Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper
RECENT POSTS
- An Emotional President Obama Tours Former Slave Port with Family
- O Baby! The Obamas Visit Maternity Clinic in Ghana
- In Ghana, President Obama Gives Tough Love
- 2 Prez Obama: Questions Sent in Via Text, Email from Africa & the World
- Obama Campaign Plane Emergency: Report Shows it Could Have Been Catastrophic
- Give it Some Time, Obama Says in Defending the Recovery Act
- In Shift, US Calls for "Amnesty" for Journalists in NK
- Obama Pushes Back Amid Criticism Over G-8 Progress on Iran
- While the President's Away, Health Care will Stray?
- 'My Cousin In Kenya Can't Get a Job Without Paying a Bribe': Obama Tells African Leaders to Get Their Houses in Order
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
McCain Veepstakes Watch (part 1)
March 14, 2008 11:18 AM
One of the National Finance Chairs and main surrogates for former Massachusetts Governor - and erstwhile GOP presidential candidate - Mitt Romney has joined Sen. John McCain's campaign team, prompting more Romney-as-VP talk.
Meg Whitman, president and CEO of eBay, will serve as national co-chair for McCain, working on fundraising and traveling the country on McCain's behalf.
Earlier this week on Hannity & Colmes, Romney seemed eager to take the job.
"I think any Republican leader in this country would be honored to be asked to be serving as the vice presidential nominee, myself included," Romney said. "Of course this is a nation which needs strong leadership, and if the nominee of our Party asked you to serve with him, anybody would be honored to receive that call, and to accept it, of course."
Romney also demonstrated his running mate potential, saying of Sen. Hillary Clinton's "3 am" ad, "that was the best ad that the McCain campaign could have ever hoped for, because listening to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama talking about experience in a national security crisis is like listening to two Chihuahuas arguing about which is the biggest dog. When it comes to national security, John McCain is the big dog, and they are each the Chihuahua."
Whom should McCain pick as his vice presidential running mate?
- jpt
March 14, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (45)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
1. Colin Powell - No question he is qualified on Day one and neutralizes the issue of the race or gender of the Dem nominee.
2. Condi Rice - See above. Downside: she ties McCain more closely to an unpopular president and war (which is a disqualifier in my opinion).
3. Joe Lieberman - Locks up the independent voter. Only works if McCain can motivate the conservative voters to come out to the polls (which is debatable unless Hillary is the nominee).
4. Mitt Romney - Successful, articulate and Hollywood good looks. If the economy is in trouble, his business acumen complements McCain's foreign policy credentials. Only problem is lots of people don't like him (maybe you can be too successful, articulate and good looking?).
Posted by: Kyle, Tucson Az | Mar 30, 2008 2:30:56 PM
I am very disappointed with Senator McCain’s association with Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman. What in the world is he thinking? Hasn’t anyone told him?
For those who may not remember or know, Fiorina was the C.E.O. of Hewlett Packard until 2005 when she was fired. Her most famous quote; No American has a God given right to a Job just because they were American. She fired tens of thousands of employees to then outsource jobs overseas. She managed to skip out of Lucent right before the Feds arrived and started the HP Boardroom investigation which connected to the scandal and the hostile culture she created at HP.
Whitman is currently embroiled in a boycott from the buyers and sellers who made eBay (a.k.a. greebay, feepay) successful. Seems like they want to have a cleansing of their members. The boycott calls for no buying or selling and the evacuating from eBay by May 1, 2008. The most recent faux pax is the conflicting story given for what many called ‘mystery auction listings’ mysteriously from the Shopping dot com site (sdc). Explanations started as a glitch in the system, changed to limited test that ran its course, changed to accident and back to a test. The SEC should love this investigation. Keep in mind, eBay’s stocks have been steadily sagging and Wall Street measures eBay based on listings. Can’t forget the current Paypal lawsuit; eBay has tied PayPal to be the only means one can buy/sell on eBay which violates the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.
Fiorina and Whitman’s involvement with the Senator will surely guarantee a Democratic victory but then again both want to be the Governor of California so their motives are, usual for them, self serving.
Posted by: greta | Mar 19, 2008 3:08:04 PM
Romney, Giuliani, or Bloomberg would all work for McCain if he intends to take California. Any of the other named VP hopefuls will not. McCain will need someone who is well-vetted and already on the national stage, like Romney, or Giuliani, with no real skeletons coming out in the last minutes of the election. Also, McCain needs a VP that will pull the Party together and be able to raise funds of which all three mentioned above can. Romney has also won the Mid-West which is important to McCain if he is to win. Romney won Minnesota, Colorado, Michigan, North Dakota and would have won Wisconsin if he had not have withdrawn from the race. Giuliani gave McCain California, New York, and other North Eastern states, also important to McCain. Bloomberg would also most likely give McCain some of the North Eastern states and provide considerable means of monies that McCain also needs badly. Any one of the three can help with economy which seems to be the most important part of this election and will likely become more important as the year extends into November. As one Republican Governor said: "We have to reenergize our conservative movement ... great leaders and passionate leaders but we need to get some reinforcements in there because it feels to me a little tired. We got to reenergize it.", Romney has energized much of the Republican base. It was Romney that drove a record Republican turnout in Minnesota. Minnesota's Governor looked a "little tired" to the Republican base, and gave McCain nothing. Go Romney, Good-bye Pawlenty, it is clear your star has fallen into the reality of your mean-spirited nature.
Posted by: Patricia Gould | Mar 17, 2008 1:57:24 PM
If McCain picks immigrant-basher Romney, he can kiss the latino vote good-bye.
Even Huckabee would be better.
Elizabeth Dole would be an intriguing choice... although they may both need VP's themselves... or at leas wheelchairs. They could probably put that on their campaign buttons! But at least she would be a good, respectable choice.
Posted by: Jesse08 | Mar 17, 2008 4:27:37 AM
If McCain picks immigrant-basher Romney, he can kiss the latino vote good-bye.
Even Huckabee would be better.
Elizabeth Dole would be an intriguing choice... although they may both need VP's themselves... or at leas wheelchairs. They could probably put that on their campaign buttons! But at least she would be a good, respectable choice.
Posted by: Jesse08 | Mar 17, 2008 3:32:02 AM
If John McCain wants to win
he must win Ohio,
all things being equal.
John Kasich is the best choice for
his running mate,I think.
This election will be close
razor thin many feel,maybe won on the margins.
Posted by: Martin | Mar 16, 2008 9:41:05 PM
I like Carly Fiorina, the former CEO of Hewlett-Packard. She's a successful businesswoman and strengthens Senator McCain's bona fides. She is on his campaign committee and has campaigned with him on the trail, even answering questions on the economy in McCain's town hall meetings. Why do we need another politician anyway?
Posted by: Josh | Mar 15, 2008 12:11:45 PM
Mitt Romney would make an excellent VP. He understands the economy and how to fix it. He could help make the US competitive again. We are electing a CEO and co CEO to run one of the largest organizations in the world with a annual budget of a couple of Trillion of dollars. It makes sense that we would put petty views aside and elect the most experienced CEO's -- ones who have managed billions of dollars before.
Posted by: John S. | Mar 15, 2008 2:31:00 AM
All I can say is that Romney would add greatly to a McCain ticket. If McCain wants any chance of winning the West or Northeast (ie swing states) he'll need Romney. Plus with Romney as VP, he can finally prove to conservatives he's worth voting for.
Posted by: Tommie | Mar 15, 2008 1:34:20 AM
well, choose a business guy..how about Louis Gerstner, ex-ibm? i think he's a republican.
Posted by: vick | Mar 14, 2008 9:02:04 PM
if he picks Condi Rice, I predict this country will be destroyed. Those of you wanting him to pick Condi because of race and sex are pushing the very same thing that you claim to hate. Shame on you
McCain was my choice at first, but he is starting to look like bush all over again. If he picks Rice, it is all over for him. As an Independent, I want to see a real centrist with a vision and a plan of action. Currently, I don't see either party having anything. Today was the first time Clinton spoke about taxing oil profits. She won me over!
Posted by: sydney | Mar 14, 2008 8:17:27 PM
After the amount of acrimony exchanged between those two???
Posted by: cordelia525 | Mar 14, 2008 3:54:03 PM
Picking is one thing, getting an acceptance is another.
McCain has to find someone who doesn't mind being on a losing ticket AND having to assume the usual VP role: playing 'attack dog' (there's that dog thing again!) against the opposition. Assuming that's Obama, it means finding the equivalent of someone willing to publicly steal from widows and orphans. Romney may be the only one narrow-visioned enough to not see it's a poisoned chalice.
Good night and good luck.
Posted by: Tom J | Mar 14, 2008 3:26:47 PM
For this election cycle, I really think that the choice of a middle-aged white guy will be the kiss of death. Further, given that this election does seem to be about change, to have any chance of attracting the media's attention some degree of diversity (a woman, a minority, etc.) will be necessary. If you notice, Sen. McCain is in the news very little these days. Given the fund raising ability of Sen. Obama (or Hillary if she manages to steal it from him), McCain will be at a definite disadvantage. If Sen. Clinton is Not the Dem. choice, there would probably be a substantial % of disappointed female voters who would be willing to look to a centrist woman VP choice. Possible choices might be: Gov. Palin, Rep. Marsha Blackburn, Colin Powell, Condi Rice, Sen. Hutchinson.
Posted by: Lee | Mar 14, 2008 2:41:27 PM
To make McCain a sure win, he
must persuade Conde Rice to
be his running mate: this would
overwhelming neutralize the
opposition. And she has the
qualifications, gender, color,
and good looks to make
everyone happy.
Posted by: sbb | Mar 14, 2008 1:47:51 PM
Colin Powell All the way!!!
Posted by: Danny | Mar 14, 2008 1:38:53 PM
Bloomberg would be the best leader on the economy and ideally complement McCain's strength on national defense.
Posted by: Michael | Mar 14, 2008 1:05:32 PM
He should pick Meg Whitman. Her legislative record is about as thick as Obama's record.
Posted by: emo chalk | Mar 14, 2008 12:57:29 PM
Michael Bloomberg would be a wise choice in my opinion. He would bring a ton of campaign resources with him to the ticket and it would put New York in play for McCain.
Posted by: Brian | Mar 14, 2008 12:47:26 PM
I listened to Pres. Bush speak today with a stance that promotes free trade. I voted for the man and have defended his positions many times. When I look around me, I see factories closed, gas prices rising, food prices sky rocket because of the alternate fuel projects. Has no one noticed that a pound of butter is $4.79 this past week? Meanwhile I notice politicians becoming very rich from service to our country. Whether it is a mayor of a city, a governor of a state, a judge (family, supreme or appellate), a congressman or a president, they greatly increase their personal wealth from personal deals made in office. I travel around the country and see cities like Rochester, NY reduced to vacant lots as they demolish what was once Kodak, a major employer now reduced to rubble. This situation is repeated across the country. Pres. Bush said reeducation is the key to this dilema. My son is in technology in Massachusetts. They are outsourcing his company to Brazil. Congress reponds to this oozing of jobs by awarding defense contracts to foreign countries. Meanwhile the kickbacks and private deals make them rich while they promise us the world such as Hillary Clinton is doing. I am a non believer in any politician holding my interest as primary in their agenda. We furnish them homes, clothing, protection, a good wage, expense accounts and the best food and booze money can bye. They repay us with betrayal.
Meanwhile fuel prices sky rocket to "nudge" americans and ecologist to back off on protecting lands in Alaska or air quality. Pres Bush used this in todays speach. Leverage is a great tactic in business, but this leverage is impacting families in a critical way. Politicians know this and laugh as they "control" the pressure. They try to make us believe that markets cannot be manipulated. That may have been true in history, but not today. Not with corporate trades and institutional trading. I hear the common man cry out for help. I hear the rhetoric of politics. No one is protecting the people. I am ashamed of my congress and my president. Coolridge, WV
Posted by: cjvwise1 | Mar 14, 2008 12:42:50 PM
Post a comment

