Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper
RECENT POSTS
- Obama’s Global Reach via Movie Theaters, Bikes Messengers, Text and Mobile Networks
- Today’s Qs for Os WH – 7/15/2009
- POTUS on Health Care Reform: You'll Save Money
- Grassley Says Colleagues 'Beating a Dead Horse to Death' on Sotomayor 'Wise Latina' Comments
- "Thinly-Veiled Threats"? White House Suggests Arizona Republicans Put Up or Shut Up
- POTUS at the All Star Game: No Bailout for the National League? "No, We're Out of Money"
- POTUS Tells Michigan Things Will Get Tougher As He Introduces New Plan for Community Colleges
- Michelle Obama's Father NOT buried at Burr Oak
- Missing Mayor
- Obama Wants to Avoid the Dirt for First Pitch
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
From the Fact Check Desk: Despite Obama Claim, Clinton Never Called NAFTA a "Boon"
February 15, 2008 1:09 PM
Trying to peel away some of Hillary Clinton's blue collar support, the Obama campaign has released a mailer hammering her for having supported NAFTA.
"Hillary Clinton believed NAFTA was 'a boon' to our economy," the outside of the flier says.
Inside the flier is more precise, saying:
"A little more than a year ago, Hillary Clinton thought NAFTA was a 'boon; to the economy. According to a Newsday issues rundown, 'Clinton thinks NAFTA has been a boon to the economy."
You can see the flier in full by clicking HERE, HERE, HERE and HERE.
Newsday has now written about the controversy.
"Back in Sept. 2006, an abbreviated chart printed on Newsday's Spin Cycle page compared Hillary with her Democratic US Senate primary challenger Jonathan Tasini on a variety of issues. The issues chart included this:
"FREE TRADE
"JONATHAN TASINI: Tasini favors scrapping the Bill Clinton-backed North American Free Trade Agreement, saying it drives down domestic wages.
"HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON: Clinton thinks NAFTA has been a boon to the economy, but voted against the Central American-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement, saying it would drive jobs offshore."
So it wasn't Clinton who used the word "boon," but Newsday, the newspaper says.
But, writes the newspaper, it does "not have a direct quote indicating her campaign told us she thought it was good for the economy at that time. Also, for that matter, Clinton's campaign did not contact us to question the item after it appeared in print.
"Obama's use of the citation in this way does strike us as misleading. The quote marks make it look as if Hillary said 'boon,' not us. It's an example of the kind of slim reeds campaigns use to try to win an office.
"That said, we should have been clearer."
It seems pretty clear that Obama's campaign have been misleading on the word "boon."
Last month in the Myrtle Beach, SC, debate, Obama said, "I know that Hillary on occasion has said — just last year said this (NAFTA) was a boon to the economy."
Last November, Obama's chief strategist, David Axelrod told CNN, "on this issue of NAFTA, just a year ago Senator Clinton said it was a boon to our economy and one of the great achievements of the Clinton administration."
On the other hand -- bigger picture -- opinion-writers who oppose NAFTA have argued that Clinton has clearly shifted on this issue from praising NAFTA to condemning it.
- jpt
February 15, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (85)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The guy lies all the time but the media doesn't call him on it beacuse he has this appealing style. For example
Barack Obama said in his book that his parents met each other on the Selma March for Civil Rights with Martin Luther King on March 7, 1965 --- tying the union of his parents to one of the greatest moments in African American history and marking him for destiny.
The only problem is Barack Obama was born 4 years before the March to Selma on August 4, 1961----Oooops.
He can manipulate and spin just like any other politician---and this one was aimed right at the African American community to gain support.
Posted by: cartwroght | Mar 27, 2008 4:47:51 AM
Looks like Obama made a mistake. If Sen. Rodham Clinton really thinks NAFTA was a good idea, and good for the economy, there should be plenty of direct quotations to support it.
On the other hand, as far as health care goes, for Sen. Rodham Clinton to argue that Obama is misleading on the penalty issue is a bit misleading since she has hammered away at the issue. She has consistently said the problem with Obama's plan is that it doesn't make everyone buy insurance. Well I dont have a PhD in rational choice theory, but it seems to me that if I don't want to buy insurance, the only way to make me buy it is to penalize me if I don't. So, Senator Rodham Clinton, will you please tell us how you plan to make people do something they don't want to do without penalizing them?
Posted by: JRL | Feb 23, 2008 8:00:44 PM
here lately it seems that Obama wants to be President more than he wants to be honest and original. Please voters, don't be fooled by this mirage of a change agent. He is the one who is demonstrating 'politics as usual', when Hillary is the one who really wants to change the country and lead it in the right direction.
Posted by: newsworthy | Feb 18, 2008 12:51:33 PM
Seems like the Press is finally waking up this President's day holiday. Barack stealing speeches from other people, Barack's lie about Hillary using the "boon" word for NAFTA, show how FAKE this BO guy is. Please report more about his persona, before US is led in the wrong way of selecting an INEXPERIENCED person as its President.
Posted by: JKan | Feb 18, 2008 11:32:16 AM
Can you spell "nit-pick"?
Posted by: Penny | Feb 18, 2008 11:10:22 AM
Lydia,
I LOVE how you just spoke for the entire state of Florida. You must be very popular. The fact is, 1.7 million democrats were smart enough to get out and vote. 1.7 MILLION! If I lived in Florida, I certainly would have voted. I am smart enough to know that it was still the Florida primary and I am also smart enough to figure that the delegates may indeed be seated. A 're-do' is costly and unfair to those who voted when they were supposed to. The only way I think it might be fair is if at least the same number of voters from the real primary joined those who would have to vote again as "new voters" Can you prove that at least 3.5 million democrats would vote in Florida the second time around? If not, stop complaining.
Posted by: Don | Feb 17, 2008 3:13:23 PM
Isn't it amazing how the liberals flocking to Obama are so eager to disenfranchise all the Democrats who voted in Fl and MI? Understandably, Obama wasn't on the ballot in MI so I'll give him a pass there, but FL is a different story. The libs screamed bloody murder in 2000, but now they don't want to count the voters in FL simply because their beloved Barack Hussein Obama (sounds like Osama) didn't win. I'm sure if Obama had won they would be screaming from the mountain tops. What a bunch of GD hypocrites if I ever saw one...
Posted by: Jimbo | Feb 17, 2008 2:27:30 AM
All I can say from day one..... I knew Obama was a fake that know how to talk a sweet game, and the youth is falling for it.... The great Movement!!! The next MLK or JFK...GIve me a break..... Yes the election is a joke now, I guess it like the American Idol now... It all about who cute or got the best smile now!!!! If you do your research like me, you will see Obama don't add up... His records that he never showup for? His religion for some odd reason had ties to racist group and ties to Muslim community.... He drugs habit and he divorce that never was talk about?
I be one of many DEMOCRATIC that be switching parties if Obama win.....
I might be a first time Republican in NOV....
Posted by: John | Feb 17, 2008 2:19:50 AM
I WILL VOTE FOR MCCAIN ANY DAY BEFORE OBAMA. I AM PREPARED TO SWITCH PARTIES IN A HEARTBEAT, SHOULD OBAMA LAND THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION. IN ALL GOOD CONSCIENCE, I CAN'T LET SOMEONE AS INEXPERIENCED AND SHADEY AS OBAMA GET INTO THE WHITE HOUSE AND RUIN OUR COUNTRY. UH UH, NOT NOW, NOT EVER. AND THIS SENTIMENT IS PERMEATING AMONG HILLARY SUPPORTERS PERVASIVELY. IF OBAMA WINS THE NOMINATION, MCCAIN WINS IN NOVEMBER. REMEMBER THAT THE PRIMARIES ARE VERY DIFFERENT FROM THE GENERAL ELCTION, SO ALL THOSE POLLS RIGHT NOW DON'T TELL YOU A SINGLE THING ABOUT THE REALITY IN NOVEMBER.
Posted by: MR | Feb 17, 2008 1:50:18 AM
It is no wonder why most Asians voted for Clinton. The group of Asians that i know do not know how to speak English, so the press could not influence their vote.
Most middle-age Asians recognize the character of a person just by looking at them. Most Americans know, too, but they have to show a lot outside before they can recognize. They can not see the hidden one (for example,in movies, in the beginning, everybody can infer who the villain is going to be at the end.
So far, i score the last four Presidents as almost 95% right.
Here is how i rate the current top candidates and their spouses for caring and compassion: Out of the ten:
Obama=2. Spouse=-8.
McCain=4. Spouse=3.
Clinton=8 Spouse=6.
Posted by: rt | Feb 16, 2008 6:57:52 PM
While she might not have said the word 'boon' the facts are that Bill's administration pushed NAFTA through Congress. It lost us a lot of good jobs here. Hillary didn't speak out against it until recently. Those are the facts.
Obama spoke out against it publicly before it was signed, as he thought it was a bad deal for American workers and it would only benefit corporate profits. Obama was right.
Posted by: Lydia | Feb 16, 2008 4:33:17 PM
I live in Florida and we don't want the votes counted. There is a need for campaigning and that's why candidates do it with "machines" & big budgets. Campaigning gets your message out and assists undecideds in deciding and galvanizes the strength of your supporters. It is not our fault that Florida votes don't count but the only way to make it fair is to have a revote. Many many many people did not vote because it didn't count, not many ppl are going to take time out of their work day, picking up their kids from daycare, etc etc if they have been told their vote won't count. So really if they would make Florida's votes count a lot of ppl would be pissed and hurt because they were told the vote didn't matter when in fact it would.
As for Michigan, Barack wasn't even on the ballot so why would that be fair?
Posted by: daytripper | Feb 16, 2008 4:01:40 PM
I am pleased to see that Hillary fans finally have something to harp on. lol.
The article did not say that the quote was wrong. It says that it could be misleading. Obama's campaign just needs to clarify further. It seems that you guys are really clutching at straws here, attempting to find fault in the Obama campaign. lol.
Posted by: Vixen2oo8 | Feb 16, 2008 1:39:57 PM
Good News on the Horizon? Al Gore will be the party's Nominee with Hillary his running mate. Obama heads back to the Senate for 12 more years to gain the necessary experience and try to establish a record of accomplishment. Sweet justice for Big Al. With the 2000 election taken from him, Al Gore can fix the foreign and domestic mess created by this president. God Bless America and God Bless Al Gore for his continuing service to the Nation. Happy Days are Here Again.
Posted by: benvictor | Feb 16, 2008 1:22:08 PM
Boy, there certainly is a lot of hate on this board. Obama's campaign was probably a bit overzelous on this one. This happens in the heat of an election. Hope they correct the flyer. He is already the leader so does not need to stoop to Hillary's level. I admire the fact that so far he has been able to keep himself and his campaign above the fray. When we look to the positive side we can acheive a lot more.
Posted by: Vixen2oo8 | Feb 16, 2008 1:18:08 PM
Another example of hypocrisy from the man who claims "the same old politics just won't do." This guy points the finger at everyone else and then engages in a more egregious version of the behavior he decries. He is the worst--arrogant and cocky. I can't imagine watching him for 4-8 years. He's like a left wing George Bush. Same crap, different party. Yuck.
Posted by: njh | Feb 16, 2008 1:05:30 PM
MOMETUM? (SIC?) WHICH WAY OBAMA? IN REALITY BACKWARDS OR FORWARD? OBAMA WILL NOT DEBATE CLINTON BECAUSE HE CANNOT COME UP WITH ANSWERS BY HIMSELF. HE NEEDS A SPEECH WRITER AND THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED IN A DEBATE. YEAH, HE IS A FINE ORATOR. HE CAN DISH OUT WHAT PEOPLE WANT TO HEAR. BUT MAKE HIM TELL THE TRUTH AND STATE THE REAL FACTS AND HE STUTTERS, AND LOOKS LIKE A BUMBLING PERSON WHO HAS LOST HIS WAY. McCAIN WILL THRASH HIM IN NOVEMEBR. I AM A DEMOCRAT BUT WILL EITHER SIT IT OUT OR VOTE FOR McCAIN IN NOVEMBER.I WILL NOT BE A PART OF A WILDFIRE SPEAD OF FALSE HOPE AND WIND BAG. REMEMBER GEORGE BUSH THE IDIOT WAS A CHEERLEADER AT YALE. OBAMA ACTS LIKE A CHEER LEADER NOW. TO BAD THE NEWS MEDIA HAS CAUSED THIS CLOSE RACE AND ARE NOT BIG ENOUGH TO TAKE THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE WRONGS THEY HAVE CREATED. WE SUFFER? DEBATE HILLARY OBAMA. WHAT IS THE MATER WITH ONE ON ONE DEBATES? YOU PLAY THE PART OF SOMETHING GREAT , SO SHOW US YOUR GREATNESS.
Posted by: LARRY THORNTON | Feb 16, 2008 11:07:22 AM
Listen to all of you on this blog. What anger and nastiness. Who would want to run for office and face the barrage of negatives. Why would anyone want to face this? Barack will be the next President and just face it and lt's move on to heal this country and correct the mistakes from the previous Clinton and Bush dynasties. Let's get a fresh face in and not OLD McCain
Posted by: Lena | Feb 16, 2008 10:48:38 AM
That's an interesting lead. Sounds like an Obama oops! If Hillary's campaign had made taken this step it would read: Hillary knowingly and intentionally issued a personal attack on Obama issuing clearly false and misleading statements about something he said about something he didn't sign into law a long time ago!
But noooo the misogynist protective press taps O on the wrist with a maybe he did something a little bit wrong but he had a good reason to misstate what he repeatedly misstated and never apologized for or acknowledge that he misstated what was clearly an ever so slight oversight on the part of his campaign and not him personally. Ok?
Well, Change Man - change NAFTA will ya? Where is his stand on NAFTA, what's he done about? Where is the the bill he proposes to introduce to stop it or change it? Why or why not? Speak up my good man. After those ever so inspiring hopeful sermons, it's Monday morning and we'll have to go to work. Are you ready? Or didn't you have a chance to "copy" your "work" from Hillary! Copy her health plan, it's a winner!
Posted by: AmazonTraveler | Feb 16, 2008 10:36:12 AM
Obama's supporters believe that any attack to Obama is a fabrication of Clinton.
How naive!
Posted by: Pat | Feb 16, 2008 10:25:51 AM
Post a comment

