Political Punch

Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

When Senators attack

November 20, 2007 3:30 PM

The second sign Hillary's Iowa numbers must really be tanking?  She just went way negative on Barack Obama's experience ... And in case anyone missed it, the campaign sent it out.

Via speakerphone, Clinton assailed Obama's claim that living abroad brought him insights to the world, telling voters in Shenandoah, Iowa, "Now voters will judge whether living in a foreign country at the age of 10 prepares one to face the big, complex international challenges the next President will face. I think we need a President with more experience than that. "

And who might that be? Clinton noted she has "traveled the world on behalf of our country -- first in the White House with my husband and now as a Senator" and "met with countless world leaders and know many of them personally."

"I believe I have the right kind of experience to be the next President. With a war and a tough economy, we need a President ready on Day One to bring our troops home from Iraq and to handle all of our other tough challenges."

Smart? Accurate? Desperate? Pathetic?

You be the judge.

- jt

UPDATE: Obama spox Bill Burton reacts: "Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld have spent time in the White House and travelled to many countries as well, but along with Hillary Clinton they led us into the worst foreign policy disaster in a generation and are now giving George Bush the benefit of the doubt on Iran. The real choice in this election is between conventional Washington thinking that prizes posture and positioning, or real change that puts judgment and honesty first."

UPDATE: Now the Edwards campaign is getting into the act, issuing this statement from campaign communications director Chris Kofinis:

"mudslinging |məd sli ng i ng | (also mud-slinging)noun informal the use of insults and accusations, esp. unjust ones, with the aim of damaging the reputation of an opponent. As in: Hillary Clinton said about Barack Obama, 'Now voters will judge whether living in a foreign country at the age of 10 prepares one to face the big, complex international challenges the next president will face.'

"Now we know what Senator Clinton meant when she talked about 'throwing mud' in the last debate. Like so many other things, when it comes to mud, Hillary Clinton says one thing and throws another."

November 20, 2007 | Permalink | User Comments (16)

User Comments

If experience REALLY mattered, we would never gotten Duh-bya and Biden, Dodd, and Richardson would be top-tier right now

Posted by: phillygirl64 | Nov 26, 2007 4:12:37 PM

It's interesting that people are so unwilling to challenge Obama...what's up? It's o.k. to say nasty, negative things about Hillary but not Obama...I personally think she's right about the experience...I also think she will turn things around more quickly than Obama can...he is a newbie in Congress...she knows the players...I like that.

Posted by: Barb | Nov 21, 2007 10:05:39 PM

Well, she can't play the victim any more, can she? Of course she can, in her mind. Just wait--in the coming days and weeks, she will spin this sarcastic attack without substance as 'high road' politics--just talking about the issues, you know. When she is called on it, as she will be--alot--with good reason--she will cry 'foul' and 'piling on' again. Hillary-corp believes that when they attack, it's just constructive campaigning, and when anyone questions her, it's an attack. Bill's charm allowed him to get away with that tactic for years. But Hillary is not charming. She should stick to being nice in public, and her normal mean, manipulative, cynical self in private. She will lose if her secret beliefs and personality traits come out into the open. I am amazed that her handlers let her try this Obama attack---even as a typical Clinton ploy to start a fight, then whine about all the violence.

Posted by: SteveW | Nov 21, 2007 3:35:11 PM

"If Bush thinks he can play games with the election..." President Bush was just giving his opinion. Now obviously those who don't like President Bush will believe everything he says has an ulterior motive. The irony is many of these same people believe him to be an idiot and incompetent yet consider him genius enough to come up with ulterior motives.

Regardless of who the nominees are for either party, the general election will be basically won or lost on the issues. Personality and character might count for 10-15%. But the true test will be whether or not the people of the United States want socialized universal health care, higher taxes and a foreign policy based on either a pre- or post-9/11 mindset.

Posted by: James Danley | Nov 21, 2007 11:19:08 AM

All the political BS aside. Americans want change and only Obama is going to provide change. Hillary is just more of the same old Washington crowd.

Posted by: Mike | Nov 21, 2007 10:54:32 AM

Growing up in any country is FAR different than living in a different one as an adult. Spending his first ten years in a foreign country does NOT mean that he understands the culture or politics of that country. Ask any ten-year-old in this country about our political system, and you'll get a blank stare. Obama is a very smart guy, but he and Edwards and others have been trying to trash Hillary for a long time now. It's about time she fought back. Hillary is every bit as smart as all the other candidates. If Bush thinks he can play games with the election by saying that Hillary will lose to the repulican candidate in order to try to get people to vote for someone else in the primaries, he is sadly mistaken. Her numbers are far better than any of the republicans', and she'd have to do something incredibly stupid for that to change.

Posted by: Bob | Nov 21, 2007 10:18:28 AM

"Meeting is one thing, negotiating is another." Absolutely!

That's why only one person stands out as the most qualified to be our next president. Regardless of your ideology, you have to admit that none of the Democrats or Republicans currently in the race are better qualified than Dr. Condoleezza Rice. I understand Dr. Rice's decision to not run for president. But should none of the Republican candidates garner the majority of delegates for the Republican Party nomination, the delegates should band together and draft Dr. Rice.

Posted by: James Danley | Nov 21, 2007 9:43:35 AM

How can Hilary become so pathetic this early for goodness sake!

This woman may end up losing this thing.

Posted by: titiberg | Nov 21, 2007 6:19:03 AM

Clinton is doing exactly what she condemmed few days back.I feel for her cos I never expected her to drift so badly under little pressure.

President confirmed my earlier fears by endorsing her technically because the GOPS knows quite well that Senator Clinton is a loser.They definately prefer her to Senator Obama for theier selfish reasons.But Americans knows better.Obama is the best and the best cannot be compromise in the alter of race,gender or fustration by a former first lady.Go Obama,Go.

Posted by: Eronss | Nov 21, 2007 4:43:10 AM

I don't recall Hillary doing much negotiating with the foreign dignitaries whom she has personally met as the spouse of the President. Meeting is one thing, negotiating is another. I would think she probably has more experience with the spouse's of those dignitaries than the dignitaries themselves. I tend to have more trust in one who traveled to Russia along with one of the Republican's best, Dick Lugar, to negotiate the re-writing of the nuclear non-proliferation act. None other than Barack Obama who has co-chaired the Senate Foreign Relations Committee alongside Mr. Lugar, a man respected on both sides of the aisle. I prefer to have Mr. Obama and his wisdom and intelligence sitting at the table, rather than the one who was concerned with which place setting should be on that table, for eight years. As far as growing up in a country such as Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim country, has to be a vast learning experience,and a window on understanding their traits, habits, and language, especially when negotiating with those who have been designated by GW, (who has yet to understand the English language), as the "axis of evil." I'll take Mr. Obama's 10 years of legislative experience any day over that of the housewife and Senator of 6 years.

Posted by: gc | Nov 21, 2007 1:10:25 AM

All the libs have no experience and always through mud, just Hilary was better at hiding who it came from.

Posted by: spock | Nov 20, 2007 10:34:18 PM

She traveled the world and knows all these people - yet couldn’t figure out that going into Iraq was a bad idea…

…experience or judgment? I will always take Obama's judgment over her Washington experience.

Posted by: Grace | Nov 20, 2007 4:58:43 PM

Hillary may be on thin ice with this approach. She has to present her experience as superior to Barack’s, which has been made more difficult by the absence of the White House records for Bill’s terms. Her Iraq war vote and subsequent support and positions with Bush cause further problems with the experience argument.

If Hillary struggles with what is considered her best calling card, it does not presage a good December for her. In addition, when one begins to factor her negative ratings, you could say that her campaign team will have their hands full.


Posted by: J Cohen | Nov 20, 2007 4:43:15 PM

She is lagging in the poll now she abandon her position to be above the political bickering...i believe that internal polling must have tell her that she is in trouble.

Posted by: Stan | Nov 20, 2007 4:39:33 PM

Apparently Hillary does not realize what a life-changing and shaping experience living in a foreign country is. Makes me less likely to trust her on foreign affairs. She may know what the political elite want, but what about the people of the nations? Hillary will be thinking about Iraq's politicians when she makes decisions, not its people.

Posted by: Ben | Nov 20, 2007 4:39:01 PM

Traveling to a country and staying in "special" quarters or hotels does not the experience make as Hillary would like us to think. As one who lives, eats, shops, interacts with others of that country -- 20 years after my first trip to England my daughter studied there -- that trip I stayed for three weeks at B&Bs, small hotels and countryside guest houses and shopped, cooked, etc lived with the people -- no comparison to staying in a hotel and getting my meals brought to me. And that was for a short time -- the experience of living abroad is something all of our children should have -- the perspective one gains along with the wisdom there is no comparison.

Posted by: Paulet | Nov 20, 2007 4:15:05 PM

Post a comment