Legalities
Life, Politics and the Law From ABC News Correspondent Jan Crawford Greenburg
Jan Crawford Greenburg is a correspondent for ABC News' bureau in Washington DC. She covers politics, the Supreme Court and provides legal analysis for ABC News. She is a graduate of the University of Chicago's law school and is a member of the New York bar.
RECENT POSTS
- Supreme Court Puts Chrysler’s Sale to Fiat on Hold
- White House Contacted Sotomayor Before Souter Announced His Retirement
- Becoming Nominee Sotomayor
- Judge Wood Goes to Washington
- Obama: Fortifying Bush's policies on terror
- The Pitfalls of Politics
- A Stealth Nominee?
- Who's on the Way to the Court: Chart the Course
- A Justice Who Has Juggled
- White House Formalizes Supreme Court Short List
- Tortured Timing
- The Harsh Interrogation Investigation
- Souter's Plans
- Are Southerners More Racist than Northerners?
- FCC Decision, Round One
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
A Voice for America?
September 04, 2008 10:23 AM
John McCain’s campaign manager, Rick Davis, told the Washington Post this week that a “very masculine” draft of the VP nominee’s speech had been written before McCain announced his bombshell of a pick in Sarah Palin.
They obviously tossed that one. Because the speech Matt Scully, President Bush’s former speechwriter, came up with last night for Palin could not have been delivered by any other of McCain’s top VP contenders. I’m not saying it was “feminine” (whatever Davis meant by “masculine”), but it was uniquely tailored to the person at the podium. And she delivered.
The picture of Palin was painted last night: She’s a small-town rebel with a cause, a pit bull of a hockey mom who believes America is great, no matter what the New York Times says. And Palin’s message was unlike anything we’ve seen in this campaign—or in the past decade or so, for that matter.
She delivered it directly to all those people she said make the country what it is--the people in those small towns “who do some of the hardest work in America, who grow our own food, run our factories and fight our wars.”
“They love their country, in good times and bad,” said this small-town gal from Wasilla. “And they’re always proud of America.”
That was the best moment of her compelling speech last night, and it captured the message John McCain has consistently failed to deliver in this campaign. So far, it’s been a campaign about change, and we’ve seen this narrative emerge and almost become conventional wisdom: America overstepped its bounds, disgraced itself on the world stage and must repent for its ills.
But that’s not a narrative a large swath of this country believes or accepts. Go to a place like rural Alabama, where I grew up. Or, I suspect, many small towns in Ohio and Michigan and Pennsylvania and Florida. There are a lot of Americans who don’t particularly care what the New York Times thinks, much less the Europeans.
Yet McCain, inexplicably in this campaign, has never stirringly delivered a Reagan-esque defense of America as a shining city upon the hill, with lights blazing as brightly as ever. That may be because McCain, after all those years in Washington, doesn’t get it. He wasn’t raised a common man, but an officer’s son, and he’s been a US Senator for 20 years now.
But he’s got a running mate, we saw last night, who can say “hell yeah” and “yee haw” with the best of them. (I’d love to ask McCain if he’d ever heard “Redneck Woman,” made wildly popular by the singer, Gretchen Wilson, who was on the stage after Palin last night.) He’s got a running mate who proudly clings to her guns and her religion---and can disparage Barack Obama for “talking about us one way in Scranton and another in way San Francisco.”
Palin showed last night she can talk to all those people who want to believe in their country’s greatness as they struggle to pay their bills. They may not like George Bush--but they want to believe America is the best country in the world, and they want to sing Toby Keith loud and proud.
On the national stage, Palin presented herself as someone who is perfectly willing to pull out her boot and---well, if you know Keith’s “Courtesy of the Red, White and Blue,” you know where I’m going with this.
So regardless of why McCain picked her and how suddenly he made his choice---because he thought she was a reformer or would appeal to women voters or reinforce his maverick image---he got a candidate who can talk to a large part of America that none of the candidates really have.
That’s obviously not why he picked her—if he’d put a premium on that, he would not been determined (until last Sunday) to tap Joe Lieberman as VP. That thought kept going through my mind last night—how staggeringly different Palin is from Lieberman---and how do you explain McCain turning away from one and picking the other?
In Palin, McCain got a running mate who could almost not be more different than Joe Lieberman-- and a running mate who, in many ways, is nothing like McCain himself.
And that means regardless of what the next two months hold—and the stories by the journalists crawling through Alaska, the upcoming clash with Joe Biden, the ongoing debate over whether Palin is qualified right now for the Oval Office—we got a race that just got a lot more interesting.
September 4, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (78)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Sarah Palin wrote this speech over two days, with a speech writer's editorial help. The guy didn't write the speech. She did!
Posted by: s.b. | Sep 4, 2008 10:36:18 AM
love how the gop keeps taking what obama said about guns and religion out of context
teh question was why wont people in small towns vote for obama
and obama said
well after this administration has basically forgotten about them You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them...And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not.
And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.
see.... i mean what the gop says and what clinton said was taking the few basic words to paint this comment as something terrible... but within the whole text its truthful and not as terrible as people are saying it is
Posted by: Bhrandon | Sep 4, 2008 10:40:50 AM
John McSame has destroyed himself by abandoning every principle that bought him the chance to be President. I was one of those Democrats, who was suckered by McSame into believing that he might be what he said he was - a Maverick willing to break with the G.O.P. whenever it was wrong, which was on about every issue. I even wrote to McSame, begging him to run, when given Kerry/Edwards as an alternative to Bush/Cheney. NO MORE. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. I won't be fooled again. McSame's choice of Palin to be a heartbeat away from the toughest, most critical job in the world is the final nail in a coffin I could see being constructed long ago. In light of McSame's impulsive, reckless, and dangerous decision to pick Palin as his running mate, I'm now convinced beyond any doubt that Sen. Barack Obama must be the choice to lead my country. I simply can't stand by and watch the country I love being destroyed by Bush/Cheney and now McSame/Palin. I think a majority of my fellow citizens will agree with me as will be shown on Nov. 4, 2008. Obama/Biden 2008!!!
Posted by: caliguy55 | Sep 4, 2008 10:45:49 AM
Conventions are going to have a lot of political hoopla. Palin presented her speech well, but her attempt to shoot down Obama's Community Organizer experience instead shot down an entire, hard working community. At the opening of the Republican convention, it was all about helping those through the Hurricane and taking off the "Republican" hat and putting on the "American" hat. Community Organizers always have their American hat on. We had more people seeking refuge from the hurricane in our convention center than lived in the town Palin was mayor - we had more evacuees in our state from the Gulf Coast than the population of Alaska. Without the experience, hard work, dedication of our CO's these people taking refuge could not have had shelter, food or medical assistance. That is A LOT of responsibility and should not be belittled or demeaned in the slightest.
Posted by: Bugging Me | Sep 4, 2008 10:46:01 AM
The speech itself was strong but overly negative. It was how Palin delivered it that particularly bothered me. She looked insincere and almost mischievous. When she said, "I'm not going to Washington to seek their good opinion. I'm going to Washington to serve the people of this country.", the way she delivered those lines conveyed quite the opposite --- she looked exactly like she was trying to court the good opinion of the audience and hopefully the media. The second line of the quote above was supposed to communicate a serious commitment to serve, yet when she said it, it felt like, "see, I've said it. What a nice line I have delivered. Did I sound smart or what?"
She also smiled too much, which took away the seriousness of whatever message she wanted to communicate. T
Made me feel that the whole thing was like a a high school student board election.
Posted by: Chris | Sep 4, 2008 10:48:33 AM
she didn't mention the McCain/Palin stands on the issues of importance. Why? Because they are the same as the Bush/Cheney stands. They are just more of the same - and that's what will mean more to the voters - where the candidates stand on the issues. We won't be fooled again by the Rove-tactics of the Republican party.
Posted by: bernadette | Sep 4, 2008 10:51:06 AM
Sarah Palin did not write a single word of this speech. Not a single word. We have heard this speech before. This speech is not different from what Geoprge Bush said in 2004. Go back and read Bush's 2004 speech at the convention. It was exactly the same thing, except that the speechwriters managed to pepper insults directed at Obama. Yes she delivered a strong performance. But the substance is nothing new.
Posted by: Kevin | Sep 4, 2008 10:51:47 AM
Empty speech, no Substance.
Now can we get back to the issues?
Alaska Independence Party. Troppergate, Bridge to Nowhere, Far right Religious views, lack of Foreign Policy awareness, Investigating self claiming jurisdiction, Raising of sales tax and running a deficit at the same time, Critized by McCain for earmarks for her village, Bashing of Community Organizers, and who is she?
Posted by: Thinking | Sep 4, 2008 11:05:29 AM
Keep trying to sell her to the american public, it won't work.
She is corrupt, unqualified and unfit to be anywhere near the white house.
all the YUP YUP's and YEE HAWS just ain't doing it.
Her resume spews unethical doings and overspending and every person knows that alaska is the easiest state to run.
Why not run the story on how she recently cut the special needs funding for alaska by 62 percent?
Please.... all this rhetoric about Palin is so not working
Posted by: l | Sep 4, 2008 11:07:23 AM
Country first my a**
What about the issues: A family of five + and no talk of education? A disadvantage child and no healthcare? Teen pregnancy? underaged drinking? THE ECONOMY? Housing market? the trillion dollar deficit? Jobs? Anything less than this is NOT COUNTRY FIRST, but REPUBLICAN THIRST.
Posted by: CFMA | Sep 4, 2008 11:23:35 AM
While I thought Palin did perform a good speech last night, and energized her base, not one person has been able to tell me how John McCain is different now than he was in 2000 that makes him more qualified. I'm not a Republican, so I will gladly give them the credit for nominating George Bush over John McCain in 2000. So, what's changed now? Only that Republicans will do whatever it takes to win, at whatever the cost. It isn't John McCain that you want to win, it is your party. I have had to live for the last 10 years with a Republican controlled congress and a Republican president, a president that Republicans preferred to John McCain.
Yes, I support Obama. Yes, I'm voting for someone with little experience... I'm willing to have his mistakes this year, and feel hopeful about our future, than to have the same from a Republican party that does nothing to inspire me, except to tell me to shop and stimulate the economy.
As far as the ATTACKS on Community Organizers, I would argue that some of the best this country has to offer has come from community organizers:
Martin Luther King, Jr.
Susan B. Anthony
Elizabeth Cady Stanton
(just to name a few)
I am for a new vision -- a COMPLETELY new vision. Not for a party or affiliation that wants to only slightly change, not for a party that is once again telling me to trust them, when this man wasn't good enough for them the first time he ran.
Posted by: Randi, Denver, CO | Sep 4, 2008 11:23:53 AM
no she didnt
she didnt write that speech
The mccain camp even said who was the speech writer
Posted by: Bhrandon | Sep 4, 2008 11:24:47 AM
REPUBLICAN TALKING POINTS:
McCain LEAD HERE LEAD NOW.
DRILL HERE DRILL NOW.
ATTACK HERE ATTACK NOW.
DRILL HERE DRILL NOW.
Barack NOT HERE NOT NOW.
Posted by: CFMA | Sep 4, 2008 11:33:05 AM
Who would vote for a man or woman that pressured her local library to ban certain books because she didn't agree with them? This woman is trying to set women rights back 50 years. My God, any thinking person that would even consider voting for her isn't even worthy of being called an American.
Posted by: Trish | Sep 4, 2008 11:38:21 AM
The DNC talking points are out in force this morning. Of course, there was a speech writer. Do you think Obama writes his speeches ? Did you hear that the teleprompter operator screwed up last night and scrolled right through the prolonged applause ? Did you notice ? No, you didn't because she coolly went on with her speech and ad-libbed a few parts. We will see both Sarah and Barack without teleprompters in the debates. I can hardly wait.
Posted by: Mike K | Sep 4, 2008 11:38:38 AM
Obama could have had those people. Unfortunately, he IS out of touch. The Clintons had them, but no...The envious New Dems wouldn't have it. Palin and this article are MAGNIFICENT. I WAS a DEM but I DON'T like Obama and I DO LIKE PALIN! I know the issues, but I also KNOW how I FEEL!
Posted by: irma | Sep 4, 2008 11:39:06 AM
Speech writers, blah blah. Palin delivered with a fantastic PUNCH! Obama is down! One, two, three.....
Posted by: irma | Sep 4, 2008 11:41:06 AM
Same talk new suit. Sarah insulted all Americans with this so called speech. I expected more from her. Thought she was going to help represent McCain's vision of change. If this is it then no thanks!
Posted by: Hippiemom | Sep 4, 2008 11:41:37 AM
S.B., can you read? The campaign manager said it was written by Bush's speechwriters, no surprise there.
Posted by: Peace | Sep 4, 2008 11:44:26 AM
All I know is that I had at least ten people call me, family members and co-workers, that were really liking Palin. But guess what.....
THEY ARE ALL COMMUNITY ORGANIZERS !!!!!
These folks were pissed. Palin needs to learn how to attack without insulting an ENTIRE group.
The republicans really blew it with a lot of family members and friends.
Posted by: MsKay | Sep 4, 2008 11:53:48 AM
Post a comment