Legalities

Life, Politics and the Law From ABC News Correspondent Jan Crawford Greenburg

Jan Crawford Greenburg is a correspondent for ABC News' bureau in Washington DC. She covers politics, the Supreme Court and provides legal analysis for ABC News. She is a graduate of the University of Chicago's law school and is a member of the New York bar.

July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

« Previous | Main | Next »

A Brawl in St. Paul

August 28, 2008 2:15 PM

With John McCain weighing a running mate who supports abortion rights, a revolt is brewing among his conservative base that includes a walkout at the Republican National Convention next week and a huge battle on the floor---especially if he selects Independent Democrat Joe Lieberman.

In addition to the expected brawl at the convention, major conservative donors who have planned to bankroll issue-oriented advertising and other grassroots efforts directed at social conservatives are putting their work on hold and will withdraw financial support, sources tell ABC News.

One conservative strategist characterized the prospect of a VP who supports abortion rights as a “disaster” for the Republican Party—and said selecting Lieberman would cost McCain the election. It would enrage conservatives, and prompt some Republicans to shift support to libertarian candidate Bob Barr, the strategist said. With the election so close, even a couple percentage points could make a difference.

McCain, who said in an interview this morning he has not decided on his pick, could announce his choice as early as tomorrow during a rally in Dayton, Ohio. But the timing of the announcement has not been finalized—and will not be settled until McCain makes his choice, sources tell ABC News. It could also occur on Saturday or closer to the opening of the convention next week.

Two abortion-rights contenders remain very much in the mix: Lieberman, who was Al Gore’s Democratic running mate in 2000, and former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge. Either would mark the first time in modern history that a VP candidate who openly supported abortion rights was on the Republican ticket.

McCain also is considering Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, a popular two-term governor in a moderate state who would bring blue-collar roots and Ronald Reagan conservatism to the ticket. The 47-year-old Pawlenty is, in many ways, the conservative version of Obama, but with real executive experience: same age, similar backgrounds, law school education and careers in public service. As governor, he balanced the state’s budget by freezing spending and implemented conservative programs and legislation, including waiting periods for abortion.

McCain also is considering his former bitter rival Mitt Romney, a multimillionaire businessman who would bring economic experience, but who also was harshly criticized by the Arizona senator and social conservatives alike during the primaries. Romney was seen as flip-flopping on key social issues, including abortion, in a perceived effort to pander to the base. Moreover, Democrats already are painting Romney, with his $30 million in residential real estate and off-shore tax havens, as elitist and out of touch with everyday Americans.

As McCain contemplates his choices, he is deciding between the conventional conservatives like Pawlenty and Romney and the two moderate-to-liberal abortion-rights contenders--who could perhaps open the party to Democratic voters who backed Hillary Clinton in the primaries.

Before the Democratic Convention, polls showed that 30 percent of Clinton’s 18 million votes were up for grabs--those voters had not decided whether to shift their support to Barack Obama. The McCain campaign has aggressively courted those voters with a series of television ads throughout the Democratic convention.

Ridge and Lieberman, it’s believed, could appeal to some of those voters. Ridge would help in Pennsylvania, a key swing state. And Lieberman would enforce McCain’s reputation as a political maverick who has a history of building bipartisan coalitions.

Both men are close friends with McCain and have appeared frequently on the campaign trail with him, and both share his views on national security.

And both would trigger a brawl at the convention next week in St. Paul, Minnesota—the likes of which hasn’t been seen at a Republican gathering since the 1964 nomination of Barry Goldwater, the last Arizona senator to be the party’s standard-bearer.

“I see a fight at the convention over either,” said Phyllis Schlafly, president of the Eagle Forum.

The choice of Lieberman would trigger an all-out war. Although he supports the war in Iraq and is therefore considered by some to be a “moderate,” he has liberal views on social issues deeply important to the Republican base. He has taken positions at odds with the Party on gun control, tax cuts, gay rights, abortion and the Supreme Court—including voting against Justice Samuel Alito.

“There would be a major revolt if it were Lieberman,” said Schlafly. “I just do not believe the Republican convention would nominate Lieberman. I just don’t think they would accept it, no mater if McCain wanted it.”

Ridge, too, would also trigger a fight because of his support for abortion rights, although he is more conservative on other issues important to the base.

Charmaine Yoest, president and CEO of Americans United for Life, said either pick would be deeply disappointing for the anti-abortion base—and would bring disarray to the convention next week.

“There’s been a lot of talk about what kind of response there would be. The worst thing that you can have at a convention--that’s supposed to be a party--is to have people anxious to leave. You’d see people who weren’t willing to wave signs. You’ll see people sitting on their hands, looking at their watches and real, real disappointment."

Yoest said the anti-abortion movement was energized after McCain’s “strong performance” talking with evangelical leader Rick Warren at his Saddleback Church and were pleased with the strong anti-abortion platform the delegates had just approved.

“There’s an expectation of wanting to see the platform and the ticket match---and for there to be the same enthusiastic commitment to life,” she said. “The mental image of placards being handed out at the convention for a candidate who stands for abortion-- instead of life--just doesn’t work.”

No modern Republican presidential nominee has ever campaigned with a running mate who openly supports abortion rights. In 1980, Ronald Reagan tapped George H.W. Bush as VP, despite Bush’s past opposition to a constitutional amendment banning abortion—but not until Bush agreed to fully embrace an anti-abortion agenda.

“It would be a terrible mistake. Every one of our nominees has been pro-life,” Schlafly said. “It’s sticking his finger in face of the pro-life constituency to pick someone who isn’t pro-life.”

Although Ridge has indicated in recent interviews that he would support McCain’s policies, he has not said he would repudiate his views on abortion. Lieberman not even conceded that---he has been a strong advocate of abortion rights, repeatedly earning a 100 percent approval rating from abortion rights groups.

Social conservatives are now planning their strategy to block either potential pick.
One possible strategy is a revolt by some of the 18 state delegations who supported either Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee—and who have not yet turned over to McCain.

Those delegations could—and sources say, likely would--revolt against Leiberman and put in their own recommendation. In the nomination process, a candidate needs five delegations supporting the nomination.

August 28, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (16)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I guess it's OK for McCain to be a maverick, but not the VP?

These republicans are really screwed up! I can't wait to see the melt down. Talk about global warming!

Posted by: DAVID NH | Aug 28, 2008 2:30:37 PM

It won't happen. Although John finished 5th from the bottom of his Naval Academy class, he's not that dumb!

Posted by: Brother Bill | Aug 28, 2008 2:33:12 PM

There wiull be no melt down; as he has done through the whole process, McCain is giving into the far right of his party.
Maverick, I don't think som.

Posted by: Thinking | Aug 28, 2008 2:34:55 PM

This is gonna be interesting. They are trying to ram Mitt Romney down his throat.

Posted by: Thomas | Aug 28, 2008 2:36:08 PM

So what if 2% of the conservatives don't come out to vote.

Picking Lieberman would give McCain far more than that in Independent and Democratic voters.

Besides, conservatives have contributed far too much money to McCain to walk away now.

In the primaries, many of the talk show hosts said they would stay home if McCain was the nominee. Fact is, they are all on board.

Conservatives will talk, but when it comes to it, they will all come out and vote for McCain regardless of who he picks. Many of them were even saying McCain should ask Hillary to be his running mate.

Posted by: Dan | Aug 28, 2008 2:37:14 PM

well if he doesn't pick someone who is pro-choice that leaves...

The Trust Fund Baby Ticket
Mccain Romney

Where they use mortgage payments mistakenly as cocktail napkins...because they have never seen them without an accounting team around them.

or

"The Bridge to tomorrow Ticket"
McCain Pawlenty

where they talk about getting to tomorrow by cutting taxes for the wealthy...using our sarcastically strong infrastructure money's...

oops there goes another bridgecollapse.

seems Pawlenty's plans don't always "hold up" go look at what his tax cuts did to the state with one of the worst bridge collapses in the history of our country.

Posted by: dl | Aug 28, 2008 2:57:44 PM

seems McCain is stuck between a 12 houses, a holy smack down and a bridge collapse.

Maybe he could pick Fiorina and she could just make up a story to negotiate with the Russians.

or maybe Meg Whitman......uhm...

okay... well maybe Pawlenty could be President if that happened...uhm...

Fiorina?...oh my God Armageddon.

Posted by: dl | Aug 28, 2008 3:02:38 PM

I'm a Democrat, never voted Republican. I predict McCain will get a significant cross over from Democrats, both men and women. I know the liberal wing of my party says its about racism, but it's not. It's taxation, experience, energy, and character concerns. I can't believe I'm a Democrat here uring Republicans to vote Republican!!! Please, people, think about the alternative to McCain. I know abortion is important to conservatives, but the economy is important, too. Obama has said he will raise taxes - do you doubt it? Raising taxes will worsen the economy, not make it better. John McCain is the one who will nominated judges, not his VP. Please keep this in mind.

Posted by: Ex-Oprah Fan | Aug 28, 2008 3:08:03 PM

The experience argument goes out the window if Pawlenty is picked. I disagree that he has "real" experience. He's a nobody who will be eaten for lunch by Joe Biden.

Posted by: diane | Aug 28, 2008 3:11:52 PM

ex-oprah fan

No one who has always voted democrat would suddenly say Obama "will raise taxes...do you doubt it?"

so please your cover blown.

as if the tax threat ever mattered to you and suddenly you have seen the light...

his energy plans ...written by the oil lobby...seriously.... and the rest of the banking and energy lobby that are his leadership team (do you know what Phil gramm who wrote his economic platform literally did for enrgy speculators?)

experience? since the only thing he got right with that "experience" was that the surge would reduce violence (and considering the goal of the surge was establishing political resolution and stability the jury is still out on whether it worked... saying it worked is like saying I got the nail in because I bought a hammer)

this election is ridiculous and posers like your self aren't helping.

lol suddenly saying "they'll raise taxes on you...but I'm a lifelong democrat" ugh

nobody buys that.

Posted by: dl | Aug 28, 2008 3:16:44 PM

McCain`s campaign said yesterday that he had decided on a running mate.

This morning when asked about it McCain said that he had not decided yet.

Conclusion; McCain is indecisive and not qualified to be commander in chief.

Posted by: Keith | Aug 28, 2008 3:16:55 PM

John Mccain has been wrong on everything besides the fact that putting boots on the ground would reduce violence...(...which doesn't mean it worked...)

outside of that fact ...Obama has been right on every point and Mccain has been wrong...

so enough with this experience argument.

Posted by: dl | Aug 28, 2008 3:19:27 PM

Pawlenty's tax cuts made the bridge fall down?

Pretty brainless, don't you think, dl?

Care to provide evidence for that assertion?

There's an NTSB interim report. Maybe you could point out where it says tax cuts caused the failure.

Posted by: drjohn | Aug 28, 2008 3:20:19 PM

McCain's been wrong?

The surge didn't work?

Are you serious? What is it with liberals? Why do you think that your opinion and reality are the same thing? Everyone from Harold Ford Jr to Hillary Clinton has said it worked but this has not penetrated into your bizarro world.

The surge was pretty much McCain's idea. Saying it didn't work doesn't make your words true.

If the US had bailed out when Obama wanted to bail, Iraq would have failed already.

Wake up and smell the reality.

Posted by: drjohn | Aug 28, 2008 3:23:37 PM

I'm with Ex Oprah Fan (which I am too by the way). I am a Republican who has voted Dem a few times too and to dangle Pro Choice is so sad, when we all know we will never turn back time to 1974. Sexualized culture, abortion will always be out there...the right wing needs to just stand behind John Sydney.
Barack Hussein is unelectable and Reps. know he is not an option. Doesn't matter who he picks as VP. I'd like Romney as when is it a bad thing to make a success of yourself and prosper. He knows how to MAKE money and a thing or two about the economy. And just let them bring up his religion and we can BRING BACK REV. WRIGHT!
B. Hussein is Denzil Washington acting as President.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN!

Posted by: Debra | Aug 28, 2008 3:25:43 PM

Right! Maybe a good floor fight would do us Republicans some good. Right now it would not hurt. Then again, we have had no convention, so we have no nominee yet- southern values voting, social conservative.

Posted by: Mike from Texas | Aug 29, 2008 3:26:58 PM

Post a comment