Legalities

Life, Politics and the Law From ABC News Correspondent Jan Crawford Greenburg

Jan Crawford Greenburg is a correspondent for ABC News' bureau in Washington DC. She covers politics, the Supreme Court and provides legal analysis for ABC News. She is a graduate of the University of Chicago's law school and is a member of the New York bar.

September 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

« Obama's "Jewish Problem" | Main | General Garre »

Supreme Court on Discrimination

May 27, 2008 10:51 AM

The Supreme Court this morning refused to narrow the scope of two federal discrimination laws, ruling that people who are fired for complaining about age and race bias are protected under federal law.

The Court, ruling in two separate cases, emphasized the long history of allowing so-called "whistleblower" suits against employers who discriminate on the job.

The first case involved a postal worker alleging the Postal Service illegally retaliated against her after she sued for age discrimination. The decision, by Justice Sam Alito, allows her lawsuit to continue. The ruling was 6-3.

The second involved a supervisor at Cracker Barrel restaurant who says he was fired after complaining about race discrimination. The decision, allowing his lawsuit to proceed under a centuries-old civil rights law, was written by Justice Stephen Breyer and was 7-2.

These decisions are in sharp contrast to a sex discrimination suit that the Court decided a year ago this week. That case, rejecting a woman's lawsuit because she filed it too late, was 5-4 and prompted harsh criticism by the liberal justices, led by Justice Ginsburg.

May 27, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (10)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/433071/29500324

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Supreme Court on Discrimination:

User Comments

If I chastise a worker of above middle age, then I am accused of age discrimination, even though I might have also chastised a younger worker for the same thing. The same applies is admonish a person of color. They will pull the race card, although I might have given their white co-worker a more severe tongue lashing for the exact same thing! Let's face it! You are damned if you do and damned if you don't!

Posted by: Irnotu | May 27, 2008 11:47:02 AM

If I chastise a worker of above middle age, then I am accused of age discrimination, even though I might have also chastised a younger worker for the same thing. The same applies if I admonish a person of color. They will pull the race card, although I might have given their white co-worker a more severe tongue lashing for the exact same thing! Let's face it! You are damned if you do and damned if you don't!

Posted by: Irnotu | May 27, 2008 11:48:11 AM

"If I chastise a worker of above middle age, then I am accused of age discrimination, even though I might have also chastised a younger worker for the same thing. The same applies if I admonish a person of color. "

since you have so little understanding of the law and management ,you should resign your job, and work full time for the obama campaign.

there, you will be praised for making everything about discrimination regardless of the facts.

Posted by: trettine | May 27, 2008 12:02:14 PM

It will mean that the employers will have to come up with employee agreements
when hired to sign, that often times pay scales are given on education, ability and years service. Have it explicitly written that is fully understood by all, and signed yearly.

Whites will have to start suing, over being discrimminated against when a someone else is hire over them. when they have, the best education, experience and more suited for the job discription.

Posted by: seah | May 27, 2008 12:09:17 PM

I think employees deserve to be fired if they falsely accuse a company of discrimination. We can't tell whether or not these were false allegations, but I despise opportunists.

Posted by: NJ | May 27, 2008 12:37:46 PM

there real acts of discrimination now they are hidden by a polite smile and a closeted intention leading to the same outcome. We are all racist in one form or another, we refuse to admit it.as long as our bias does not cause the livehood of anther. Then when it does your racist actions must be rreverted by the society at large.

Posted by: etubrute | May 27, 2008 12:37:46 PM

Trettine, what gives you the idea that I know nothing about the law or management? I have been running a business for over 35 years and I am very careful to obey the laws. However, that does not keep me from expressing an opinion about the situation as it is in this day and time. Oh, I have also probably attended more management classes than you have total time in school!

Posted by: Irnotu | May 27, 2008 12:44:32 PM

You go Irnotu!

Posted by: HCRC | May 27, 2008 4:25:52 PM

The picture accompanying this story is racist and stereotypical, showing a Caucasian guy pointing angrily at an Oriental woman, while a Caucasian woman takes notes. How dare they make this assumption that only Caucasian men are racist or sexist. That claim is not only absurd, it's not real life or remotely close to it.

Posted by: therockofages | May 27, 2008 8:35:13 PM

I for one think the most discrimated person is a white male with no disabilities, no verterns rights. nothing going for him except he is white

Posted by: scared2roamru | Jun 5, 2008 1:07:55 PM

Post a comment