Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

Obama Was THE Most Liberal Senator Last Year?

January 31, 2008 1:37 PM

In the National Journal's annual ratings of senators' standings on the political prism you have to hang a Left before you find Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois.

Pass Barbara Boxer...Ted Kennedy...keep going.

Pass Sheldon Whitehouse....Robert Menendez...

Keep going....

Oh, look, here's Bernie Sanders of Vermont, a self-described socialist...

Keep going.

Ah, at the waaaaaaay end. 

Senator Obama, good to see you sir.

"The insurgent presidential candidate shifted further to the left last year in the run-up to the primaries, after ranking as the 16th- and 10th-most-liberal during his first two years in the Senate," the National Journal writes. "Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., the other front-runner in the Democratic presidential race, also shifted to the left last year. She ranked as the 16th-most-liberal senator in the 2007 ratings, a computer-assisted analysis that used 99 key Senate votes, selected by NJ reporters and editors, to place every senator on a liberal-to-conservative scale in each of three issue categories. In 2006, Clinton was the 32nd-most-liberal senator. " 

Read more HERE.

-- jpt

UPDATE: The Obama campaign has some major pushback on this that is worth reading, it calls into serious question these rankings. Check it out HERE.

January 31, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (33)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I cannot believe that the press and those same old politicians whom we have been advised by Obama's need to change are the ones supporting him. Also I cannot believe that Obama does not even bring up the issues or tell us how he will fix the problems. I can tell you after being a democrate for 55 years if he gets the nomination I will for the 1ST time in my life vote republican.

Posted by: Tony | Jan 31, 2008 3:56:31 PM

It’s because Obama is black and this is a racial country that Obama has any big lead over Hillary in a few poles. It’s just a shame …

Posted by: Strong79 | Jan 31, 2008 3:49:56 PM

I'm sure this has nothing to do with the fact that a Senator in the middle of a campaign only flies back to Congress to make a public vote on crucial, close bills where his role as a loyal party foot-soldier is called for.

Posted by: Tyro | Jan 31, 2008 3:39:10 PM

Ummm, why is THIS news??? Isn't the whole idea of being a Democrat is to be Liberal? Wouldn't Dems be happy he is a liberal? You make it sound bad.

What gives?

Jake, you are taking a Republican pejorative and turning it around on Democrats. This is not Fox News. Or is it?

Posted by: dionysus | Jan 31, 2008 3:38:21 PM

Hey jake, thanks for the creative "left vs. right" angle. I would nevery have known that the complicated and diverse American political system couldbe boiled down into a simpleminded dichotomy if I didn't have you and the National Journal.

Posted by: drfranklives | Jan 31, 2008 3:28:38 PM

I suppose there are far worst things in life than being a liberal senator. Such as being George Bush - THE worst president in U.S. History.

Posted by: hamishdad | Jan 31, 2008 3:16:49 PM

Being on the liberal edge of our Congress does not mean you are particularly liberal. It means that you ar on the liberal edge of what is, generally, a very conservative group. Relative to the rest of the country it probably means you are marginally left of center.

Posted by: DKNY | Jan 31, 2008 3:07:45 PM

I find it laughable that Obama, who is saying to all, that he will bring change to Washington from the "politics as usual" crowd, yet is being endorsed by the oldest "politics as usual" politician...Kennedy.

Also laughable, is the New York Post has endorsed Obama. That's like getting an endorsement from the National Inquirer.

Posted by: zieras | Jan 31, 2008 3:04:46 PM

Awesome, America needs a far left liberal as USA President who also works with with Independents and Republicans (as well as Greens and Libertarians)! Go Obama, Go! Protect the environment, fight global warming, make the USA energy independent, expand Kyoto Treaty, eliminate the USA trade deficit, bring manufacturing jobs back to the USA, eliminate the federal budget deficit and reduce the national debt, make the wealthy pay their fair in taxes, end poverty in the USA, reduce coporate welfare, end tax breaks to the wealthy oil and gas companies, make corporations pay market rate royalities to the USA government when they mine or drill on USA government public lands,
reduce the political power of large for-profit corporations, end the war in Iraq, spread peace throughout the world while reducing crime in the USA, pass the Equal Right Ammendment to the USA constitution, ensure that every election vote counts, and much more!

Posted by: Gavin Young | Jan 31, 2008 3:02:05 PM

ABC News

Oh of course. The same folks who run ABC/Family and still put Pat Robertson on after "Who's Line Is It?" and who insisted on airing a documentary blaming OBL's survival on Bill.

No wonder their Senior National Correspondent is reading impaired. That's what he's paid for.

Posted by: Paul Dirks | Jan 31, 2008 2:53:56 PM

Yup. Put that up against McCain and you've got another Dufus in the whitehouse. People, use your heads.

Posted by: God Help Us | Jan 31, 2008 2:40:29 PM

The irony is that despite his liberal credentials, he's acceptable to most centrists and a surprising number of conservatives, including high-profile people like George Will, Andrew Sullivan and Peggy Noonan.

That, in a nutshell, is the amazing appeal of Obama. He cuts across party lines and ideological nonsense. I may not agree with him on every issue, but I respect his thinking and his willingness to listen to opposing views. If the Democrats pass over this amazing guy, they deserve their third straight defeat at the polls.

Posted by: Howard B. | Jan 31, 2008 2:16:31 PM

Obama missed a lot of unimportant votes that would have lowered this record, and was in senate for the important votes that increased the number. Essentially, nothing to see here.

Posted by: mark from ny | Jan 31, 2008 2:15:54 PM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS