Money Beat
From Your Wallet to Wall Street: The Money News That Matters to You From the ABC News Business Team
RECENT POSTS
- The Year in Business: 2008
- Median Home Price Drops to $181,300
- Michigan Tops Unemployment Rolls
- Chrysler to Temporarily Shut Down Plants
- Did the SEC Miss the Obvious When It Came to Madoff?
- Madoff's $50 Billion Swindle Yields Victims Around the World
- Bankruptcy Options for General Motors and Chrysler
- Automakers: All for One and One for Parts?
- Uncle Sam's Credit Card Rate? Zero Percent
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
« Previous | Main | Next »
Short Selling and the 'Plus Tick' Rule of Yore
September 19, 2008 1:07 PM
ABC News’ Alice Gomstyn and Zunaira Zaki report: The news of a potential trillion-dollar federal government solution to the credit crisis is the dominant news story of the day, but let’s not sell the other news short.
Pun intended.
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it is temporarily banning the short selling of 799 financial stocks to “to protect the integrity and quality of the securities market and strengthen investor confidence.”
As of now, the ban is scheduled to hold until the end of the day Thursday, Oct. 2.
Short sellers, who take bets that a share price is going to fail, have come under extra scrutiny lately, with some arguing that they’ve played a large part in the breathtaking plunges this year of once-valuable stocks, with now-bankrupt Lehman Brothers being held up as the most recent, prominent example.
SEC chairman Christopher Cox alluded to those concerns in his statement today about the new ban.
“The Commission is committed to using every weapon in its arsenal to combat market manipulation that threatens investors and capital markets,” Cox said.
The SEC’s move follows a similar move by regulators in the U.K. and the announcement by New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo that he’s launching an investigation of short selling. (For more on the SEC’s earlier actions on short selling, check out this blog post from Thursday.)
Meanwhile, some are defending the practice of short selling.
“There's nothing wrong with short selling,” said Ted Weisberg, the president of the brokerage firm Seaport Securities.“In free markets, you should be able to sell short.”
Weisberg said that the real problem lies in the fact that the SEC eliminated a rule known as the “plus tick” rule last year. That rule prevented traders from ganging up on a stock that was already falling in price and instead, limited potential short sales to stocks that were on an upswing.
Weisberg said that reintroducing the rule is a better long-term solution than simply banning short-selling.
The SEC hasn’t immediately responded to calls for comment on Weisberg’s suggestion. We’ll let you know if that changes.
UPDATE: The SEC responded to an ABC News request for comment by directing us to a statement issued just before the “plus tick” rule change was set in motion. According to the statement, the change was “designed to modernize and simplify short sale regulation and, at the same time, provide greater regulatory consistency by removing restrictions where they no longer appear effective or necessary.”
September 19, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (20)
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/433071/33634254
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Short Selling and the 'Plus Tick' Rule of Yore:
Everybody paying attention knows that short selling and naked short selling helped fan the flames of these companies going under.
With this new government intervention though, you'll see inflation go up and increasing interest rates. Better fix the rate on your adjustable loans now if you can.
Posted by: 1percenter | Sep 19, 2008 1:26:47 PM
So someone remembers the 'uptick rule'. This is classis poor deregulation. It it ain't broke, don't try to fix it. Especially if you are the SEC.
Posted by: Steve in Austin | Sep 19, 2008 3:51:43 PM
I can't help but think this one smells fishy. So now 799 preferred financial stocks get complete protection from short sellers, while the rest of the market remains completely exposed. Talk about preferrential treatment! Why not just bring back the uptick rule?
Posted by: Steve in Austin | Sep 19, 2008 3:54:17 PM
I can't help wondering if part of the market's rally was the result of panic _buying_ as short-sellers scrambled to cover their positions before prices climbed too high.
Posted by: Suspicious | Sep 19, 2008 5:31:30 PM
To Elliot Spitzer:
Why did you become governor of New York and not control your sexual urges?Ironic that this mess started after Spitzer stopped going after people. I wonder who tipped off his promiscuity.
Where would we be if Spitzer stayed as Attorney General?
Posted by: thegr8 1 | Sep 19, 2008 7:57:40 PM
They should stop allowing short selling altogether - it is based on betting against success, rather than betting for success. People buy on news and sell on rumor. It is too easy to manipulate the market this way because it is human nature to believe bad news blindly - and act on it...without checking first.
Posted by: Bill | Sep 20, 2008 11:46:10 AM
the problem isn't short selling, the problem is naked short selling. With naked short selling you sell shares that basically don't exist. With normal short selling you have to borrow shares before you sell them.
Posted by: john | Sep 20, 2008 2:30:05 PM
INSANITY! You can only make money shorting if the stock is overvalued.
First, why should the American people bail out these corporations when there are PLENTY of other financial institutions that will take there place in a matter of months.
Second, if the government wants liquidity, then it should give loans to
"good banks" that are not in financial trouble to give loans or give another rebate.
Third, our country is going to go bankrupt trying to save these corrupt out-moded institutions.
Fourth, the bail out is giving new executive powers to the presidency and the treasury department.
Americans must be the dumbest citizens of any first world nation in the world.
And that's why were going to be a 2nd, maybe even 3rd world nation in a few short years.
Tell your congressman and reps "NO BAIL OUT"!
Posted by: SG | Sep 20, 2008 11:26:13 PM
I am not a stock player. To me, buying short is simply an empty scam, like playing roulette where you bet that red or black, odd or even or play 0 and 00 so if everybody loses, you win. It is gambling pure and simple. You buy short hoping that the company stock tanks. How unethical is that? Futures is another scam. Futures should be banned also. It should be pay as you go.
JA
Posted by: john ashton | Sep 21, 2008 3:04:23 AM
The bigger problem is that about a year ago the SEC got rid of the "uptick rule" for short sales. The only way dropping that rule made sense is if someone at the SEC took a bribe, or had some other hidden conflict of interest. The ironic thing is that Lehman CEO Richard S. Fuld, Jr. was a big advocate of dropping the uptick rule. The ego maniac never thought his own company was being protected by that rule.
Posted by: Tyrone | Sep 21, 2008 10:27:31 AM
Execs pointing to short selling is a smoke screen. These execs have fatally wounded their companies, investors and employees and are trying to shift the blame. Their stock prices have plummeted because their partners/customers are withdrawing business - a run on their business. Institutional $mangers are selling the stocks accordingly. Short sellers see it happening and jump on for the ride. Greedy Wall St execs knowingly took on massive risk leveraged to the gills without regard for the consequences - that's what greed is after all - in so doing they've destroyed these companies. They are to blame - not opportunistic short sellers. Solvent companies with good quality earnings and reasonable debt are immune to short selling. That is the point -
Posted by: Jerry | Sep 21, 2008 11:38:26 AM
This is to do what?? "...protect the integrity and quality of the securities market and strengthen investor confidence.” How does not allowing folks to guess a security is a dud and put his buck where his short-sale slip is ever protect the "...quality of the securities market..." when it appears to be more of a no-security-here market?
Some how this protects "...integrity...". Folks, I am dull witted....I don't understand it. Do you feel you have a "...strenghtened consomer confidence..." soul since Wall Street won't let you sell it? Yup, just dull witted I guess, just can't think straight.
Posted by: Wonderful Willia | Sep 21, 2008 4:08:29 PM
This does what?? Well it is “to protect the integrity and quality of the securities market and strengthen investor confidence.” How does it "..protect the integrity...of the securities market" if you can not sell the "security" duds short. Your saying they are "no-security-here" pieces of paper" and saying it with both personal integrity and your savings account. Your willing to put your buck where your short-sales slip indicates but little did you know you are destroying the "..integrity of the securities market...".
With this action is your soul now over whelmed with strengthened "..investor confidence..."?
Posted by: Wonderful Willie | Sep 21, 2008 4:20:20 PM
Stopped short selling but didn't freeze gas prices...........interesting...
Posted by: AnnD52 | Sep 21, 2008 5:43:25 PM
bring back the uptick rule.... in one year short sellers have crashed the market... Jay Gould lives.... the uptick rules protects the market from accelarating downward price swings and put on brakes to upward swings in stock prices.... legislate it into the USCODE..
Posted by: fred | Sep 21, 2008 6:27:04 PM
"Loan Titans Paid McCain Adviser Nearly $2 Million
Senator John McCain’s campaign manager was paid more than $30,000 a month for five years as president of an advocacy group set up by the mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to defend them against stricter regulations, current and former officials say.
Mr. McCain, the Republican candidate for president, has recently begun campaigning as a critic of the two companies and the lobbying army that helped them evade greater regulation as they began buying riskier mortgages with implicit federal backing. He and his Democratic rival, Senator Barack Obama, have donors and advisers who are tied to the companies.
But last week the McCain campaign stepped up a running battle of guilt by association when it began broadcasting commercials trying to link Mr. Obama directly to the government bailout of the mortgage giants this month by charging that he takes advice from Fannie Mae’s former chief executive, Franklin Raines, an assertion both Mr. Raines and the Obama campaign dispute.
Incensed by the advertisements, several current and former executives of the companies came forward to discuss the role that Rick Davis, Mr. McCain’s campaign manager and longtime adviser, played in helping Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac beat back regulatory challenges when he served as president of their advocacy group, the Homeownership Alliance, formed in the summer of 2000. Some who came forward were Democrats, but Republicans, speaking on the condition of anonymity, confirmed their descriptions."
Posted by: caliguy55 | Sep 22, 2008 5:13:18 PM
Fifty years ago the speed of buy, sell, speculate wasn't nearly the pace that the speed-of-light internet has given us. While it's unreasonable to say unplug it, it's reasonable to put in controls to slow it down, to stop the frenzied cycles, to place buyers into a position that investments aren't a one day whim and profits had by encouraging them are removed. In other words...take the conflict of interest and profiteering out of wall street.
Posted by: Rick_VT | Sep 22, 2008 8:58:51 PM
In "SHORT"we need the"UPTICK RULE"returned........
Posted by: AL | Sep 22, 2008 9:55:35 PM
SEC appears SICK in my opinion.
Posted by: snothanky | Sep 23, 2008 10:33:56 AM
Putting former Congressman Chris Cox, and such people like Diego Ruiz, from Orange County CA (AKA "ORANGE CURTAIN") at the helm of the SEC, just blows the mind!!!!!
Guess everyone forgot about the Orange County Bankrupcy and all the corruption there
An affluent County, where white collar crime has been effectively decriminalized, and Racketeer Influenced Organizations found a safe harbor
Posted by: POWMIA | Sep 29, 2008 6:16:11 PM
Post a comment