George Stephanopoulos reports on events in politics, Congress and the White House for ABCNews, on the air and online. He interviews top newsmakers, discusses the events of the week and looks to the week ahead each Sunday on 'This Week.'
RECENT POSTS
- Reich: Palin Populism v Romney Respectability
- Blackburn: Health Care By the Numbers
- Coburn: No Negotiation Over Ensign Affair
- Breast Cancer Controversy: Will Reform Impose Guidelines?
- Ben Nelson: No Health Care if No Change in Public Option and Abortion Funding
- Fireworks? (So Far) Sedate Senate Health Debate Underway
- Sen. Nelson Will Vote Yes on Saturday
- Obama Group Targets 'Dangerous' Palin
- No Thanksgiving Troop Decision
- Coming Up on 'This Week': Exclusive Health Care Debate
- Obama May Extend TARP Beyond Expiration Date
- Reid Rules Out Reconciliation?
- Report: Rudy Giuliani Rules Out NY Gov Bid
- Ben Nelson Ready to Let Health Debate Begin
- Sebelius says Ignore Mammogram Rec, GOP Attacks Health Reform Bill
- Small Business Issues Take Center Stage at Treasury
- Palin on Rush: Let’s Duke It Out
- Byrd to Become Longest-Serving Member of Congress
- Health Care: CBO Numbers Are In (Almost)
- Terror Trials: Will Says Not a Bad Choice; Brooks Predicts Long Circus Trial
GEORGE REPORTS
- 2016
- Afghanistan
- Barack Obama
- Books
- Capitol Hill
- Caught My Eye
- Current Affairs
- Daily Show
- Democrats
- Democrats Vote 2008
- Environment
- Financial Bailout
- George Personal
- Health Care
- Hillary Clinton
- Iran
- Iraq
- Joe Biden
- John McCain
- Music
- Nobel Prize
- North Korea
- Pakistan
- Polls
- Question of the Day
- Republicans
- Republicans Vote 2008
- Sarah Palin
- Supreme Court
- Ted Kennedy
- Television
- The Economy
- This Week with George Stephanopoulos
- Washington
- What I'm Reading
- White House
- World News
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Ft. Hood: Gen. Casey Doesn't Rule Out Terrorism
November 08, 2009 9:42 AM
The Army’s top officer, General George Casey wouldn’t rule out the possibility that the mass killing at Ft. Hood was an act of terrorism. I asked General Casey about warning signs that could have been acted upon and if this was a premeditated act of terrorism or if this is a case of someone who just snapped. Casey said, “I think we need to be very careful here on speculations based on anecdotes like that.”
“We all want to know what happened and what motivated the suspect, but I think we need to be very, very careful here in these early days and let the investigation take its course,” Casey told me on ‘This Week.’
General Casey told me on This Week that he’s worried that diversity could become another victim of Thursday’s mass killing at Ft. Hood. The incident was not the first case of fratricide by a Muslim and when I asked how the military plans to deal with this potential problem in its ranks, Casey said, “Speculation could potentially heighten backlash against some of our Muslim soldiers and what happened at Fort Hood was a tragedy, but I believe it would be an even greater tragedy if our diversity becomes a casualty here. It’s not just about Muslims, we have a very diverse army, we have very diverse society and that gives us all strength. But again we need to be very careful about that.”
Watch video HERE:
- George Stephanopoulos
November 8, 2009 in This Week with George Stephanopoulos | Permalink | Share | User Comments (100)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
To me his allegiance to his fellow Muslims on the receiving end of our bombs outweighed his allegiance to America the country of his birth. It really is as simple as that. He most likely viewed our foreign interventions as terrorist acts themselves and could not take the fact that he was about to become part of that injustice. After all it was preemptive and many civilians have been killed. I am not condoning his actions but rather viewing them from his mind if that is possible. Time to stop our cruelty because it is creating more enemies than we can imagine, as it should. It is a good thing we have two oceans surrounding us but even that may not stop them in the future.
Posted by: Huh | Nov 8, 2009 9:57:35 AM
General Casey,
Why do you come on TV in a fighting man's uniform? How can anyone trust you when you obviously are a deceptive person? Put on your dress uniform and act your grade!
Posted by: Rodney Peters | Nov 8, 2009 10:09:28 AM
ABC Roudtable never answers the hard questions for health care as follows:
1. When we are short of doctors now, how do you prevent rationing when we bring a flood of people to free health care? It takes ten years to bring a doctor on board!!! Why doesn't the bill call for influencing doctors to come to the USA by offering them $$$$.
2. If 500 billion $$$$ is taken out of medicare over the next ten years, how do you cover the 30 million projected to retire??
Posted by: Ron Tanski | Nov 8, 2009 10:17:05 AM
Terrorism? Of COURSE IT IS/Was!! He wasn't yelling, "Sale at the PX"! There has been no mention of authorities checking out his Mosque?Imam. The connection HAS to be THERE!
Posted by: kim | Nov 8, 2009 10:17:57 AM
General Casey, They pay you the big bucks for this comment? Of COURSE it IS Terrorism! Any one can see this, any one! Everyone is so worried about being Politically Correct! Screw PC! If it walks like a duck.....Your'e smart, fill in the rest!
Posted by: Duh!?! | Nov 8, 2009 10:23:16 AM
Hasan, the sole suspect in the massacre of 13 fellow US soldiers in Texas, attended the controversial Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Great Falls, Virginia, in 2001 at the same time as two of the September 11 terorists.
The preacher at the time was Anwar al-Awlaki, an American-born Yemeni scholar who was banned from addressing a meeting in London by video link in August because he is accused of supporting attacks on British troops and backing terrorist organizations.
Hasan's eyes "lit up" when he mentioned his deep respect for al-Awlaki's teachings, according to a fellow Muslim officer at the Fort Hood base in Texas, the scene of Thursday's horrific shooting spree.
wrOng
For America
Posted by: sharon | Nov 8, 2009 10:33:31 AM
When I was in the military, I had different uniforms for different duties. Does the General think that talking to the American public on TV on a Sunday in a studio setting really needs him to wear his battle dress? Shows some lack of judgment. But then, isn't lack of judgment why no one blew the whistle on the killer given all the signals he was sending?
Posted by: John | Nov 8, 2009 10:39:44 AM
What is this? So far they have come up empty on finding any connection to this guy and other terrorist's. Fanning the flames.
Posted by: secondlook | Nov 8, 2009 10:49:12 AM
Ron, this story is about Fort Hood, not health Care!
Posted by: Phil | Nov 8, 2009 10:51:13 AM
This makes me SICK!. He killed alot of people and because he has a Muslim sounding last name now all the armchair patriots jump on it. I think what this is simply is a MURDERING nut case. NOTHING more... What is next someone here is going to say he is Osama's long lost cousin. I think WE IN THIS COUNTRY are far too much jumping on the terrorism excuse to justify our actions. The man went nuts, and trajically killed alot of young men and women. Why are we not calling the Seattle killing, or the Camp Leujene murder terrorism.... This is sick.
Posted by: DonsSemora | Nov 8, 2009 11:17:38 AM
The military needs to take mental illness seriously. This man was showing signs of mental illness when he impossed religious beliefs into his counseling sessions. A rational person of any religion would not have done that. Sending him to Fort Hood to ship out to Iran was stupidity or arrogance. Forcing the mentally unstable to stay in the military puts our nation at risk.
Posted by: greenthumbx | Nov 8, 2009 11:31:36 AM
The potential symbolism of this of this horror might give us pause. The stress on the military from the longest sustained combat operation in American history has been distilled into a single American who embodies the many faces of this nation and its "war on terror". Let us be cautious in the lessons we take from this sadness. There is more harm that could unfold.
Posted by: Mike | Nov 8, 2009 11:37:32 AM
The terrorist court the mentally unstable to do their dirty work. They use these vulnerable people who are very needy emotionally and manipulate them to carry out the terrorists cowardly agenda. All persons entering the military should be given the MMPI to screen out potential mentally unstable people. I think the killers superior officers should also be given this test.
Posted by: greenthumbx | Nov 8, 2009 11:38:27 AM
The general needs to retire and start a hobby writing poems about dandelions and butterflies.
Posted by: EPU | Nov 8, 2009 11:39:21 AM
It is horrible that there are people in this country that just want to label all Muslims terrorists. This guy obviously was stressed over his coming deployment to a war he made clear he was against and our armed forces were still forcing him to go. Once he had moved to Fort Hood in August he had been religiously persecute by his fellow officers and he lost it. People need to open their eyes and look at the whole picture not just a nut job delusion that any Muslim acting out is terrorist.
Posted by: Heather | Nov 8, 2009 11:41:27 AM
Terrorism: The calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.
1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes.
2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.
-------------
Sounds like terrorism to me, the guy didn't go off the deep end strictly for personal reasons but political ones. After all if he just wanted to avoid going to Afghanistan he could have just injured himself, problem solved, he wouldn't have been sent. If it was against any person in particular he would have injured that person, he didn't, it was random, it was violence against a US policy and the icons (soldiers) that represent that policy.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | Nov 8, 2009 11:41:44 AM
Donsemora:
The shooter cried Allahu Akbar as he slew his unarmed victims in cold blood. Sounds like the calling card of a terrorist to me.
Posted by: EPU | Nov 8, 2009 11:42:00 AM
Posted by: Heather | Nov 8, 2009 11:41:27 AM
We have a volunteer Army, no one was forcing him to do anything that he didn't willfully sign up for and take an oath to do. Do you think a soldier gets to pick and choose who he will fight and who he won't? His moral conflict was no greater than any other soldiers moral conflict and if their moral conflicts are so great that they can't uphold their oath the army is not the place they go.
Posted by: Ferrari5858 | Nov 8, 2009 11:48:29 AM
Does the army around a medic to carry that many rounds when on an army base. The question is always who supplied him the rounds s the question to the generals in Afghanistan is where doe sTaliban get its ammunition.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | Nov 8, 2009 11:49:15 AM
I think he had this planned for quite some time. I would call it terriorism. When he called out his Allahu Akbar. Our country needs to rethink who is allowed in our country. He will rot in hell for what he has done, and he deserves everything he gets. He should have no mercy. God Bless our United States of America.
Posted by: pjo136 | Nov 8, 2009 11:51:52 AM
Elsewhere, Casey says that the Army will revisit the issue of mental health as it refers to the multiple deployments.
History proves that such statements are worthless. A review will be made, Fort Hood officer staff will be interviewed, press conferenes will be held and in the end what will change - NOTHING.
Posted by: Beto | Nov 8, 2009 12:10:43 PM
Hello. Lets stop being untruthful and tell the truth for once even though it hurts. It was Terroism period. Bottomline.
Posted by: Steve | Nov 8, 2009 12:14:39 PM
So because he was a Muslim it was automatically terrorism? Wow people.
So how about the hundreds a times a year in this country that a white guy shoots up some public place, that's not terrorism right?
Posted by: CommonSense | Nov 8, 2009 12:47:57 PM
Why is General Casey's flag patch have the stars on the left side?
Posted by: Mark | Nov 8, 2009 1:01:25 PM
In our eyes this is a possible associated act of homeland terrorism. In the eyes of Muslims around the world this clearly an act of Jihad which is rationalized by the Qur'an. Jihad takes on many forms, information or al-Taqiyya (deception), education, then violence. The goal is always to transform the "Kafir" or non-believer to Islam faith or non-believing dhimmi.
In many ways, Hasan did Jihad by the book. Also, this the reason why al-Qaeda broadcast a video before any attacks of inhumanity. A good Muslim will study the Qur'an and the Sira or the life of Mohammad. The life of Mohammad is where the problem lies for Islam and for all other religions and cultures. Use history as a witness with the lens of Islamic conquest.
Make no mistake the Islamic external struggle is of religious, political, financial and cultural conquest and no one has to look no farther than to Iran, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan-Taliban, Pakistan, and the rest of Islamic states.
For the West this our struggle too, but for freedom, tolerance of thought and respect for all human kind.
Today, in order for Islam to be accepted as creditably religion of world peace and not a cult of Mohammad, it would require all believers to put the Sira and Book of Medina away and only hold the Book of Mecca as the faith.
In addition, the believers of the Islamic faith must seek to transformed their faith from the chains of thought of the Iron Age to Age of Peace and tolerance of all life.
Only then will Islam have the creditability and place in the world as a religion of peace.
Posted by: threeriverscrossing | Nov 8, 2009 1:25:49 PM
Post a comment
MY MUST-READS
- Talking Points Memo
- ABC News' The Note
- Jake Tapper's Political Punch
- ABC News' The Numbers
- Mark Halperin's The Page
- The American Prospect
- The Chicago Sun-Times -- Lynn Sweet
- The Huffington Post -- Politics
- Drudge Report
- FiveThirtyEight: Politics Done Right
- National Review -- The Corner
- New York Times -- David Brooks
- The New York Times -- The Caucus
- The New Majority
- Paul Krugman -- The Conscience of a Liberal
- Politico -- Ben Smith
- Politico -- Mike Allen’s Playbook
- Powerline Blog
- Real Clear Politics
- The Washington Post -- The Fix
- Los Angeles Times - Top of the Ticket

