Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

Kathleen Willey Warns Obama About Clintons

January 30, 2008 3:41 PM

In an open letter to Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, on the conservative website WorldNetDaily, self-described Clinton victim Kathleen Willey warns him to no be naïve….to watch out …and to get a shredder…among other advice.

Among the unusual warnings she issues, she tells Obama to beware of "the Clintons' secret private-investigator army, which no doubt has already been deployed to counter the threat that you present. I know that army's tactics well. They have threatened my children and my friend's children. They've threatened and killed my pets. They've vandalized my car. They've entered my home and stolen my book manuscript."

Well!

-- jpt

January 30, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (46)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Oh come on! let's keep on rewarding the clintons..they keep us entertained. hollywood loves them and we love sleeeze entertainment. why not hillary?

Posted by: crazyone | Jan 31, 2008 11:37:35 AM

I put nothing past the Clintons - they are as dirty as they come. As far as one posts asking "could Ms. Wiley have an ax to grind" I would say hell yes she does - and rightfully so. What the Clintons and their "army" have done to her is simply awful. The sad thing is there are many more Ms. Wiley's out-there that have suffered the same or worse. I have several friends who used to work "security" details for Clinton when he was governor of Arkansas - they said that he had women in nearly every town - and they paid-off and "bought" (threatened) many of them. What scumbags they are

Posted by: Mike | Jan 31, 2008 11:17:31 AM

The comment above that the Clintons are "both are left leaning, big government in your face, liberals," sounds like a line from the political entertainer/demagogue Rush Limabugh. I am no fan of the Clintons; I do NOT support Hillary. But if you want to talk about big government getting in your face, take a look at what has happened under the Bush regime, with all the rollbacks of our civil liberties, spying on Americans without court approval, suspension of habeas corpus, etc. Bush has transformed this country into the very sort of police-state nation that the terrorists want it to be. He has used the very real terrorist threat as a pretext for destroying Constitutional protections and claiming for himself the powers of a tyrant.

Posted by: Neal Lawrence | Jan 31, 2008 11:01:30 AM

The Clintons want power so bad, and that is the exact reason why they shouldn't have it. Who would spend millions and destroy other people for a job that pays $400,000/year?

These people are blood sucking parasites, and have been sucking since the early 70s.

RETIRE ALREADY!

Posted by: blanket | Jan 31, 2008 10:51:52 AM

They both are left leaning, big government in your face, liberals. If either gets into the white house better build a bunker under your house, or locate the nearest civil defense facility - neither has enough on the ball to put a foreign policy into place that is worth a dime.
And what about those "Green Collar" jobs she touts in order to enhance the economy - while Bill indicates austerity is better than "Global Warming". There's a new twist on politicians talking out of both sides of their mouths.

Posted by: Jim | Jan 31, 2008 10:33:00 AM

Interestingly true

See the modern day dems are so blinded to there Socialist Candidates that the candidates get away with murder!

Obama uses the race card evertime someone says something about his credentials (yes thru his minions), The Clintons use intimidation against anything bad against them. Just ask ABC when they wanted to do the miniseries.

Hilary forced them to take out parts that made them look bad like when Albright hung the phone up on the CIA when Bin Laden was in there sites!!

If Obama is really for the Black man why was he in cohoots with Rezko the Slumlord to the Blacks of Illionois. And Obama needs to answer it

Do not let these libs go on with unanswered questions.

Posted by: spock | Jan 31, 2008 10:23:10 AM

James, you sense the truth in Willey's story because of what Bill Clinton has conspicuously NOT done. This very capable lawyer has not sued, nor even threatened to sue, Willey for libel.

Posted by: Ross Odom | Jan 31, 2008 10:22:02 AM

Isn't it funny that the Clinton defenders are always quick to bad-mouth anyone who doesn't think they're the greatest show on earth -- and equally quick to believe falsified rumors about their political opponents from Obama to Willey?

That's called a double standard, folks.

Posted by: Paul in NJ | Jan 31, 2008 9:58:20 AM

Are we allowed to know the personal sexual habits of the candidate? If so, who is Hillary having sex with? It obviously isn't Bill? Who will the Secret Service be sneaking into the White House if she is President?

Posted by: Kris | Jan 31, 2008 9:55:08 AM

The Clintons are evil doers for sure. How about all of the dead people left in their wake let alone Wiley. They will do anything and say anything to get power. EVIL

Posted by: JamesM | Jan 31, 2008 9:54:15 AM

It occurred to me that the anti-Willie posts are all strangely similar. Could Slick Hilly's minions have received their talking points so quickly?

Posted by: BlueMax372 | Jan 31, 2008 9:49:28 AM

Could Ms. Willey possibly have any axe to grind with the Clintons? Could she be feeling somewhat angered that her allegations were never fully resolved? Could she be shilling for the Repubs to embarass the Clintons? Could she be writing such turgid prose to hawk a book of hers? I think the answer to all of those questions is painfully obvious.

Posted by: chuck | Jan 31, 2008 9:09:16 AM

Obama was listening to my phone calls. Thanks to the PATRIOT ACT that he signed into legislation.

Watch out for the kenyan.

Posted by: dkki | Jan 31, 2008 3:33:38 AM

Funny how anytime someone exposes Obama as a fraud, liar, fake, phony or crook your labeled a racist. OBAMA and his partner Rezko used money meant for the poor for special favors and campaign money and Obama knew it. Obama does need to be dragged into court to find out what really went on with REZKO.

Posted by: ggghfgg ggggddf | Jan 31, 2008 3:31:04 AM

HILLARY AND JACK PALLADINO'S TERROR CAMPAIGN ON KATHLEEN WILLEY (1997-98)
THE BOTTOM LINE: HILLARY IS IRRESPONSIBLE WITH POWER.

Kathleen tells what Hillary’s
Goons did to her (1997-98):

“They threatened my children. They threatened my friend’s children. They took one of my cats [Bullseye] and killed another [Blarney]. They left a skull on my porch. They told me I was in danger. They followed me. They vandalized my car. They tried to retrieve my dogs from a kennel. They hid under my deck in the middle of the night. They subjected me to a campaign of fear and intimidation, trying to silence me.”

[Kathleen Willey, Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton, p. x]

Jack Palladino says “The only regret that I have about that whole thing was that Hillary did not pay me in a timely fashion.” [Kathleen Willey, Target, p. 212]

Posted by: Robert Morrow | Jan 31, 2008 2:02:13 AM

Be afraid America...be very afraid of the Clintons.

As far as there being so many negative posts on the Clintons...there are many reasons why and so many negative things for us to voice our opinions on.

If the blogs and news come out negative, it's because it is truthful.

Posted by: Texan for Obama | Jan 30, 2008 9:53:06 PM

If any one has seen Willey on tv with Sean hannity, you would realize she is a nut job. She is just trying to sell her new book, which most of America is using as toilet paper!! Kathleen your 5 mins. of fame are over!!

Posted by: S. Arabia | Jan 30, 2008 6:46:51 PM

Allison H - If you can use a computer to post to blogs, it's just as easy to use it to visit the candidate's websites to read their position papers.

The press isn't going to be able to do that in 30-second sound bites.

Posted by: sue | Jan 30, 2008 5:53:43 PM

Big news!! Anything lately from Gennifer Flowers!?!?!?!

Posted by: DKNY | Jan 30, 2008 5:13:45 PM

So, someone trying to sell a book is trashing the Clintons...whoppee. So what else is new? Unless you personally know this woman and know that she doesn't have an axe to grind, or isn't trying to make money with publicity, I would take her proclamations with a grain of salt. I agree with the previous poster who wondered why ABC is broadcasting this story.

Posted by: evenhanded | Jan 30, 2008 5:11:47 PM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS