Political Punch

mockingbird - what i bring up and jake is true and factual.

I noticed Libs ignore facts and the truth to further their agenda. When someone like Jake brings up facts it is not attacking it is bringing up the truth. Get one straight this is a blog.

I give facts about Clinton, no hype, you libs generalize about Pres. Bush with no facts.

You talk about Iraq saying we are involved in a so called civil war, when it is not a civil war, but yet pat the Clintons on the back for getting us involved in a true civil war.

you ignore the at a minimum 800000 dead in Rwanda under Clinton which could of been resolve if he did not back away from supporting the Canadian general there. Who asked for supplies and possible air support, and Clinton went against it at the UN.

The Blood is on her shoulders. And before you libs attack this statement look it up!

I think you're embellishing her claim.

Hillary said, ""What I did during those eight years...was to try to be the face of American policy in a lot of different places."

Albright said, "Hillary Clinton represented American interests and values during her visits to more than 80 countries and her meetings with presidents, prime ministers and leaders of civil society."

The only contradiction I see is a semantic one. This will cause serious concern only for those who already hate her.

I think Iowans have HC figured out.

Ah, spock, what's new with rightwinger repub diatribes (read that lies) against Hillary Clinton. Or for any democrat for that matter. Trying to protect your "values and traditions"?

Boy, that's a fair question, Jake: "Or does her unique status mean she can claim the good stuff and not the bad stuff?" Kind of suggests the answer, huh?

Anyway, you've provided the context for Clinton's quote, and then challenged her only after stripping that context.

Clinton said that, while her husband was in office she would "TRY TO BE the face of American policy in a lot of different places."

She did NOT say that she was making policy, nor that she was regularly at the negotiating table (save for Ireland), as your post suggests she was saying. In fact, Madeline Albright seems to have said in about 500 words exactly what Clinton said in about a dozen.

For matters concerning which Clinton deserves criticism, there is plenty of meat on bone. This, however, is a fabricated non-issue.

You're so desperately anti-Clinton, day after day....strangely obvious, too.

I think that's a fair criticism, but owning the bad with the good isn't particularly damning. The Clinton Administration DID intervene successfully in Bosnia. No, the Clinton administration wasn't succesful in brokering peace in the mideast, but the administration isn't regarded as a failure in that regard; after all, the Clinton Administration arguably came closer to the goal of peace than its predecessors and successor. Rwanda, maybe, is an albatross. I don't see anyone but pundits (read: YOU) raising this as an issue for Clinton.

Umm, gets you to think, when she went to China, is that when the Clintons gave them Rocket technology?

There is an old saying you got yo take the Good with the Bad!

And during the Clinton times there was more bad then good, 800000 dead Rwandians, Terrorist attacks against us with no reprisal, over 4500 servicemen killed in a supposed peace time. (thats more then killed in this War)

Yes and do not forget the use of the IRS and FBI against her political enemies. The illegal collection of donations in the White house. Stealing of US property from the White house.

A healthcare plan that was diseastorus, that she is trying to bring back in small doses again.

High Taxes, out of control spending.

yes we want that again, NOT!