RECENT POSTS
- Oprah, Health Care Lobbyists, Among Recent Visitors to White House
- An Obama Thanksgiving Menu, with an Extra Serving of Pie
- White House Thanksgiving Traditions: Broken and Observed
- Obama, GOP Air Differences Over Jobs, Economy In Thanksgiving Addresses
- White House State Dinner Party Crashers
- Obama to Lay Out Emissions Goals in Copenhagen
- Free Bird
- The "Good" War
- The Presidential Planner
- Under the Stars, Obama Toasts India’s Prime Minister
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Is It Sexist to Discuss Hillary’s Wrinkles?
December 19, 2007 10:30 AM
Prompted by an unflattering photo of the 61-year-old senator that appeared on Drudge, commentators are discussing not only how Sen. Hillary Clinton looks in that shot (you can view it HERE), but whether the discussion is sexist or appropriate at all.
Rush Limbaugh started much of this conversation, saying “Americans are addicted to physical perfection, thanks to Hollywood and thanks to television. …There is this thing in this country that, as you age -- and this is particularly, you know, women are hardest hit on this, and particularly in Hollywood -- America loses interest in you, and we know this is true because we constantly hear from aging actresses, who lament that they can't get decent roles anymore, other than in supporting roles that will not lead to any direct impact, yay or nay, in the box office.”
Noting that “the presidency ages the occupants of that office rapidly," Limbaugh asked, "Will Americans want to watch a woman get older before their eyes on a daily basis? And that woman, by the way, is not going to want to look like she's getting older, because it will impact poll numbers. It will impact perceptions.”
Maureen Dowd discussed this in her New York Times column today as well, calling it “Hillary’s latest hurdle: the Old Hag routine.”
Said Dowd: “When men want to put down a powerful woman in a sexist way, they will say she’s a hag or a nag or a witch or angry or hysterical…. some conservative pundits who disagree with a woman on matters of policy jump straight into an attack on the woman’s looks or personal life….
“Women are still scrutinized more critically on their looks, which seem to fluctuate more on camera, depending on lighting, bloating and wardrobe.”
On the CBS Early Show, Meg Oliver referred to this as a “question of sexism in politics.”
MSNBC’s David Shuster referred to “some rumblings that certainly the stuff on the Drudge Report and the stuff that Rush Limbaugh's been saying, is totally over the line, is sort of generating some sympathy” for Clinton.
On The View, Barbara Walters noted that “ there was a woman named Margaret Thatcher -- remember her? -- British prime minister? Came in at 53, left at 65. Golda Meir? I mean, hardly a sex symbol -- took office at 71, left at 76, came back again, and then Indira Gandhi, how she took office at 48, left at 59, took office again at 62.”
Clinton in person looks loads better than that photograph, but Limbaugh's point seemed to me to be that this is a sexist culture that judges women more harshly on their looks as they age, and he wondered how that would impact Clinton's run. Honestly it hadn't occurred to me until now…
What do you think?
-- jpt
December 19, 2007 in 2008: Democrats | Permalink | Share | User Comments (25)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
For Barbara Walters to compare Hillary with the other world leaders is a stretch. Margret Thatcher, Golda Meir, Indira Gandhi, they were all real leaders with good leadership qualitites. Hillary Clinton does not make that cut. Hillary is just the wife of a president, who is a wannabe. She hasn't really lead any group, or stood for a cause or anything. Just because her husband was a president and she has some ambitions, one can not put her on the same scale with the other world women leaders. Look at Benazir Bhutto. She is willing to risk her life and go in the middle of the dangerous country in public and campaign. Do you think Hillary would be willing to do that? No way. Hillary will ask a surrogate to do the dirty work and stand back take a poll. There is a wimp factor associated with Hillary, that the other women world leaders don't have. Hillary can't even give an yes or no answer to a question. The other women leaders will argue with any leader for hours and make their point. Not Hillary. She wll cry to Bill, and Bill will wag the finger for Hillary.
Posted by: Mary Jane | Dec 19, 2007 12:23:17 PM
You have to be really stupid to listen to whatever Rush Limbaugh has to say.
Posted by: JL | Dec 19, 2007 11:23:03 AM
Rush has said some stupid stuff before but this takes the cake...we don't want to see a woman age? You know who I don't want to see (or hear) anymore? RUSH
Posted by: phillygirl64 | Dec 19, 2007 11:21:54 AM
I was pleasantly surprised to see ABC not take Rush's point out of context. I think Drudge was actually trying to help Clinton with that picture.
Posted by: tanmany2k | Dec 19, 2007 11:08:32 AM
I think that conservative pundits will jump on anything in an attempt to convince people not to vote for Hillary. Any comments on her looks will be sexist unless the person making them is also commenting on the looks of her opponents in the same way. I'm not convinced this is actually Hillary, though. While it looks a good deal like her, what proof do we have that this is not a look-alike?
Posted by: Bob | Dec 19, 2007 10:59:25 AM
Post a comment
