Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior National Correspondent Jake Tapper
Jake Tapper is ABC News' Senior National Correspondent based in the network's Washington bureau. He writes about politics and popular culture and covers a range of national stories.
RECENT POSTS
- A Different Member of the Keating 5 Introduces the Boss at Obama Rally
- An Adorable Maverick
- Obama on Attacking Keating Attacks on McCain: ‘We Don't Throw the First Punch, But We'll Throw the Last’
- McCain: Obama Called Subprime Loans a ‘Good Idea’
- LA NOW Prez on Palin: 'America, This is What a Feminist Looks Like'
- As Dow Plummets, McCain Campaign Highlights Palin's Attacking Obama on Ayers
- Palin Questions McCain Decision to Not Hit Obama on Wright
- Obama to Attack McCain on Role in "Keating 5" Scandal, Despite Previous Statement it isn't "Germane"
- At the Foothills of the Smokey Mountains, Obama Assails McCain Attacks
- RNC to Demand FEC Audit of Obama Campaign
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« I see dead people | Main | False Pushback from Clinton Allies »
Jesse Not Upset at Bubba Slam
January 28, 2008 12:21 PM
Over at the New York Times, our friend Kit Seelye checks in with Rev. Jesse Jackson to see what he made of the comments of former President Bill Clinton, in which he compared Sen. Barack Obama's South Carolina victory not to John Edwards' in 2004, Al Gore in 2000, or even himself in 1992, but to Jackson in 1984 and 1988.
Not surprisingly, perhaps, Jackson was not offended. (Read more HERE)
"I don't read anything negative into Clinton's observation," Jackson said.
He said he spoke with Obama on Saturday. "He told me what Bill had said. And I said to Barack, as a tactical matter, resist any temptation to come down to that level. There may be temptations, especially when the media keeps saying 'Barack is black,' and they never said 'Dukakis is white' or 'Hillary is white.' Bill has done so much for race relations and inclusion, I would tend not to read a negative scenario into his comments."
It would seem to me that in order to consider a comparison of Obama with Jackson as an insult, you would have to think of "Jesse Jackson" as a pejorative.
Why would anyone expect Jesse Jackson to consider "Jesse Jackson" as pejorative?
- jpt
January 28, 2008 in 2008: Democrats | Permalink | User Comments (11)
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/433071/25555848
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Jesse Not Upset at Bubba Slam:
I become frustrated and disenchanted that yet another election is being spun (out of control at times) by media outlets and other pundits causing us all to fall dizzily into the haze that is the blaming, finger-pointing, he said-she said, black-white, buzz word filled popularity contest that seems to be ruining our democratic process. Remember when someone's political platform and political beliefs used to be what people focused and voted on? Yeah, me neither.
Posted by: Natalie | Jan 29, 2008 4:57:49 PM
oh and btw, the hypothesis that Clinton's remarks and stategy was intended to ghetto-ize was made by Dick Morris (and of course all of MSM quickly bought into in and turned it into the meme du jour). But I think the popularity of the meme says more about Dick Morris and main stream media than it does about the Clintons, whom as Jesse Jackson indicated have a long history of supporting civil rights.
Posted by: cordelia525 | Jan 29, 2008 10:40:40 AM
I'm white and I'm not offended. What about taking notice of the statistical fact that women were instrumental in propelling Clinton to a win in NH? Does that make me sexist? Is it not a statistical fact that blacks helped Jesse Jackson win a few primaries and that a majority of blacks voted for Obama in SC? Are we so uptight that we can't take notice of neutral statistical facts?
Posted by: cordelia525 | Jan 29, 2008 10:36:06 AM
How is it a "slam" if Jesse himself isn't upset?
Posted by: God Help Us | Jan 29, 2008 10:06:29 AM
What do Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and Barak Obama have in common? Thy are all lawyers. What is the most mistrusted and hated profession in this country (besides politicians)? Right again---lawyers. They are experts on oration, lying, playing on emotions, and manipulation.
Posted by: Ron Powell | Jan 29, 2008 12:13:21 AM
hey geevill, it's not really a valid comparison, because in 1988 South Carolina had a caucus in which only about 10 percent of the population of the state participated. In 2008, it was a vote, which, obviously is a better gauge for what South Carolinians are feeling. Also, Jesse Jackson only won 9% of the White vote, Barack 25%
Posted by: pshine | Jan 28, 2008 11:50:11 PM
HEE.you low level headed GEEVILL get some commonsense in your head ,why didn't Bill Clinton compared his won in S.C IN 1992 with OBAMA'S VICTORY IN S.C THAN to compare it with that of JESSE JACKSON. IT IS such a shameful comment made by a person like BILL CLINTON,i think he has had his time and is over now for him to shut up.period.let hillary fights for her own nomination.
Posted by: zoe | Jan 28, 2008 7:53:07 PM
Saint Obama’s good buddy Rezko was arrested today. Yet that story is going to be buried…just like the story about Obama’s chief advisor blaming Clinton for Bhutto’s death, his South Carolina chair playing the race card by claiming she didn’t cry for Katrina victims, the Obama campaign releasing a memo claiming the Clintons were racist, Obama comparing Bill to Richard Nixon, and the fact that Obama lost among white voters in Michigan, Nevada, South Carolina and is losing among them nationally.
All we’ll hear is more stuff about how Hillary is being divisive. Media bias against Hillary is obvious and sickening. Thank you Senator Obama for blowing apart the Democratic party for your own personal ambition. If this is what he calls hope and unity, I don’t want any part of it!
Posted by: David | Jan 28, 2008 6:22:05 PM
It was a lame insinuation by Bill Clinton to discount Obama's thorough rout of Hillary in SC. A trademark Bill Clinton slap. Even more pathetic, Hillary didn't even win the white vote, Edwards did.
Posted by: Cheryl | Jan 28, 2008 4:18:53 PM
In his campaigning, I think Sen. Obama would do well to follow Rev. Jackson's advice: " resist any temptation to come down to that level." He needs to remember that one cannot throw mud without getting some on oneself.
Posted by: chuck | Jan 28, 2008 2:39:48 PM
Jesse Jackson won with 55% in 1988. it is a valid comparison. The voters were voting based on race pure and simple. In 1988 and in 2008.
Posted by: geevill | Jan 28, 2008 2:20:50 PM
Post a comment