George Stephanopoulos reports on events in politics, Congress and the White House for ABCNews, on the air and online. He interviews top newsmakers, discusses the events of the week and looks to the week ahead each Sunday on 'This Week.'
RECENT POSTS
- Roundtable: Geithner Isn’t Going Anywhere
- Reich: Palin Populism v Romney Respectability
- Blackburn: Health Care By the Numbers
- Coburn: No Negotiation Over Ensign Affair
- Breast Cancer Controversy: Will Reform Impose Guidelines?
- Ben Nelson: No Health Care if No Change in Public Option and Abortion Funding
- Fireworks? (So Far) Sedate Senate Health Debate Underway
- Sen. Nelson Will Vote Yes on Saturday
- Obama Group Targets 'Dangerous' Palin
- No Thanksgiving Troop Decision
- Coming Up on 'This Week': Exclusive Health Care Debate
- Obama May Extend TARP Beyond Expiration Date
- Reid Rules Out Reconciliation?
- Report: Rudy Giuliani Rules Out NY Gov Bid
- Ben Nelson Ready to Let Health Debate Begin
- Sebelius says Ignore Mammogram Rec, GOP Attacks Health Reform Bill
- Small Business Issues Take Center Stage at Treasury
- Palin on Rush: Let’s Duke It Out
- Byrd to Become Longest-Serving Member of Congress
- Health Care: CBO Numbers Are In (Almost)
GEORGE REPORTS
- 2016
- Afghanistan
- Barack Obama
- Books
- Capitol Hill
- Caught My Eye
- Current Affairs
- Daily Show
- Democrats
- Democrats Vote 2008
- Environment
- Financial Bailout
- George Personal
- Health Care
- Hillary Clinton
- Iran
- Iraq
- Joe Biden
- John McCain
- Music
- Nobel Prize
- North Korea
- Pakistan
- Polls
- Question of the Day
- Republicans
- Republicans Vote 2008
- Sarah Palin
- Supreme Court
- Ted Kennedy
- Television
- The Economy
- This Week with George Stephanopoulos
- Washington
- What I'm Reading
- White House
- World News
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
BREAKING: Catholic Bishops On Health Care - Change Bills Or Else
October 08, 2009 5:10 PM
In a letter just released, the three Catholic bishops leading the Church’s efforts on health care warned Congress that “we will have no choice but to oppose the bill” unless current bills are amended.
The letter signed by Bishop William Murphy, Cardinal Justin Rigali and Bishop John Wester outlines three main areas of concern: “that no one should be forced to pay for or participate in abortion, that health care should be affordable and available to the poor and vulnerable, and that the needs of legal immigrants should be met.”
Of those, of course, abortion poses the gravest threat to the bill. The bishops simply don’t buy the argument that House Democrats found a way to block public funding for abortions with the Capps amendment, and they insist that the Hyde amendment doesn’t apply to the bills because they are not appropriations measures. A sizable bloc of House Democrats, led by Bart Stupak of Michigan, agree and are pressuring for a clear prohibition on public funding.
Add this to the list of complications I outlined this morning. Here’s the Bishop’s letter.
- George Stephanopoulos
October 8, 2009 in Health Care | Permalink | Share | User Comments (574)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Abortion is a legal and sometimes very necessary medical procedure in the United States and in almost every civilized country on Earth. The Catholic Church should have no say whatsoever on any healthcare policy. Interesting that those on the right say that the government should stay out of healthcare, unless of course, it's a women's issue. The Catholic Church is one of the most sexist institutions that exist. There's reason so many Catholics have left the church. The above story is one of them.
Posted by: Deb | Oct 8, 2009 5:37:51 PM
I agree with all three demands, though I would also say that *illegal* immigrants should be promptly jailed and deported after receiving treatment.
Posted by: knowerseeker | Oct 8, 2009 5:38:22 PM
Forcing people to pay for abortion will cause such an uproar that it will lead to an open political revolt.....How long to we have to be governed by idiots?
Posted by: robert m. simon | Oct 8, 2009 5:39:27 PM
Well it's a good thing we have the separation of church and state, thanks for your opinion Bishops, but you were not elected by the American people and Congress is NOT beholden to you. Democrats were elected with a sizable mandate for change, Universal Health Care being a key piece of that change.
Posted by: Mike | Oct 8, 2009 5:40:43 PM
} might also add covering illegals,mandating insurance and exploding the deficit will have the same effect....
Posted by: robert m. simon | Oct 8, 2009 5:43:55 PM
What I dont understand is what is the "Else"? What are they going to do. What are the repercussions?
Posted by: Billy C | Oct 8, 2009 5:49:02 PM
In the name of the father, the son, and the right wing...
Posted by: FSM | Oct 8, 2009 5:53:18 PM
If the leaders of my church had made that comment it would not have been noticed. Why are we bothering to give them coverage. Every American is entitled to his or her opinion and that is all these statements are, 3 individuals opinions.
Posted by: Jessie Singleton | Oct 8, 2009 5:53:52 PM
Are those bishops for or against the health care required to heal the boys who have been molested and sodomized by the RC clergy?
Posted by: M Haar | Oct 8, 2009 5:54:44 PM
"What I dont understand is what is the "Else"? What are they going to do. What are the repercussions?"
Billy C | Oct 8, 2009 5:49:02 PM
Catholics are the largest single religion in America, and we are a majority rule country. The 'or else' should be pretty obvious.
The abortion issue is one of conscience where the Church has been steadfastly (infuriatingly at times) unyielding on. And unlike Republicans who are happy to kill people off after they get out of the womb, the Catholic belief in the right to life is consistent regardless of their crimes or threat.
Congress would be wise to find a mechanism to prise out abortion funding from the bill. A little like China and Taiwan, we're not up for rational discussion on the subject.
Posted by: jhw539 | Oct 8, 2009 5:55:28 PM
How can you call yourself an unbiased journalist when you use language like "they insist that the Hyde amendment doesn’t apply to the bills"?
They INSIST? really?
YOU should insist, George. They speak the truth. Get educated. The Hyde amendment does not apply to the health care reform bills.
Posted by: INSIST on TRUTH | Oct 8, 2009 5:57:37 PM
Ignorance is amazing! The public already funds abortions through medicaid, and subsidized state health insurance programs, and this has been going on for decades. Also, in case of ectopic pregnancy, what would the church like done? Either an abortion must be performed or the mother and fetus will die of hemmorage. Clearly, there are some very valid non-elective reasons for abortion that are not being thought out by the church. Even the bible puts more value to a live woman's life than to that of the unborn, so why doesn't the church? Lawmakers and clergy really need to stop interfering with women's health.
Posted by: Human Being #924499984438743 | Oct 8, 2009 5:57:44 PM
This bill has become totally contaminated. On one hand, they don't want anyone coming between the doctor and patient. On the other hand, they want issues such as abortion, racism, immigration, campaign contribution, corrupted politicians, etc. etc. to be handled in this bill.
Let's adhere to real health reform issues and forget Fox and faux friends (clowns).
Posted by: michelle | Oct 8, 2009 5:59:09 PM
Bishop William Murphy, Cardinal Justin Rigali and Bishop John Wester need to setup a place where the unwanted unaborted kids can go and fund the first 18 years of their lives. Put that in the bill and then prohibit public funding for abortion. Problem solved.
Posted by: Jim Rogers, Burlington, VT | Oct 8, 2009 6:01:31 PM
So the Catholic Church wants to be a political organization? Fine. Take away their tax-exempt status.
Posted by: Hank Fox | Oct 8, 2009 6:13:03 PM
If you like your government to be run by religion, move to Iran.
Posted by: MaryMary | Oct 8, 2009 6:13:26 PM
Deb is wrong. Not all abortions are "medically necessarily"! In fact, out of all abortions performed in the United States, only ONE PERCENT (1%) is medically necessarily to have abortion just to save the lives of mothers. All other reasons are nothing but stupid and selfish on our parts. We were being deceived ourselves to prevent births because it will cramp our lifestyle, or we can't afford it, or because they are too much trouble for us, or we were too young, making prom night mistakes, etc. etc. Let get ride of innocent babies to save some bucks and instead spend on hardwood flooring, new car, or God forbids that you only want the pleasures - not accept the consequent. We tell ourselves this lie! Heaven forbid we should lay this justification (including so-called medical neccessarily as an excuse to cover up your mistakes) at the feet of God. I will promise you this!
Posted by: Erik | Oct 8, 2009 6:18:17 PM
I didn't think that the Catholic church had a vote in Congress...
Posted by: mallory | Oct 8, 2009 6:18:24 PM
Erik...as much as you're entitled to your opinion about the ills of abortion, you'd do well to remember that your life will NEVER be in jeopardy from pregnancy or the secondary effects of it. I suggest you back on down from the pulpit of self-rightiousness, you'll NEVER know what it's like to be raped and impregnated or at risk of death if you carry a fetus to term. Who are you to judge or lecture? Your opinion is tainted by your arrogant tone.
Posted by: MaryMary | Oct 8, 2009 6:24:35 PM
So it's o.k. to try to keep affordable insurance from those hurting, to continue to deny pre-existing, because of this one issue? How is one ANY different from the other? Is helping the sick not a moral obligation? How is this any different from me having to pay for a war I never approved of?
Posted by: secondlook | Oct 8, 2009 6:26:46 PM
So it's o.k. to try to keep affordable insurance from those hurting, to continue to deny pre-existing, because of this one issue? How is one ANY different from the other? Is helping the sick not a moral obligation? How is this any different from me having to pay for a war I never approved of?
Posted by: secondlook | Oct 8, 2009 6:26:47 PM
Abortion, for the most part, is an elective procedure and as such should be paid for out of pocket except in those few cases where there is an underlying medical issue regarding the health of the mother, mental or physical. Many women use abortion as birth control and this practice cannot be stopped if public funding for abortions is increased, promoted, or readily available.
Posted by: Linda | Oct 8, 2009 6:27:25 PM
the churches responsibility it is to populate the land...,...,... then MAKE SURE NO CHILD IS LEFT BEHIND, E.T. phone home ,gods calling come home lost boy. statistical norms of devine inteligence [not just intelligent design but RESPONSIBILITY to "find&send" the present extra-link / snag! of bifurcating ignorance, find the prime case and send! them early to whence they truely belong and long to go. unleasch my heart! and the corinthians shall march man.destinies excess faith,
Posted by: brennan | Oct 8, 2009 6:27:44 PM
yeah right! corinthians march to save the out-land lost youth raised in distant culture find&send annyt
Posted by: brennan | Oct 8, 2009 6:29:44 PM
It makes me laugh when people claim that voters Congress and Obama were given a mandate to pass Obamacare when they voted for "change". Obama never described the "change" he was going to bring other than to say that all bills would be posted on the net for people to read before any vote was taken. Not only did that not happen the Dems voted against it. Obama said that people making under $250,000 per year would not see a dime extra in taxes, then the bill charges fines and fees,BUT he didn't raise the taxes. When are we going to start seeing the changes he did actually put into words?
Posted by: tiredofit | Oct 8, 2009 6:33:15 PM
Post a comment
MY MUST-READS
- Talking Points Memo
- ABC News' The Note
- Jake Tapper's Political Punch
- ABC News' The Numbers
- Mark Halperin's The Page
- The American Prospect
- The Chicago Sun-Times -- Lynn Sweet
- The Huffington Post -- Politics
- Drudge Report
- FiveThirtyEight: Politics Done Right
- National Review -- The Corner
- New York Times -- David Brooks
- The New York Times -- The Caucus
- The New Majority
- Paul Krugman -- The Conscience of a Liberal
- Politico -- Ben Smith
- Politico -- Mike Allen’s Playbook
- Powerline Blog
- Real Clear Politics
- The Washington Post -- The Fix
- Los Angeles Times - Top of the Ticket

