | Jun 7, 2009 1:19:42 PM

It's really becoming tiresome hearing about pressuring Israel to give up more land. Everyone needs to get the facts straight, as George Wills did today. It's Israel's land, the Palestinians are being used to pressure Israel by the Moslem world; and how would we feel if another world dominating power came to the U.S. and said "you have to give up California to Spain, the Lousiana Purchase to France, New Mexico territory to Mexico and New York (specifically NYC to the Dutch." Doesn't make much sense does it?

Posted by: Nancy | Jun 7, 2009 2:12:01 PM

Ronald - Since that is your reasoning, then the American Indians have the sole claim to the United States. Think about it.

Just some food for thought, Nelson Mandela at one point was considered a terrorist, and the ANC a terrorist group.

Posted by: Try the truth | Jun 7, 2009 2:59:06 PM

Israel needs to pull back to pre-1967 borders. If not, the arab birth rate and closing parity in weapons will seal Israel's fate.

Posted by: Ben Straub | Jun 7, 2009 11:14:01 PM

The posting here are increasingly shrill. Perhaps they see the 'writing on the wall'? Send the settlers home to Williamsburg and Crown Heights, and let the Palestinians have their land back. As Obama said, Jerusalem should be an international secular city, like Geneva - let's make it UN headquarters in the ME - and make the Israelis give up those nuclear arms - they're too paranoid and trigger happy to be trusted as grownups.

Posted by: Charles | Jun 8, 2009 11:12:06 AM

An international city, like Geneva? I've been to Geneva, and I can tell you that the border guards who looked at my passport were Swiss.

Posted by: Katherine | Jun 8, 2009 1:44:39 PM

Is Obama now going to micro-manage Israel, as well as GM, Chrysler and AIG? Looks like the only place on earth that they are building homes is on the West Back. Maybe USA should be investing, rather than complain.

And guess what? The whole Israel-Palestine thing is so much BS. If Israel disappeared tomorrow, it would make no difference whatsover in Arabia. The "peaceful" Muslims of Arabia would continue to butcher each other, as they always have, and as they always will.

The only difference is that without Israel, a nuclear-powered Iran would become the new Ottoman empire. And the USA wouldn't be able to do squat, because they have the oil and the money.

The only country capable of stopping Iran is tiny Israel. Israel has a population of 6 million, versus Iran's 66 million. But with Iraq weak, nobody else can limit Iran's emerging nuclear power.

Posted by: Jack W. Orf | Jun 8, 2009 4:26:52 PM

Post a comment