John Berman has been at ABC since 1995, and allowed to appear on television since 2001. He covered the 2008 campaign extensively, following John McCain and Mitt Romney during the primaries and then Barack Obama in the general election. He also spent more than 20 months chasing George W. Bush around the country as a producer from 1999 until 2001, earning the clever nickname, "Pain in the Ass," from our 43rd president. He is a frequent and sometimes welcome contributor to all of ABC's broadcasts.
RECENT POSTS
- Bush's Flight Home
- Green Mountain Miracle
- Dow Says 'O No'
- Meanwhile, in New Mexico...
- Kennedy at the Convention
- Concern for Senator Kennedy
- Shameless Self Promotion
- Bush Staffer: 'We're Ready' to Go
- Powell 'Thinks' He's a Republican
- More on Malaise
- Obama's Malaise Speech?
- Chief Justice Roberts Flubs Oath
- Great Day for the Flag
- Aretha's Hat
- Beau Biden on the Platform
« Previous | Main | Next »
Commission Chair: We Didn’t Know About Ifill’s Book, and We don’t Care
October 02, 2008 3:37 PM
Frank Fahrenkopf, the Republican co-chairman of the Commission on Presidential Debates, told Fox News' Carl Cameron that the commission didn’t know about Gwen Ifill's book about Obama when it named her to moderate the vice-presidential debate -- but said the commission isn't bothered by it because it's not just about Obama, and because "she hasn't even written the chapter on Obama."
Per Greta Van Susteren's blog, Fahrenkopf said: “We didn’t know when we named Gwen about the book. Although I will say this: knowing now that she hasn’t even written the chapter on Obama, it doesn’t concern us.” http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/10/02/the-debate-chair-said-they-did-not-know-about-ifills-book/
Fahrenkopf noted that plenty of journalists -- including Ifill’s fellow debate moderators, Bob Schieffer and Jim Lehrer -- have written books without compromising their journalistic integrity.
“Since it’s not just on Obama, it covers a whole wide expanse of new black politicians, we’re not concern about it,” he said. “We pick our moderators based upon our trust and the knowledge of their lifetime work in journalism, their integrity, their ability to be unbiased, and to do it right. So we have great confidence in Gwen.”
And he made light of the carping that always comes the commission’s way: “Those complaints in the last 24 hours have been that there’s a secret listening device in Gov. Palin’s ear and that the people are going to be giving her the answers to the questions. We get this every four years and we’ve learned to live with it.”
The commission named its moderators August 5; Time magazine mentioned Ifill’s book later that month.
-- Rick Klein
October 2, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (36)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Of course you don't care! That's sorta the whole point!
I'm just glad Gwen's reputation for integrity is lost forever. Everyone knows you should at least disclose this kind of thing in the beginning. Any honest person would.
Adios to your reputation Gwen!
Posted by: No Obama | Oct 2, 2008 3:52:27 PM
So take that John McShame.... quit your whining and lets get on with the debate
Posted by: algwriter | Oct 2, 2008 3:53:02 PM
If Sarah palin does poorly tonight, it is all somebody elses fault!
Posted by: Truth Matters | Oct 2, 2008 3:53:16 PM
Ifill should still step aside.
Just like Pelosi, Reid they have shown rotten leadership.
Posted by: Melissa | Oct 2, 2008 3:54:05 PM
Palin should just turn to Gwen tonight and congratulate her on her book and ask if she'll sign it for her on it's release day which is inauguration day. Tell Gwen she'll be up at the podium getting sworn in with McCain if she wasn't sure where to reach her.
;-)
Posted by: Jo | Oct 2, 2008 3:54:24 PM
Remember the democrats (Edwards & Obama & Hillary) refused to do a Fox debate for the . They boycotted it and it never occured.
Now McCain/Palin are suppose to just suck it up and do a debate with a partisan hack in the GENERAL and be okay with it.
Bizarro world indeed.
Posted by: Jo | Oct 2, 2008 3:55:48 PM
If McCain had taken his VP decision seriously and picked a qualified candidate, he wouldn't need to engage in this pathetic whining nonsense about the HIGHLY RESPECTED Gwen Ifill.
IT'S SAD.
JOHN: YOU SCREWED UP.
Posted by: Ed from MA | Oct 2, 2008 3:56:02 PM
well i care. conflict of interest is conflict of interest. if obama is elected, ifill hopes to make hundreds of thousands of dollars off the sale of her book; if he loses, she will sell 4 copies. motives are seldom pure and this woman is no saint: ifill has motive to assist the candidate she supports; that is not fair.
Posted by: ron | Oct 2, 2008 3:56:23 PM
Republicans did a debate with Chris Matthews as moderator, but Dems wouldn't do one on Fox News.
Can you say WUSSY BOYS????
Lol.
Posted by: No Obama | Oct 2, 2008 3:57:17 PM
Columbia Journalism Review disagrees. She stands to benefit financially if Obama wins; thus, she should be disqualified. I don't understand why this is so hard for others to understand. She has a clear financial conflict of interest. She should be gone! It would be exactly the same if she (or any other moderator) were writing a book about McCain that were clearly tied to HIS winning the election. If there's a stake in the outcome, that person should not be involved. Period.
And Ifill definitely should have informed the commission and not even taken the job.
Posted by: beth | Oct 2, 2008 3:57:18 PM
How can Gwen's reputation be lost when it's the Republican Co-Chairperson on Presidential Debates that said he doesn't care. If I remember correctly, that means his party could give a rip about the book. Only McShame is crying, probably because his "hand picked" bimbo is going to make him look like a bigger fool.
Posted by: algwriter | Oct 2, 2008 3:59:12 PM
Gwen named her book in July. Anyone can google it and find the details.
Stop making excuses for Sarah. Let them debate. If there is bias, everyone will see it.
Then we can all blog about that.
Posted by: TexGal51 | Oct 2, 2008 4:00:42 PM
Smacks of desperation from the McPain camp.
Posted by: Deep Release | Oct 2, 2008 4:03:02 PM
Sarah Palin has committed yet another political blunder after claiming she had held talks with a British ambassador - talks that never actually took place.
In an answer to questions about her foreign policy experience ahead of tonight's make-or-break vice presidential TV debate, her aides listed numerous contacts with foreign officials - including Britain's ambassador to Washington, Sir Nigel Sheinwald.
However the meeting never occurred. Officials at the embassy swiftly contacted the McCain-Palin campaign to inform them of the discrepancy.
A British Embassy spokesman said the error arose after Sir Nigel's name was listed among those who had attended a US Governor's meeting in July.
Mrs Palin was at the meeting in her role as Governor of Alaska. However Sir Nigel pulled out at the last minute, leaving his name on the guest list.
The embarrassing mishap comes as Mrs Palin faces the biggest challenge of her political life tonight in a head-to-head vice-presidential debate with Democratic candidate Joe Biden.
Posted by: another one | Oct 2, 2008 4:04:01 PM
She hasn't asked a single question and yet all the Palin sympathizers are convinced they will be biased.
Why so worried about your candidate? It's almost sad how little confidence you have in her.
Posted by: really | Oct 2, 2008 4:05:01 PM
Ifill is old school journalism at it's best.She's one of the few journalists left that can separate her profession from opinion.People are interjecting their opinion of her book without even knowing what it's about. Talk about unprofessional. People have become so jaded and skeptical.A generation of excuses. That's what happens when you let your kids win all the time. They look for excuses. I suppose if Biden wins the debate, that will be Palin's excuse. The moderator. Well, if your good at what you do and know your stuff, it dosen't matter who the moderator is. They both get the same questions and the same amount of time. With the invention of Fox news and the Olberman's and O'Reilly's out there, no wonder people have forgotten what a real journalist does. I for one miss those journalists.
Posted by: Bea | Oct 2, 2008 4:08:38 PM
It is stunning that the committee didn't know about Ifill's Obama book. Gwen Ifill needs to behave professionally regardless of her feeling about race. This time she failed, and it will take years for her to regain her credibility.
Posted by: tina | Oct 2, 2008 4:21:15 PM
Gwen should have disclosed this fact, but did not. Same as a lie. Disgraceful
Posted by: emma divine | Oct 2, 2008 4:21:41 PM
It won't matter. Everyone's made up their mind that Palin will win even before she steps on stage.
Everyone will give Palin the win because its better TV if they do.
Posted by: Greg | Oct 2, 2008 4:29:29 PM
1st off it isn't a book about Obama, its a book about Blacks in Politics. 2nd it would still sell regardless if he is president or not, it shows the path towards their political careers.
Why don't we just get Karl Rove to moderate it, that would be fair right?
Posted by: make it known | Oct 2, 2008 4:30:06 PM
What exactly is she going to do to hurt Palin? Ask her what papers she reads?
Oh no, that's too hard. BIAS!
Frank Fahrenkopf, the REPUBLICAN co-chairman of the Commission on Presidential Debates said the commission isn't bothered.
This is just another excuse for Plain if she flails. Of course it's always someone elses fault. And the debate hasn't even started.
PATHETIC this is the best the Republicans have to offer.
OBAMA/BIDEN. Say goodnight Republicans. It's over!
Posted by: But she's so "likeable" | Oct 2, 2008 4:32:11 PM
The REPUBLICAN Whiners are here again!
Gwen's book is NOT been kept a secret!
It has been on pre-order sales at Amazon and Barnes and Noble for months!
Ifill's book was mentioned by name in a July 21 Associated Press article by Kinney Littlefield. The roster of debate moderators was revealed back August 5 after. After it has already been advertised in Magazines!
Ifill has moderated many debates over the years.
SHE DID NOT LIE or HIDE anything!
She is a professional!
Posted by: The Republican Party is the STUPID party! | Oct 2, 2008 4:36:14 PM
Gwen should have disclosed this fact, but did not.
-----------------------------
ACTUALLY, the book was announced in JULY. It's not done and it's not even about Obama, it's about black politicians.
And why does the McCain campaign just start complaining in the last two days? It couldn't be that the golden girl has made an ass of herself in every interview recently could it?
CAN WE PLEASE LOWER THE BAR EVEN MORE SO MS PLAIN CAN FINALLY JUMP OVER IT?
Posted by: But she's so "likeable" | Oct 2, 2008 4:37:21 PM
I am curious - if BO does win, are you all you McCain haters going to be Obama haters when he gets in office and everyone discovers that - OH MY GOD, HE LIED! Not Barack, can't be!
What gets me is that everyone is hounding Palin because of inexperience - yet refuse to look at where all the so-called experienced people and experts have managed to get us so far.
When are you idiots going to wake up, smell the coffee and quit tolerating this cr@p from the politicians - on both sides of the fence?
I am still undecided. It doesn't matter which one gets elected, we are thoroughly screwed either way.
Posted by: Just Wondering | Oct 2, 2008 4:38:05 PM
They both get the same questions people...where is the bias? One question is not worded differently than the other. They moderator's job is to keep the debate moving. She doesn't stand up and raise the hand of the winner like a referee at a boxing match.
People are losing jobs, homes and life savings and you guys are worried about who the moderator is or is not at a "VP" debate! Man, what is this country coming to? No wonder Congress turned a blind eye while Wall Street was raping the country. The people were concerned about the wrong things and not holding them accountable!
Posted by: Johnson | Oct 2, 2008 4:40:18 PM
Post a comment