George's Bottom Line
Reporting and analysis from ABC News Chief Washington Correspondent and "This Week" Host George Stephanopoulos

George Stephanopoulos reports on events in politics, Congress and the White House for ABCNews, on the air and online. He interviews top newsmakers, discusses the events of the week and looks to the week ahead each Sunday on 'This Week.'

MONTHLY ARCHIVES

November 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

« Previous | Main | Next »

Landrieu ‘Skeptical’ of Reid Health Care Plan

November 03, 2009 11:27 AM

More trouble brewing for Harry Reid's public option, reports ABC's Z. Byron Wolf from Capitol Hill:

Wolf Another Democrat expressed grave reservations with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s proposal for a health care reform bill that includes a compromised public health insurance option which states could choose to “opt out” of.

And President Obama was set to meet in the oval office with a third Democrat skeptical of creating a public insurance option as the road to 60 votes for a health reform bill in the Senate became more difficult for Democratic leaders.

Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., told reporters today she remains “skeptical of what has been outlined” by the Majority Leader and has not decided whether she will vote with Democrats even to consider the bill on the Senate floor. Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., has said he will vote to consider the bill, but will help Republicans filibuster it if the public option portion is not stripped on the Senate floor. Reid’s bill might not even get to the floor, however.

Landrieu made her comments after appearing at an emotional press conference with small business owners and Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, an avowed supporter of the public option. The small business owners described their experiences, choosing between cutting wages for their employees or providing health insurance. An optometrist from Richmond, Va., described being a health care provider who was unable to have health insurance when his wife was pregnant with their child.

But while Landrieu said in front of TV cameras at the press conference that “doing nothing is not an option” and described how Senate Democrats’ bill will provide tax credits and change the insurance rules to help small business owners, she slipped out of the room before reporters could ask questions about her lack of support for the public option and whether that could endanger the health reform effort.

Landrieu chairs the Senate Small Business Committee and the ranking Republican on that committee is Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, the only Republican to vote for a Democratic health reform bill in a Congressional Committee. Snowe supports a public plan, but only one that would be triggered to start in markets where the free market is shown to be failing consumers.

The trigger idea got praise today from Landrieu, who cited the aims of health reform as lowering costs, providing coverage to all Americans, and making that coverage portable.

“If we can achieve that through private market reform, that’s wonderful,” Landrieu said, expressing her preference to “reform the private market first,” before creating any sort of public health insurance option.

The trigger option, which Lieberman opposes, had seemed to have given its death rattle when Reid chose to alienate Snowe and instead sided with the majority of his party and include a stronger public option.

But his bill has yet to be formally released. It is currently at the Congressional Budget Office for an official cost assessment. Democratic moderates have insisted that the full bill be posted online for 72 hours before a cloture vote on whether to bring it to the Senate floor.

Meanwhile, Democrat Sen. Blanche Lincoln, who faces a tough reelection battle in Arkansas in 2010, is set to meet today with President Obama in the Oval Office.

“I believe I have an obligation to my Arkansas constituents to exhaust all the possibilities before the full Senate begins debate on a bill or even on the motion to proceed to a bill,” said Lincoln of why she requested the meeting. “ I do not know what these talks will produce but I am hopeful we will find a way forward that achieves significant health insurance reform without expanding government where taxpayers assume all the risk.”

Sen. Ben Nelson, R-Neb., has also said he wants to see a final proposal from Reid before he agrees to bring a bill to the Senate floor. All 60 Democrats will have to support cloture when Reid tries to bring his bill to the floor.

Moderates are increasingly under attack by liberals who support the public option.

The liberal grassroots organization, MoveOn, is launching new radio ads and a direct mail campaign aimed at Sens. Landrieu and Lincoln. The group is also targeting Sens. Snowe, Nelson, Kent Conrad, D-N.D., and Evan Bayh, D-Ind.

“Just as Congress is getting ready to pass this historic legislation Senator Landrieu is threatening to block reform from even coming up for a vote -- siding with insurance companies against Louisiana families,” says the narrator in the new radio ad.

November 3, 2009 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (23)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

hEy Hi YaLl No CoMmEnTs. JuS rEaDiNg.

Posted by: sTePhEn WiLlIaMs | Nov 3, 2009 11:31:25 AM

how about some stinking private sector jobs. how about some releif for small business. how about taking care of tax paying americans

Posted by: catman | Nov 3, 2009 11:47:32 AM

how about taking care of tax paying americans
catman | Nov 3, 2009 11:47:32 AM

The $200 billion+ in tax relief in the stimulus wasn't relief for small business and taxpayers? How much bigger (more debt) did you want the stimulus?

Posted by: jhw539 | Nov 3, 2009 12:06:07 PM

jhw539...you answered your own question. with unemployment at 10% or more there obviously has not been enough help for small business. if you throw on a 8% payroll tax to fund health care there will be no jobs. what 200 billion in releif for small business???

Posted by: catman | Nov 3, 2009 12:30:07 PM

200B was equal to roughly $16/month. So, that's what you call relief?

Posted by: stdntDrvr | Nov 3, 2009 12:30:55 PM

JHW539;Have you ever had to make payroll?

Posted by: JJJ | Nov 3, 2009 12:55:17 PM

"Sen. Ben Nelson, R-Neb." - Freudian slip?

Posted by: Jim | Nov 3, 2009 1:25:07 PM

What is the total tax collected from tax payers from one year to the next.

I had to use my savings because I was out of work for one year. I did not any breaks from the IRS. I paid more than I now owe. If I could get the fee dismissed, I would owe nothing. I paid the taxes, just the fee for withdrawing my money.

Posted by: matt Wood | Nov 3, 2009 2:13:40 PM

Get the bill written put it on line or someplace where at least the legislators can read it then if they read it it will fail.

Posted by: earl | Nov 3, 2009 2:33:57 PM

At the rate Obama is racking up the debt, there isn't enough money on the planet to pay for his programs. Why not take the Sar Trek solution and just get rid of money?

Posted by: Jim Jordan | Nov 3, 2009 3:30:48 PM

matt Wood wrote: " I did not any breaks from the IRS. I paid more than I now owe. If I could get the fee dismissed, I would owe nothing."

I have a similar problem. The IRS claimed I never filed a 2001 return. It claimed I owed, with penalties, over $10K. When I refused to pay while arguing for reconsideration, they docked my checking & savings account for $5600, leaving me with about $150 in bounced check fees. I refiled 2001-2007 and, after phone call after call and meeting after meeting, I received a letter saying the IRS owed me $2865 on the returns alone - which they are applying to "the $3200 I owe in penalties"! They thought I'd be thrilled that they "ruled" I only owed them $300+. I asked them to explain how they could be over $12000+ wrong on a middle class income-return and what happened to the $5600, and what the penalties were for. They're now "looking into it". I wish I could dock THEM for the approx. $8500 I'm telling them they owe me until they ask for "reconsideration". There's going to be more meeting after meeting until I get paid. They owe ME and are trying to wear me out. But their shorthanded office is going to have to deal with a couple calls per day from me if that's what it takes.

Posted by: The_Mick | Nov 3, 2009 3:48:42 PM

My home state is Hawaii. And while Hawaii does have health insurance for working people, it does so thru requiring businesses to provide insurance to workers that work more than 20 hours per week. No public option there; and it's for people who work. Obviously, you take care of the people "between the cracks" with other programs; so let's keep the "public option" outside of this fixing medicare-and-healthcare debate. Too much on the plate will lead to a huge defeat for Obama, which might be best the first time around if he doesn't get it yet.

Posted by: Patrick | Nov 3, 2009 3:59:30 PM

The left wing of the Democrat party has hijacked the party to such extreme that the consequences to our country are going to be disastrous. A prime example is nacy Pelosi's and Harry Reid's Healthcare Plans, both plans are intended to destroy healthcare as we know it, to violate the sacred relationships of doctor and patient and to spend over 1 Trillion dollars to fund abortions, insure illegal aliens, and make the middle class pay for it, by raising taxes in the future. Obma is an extreme leftist and he wants to turn this country into Government controlled socialist state. I don't believe Democrats really want this path for our future, and common sense Democrats are going to rebel against Obama's agenda. I just hope that Hillary Clinton runs against Obama in 2012, she would be much better this country than he would ever be.

Posted by: wizcat123 | Nov 3, 2009 5:02:13 PM

Can somebody tell me exactly what this bill will do that will make me and my family's health care better......Please do not tell me it's a cost saver because that I already know is not fact...It will cost me more and it will be government run..Can anybody answer..

Posted by: bailedout | Nov 3, 2009 5:30:05 PM

My prayer is that the whole bill is stopped and redone. We don't need this bill the way it is. National Healthcare is a luxury. The government has proved through Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security that it can't handle government run healthcare (that term just freaks me out). We need to focus on the economy first then focus on healthcare.

Posted by: john | Nov 3, 2009 5:36:41 PM

Please Harry, don't compromise on your health care bill. Ride the ship right to the bottom along with Pelosi and Schummer.

Posted by: Bob Stein | Nov 3, 2009 6:02:42 PM

Obama and the Democrats are tone deaf when it comes to health care. Only 35% of the American people support their bill and yet they seem determined to cram it down our throats. If Obama was half the politician that Bill Clinton was he would pull the bill. Act like he is doing the American people a favor and promise to reform healthcare in a bipartisan way. If he did that his poll numbers would instantly improve and it might provide some confidence to small businesses that they can hire again without worrying about huge new mandates and tax increases. By the way, he should do the same with Cap-and-Trade. These huge programs will require huge tax increases and small businesses are scared senseless over their impact.

Posted by: Jenny | Nov 3, 2009 8:25:08 PM

The President should listen to the election last night. Americans are fed up with being overtaxed and underpaid. The last thing we want is another government program that will spend over a trillion dollars and raise our taxes even higher and prevent any kind of job growth. The stimulus worked for Wall Street, but not for the rest of us. This plan will infuse tons of money into the medical industry, but there's absolutely nothing to reduce costs for the average working stiff. In fact, it raises costs for the typical family.

Mr. Obama, forget this nonsense and get back to some fiscal sanity. PLEASE.

Posted by: Ray | Nov 4, 2009 7:40:48 AM

Why you people whining, why you dislike Obama he is in the office less then one year, and you blaming everything on him come on that is not fear. Why don't you blama the problem bush and his repubican friends they are the one who created this mess the country facing now. Obama has nothing to do this problem he didn't invaded Iraq, Afghanistan he didnt spent money on war. Bush and his repubican sold to the American people illegal war; they spent trillion dollars Iraq war, blame the problem America facing now Bush and his people. There is reason why you dislike Obama, but you can't do nothing he will success GOD willing.

Posted by: Minnesotans | Nov 4, 2009 4:59:42 PM

the reason the government wants the health care bill it the money. its a huge amount of money , if they can get rid of the health care insurance industry, not only will they charge taxpayers for there insurance. they will also tax those who refuse to pay. they see the dollar signs not uninsured people . one thing you have got to remember is not one thing has been done to root out corruption, not one thing has been done at stopping the billions of dollars of misspent and wasted tax payers money what happened to the tarp money that a lot of the banks have payed back and the billions in loans that the car companies were to pay back or was the plan to not ever pay back the loans this this is got to be the biggist rip off in history

Posted by: wtobias | Nov 4, 2009 5:15:29 PM

I find it funny that the same people who had bottomless pockets for the War in Iraq and have no idea how much our grandchildren are paying for that are the same folks that scream bloody murder when we do something for the AMERICAN people. These people are making me sick. Such hypocrits. I can't believe they talk these other fools into whining about the deficits when they know damn well they came from Bush! No Public Option - No GOP in the House or Senate. I will pay big bucks to help remove them and the Dems who are blocking the public option. End of story!

Posted by: Julescator | Nov 4, 2009 5:32:37 PM

Out of 20 posts, I count two in support of Obamacare - Minnesotans & Julescator. It's quite clear most of the public don't want this. They want jobs first, then we can discuss real reform. So may I ask you two this: have you read either the Senate or House bills? They are posted online if you're willing to do a little homework. Try reading the nearly 2000 page monstrosity and see if you can understand it. If you can't, try and read just 1% (20 pages) of it. If you still can't, ask your Congressman & senators if they have. If you can't get a straight answer, why would you want them to vote for it? There is no public option and yes, there are honest Democrats (like Colin Peterson of Minnesota) who will confirm that. We all will go on Obamacare. We won't have a choice (option) Look it up!

Posted by: Hoosier Guy | Nov 4, 2009 6:33:05 PM

Julescator: Deficits didn't begin with Bush. The country has had one balanced budget in the past 50 years, and that one was only "balanced' because the previous 40 years of accumulated debt wasn't accounted for. Why are we upset with the President? He promised us change - only the change he apparently envisions is not change we can believe in. His version of change is having the government monopolize as many industries as he can. He's done it with autos, he's doing it with finance. He has plans on the table to monopolize higher education, energy and now healthcare. He pays lip-service to the ideal of entreprenuership and self-reliance, but actions speak loader than words. By the time he's done, the government will be your employer, your banker, your doctor and your babysitter. When I was growing up, that was the definition of communism.

Posted by: Ray | Nov 4, 2009 10:42:47 PM

Post a comment