RECENT POSTS
- Today’s Qs for O’s WH – 11/30/09
- President Obama Gave the Orders for the New Afghanistan Strategy
- Where was the East Wing?
- Chelsea Clinton Engaged
- Facing Bad Poll Numbers on Health Care, White House Asks "Who Do You Trust?"
- The West Point Speech
- The Presidential Planner
- White House: Iran Continuing to Isolate Itself
- Obamas Catch A College Basketball Game
- Lobbyists Furiously Lobby White House to Preserve Lobbyist Power
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
The Great Leap Backward
January 12, 2007 6:03 PM
NITYA VENKATARAMAN WRITES:
So Boxer played the "family" card (which most single women will readily admit is really the "single" card and hard enough to hear at dinner parties and awkward family gatherings, let alone during congressional testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee defending the unpopular decision-making of a boss whose approval ratings are tanking).
People reacted. Strongly. Scrutinizing the Secretary of State's every eye twitch to see if California Senator had struck a nerve.
Everyone had a punny headline.
(Rush Limbaugh said ovaries.)
Boxer stood by her words.
Condi thought single women had come farther than that.
And, not to be outpunned by the media, Tony Snow told Fox News that Boxer's "jabs" were a "great leap backward for feminism".
It must be the season of great leaps backward in Washington because this past December another powerful woman -- one a little closer to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue -- also side-swiped Condi's single status.
ABC News White House producer Karen Travers reported that during the President and First Lady's annual interview with People Magazine Laura Bush referenced Secretary Rice in a conversation about a female candidate for president and noted that while she would be a "really good candidate", Rice is not interested.
"Probably because she is single, her parents are no longer living, she's an only child. You need a very supportive family and supportive friends to have this job," the First Lady said.
(Ouch. No family AND no friends. Obviously.)
Is Betty Friedan turning in her grave yet?
-- Nitya Venkataraman
January 12, 2007 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (2)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
*Now* the republicans are defending feminism? Their feigned outrage is laughable.
Posted by: Cat | Jan 13, 2007 1:40:03 PM
Et tu, Laura? Sometimes the unkindest cuts of all are delivered by close "friends" such as Mrs. Bush.
Posted by: chuck | Jan 12, 2007 9:28:12 PM
Post a comment


