Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior National Correspondent Jake Tapper
Jake Tapper is ABC News' Senior National Correspondent based in the network's Washington bureau. He writes about politics and popular culture and covers a range of national stories.
RECENT POSTS
- Obama's Globetrotting
- DNC Sees Cindy McCain's Wealth as Fair Game
- Crypto-Gramm
- Night of the Gun
- Michelle Obama Fair Game for Another State GOP
- All the World's Obama's Stage
- The McCain Campaign's Anti-Obama Video
- Rahm: Bush and McCain Are Following Obama's Foreign Policy Lead
- Thanks for Nothin', Joe!
- Comedy Is Not Pretty
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Hillary Denies Saying "Big Boys" Were Trying to Bully a Woman Out of the Race | Main | Who's Scrubbing the Trinity United Church of Christ Website? »
Legal Eagles
March 31, 2008 2:01 PM
Is it fair for Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, to call himself a former law professor?
The Clinton campaign has made a stink of this as of late, hoping to muddy the resume-inflation waters after Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, was forced to recant her Hemingway-esque tale of landing in Bosnia under sniper fire. Team Clinton sent out an email called "Just Embellished Words: Senator Obama's Record of Exaggerations & Misstatements," and deputy communications director Phil Singer in a conference call told reporters, "Sen. Obama has often referred to himself as 'a constitutional law professor' out on the campaign trail. He never held any such title. And I think anyone, if you ask anyone in academia the distinction between a professor who has tenure and an instructor that does not...you’ll get quite an emotional response."
The issue was first raised by the incomparable Lynn Sweet of the Chicago Sun-Times in 2004 who wrote that "Several direct-mail pieces issued for Obama's primary campaign said he was a law professor at the University of Chicago. He is not. He is a senior lecturer (now on leave) at the school. In academia, there is a vast difference between the two titles. Details matter."
But last week, after the Clinton campaign attack, the University of Chicago Law School entered the fray, seemingly siding with Obama.
Wrote the media office of the school: "The Law School has received many media requests about Barack Obama, especially about his status as "Senior Lecturer." From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School's Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined."
In other words, Obama never held the title of professor but he "served as a professor." He was a lecturer, then a senior lecturer. "Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors," says the law school.
That was enough for our friends at Factcheck.org though it was not enough for Lynn Sweet.
Here's something interesting, though.
If you go back and look at the old archived web pages of the University of Chicago Law School, it actually lists Obama under "Faculty and Senior Lecturers." (See it HERE.)
So perhaps senior lecturers were considered faculty….but for whatever reason there was some differentiation on the web page where they were listed. Obama's page can be seen HERE.
What do you think?
- jpt
March 31, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (36)
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/433071/27629382
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Legal Eagles:
I am a "lecturer" not a "professor" and I agree that there is a significant distinction between the two titles. Professors are scholars, and as part of the job, both teach and conduct academic research. Lecturers only teach. Professors are paid more, sometimes a lot more, than lecturers. Before being appointed as a professor, an individual goes through a significant vetting process, because the school knows the individual will be around for a long time. Lecturers, on the other hand, are hired as needed. If they work out, fine, if they do not they are not asked back. My students often refer to me as professor, out of courtesy, but that is clearly not my title.
Posted by: David H | Apr 1, 2008 3:07:42 PM
As it was put earlier. The title of Professor implies that the individual has received a PHD and has reached the highest level of his or her field.
Obama missrepresented.
Posted by: Fisher | Apr 1, 2008 2:54:43 PM
The important point is that Obama taught Constitutional Law at a major law school for ten years.
Team Bush has been dismantling our system of checks and balances, and we need someone who understands and respects that system.
We do NOT need someone who thinks the point is the proper use of academic terms.
Obama = forest
Clinton = trees
Posted by: Tom J | Mar 31, 2008 10:47:09 PM
I think - as many others so as well - that Lynn Sweet has a personal problem with Sen. Obama
We have tried many times to post corrections to come of her columns on her blog and she does not allow most of the comments through - she edits what she wants to have shown - not a fair and balanced blog
We have asked Ms. Sweet through e-mails and comments to please let the public know why she has such a problem with Sen. Obama when she is supposed to be a reporter covering him for a newspaper - she is not an editorial columnist she is a reporter
Maybe you can find out Jake - Lynn Sweet doesn't seem to like being questioned by the public
Posted by: alison | Mar 31, 2008 7:47:01 PM
I do not know the semantics of faculty titles of today.
Guess you can call yourself whatever you like. That rule certainly applies to Federal Regulations re affirmative action.
You are what you say you are unless you say you are Native American. Then you have to have proof of blood certificate.
Go figure. More stringent rules for Native Americans than any other minority.
Back to the topic. I never had, nor have I heard of a "tenured lecturer", but I guess they exist.
Posted by: MC | Mar 31, 2008 7:11:01 PM
May God bless Professor Barak Obama, thank you for teaching constitutional law and our children have had the opportunity to learn from the right source. OBAMA08
Posted by: BKMC | Mar 31, 2008 7:10:12 PM
Let's see -- the University of Chicago considers him a professor according to their own standards, and he was in fact offered a tenure-track position by them, so they thought he was fully qualified. . .
Do they think we will drop this so easily? As if we can't come up our own interpretations of what the word "professor" means. Hah!
Posted by: tempus | Mar 31, 2008 6:14:15 PM
It's another inflated claim by Obama.
Posted by: Rene | Mar 31, 2008 5:58:39 PM
"this is the stupidest thing i have ever hear. i went to law school. we had part time, adjuncts, lecturers and full time faculty. you know what? we called them all professor. Jeez louise this is stupid. "
-------------
This is true, I was called "professor" by students even when I was just a part-time instructor right after I finished graduate school and began some teaching.
The term can be used differently. Calling a (senior) lecturer or whoever on the teaching stage a “professor” means somehow the fact that he or she is doing a “teaching job” in university, this is the widest or very causal use of the term.
More often than that, the term refers to qualifications, experience and tenure – those on the tenure track with titles assistant processors, associate professors or (full) professors, they are usually tenure positions. Normally instructors, lecturer or senor lecturers are not. In this sense, senior lecturer is not the same as those on the tenure track.
In a more formal sense, the term only refers to those “full professors”, not including any assistant or associate professors.
Obama’s use of “law professor” is OK only in the first sense - informal use by students, but not accurate in the second or third sense.
Posted by: Victor | Mar 31, 2008 5:21:18 PM
What do I think? I think this is one of the most ridiculous non-stories ever pursued. What's the endgame? HRC's campaign wins a tedious semantic point? Bravo! Now she can retire with her head held high. Barring the presence of sniper fire, of course.
And what's with every news outlet (and I mean every - Google it) referring to Lynn Sweet as "the incomparable" Lynn Sweet? I'm from Chicago, I've seen Lynn Sweet on a number of occasions, and I question why she isn't simply referred to as "the curmudgeonly" Lynn Sweet? That's the between-the-lines messaging here, isn't it? Okay, how about "bristly"? That sounds a bit nicer. As Lynn would say, "Details count."
One can only hope that Obama, upon returning to Chicago, will pay her a visit, remove the pea from between her 13th and 14th mattresses, and make this "story", and her crusty temperament, magically disappear....
Posted by: jamois | Mar 31, 2008 5:14:48 PM
Obama inflating his own resume reminds me that he also inflated his father's too back in 1990 when he was interviewed by the N.Y. Times following his election as President of the Harvard Law Review. The article indicates that Obama Sr. was a "Finance Minister" in Kenya. He wasn't. He was a bureaucrat - maybe IN the Finance Ministry. But He wasn't the FINANCE MINISTER! - That's a pretty visible job. Had he been the Finance Minister, I'm sure that that would be prominently mentioned in his campaign literature. Just another example of INFLATING his background and record (and back then it wouldn't have even mattered, so why did he do it?
One comment about Clinton's mis-remembering events when she landed in Bosnia. Most people would agree that traveling to a war zone is outside their comfort zone. I'm sure that many of Clinton's travels have also been outside the comfort zone of most people. Let me ask - WHEN HAS OBAMA EVER BEEN OUTSIDE HIS COMFORT ZONE??????
All part of that important testing, experience that he just doesn't have folks!
Posted by: s. valenti | Mar 31, 2008 5:12:17 PM
Resume padding to go with his biography padding!
Posted by: John | Mar 31, 2008 4:26:49 PM
this is the stupidest thing i have ever hear. i went to law school. we had part time, adjuncts, lecturers and full time faculty. you know what? we called them all professor. Jeez louise this is stupid.
Posted by: Mac | Mar 31, 2008 4:03:09 PM
IF IM LECTURING A CLASS AT A TOP AMERICAN COLLEGE AND WAS WRITING OUT MY RESUME I WOULD PUT "POLITICAL PROFESSOR" ON IT. BUT IF I VISITED CALIFORNIA AND I SEE SOMEONE GET PULLED OVER IM NOT GOING TO SAY I SAW A POLICE CHASE. THEY ALL LIE, QUESTION IS WHO LIES ARE MORE RELEVENT TO MY IMEDIATE LIFE FOREIGN AFFAIRS BYE SAYING ANOTHER COUNTRY HAD SNIPERS SHOOTING AT ME OR SAYING I WAS A PROFESSOR? HELLO!!!!! WHAT ARE PROFESSORS DOING? "LECTURING"YOU PEOPLE REALLY HAVE TO HAVE SOME BETTER LOGIC. I GUESS YOU THINK THE WAR IS GOING GREAT AND BUSH ISGOD...LOL
Posted by: reality check | Mar 31, 2008 3:54:33 PM
LOL....OMG! WE ARE NOT PLAYING WORD GAMES ARE WE HILLARY. I MEAN BECAUSE I STILL DONT KNOW WHAT "IS" MEANS...FOR EVERY ONE NEGATIVE THING PEOPLE SAY ABOUT OBAMA THERE ARE FIVE NEGATIVE HILLARY STORIES. AND WE ALL KNOW SOME ARE TRUE AND SOME ARE EXAGGERATED. POINT IS HILLARY WILL LOSE BUT I STILL THINK SHE WILL BE THE NEXT PRES.....GET IT!!!!!!!!!!! STOP THIEF..
Posted by: words | Mar 31, 2008 3:47:24 PM
HOLY COW!!!
Are Hillary Fans giving a LECTURES on the definition of words now? What has the world come to?
OK. I play. How many different definitions are there for the word "IS"?
Posted by: The Commander Guy | Mar 31, 2008 3:18:47 PM
I think it would be terrific to have a President who is an authority on Constitutional Law. Ron Paul will have a reason to be happy with Obama as well. Closing Guantanamo Bay will no doubt be one the first of President Obama's actions.
The meaning of the difference between a university professor or Professor for this presidential election strikes me as utterly non-existent. Who cares? - except again for the desperate hillbillies collecting pebbles to throw at the rising tide.
At the University BO had a great reputation, among students and staff alike, and that tells us something.
Posted by: greg | Mar 31, 2008 3:06:02 PM
This is a ligitimate issue. A Full Professor is the highest status a law school teacher can have. Next status is Associate Professor and then Assistant Professor in that order. These are tenured and tenured-track teachers. Obama is neither.
The most significant difference between being a lecturer and a professor is that a lecturer does not have to publish scholarly articles. Obama has never published a legal research article as a law school instructor or even as Editor in Chief of the Harvard Law Review. As such, his legal theories have never been legally critiqued by his peers. The fact that he published no article as Editor in Chief of HLR is truly remarkable and probably unprecedented!!
To be sure, with no published articles to his credit, he would not even be in contention for a professorship at any decent law school, let along Chicago.
Note, if elected president, Obama will be very influential on supreme court and overall federal court appointments. University of Chicago is very well aware of that. Further, Obama's election would also bode well for federal clerkships for its law students, positions that are highly coveted, and extremely competitive.
Univ. of Chicago has a vested interest in Obama as Presiedent.
Posted by: countallthevotes | Mar 31, 2008 2:59:04 PM
There are 3 types of professors all of who have to have a PhD: Associate Prof, Assistant Prof and Full Prof.
Obama doesnt have a PhD so he IS NOT a Professor.
I want to see how UIC explains to all the other Senior Lecturers that they are not Professors and only Obama is a "Professor"
Posted by: MattOhio | Mar 31, 2008 2:55:25 PM
I can see that nothing that is dug-up on Obama is going to stick while he is running for the nomination, the MSM will not hear of it. I predict this will change when and if he gets the nomination. Clinton's miss-speaks or half-truths or whatever you want to call them are blown-up all out of proportion. While Obama's half-truths or whatever you want to call them are nicely ignored or smooth-out by MSM. This will change.
Posted by: Christine D | Mar 31, 2008 2:49:48 PM
This is kind of old news ABC. CNN reported on this last week, and as I said on their bog...if the university confirmed he was a professor...then he WAS a professor.
Obama wasn't the one claiming his spouse's experience, he didn't claim to negotiate peace treaties in Ireland, nor did he claim to be under enemy fire in Bosnia. Hillary's SS will have to do better than this to drag him down.
Now what about her tax returns and all those pork barrell initiatives she not only received but requested. While we are at it, now where are the lists of contributors to Bill Clinton's Library?
Hillary should expended more energy in getting her own house in order and release the documents she promised to America and less energy in trying to take down Obama with her sniper fire. The truth usually does win out. Not always in a timely enough manner which is really all the Clintons are hoping for.
Posted by: Try Again | Mar 31, 2008 2:35:09 PM
OMG! Barack Obama is such a liar. See, this is just more proof that he says one thing and does another. Hillary Clinton would never lie about something like this. Thank you Jake for exposing the truth about this rookie. Seat FL and MI voters!
hahahahaha... I just had to see what it was like to be a Clinton supporter. Its not very fun, its very bitter and demands intolerance.
Posted by: Hillary4life | Mar 31, 2008 2:32:49 PM
jake look at the current politico story on obama and the 1996 survey he filled out on his liberal positions and his campaign denial about it even though the form is in obama's own handwriting...
Posted by: al | Mar 31, 2008 2:31:28 PM
You know what I think? I think Senior Lecturer Obama knows the Consititutin better than Clinton and McCain. Without a doubt.
Posted by: Nobodys fool | Mar 31, 2008 2:29:22 PM
This is my favorite posting so far in the election
Cindy -
"Jake why don't you report on something worth reporting on; like the poem Maya Angelou posted on Hillary's website...It's beautiful, Maya Angelou is beautiful!!!"
Forget the war...forget race...forget ethics, healthcare the economy...report on something really important...
Maya Angelou's poem.
I think that is like the moment where the last crew member on the SS Clinton is slipping into the cold sea..."Report on "I know why the caged bird sings because the caged bird is losing the ELECTION!"
Posted by: dl | Mar 31, 2008 2:24:03 PM
If he were a Professor, that would be his title. Of course the University is going to promote itself via their staff.
Posted by: irma | Mar 31, 2008 2:20:21 PM
I have to say I had not seen Sen obama ever say Professor on the stump ever...always referring to when he "taught constitutional law" but I have seen people from the University and others refer to him being a Professor...which from the sounds of it...is what he was... it sounds like the difference between an associate professor and adjunct professor...
all I know is he taught Contitutional Law at a University...that is the issue and this constant attempt to bring them down to their level of a flawed candidate because they have lost credibility after years of issues with it...just makes the Clinton campaign look ...well, I don't have to say ...it is apparent.
Posted by: dl | Mar 31, 2008 2:20:02 PM
Nice try.
Posted by: Blake | Mar 31, 2008 2:19:56 PM
This is seriously, one of the most irrelevant issues I've ever seen raised in my life. So, when are we voting again? Because this stuff is just nonsense.
Posted by: davidconnell | Mar 31, 2008 2:15:45 PM
Impersonation of a doctor, professor, lawyer, police officer, etc... IS A FELONY!!!
Posted by: Cindy | Mar 31, 2008 2:14:40 PM
Jake why don't you report on something worth reporting on; like the poem Maya Angelou posted on Hillary's website...It's beautiful, Maya Angelou is beautiful!!!
Posted by: Cindy | Mar 31, 2008 2:12:47 PM
jake look at the current politico story on obama and the 1996 survey he filled out on his liberal positions and his campaign denial about it even though the form is in obama's own handwriting...
Posted by: al | Mar 31, 2008 2:12:09 PM
I think it doesn't matter. This one is trivia that distract from the more important misstatements he has made regarding his associations and tactics. It speaks to his lack of character but is a small straw on a haystack.
The press will give it time to fatigue the ears of the electorate so they will vote for whomever the press tells them is winning. Then the press will tear the winner down for the next four years. Qui bono? The media.
Posted by: len | Mar 31, 2008 2:11:15 PM
I think that I just wasted five minutes of my life that I will never get back.
Posted by: cavemandave | Mar 31, 2008 2:10:55 PM
jake look at the current politico story on obama and the 1996 survey he filled out on his liberal positions and his campaign denial about it even though the form is in obama's own handwriting...
Posted by: al | Mar 31, 2008 2:09:07 PM
I think that if you were taller, you'd have an easier time grasping at the straws.
Posted by: Tom | Mar 31, 2008 2:05:49 PM
Post a comment