RECENT POSTS
- Obama to Lay Out Emissions Goals in Copenhagen
- Free Bird
- The "Good" War
- The Presidential Planner
- Under the Stars, Obama Toasts India’s Prime Minister
- White House State Dinner – Who Made the Exclusive Guest List?
- Admiral Mike Mullen To Geneva for START Talks
- VP Biden to Indian Prime Minister: “You’re the Hottest Ticket in Town”
- FLOTUS on the State Dinner: Like a Swan, "Calm and Serene Above Water, But We're Paddling Like Mad, Going Crazy Underneath"
- White House State Dinner: The Menu, Entertainment, and Decor
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Pulling the Ads
December 31, 2007 8:26 PM
An odd turn of events today on the Huckabus.
Read about it HERE or watch our World News video HERE
And Happy New Year!
best
jake
December 31, 2007 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (3)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
He didn't pull the ads!!
He said that he won't attack Mitt, but if I would attack him, I would call him these nasty names....
Funny, for not showing it, a lot of people sure have seen this personal (not policy) attack ad by the Huckster...Mitt never attacked the person, only pointed out differences. Huck ends this commercial with him personally attacking Mitt's person.
Huck is a scumbag (I never promised that I would refrain from such truthtelling).
I have met with both men in person as part of my employment here in Seattle, and was able to speak at length with both of them. WOW what a difference!! Mitt has a positive vision for the future of America. he is brilliant, well-educated and a role model for families everywhere.
Huck, on the other hand is funny. He has lots of one-liners. So does my uncle Lee, and a thousand other people's funny relatives or entertaining ministers.
Huck has learned how to silkily talk without saying anything of substance.
Huck would be my vote for jester-in-chief. Not commander in chief.
We are not in the 1990s. WE are in perilous times and need more than a comedian.
Huck is not presidential.
Posted by: BigRob | Jan 1, 2008 8:29:59 PM
Jake, I think the video part of the blog is really nice. Please have more if you could. Thanks!
Posted by: Ken | Jan 1, 2008 1:46:34 PM
The text version is a bit confusing..I try to stay away from the Vid stuff because 3-minutes takes 40-minutes to review..Yet..the last paragraph(split in two)seems to suggest that Mitt Rommney is a law breaker..or that New England has law breaking associations..(that's difficult)..The Tri-State area has many "twists" in its stories.I'm sure that Arkansas is not far from the same acts..I doubt that Mike Huckabee can distance himself from the pandering political acts that are quite "smelly"..In Purpose..I think Mitt Rommney is a good choice for a President because of his character..I would choose him over Mike Huckabee because of the "futuristic" moves available in the USA..leaving Mike Huckabee as that Salvation candidate(alone)this would offer very little against the "materialistic" world thats there(the)un-movable object..attacks against John McCain show very little conscience..John McCain holds that he's like a career politician..Yet..his sentiment lies 100% w/the Constitution..America is his constituent..between the two Governor's/??/there seems that perspective about looking at the USA from "way back there"..and the concensus offers "crimminal" acts..if something did "bubble" to the surface..or they actually shot of WARNING FLAIRS..??..I personally havn't seem alot of problems in the MIX of political jobs..Offices..its the give-a-away platforms that excist(and I don't mean PORK)..I wonder about these two politicians and the truth about success..Education and main-stay..Values and trust..and find John McCain the bottom line on this one.
Posted by: Mark S. M. | Jan 1, 2008 5:26:06 AM
Post a comment


