RECENT POSTS
- Oprah, Health Care Lobbyists, Among Recent Visitors to White House
- An Obama Thanksgiving Menu, with an Extra Serving of Pie
- White House Thanksgiving Traditions: Broken and Observed
- Obama, GOP Air Differences Over Jobs, Economy In Thanksgiving Addresses
- White House State Dinner Party Crashers
- Obama to Lay Out Emissions Goals in Copenhagen
- Free Bird
- The "Good" War
- The Presidential Planner
- Under the Stars, Obama Toasts India’s Prime Minister
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
John McCain Enters the Autism Wars
February 29, 2008 7:11 PM
At a town hall meeting Friday in Texas, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., declared that "there’s strong evidence" that thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative that was once in many childhood vaccines, is responsible for the increased diagnoses of autism in the U.S. -- a position in stark contrast with the view of the medical establishment.
McCain was responding to a question from the mother of a boy with autism, who asked about a recent story that the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program had issued a judgment in favor of an unnamed child whose family claimed regressive encephalopathy and symptoms of autism were caused by thimerosal.
"We’ve been waiting for years for kind of a responsible answer to this question, and are hoping that you can help us out there," the woman said.
McCain said, per ABC News' Bret Hovell, that "It’s indisputable that (autism) is on the rise amongst children, the question is what’s causing it. And we go back and forth and there’s strong evidence that indicates that it’s got to do with a preservative in vaccines."
McCain said there’s "divided scientific opinion" on the matter, with "many on the other side that are credible scientists that are saying that’s not the cause of it."
The established medical community is not as divided as McCain made it sound, however. Overwhelmingly the "credible scientists," at least as the government and the medical establishment so ordain them, side against McCain's view.
Moreover, those scientists and organizations fear that powerful people lending credence to the thimerosal theory could dissuade parents from getting their children immunized -- which in their view would lead to a very real health crisis.
The Centers for Disease Control says "There is no convincing scientific evidence of harm caused by the low doses of thimerosal in vaccines, except for minor reactions like redness and swelling at the injection site."
The American Academy of Pediatrics says"No scientific data link thimerosal used as a preservative in vaccines with any pediatric neurologic disorder, including autism."
The Food and Drug Administration conducted a review in 1999 -- the year thimerosal was ordered to be removed from most vaccines -- and said that it "found no evidence of harm from the use of thimerosal as a vaccine preservative, other than local hypersensitivity reactions."
The Institute of Medicine’s Immunization Safety Review Committee concluded "that the body of epidemiological evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism."
And a study of California Department of Developmental Services data published last month indicated that there was "an increase in autism in California despite the removal of thimerosal from most vaccines."
Yet there is a vocal, determined, passionate group -- including some medical researchers and organizations -- who vehemently dispute what the established medical community says about this wrenching issue. One of the questions they ask is why would the thimerosal have been removed from the vaccines if there was no real harm?
(The answer according to the Public Health Service, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and vaccine manufacturers was "because any potential risk is of concern.")
In any case, here we have a major political figure, the presumptive Republican nominee, who stated that he at the very least isn’t as sure about thimerosal as the medical establishment is.
Moreover, he made it sound as if the thimerosal is still in vaccines -- though as I understand it, thimerosal is all but gone in almost every childhood vaccine now, and has been for years.
This could be quite controversial.
- jpt
February 29, 2008 in 2008: Republicans | Permalink | Share | User Comments (187)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Hi,
I’m a student at a college in New England majoring in Psychology. For my Research Methods class I need to do a study and I chose to do Mercury causing Autism. I have a few questions that I would be very greatful if anyone would answer them and maybe give me an idea of how you feel about the subject. Thank you for taking the time.
1. Do you personally know anyone that has Autism?
2. Do you know a lot of information about Autism? Would you consider yourself an expert?
3. Do you believe mercury causes Autism?
4. Do you believe that thimerosal has made Autism increase?
5. Why do you think that the rate of Autism is at 1 out of 150 children?
6. Why do you believe that that number varies from state to state?
Is it the environment?
The mercury in the environment?
7. Do you believe that testing childrens’ hair is an accurate test of mercury causing Autism?
Posted by: Ashley | Mar 25, 2008 8:33:24 PM
What's next in line of conspiracy theories gaining mainstream acceptance-the rigging of the 2004 presidential election in Ohio, the NAFTA superhighway, or AIDS not being a disease?
Posted by: dbrett | Mar 25, 2008 4:49:45 PM
None of you have answered my questions.
None of you have answered my questions.
How can parents tolerate Gerberding's Lies?
Why if everyone is so confident that there are no side effects to vaccines do we need double speak and dishonesty?
The parents are not stupid... We know vaccines do great things for the general population.
We also believe we need to get the bad things out of our environment.
I guess when you have a son who could talk and use his body one day... Then he gets shots and does not talk and function... You tend to discount just about anything anybody says.
None of you have answered my questions.
How can parents tolerate Gerberding's Lies? This is not the only case. Admit it. Give help to those that need it... And let's move on.
We need Therapy, respite, and Recovery now!
Posted by: Tim, IL | Mar 12, 2008 6:46:34 PM
Tim, from IL-
Coincidences do happen over and over again.
Consider this. Over the past century, the number of storks has diminished in all industrialized countries, and so have birth rates. Today, in countries where storks are abundant, for instance in Africa where they stay in winter, birth rates are also high. There is a clear, highly significant positive correlation between the frequencies of storks and babies. There is also a theory about storks bringing children. Do storks cause births? Or do babies bring storks?
Most people would say no and no. Simply because there may be an apparent correlation between vaccines and autism does not mean that one causes the other. Furthermore, unvaccinated children acquire autism, too. So, at the very least, vaccines are not the only cause, if they are a cause at all (for which there is almost no evidence), of autism. Probably a variety of genetic and environmental causes contribute to the development of autism.
Thank you, Rick, for posting the new connections between autism and genetics. Once the mechanism behind autism is clearer, research can be done to determine possible treatments.
While I have no personal experience with autism, I truly feel for people who have. I just don't feel that attacking vaccines and the people who make them is productive. Instead, we should focus on researching more tangible causes (like genetics and environmental factors), so we can in turn provide the treatments that people are so badly seeking. At heart, I feel this is a funding issue. For whatever reason, not enough money is available to fund unbiased research about many diseases, let alone autism. I feel it is too much of a generalization to claim it is basically a government conspiracy.
Posted by: Heather, student pharmacist | Mar 11, 2008 6:59:56 PM
I also look forward to more studies that refute the autism/ vaccine link and bring to light an environmental/ DNA link.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Scientists revealed the most extensive findings to date on the genetics of autism on Sunday, pinpointing two new genetic links that may predispose children to develop the complex brain disorder.
The five-year study, led by an international consortium of researchers from 19 nations, indicated autism had numerous genetic origins rather than a single or a few primary causes.
The researchers scoured DNA samples from 1,168 families with two or more children with autism, and used "gene chip" technology to detect genetic similarities. They also looked for tiny insertions and deletions of genetic material that could play a role in autism.
The scientists hope that nailing down the genetics of autism will lead to better ways to diagnose it and focus efforts on developing drugs to treat it. They announced they are launching a new phase in the research to map genes responsible for autism.
The study incriminated a gene called neurexin 1 involved with glutamate, a brain chemical previously implicated in autism that plays a role in early brain development, as a possible susceptibility gene for autism. A previously unidentified region of chromosome 11 also was implicated.
Autism is a spectrum of disorders apparently stemming from genetic and environmental causes. Geneticist Stephen Scherer of the University of Toronto and the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto said 90 percent of autism may have a genetic basis.
"What we have now that we didn't really have before is a pretty decent understanding of what the genetic architecture is looking like in the autism genome," said Scherer, who worked on the study published in the journal Nature Genetics.
Posted by: Rick | Mar 11, 2008 11:48:05 AM
On March 7, 2008, the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) received notification of a 15-month-old unvaccinated child with laboratory-confirmed measles (IgM-positive, IgG-negative, serum collected on February 27). The child is a resident of northern Virginia and returned to the United States after a 2.5-week visit to India on February 22. On the return flight (February 21–22) from New Delhi to Newark, New Jersey, the child developed fever and cold-like symptoms.
This child ended up becoming very ill with measles. Whe the HECK are people thinking? Taking an unvaccinated child to India? Since they purposely did not vaccinate this child, and did something idiotic, their health insurance should deny the claims to treat this child for this preventable disease.
Posted by: Rick | Mar 11, 2008 11:41:38 AM
A coincidence does not happen over and over again...
If the law mandates the vaccination then the Government is responsible for therapy, respite, recovery, and remediation.
So far all the parents get is smoke screens, lies, deflection, lies, delay, lies, and portral as the bad guys.
Creditablility is built on honesty and trust... One cannot say there is no link and then concede. It is not either/or... There is no such thing as Autism like... We already have a spectrum... Therefore the vacinations are involved in causing Autism. Double speak all you want.
The over 4800 cases are just the families of the Doctors and lawyers... Eventually the families of the non-professionals will have their day...
Posted by: Tim, IL | Mar 10, 2008 6:12:01 PM
A vaccine is not going to cause an instantaneous neuroligical deconditioning of a child. It is merely a coincidence. These kids are born with genetic anomalies that manifest themselves at different times and different ways. Parents want someone and something to blame. That is understandable. But it isn't the government's responsibility to pay for therapy for autistic children. It is the parent's responsibility.
Posted by: neurodoc | Mar 10, 2008 12:36:30 PM
Why if everyone is so confident that there are no side effects to vaccines do we need double speak and dishonesty?
The parents are not stupid... We know vaccines do great things for the general population.
We also believe we need to get the bad things out of our environment.
I guess when you have a son who could talk and use his body one day... Then he gets shots and does not talk and function... You tend to discount just about anything anybody says.
None of you have answered my questions.
How can parents tolerate Gerberding's Lies? This is not the only case. Admit it. Give help to those that need it... And let's move on.
We need Therapy, respite, and Recovery now!
Posted by: Tim, IL | Mar 10, 2008 9:34:47 AM
It is amazing that no one seems to know or care that there is more mercury in our food and drinking water than there EVER has been in vaccines. And it is the "bad" kind of mercury that your body doesn't get rid of. But yet, we'll sit and blame vaccines. Never mind the fact that we're immersed in a toxic environment.
Posted by: KATYRN | Mar 10, 2008 12:25:26 AM
Vaccines such as HIB and pneumococcal have saved many lives. They are "newly required" vaccines. Do the research. Meningococcal has as well. Do some reading on these. More research is being done on vaccine preventable disease,a nd we are finding more ways to prevent death. Children die from pneumoccocal disease and HIB meningitis. The ingredients such as thimerosal were used to keep the vaccines from becoming contaminated with bacteria. They were used to keep vaccines safe. Autism is more "prevalent" now becuause it is diagnosed sooner and we are now calling things "autism" that never used to be categorized as such. I am looking forward to more studies being done so we can move on from this situation.
Posted by: Tim | Mar 10, 2008 12:07:47 AM
It will take serious studies done in 2010 and beyond to figure out the damage done by the perservatives and other additives. It has been shown there was mercury in the vaccine pool in 2003 and beyond. Flu shots alone could skew the data.
All the hysterical parents are saying is Green our vaccines. Look at the facts:
1983: Autism rate 1 in 10,000
Vaccine schedule 10 shots
2008: Autism rate in boys 1 in 70
Vaccine schedule 36
My sons last words:
"My name is Tanner. My name is Tanner."
The week of his shots for school...
Show me any other campaign for disinformation as wound up as this one by the medical(vaccine maker) community. Remove the Mecury, Aluminum, formaldehyde, ether, antifreeze. Reevaluate the schedule. What was the death rate from these deadly diseases in 1983 that we had to add 26shots? If there are side effects to the vaccinations all we asking for is support for therapy, respite, and recovery.
Posted by: Tim, IL | Mar 9, 2008 10:57:22 PM
This does not represent anything other than a very special situation," said Dr. Julie Gerberding, head of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Who are you going to believe the Boss doing the spin or the Judge that slipped?
The case may not be a first, said Gary Golkiewicz, chief special master for the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. He oversees the special "vaccine court" which rules on requests for payments from the vaccine injury fund.
"Years ago, actually, I had a case, before we understood or knew the implications of autism, that the vaccine injured the child's brain caused an encephalopathy," he said. And the symptoms that come with that "fall within the broad rubric of autism."
And there are other somewhat similar cases, Golkiewicz says, that were decided before autism and its symptoms were more clearly defined
Posted by: Tim, IL | Mar 9, 2008 10:53:09 PM
Tim, how do you explain all of the current cases of autism? There are just as many, if not more than prior to 2001 when thimerosal was removed. There are children who have only recieved vaccines like MMR, Varicella, and polio which have never been produced using thimerosal and those children have autism. There are unvaccinated children with autism. What is your explanation from that? Time to start looking at environmental factors.
Posted by: KATYRN | Mar 9, 2008 11:37:39 AM
"What protects us from disease is our immune systems"
I would LOVE to see how the poster:Mercuryfree's immune system holds up against measles or hepatitis b. Our immune system cannot protect us against everything. Be realistic.
Posted by: KATYRN | Mar 7, 2008 8:45:33 PM
There is a HUGE difference between a trace <1 mcg and 25-500 mcg per vaccine. LESS THAN ONE MICROGRAM of ethyl Hg is NOT considered neurotoxic. Why don't people focus on some realistic causes such as environmental contaminants, as well as household toxins (vinyl flooring and siding is toxic, fame retardants in furniture, beds, etc is toxic, stain retardants in carpet are toxic, the list goes on and on. No one seems to be concerned about that.
Posted by: jeneile | Mar 7, 2008 8:30:28 PM
"There is a major cover -up"
Wow. Now there is a conspiracy because SOME (not all) vaccines have a TRACE of thimerosal? Come on. Nothing is good enough. Pretty soon a vial of sterile water will cause cancer.
Posted by: Rick | Mar 7, 2008 8:21:28 PM
The goverment and Pharm. companies are hand in hand with this. There is a major cover -up. Vaccines are NOT completely free of thermisol. It is a percentage less than what the FDA allows a pharm. comp. to label as "Free"
It is still present , but at a lower dose. As far as "Do vaccines cause autism?" I just rather leave that question alone.
Posted by: Nina | Mar 7, 2008 8:08:44 PM
"I have to admit, though, it was my friends very outspoken sister in law who got me to pay attention to the issues surrounding vaccines. At lunch, She turned to me and asked me outright if I was vaccinating my daughter. When I said "of course," she looked at me in horror."
Ask a parent who lost their 18 year old college student to meningococcal meningitis the same question. I lost my sister to meningitis. It could have been prevented. She never got vaccinated.
Posted by: KATYRN | Mar 7, 2008 7:17:57 PM
" John’s truthfulness, dedication and what he believes in is demonstrated by his sincere actions and service as a Senator of the United States of America. We could do a whole lot worse than vote for John Mc Cain"
Are you kidding me?
McCain was opposing the war until he found out that supporting it could get him a vote for president. I won't be voting for him. Any ally of Bush is an enemy of mine.
Posted by: jeneile | Mar 7, 2008 7:12:04 PM
Post a comment


