Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior National Correspondent Jake Tapper
Jake Tapper is ABC News' Senior National Correspondent based in the network's Washington bureau. He writes about politics and popular culture and covers a range of national stories.
RECENT POSTS
- House Majority Whip: 'I Don’t Believe That There Is Any Way That She Can Win the Nomination'
- Obama-Backing Congressman Compares Hillary Clinton to Glenn Close in 'Fatal Attraction'
- The Latest...from Albany, Oregon
- Obama New Oregon Superdelegate Impugns McCain's Ethics
- Obama Fires Foreign Policy Adviser for Meeting With Hamas
- Obama Open to Helping Clinton Relieve Her Campaign Debt
- "West Wing" Actors Back Arianna V. McCain
- Ecclesiastes 3: 1-8
- Edwards May Endorse, Says Obama "Is Clearly the Likely Nominee"
- Panetta: Time for Clinton to Concede
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Client-9 "Would Ask You To Do Things That, Like, You Might Not Think Were Safe" | Main | Obama Flips on Whether Clinton Leaked that Photo »
Mann, oh Mann
March 10, 2008 7:37 PM
Former New York prosecutor Michael Bachner tells the Wall Street Journal that "to the extent Spitzer is charged it would likely be under the Mann Act, which prohibits transportation of people across state lines with the intent to commit prostitution."
This is classic New York snobbery.
What, our prostitutes in DC aren't good enough for you fancy-shmancy Manhattanites?
- jpt
March 10, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (17)
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/433071/26975998
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mann, oh Mann:
And all of this to say...
Bill is going to have waaaay to much time on his hands in the White House if Hillary wins.
Posted by: Marie | Mar 11, 2008 8:13:18 AM
Before this is all over the Democrats will end up blaming everything ralted to this scandal on the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy". And most of the "Dumb Masses" out there will end up believing them.
Posted by: smearjay | Mar 11, 2008 7:08:49 AM
What's the big deal here. It's not like he was drunk and drove his car off a bridge and a women drowned. On a scale of 1 to 10. This is like a 2 for Democrats. Now, if he had murdered her, that might be serious enough to be censured by his Democratic colleagues.
Posted by: smearjay | Mar 11, 2008 7:05:35 AM
Here's some info on the Mann Act SC decisions (from Wikipedia):
# Athanasaw v. United States (227 U.S. 326, 328) (1913). The Court decided that the law was not limited strictly to prostitution, but to “debauchery” as well.
# Caminetti v. United States (242 U.S. 470, 484-85) (1917). The Court decided that the Mann Act applied not strictly to purposes of prostitution, but to other noncommercial consensual sexual liaisons. Thus consensual extramarital sex falls within the genre of “immoral sex.”
Yeah, that little K Street babe you take over to Arlington -- MANN Act!
Posted by: Tom Traubert | Mar 10, 2008 10:43:12 PM
LAGuy... I live in LA. I do believe it matters that he betrayed his wife and broke the law. I may not think that it should be illegal but that does not matter. I don't like the speed limit but I can't argue that because i don't believe in it, it does not apply to me. It has not much to do with prostitution... it has to do with living up to the standards that you have become famous for. If this was Larry Flynt... yah, who cares. But this is different.
Posted by: smartprimate | Mar 10, 2008 10:42:40 PM
As a public official yes its bad but there is a bit of hypocrisy in some it is NY of all places, not that it makes it right what he has done, but NY is not really a beacon of virtue as a city now is it.
Posted by: SJ | Mar 10, 2008 10:40:06 PM
Well, you know, the guy was a john. They get the FBI and wiretaps going because the guy paid a prostitute? Yeah, the wifey should be mad, but get a grip, people.
Posted by: Tom Traubert | Mar 10, 2008 10:37:22 PM
From the apology statement: "Today, I want to briefly address a private matter. I have acted in a way that violates my obligations to my family and that violates my — or any — sense of right and wrong"
He also broke the law... this is not just a private matter no matter how much he says otherwise. This is a public issue... does he feel as the supreme executive of NY, that he is above legal scrutiny. I am sure that the voters of NY beg to differ!
Posted by: smartprimate | Mar 10, 2008 10:36:13 PM
LA they are all pretending to be so shocked about it because he got caught, but am sure many who are playing that oh my look what he has done, probably at one time have done the same thing.
Posted by: SJ | Mar 10, 2008 10:34:53 PM
I can't believe the people of NY care about a visit to a prostitute. Here in California we are not nealy as uptight about sex. NY isn't Kansas or Idaho, where they think you have kinky s*x if you leave the light on. Most of us have long since left the seventeenth century and the fourth grade.
Posted by: LAGuy | Mar 10, 2008 10:32:29 PM
What does any of this have to do with Hillary?
Spitzer is a democrat so to me he is a disgrace to the party on a whole and not just one individual.
If you are going to hang his actions on Hilliary you may as well hang some on Obama also because they are both running in the democrat primary under a democrat banner.
Posted by: SJ | Mar 10, 2008 10:32:18 PM
Gregg, why do you blame Hillary for something that her husband did, that is ridiculous. It is not her fault that men are such dogs.
Posted by: pat | Mar 10, 2008 10:24:54 PM
Hillary refrains from commentary on her endorser's escapades.
She can't condemn his behavior for she accepted all of her old man's escapades, and still does.
A woman without a moral ground. And for that very reason not fit to be President of The United States.
Posted by: Greg | Mar 10, 2008 10:10:40 PM
He does not believe in taxing us all to death so that Big Government can take care of all our needs. He does not believe in cutting and running from our strategic interests in the Middle East. I think we all know his stand on many things. Why concentrate on him when he is going to be the Rep Nom... we still don't know who the Dem Nom will be... that's why so much press on them
Posted by: smartprimate | Mar 10, 2008 9:19:53 PM
haha, this one is funny.
Posted by: kate | Mar 10, 2008 9:18:03 PM
Okay, it's America. We're in really, realy, bad shape. There's a presidential election going on. Except the press only covers 2 candidates - Clinton and Obama. In the meantime, John McCain flip-flops on the war, sings songs about bombing another sovereign nation, reverses a career-long position on torture, and what do we get? Nothing. There are three people in this election. It's time to start reporting on all of them. If you can't start with the obvious questions, start easy. What does he believe in?
Posted by: Mara | Mar 10, 2008 9:04:43 PM
This one doesn't deserve comment.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | Mar 10, 2008 8:33:54 PM
Post a comment