Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

Romney self-funding more than Forbes?

October 10, 2007 8:54 PM

Yep. Read all about it HERE.

-- jpt

October 10, 2007 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (3)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Doesn't it say something about a candidate's lack of support if he has to fund his own campaign? Well, at least he'll be beholden to no group or individual, save himself, and God save us all!

Posted by: chuck | Oct 17, 2007 8:35:12 AM

tsk, tsk, tsk ahh the irony

Perot or Bloomberg two libs acting as moderates!

So by attacking Bush because he may have taken contributions from Enron, which was not against the law but yet a turn the back on Clinton taking donation from Convict on the Run Hsu, the PLO, China (for which Clinton gave rocket technology), North Korea, the PR Terrorist organization (for which Bill pardoned Cop killers)

How come President Bush has the most enviroment friendly home, and actualy had enviroment friendly thing add to the Whitehouse, but yet the Libs own 9 mansions each, fly their private jet and tell everyone else to cut down.

Oh by the way Hilary is self funding also, how come no blog on that? How come no blog on Obamas religion and Church but their was one on Romney.

Who cares if he is self funding?

Posted by: spock | Oct 11, 2007 10:01:28 AM

Specter was alarmed when Forbes tried to buy the election? LOL. Specter, dude, been there, done that, own the t-shirt. The buyer was Enron, and the seller was the guy we call prez. I'd take a self-financed Perot or Bloomberg over the likes of energy-financed Bush any day. At least Perot and Bloomberg earned their fortune the hard way.

Posted by: cordelia525 | Oct 10, 2007 10:00:10 PM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS