Political Punch

George Ortiz

Well! ABC "News" report on the "The Path to 9/11" (AKA:"The Path to Winning in November")is not suprising considering their desperate attempt to defend the obvious fact that the "docudrama" is aimed at supporting the republicans and bush while slamming the Democrats and Clinton. It is obvious that ABC and apparently ABC News is another voice for Rove, the RNC, and the ultra right. Why don't you just change your name to FOX2 and FOX News2 and get it over with.
George You’re a idiot and by the way your spelling is atrocious may be your liberal university or most likely you are a high school drop out and living on welfare , any way ABC is nothing like Fox and as far to the left you are you don’t even see that ABC puts blame (as the commission did) on BOTH administrations not jus Clintons but then again we were attacked 3 times during the Clinton administration weren’t we.
My statement is fact not liberal hack

Ron

I say once a terrorist always a Terrorist!! Romney did the right thing Khatami's needs none of our protection he should never been allowed in the country.

Ron

I think abc should be proud of its news story.As a mom of two soliders in irag i am thankful for abcnews.I miss peter jennings, but charlie is great.looking forward to your program about 911.

9/11 Project

Have been a ABC View all my life your newproject to air this week will be the last time i ever look at abc again..I am gona go to CBS starting with you air date. your disregard for the fact is nothing short of treason
Respectfully
George

Well! ABC "News" report on the "The Path to 9/11" (AKA:"The Path to Winning in November")is not suprising considering their desperate attempt to defend the obvious fact that the "docudrama" is aimed at supporting the republicans and bush while slamming the Democrats and Clinton. It is obvious that ABC and apparently ABC News is another voice for Rove, the RNC, and the ultra right. Why don't you just change your name to FOX2 and FOX News2 and get it over with.

Wlcome back, Jake! Three quick comments on today's entries:

Concerning Ms. Harris--As I understand it, she ran a very inept campaign which saw many hard-working staffers quit in frustration due to her micromanagement and muddled message. This overly-mascara'ed beauty school dropout deserves to lose if she can't even get her act together before taking it on the road.

Concerning Mr. Siegel--hoist by his own petard!

Concerning Gov. Romney--Wouldn't it be ironic if, God forbid, something actually HAPPENED to former President Khatami? Who is Romney to deny services to former foreign heads of state? Is Romney's presidential fever clouding his judgment?

LOL busted! But at least Siegel had the sense to adopt a pseudonym. Olbermann flamed his detractors under his own moniker. In so doing, in Olbermann's defense, at least he wasn't a coward or a fraud. This Siegel guy sounds like a real drip.

I'm torn on the Romney issue. I believe Romney is a person of integrity, and I generally respect his actions even if I disagree with them. Here, he has a point in that the former Iranian president supported terrorism. State sponsored terrorism. Axis of evil, founding member. However, Harvard has a good counterpoint: his visit will facilitate an exchange of ideas and promote dialogue. But if you accept Harvard's argument, where do you draw the line? What if they asked the leader of Hamas to speak? Is there anything to gain by exchanging ideas with some one who advocates killing innocent women and children? I think not.