Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

I Just Called to Say I Love You

February 13, 2008 10:13 AM

As ABC News' Kate Snow and Eloise Harper report, Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-Texas, didn't mention her Potomac Primary losses or congratulate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, on his landslides, when she spoke at a rally in El Paso, Texas, last night. (Watch her speak HERE.)

This did not impress columnist James Fallows, who writes that "whoever advised her to take this petty approach made a mistake. Or maybe, reacting as a normal person, she just couldn't bear to talk about it."

I'm told the last time Clinton called Obama to congratulate him was after South Carolina primary. The last time Obama called her to offer a mazal tov was after her win in the Nevada Caucuses. Neither called the other after the mixed results of Super Tuesday.

- jpt

February 13, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (11)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Since Hillary called Obama to congratulate him on S. Carolina, neither one has called to congratulate the other on victories. Yet this piece is premised on the notion that Hillary was petty in not congratulating Obama at a rally last night in Texas? (At which she drew 12,000 screaming supporters). Oh those anti-Hillary insults just keep coming don't they. Hillary not congratulating Obama, Sen. Hillary (D-Texas)... you guys never stop. The pettiness is all about the little barbs of nothing you guys write up in an election to decide the President of the United States.

Posted by: Hopesprings52 | Feb 14, 2008 1:20:45 PM

she does better when she acts cordially with what's left of the candidate list.
shows more professonalism on her part and i think she should continue that approach..

Posted by: saxbob | Feb 14, 2008 11:42:19 AM

The reason that Obama hasn't called Clinton to congratulate her since Nevada is ... she hasn't beaten him since Nevada. She won some races on Super Tuesday, but the whole day was essentially a split decision, with no real winner. Other than that, all the wins have been on Obama's side. What was he supposed to do? Call Hillary and congratulate her on breaking 35 percent in Virginia?

Posted by: Fred App | Feb 13, 2008 10:07:46 PM

What I will giove Clintons is that they don't back down, even in the face of humiliation, it reminds me of another politician - George W. Bush. If you can win on the merits scare the hell out of the electorate and they will jump where you tell 'em.

Posted by: Louis | Feb 13, 2008 6:16:50 PM

Kübler-Ross Grief Cycle:
denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance

It's often not a straight progression.

It's not the lack of congratulations, it's the denial of her defeats altogether that's the issue. At the same time she's angry with her staff and blames them for her campaign problems. She's bargaining: Here's five million, let me win Ohio and Texas and that'll fix things. Let me have my Florida and Michigan delegates and everything will be okay again. Just keep Bill away and ?

Well, she'll be at the depression stage soon enough.

Posted by: Tom J | Feb 13, 2008 4:31:17 PM

So, Jake, when did Sen. Clinton switch states and start representing the fine people of Texas? Or is it that Texas annexed Arkansas when we weren't looking?

Posted by: chuck | Feb 13, 2008 3:06:03 PM

Frank: did you read the article, short as it was? It clearly mentions Senator Obama called to congratulate her on the Nevada win. He thanked his supporters in New Hampshire for their hard work, suggesting it could be used a valuable lesson. He reassured his penalty box supporters in Florida too. He has yet to dismiss or run away from a losing state before hearing the results. That's called integrity, sir. It would be sad to think it's been so long you've forgotten.

Posted by: SE Croft | Feb 13, 2008 11:53:47 AM

After Nevada, Obama didn't say anything either. He just got on a plane and left.

I guess it's always worse when someone named "Clinton" does it.

Posted by: Frank | Feb 13, 2008 11:21:10 AM

I second that previous comment:

1.) since when did Texas get a Democratic Senator

2.) since when did Texas elect Hillary Clinton to be one of its senators

Posted by: Jane | Feb 13, 2008 11:09:05 AM

Kyle: As soon as she saw the faint glimmer of a win there.


As for the rest of the article, what's so strange about this latest oversite from her campaign? She dissed Iowa as "doesn't count", indirectly claimed SC was just some racial fluke via her mouthpiece co-candidate, swooped into Florida to claim a (sadly empty) victory and dumped on any recent state with a caucus as somehow not valid. Why would anyone be looking for any grace from such a poor loser?

Posted by: SE Croft | Feb 13, 2008 11:00:25 AM

When did Hillary become a Texas senator?

Posted by: Kyle | Feb 13, 2008 10:25:30 AM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS