Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

Does John McCain Need to Give a Speech on Race?

April 04, 2008 10:27 AM

I ask that seriously. On March 31, the Arizona senator seemed to reporters who were there (I wasn't) a bit uncomfortable talking about his trip today to Memphis to honor Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., on the 40th anniversary of his assassination.

Though it's unlikely that McCain will do well with black voters in November, he is of course running for president of the whole country (a point I once made when Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, seemed to dis Mississippi) and he seems to resent questions about why he in 1983 voted against the MLK Holiday.

McCain can be quite eloquent on the subject of race. In 2005, interviewed on Tavis Smiley's radio show, McCain recommended that African-Americans read (or re-read) King's "Letter from a Birmingham Jail."

But per ABC News' Bret Hovell, on March 31, reporters tried to understand how and why McCain evolved on this issue -- and McCain seems a bit perturbed.

It started when a reporter asked McCain why he decided to go to Memphis today.

"Because we were invited," McCain said. "Because I was invited to attend. So we accepted the invitation. That’s, that’s all."

Why didn't he vote for an MLK holiday in 1983?

"Well. I voted in my first, I think it was my first year in Congress, against that," McCain said. "Then I began to learn. And I studied and people talked to me, and I not only supported it, but I fought very hard in my home state of Arizona for recognition against a governor who was of my own party…"

What did he mean that he "began to learn"?

"I learned all that this individual was a transcendent figure in American history," McCain said. "He deserved to be honored. And I...thought it was appropriate to do so. And my home state of Arizona, I was not proud that we were one of the last states to recognize Dr. King’s birthday as a holiday. I was pleased to be part of the fight for that recognition."

What didn’t you know when you voted initially against it?

"I had not really been involved in the issue," McCain said. "I just had not had a lot of experience in the issue."

Because he hadn’t been around? (McCain was in a P.O.W. camp when King was assassinated.)

"I came from the military, where we are the greatest equal opportunity employer in the nation and still are, and I had just not been involved in the issue," McCain said. "There were issues that I had not been involved in when I was in the military. And then I went relatively very quickly to being a member of Congress."

So he just didn’t realize the large role --

"I think I just explained it about as well as I could - " McCain interrupted.

A reporter said that one didn't have to be "involved" in the civil rights struggles of the 1960s to be aware of King's impact.

"I think you are entitled to your opinion on it, and I respect your opinion on it," McCain said. "But I had not been involved in the issue. I had come from being in the military to running for Congress in a state that did not have a very large African American population, and it had not been an issue. I mean it just simply had not been in my state in that time, nor even in Congress. The momentum was building in that direction. And frankly I’m proud of my record and support of Dr. Martin Luther, recognition of Dr. Martin Luther King. I'm very proud of it… And I’m proud to have been a part of the greatest equal opportunity employer that provided that for people who want to go as far as their ambitions will take them in the United States military."

I wasn't there, but reporters who were describe McCain as "testy" and "feisty" in this conversation. Why?

Between the lines it seems that McCain is saying he just hadn't had much exposure to the civil rights movement or, frankly, to many African-Americans. And beginning in 1983 his mind began to open up on the subject of King and race in general. That's a journey he has not been on alone -- indeed it wasn't until 2000 that all 50 states recognized the MLK Holiday. It may be that what's called for here is not just straight talk, but some straight-from-the-heart talk. Because this tone seems just oft-putting.

- jpt

April 4, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (39)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I think that McCain has done a credible job of explaining his position and how he feels about race now. I am sure that his position on immigration and his votes in the Senate will show a clear record of embracing all Americans.

He really is the only Republican that could get elected in 2008....His current position on Iraq might be the only thing that stops him.

As far as race baiting there has been a successful effort of Obamas campaign to paint people as racists. I do believe that like in any political campaign Bill Clinton was trying to minimize the opposing candidate but it was definitely not an attack based on race. The "fairytale" remarks were completely in context regarding Obama's war position.

And the Jesse Jackson comparison had been made in the media repeatedly prior to Clinton repeating it.

Obama's campaign was "accidently" leaking memos accusing Bill and Hillary of racism. This is not a wise campaign tactic because even if it works and it did.......Obama was reinforcing that he was the "black" candidate...and the whole time he was insisting that his camp was not accusing the Clinton's of racism.

Then when Obama got in trouble with Wright his campaign dug up some 2 weeks old comments from Ferraro and started "race baiting" again. The problem with those comments (which were widely taken out of comments to remove the "and woman" part) was that Obama had said the same thing in 2005.

I am a middle aged white woman with a bi-racial grandson. My vote will not tip an election either way....but the destruction rather than healing that has been created with Obama's campaign constant race attacks has left it's mark.

Wright's comments would have been unacceptable whether he was black or white...but now the media is on a strange road....trying to prove that personal vicious attacks of a political opponent and anti-White rhetoric and anti-American rhetoric and even the false teaching that AIDS is a government invention are all acceptable from a pulpit as long as the person making them is Black.

I want out of Iraq. We need a Democrat in the White House. But I am seriously considering McCain.

I do not agree with the media that only uneducated racists vote for Hillary. I do not believe I am either.

And I am not sure I can vote for a man that has orchestrated race attacks condoned political attacks from his spiritual mentors pulpit and stayed in this church for 20 years.

Posted by: Jackie | Apr 6, 2008 2:29:23 AM

lou, so right.

re obama, he's a jerk, not a white jerk, not a black jerk, just a jerk.

will never vote for him.

Posted by: so saddened | Apr 5, 2008 4:15:28 AM

maybe obama needs to give another speech on race. after all, hillary and mccain managed to find time to attend the 40 year mlk anniversary event, but obama said he was too busy and didn't go.

Posted by: so saddened | Apr 5, 2008 3:13:53 AM

A speech on race will not help someone who just now feels the need to explain a vote against the legacy of MLK's holiday that happened 25 years ago when he was 47. And that after the state was losing tourism dollars from boycotts.

Posted by: kravitz | Apr 5, 2008 2:20:49 AM

No, MCCain does not have to give any more speeches on race ...
Enough heard already ...

What MCCain need is to win the White House in November if Obama is the Democratic Nominee.

And to win the White House in November if Obama is the other nominee, he has to win Hillary's supporters .. And who else best to help MCCain win Hillary supporters - yes, Hillary herself.

MCCAIN/HILLARY ticket (if Obama is the Democratic nominee)

MCCain has the 28% Hillary supporters who will never vote Obama but he needs to grab more ...
Dont have to worry about the Black vote because Hillary is doing as well as she is right now WITHOUT the Black vote. Obama has 80-90% black votes as is.

MCCAIN wins the White House by keeping all the Republicans, getting the thinking Independents and Hillary's supporters.

Obama CANNOT win the presidency without Hillary's supporters ..

So MCCAIN, please consider Hillary as VP if she is not the Democratic nominee

All you Republicans need to give Hillary another look, like Scaife did ..

Hillary is intelligent, diligent, clear-headed, pragmatic, sensible, experienced, consensus-builder, knowledgeable, patriotic ...
She clearly has the credentials befitting that of the President of the United States ...


Posted by: mccain_hillary | Apr 4, 2008 10:31:23 PM

I will just re-direct everyone to Lou's comments. Well said, Lou! I totally agree.

Posted by: Bea | Apr 4, 2008 8:40:14 PM

A speech? McCain needs to start by doing a grade school level book report. Just add this to the growing list of "issues" McCain is disturbingly ignorant of.

Posted by: Chris R | Apr 4, 2008 4:01:31 PM

Mr. King Jr. was killed in 1968 and McCain voted against that bill in 1983, and only after more than 15 years he started to realize the immense personality Mr. King Jr. had in this country. Where was McCain hiding during those years? Beneath a stone? Come on, McCain. That only goes to show you did not care at all about the Blacks' rights and now you are running for President and want to play Mr. Nice Guy? You are nothing more but a racist in the back of your mind!!!

Posted by: Tony Hernandez | Apr 4, 2008 3:53:26 PM

I'm an African-American who is currently supporting Obama and I was very, very pleased with the class that John McCain showed today when giving his speech. He is representing the republican party who has not been very succesful in obtaining the African-American vote mainly due to, what I believe to be, a lack of trust that Republicans really care about them. He's speech today spoke to me. I've seen McCain as a classy guy sense he entered the race and what he said today just confirmed that. If Obama doesn't win, I'll be just fine calling "McCain Mr. President"

Posted by: ddpwoman | Apr 4, 2008 2:07:20 PM

Gee Juan Williams...lol. Why is it, that when the time comes to have a seriois dialog about race the right-wingers roll this guy out like, he's black..see look at how much has changed. Please...what no Larry Elder quotes? I'm so sick of a black face with a white voice pandering to those who truely believe in America is the greatest melting pot of culture in world history. He's good enough to put these right wingers at ease. Trust me Juan Williams is such a reverse racism appologist it's sickening. If you choose to use appeasment as a solution to a real issue than you are just drinking the GOP kool-aide. Juan Williams is about as black as Robin Williams, just another GOP lackey. I don't trust anyone who would ignore history and the fact that institutional racism has existed since this country's inception. Apoligize and appease white folks for his personal status and gain. The funny thing is the GOP and the like have their heads so far up their (G.W.) Bush they don't see how phoney this guy really is.

Posted by: Now that's good for a laugh | Apr 4, 2008 1:46:37 PM

Why should he? He is not a racist like Obama! and the libs!

Posted by: spock | Apr 4, 2008 1:28:42 PM

Someone should ask Michelle Obama why she wasn't proud when MLK day was made a holiday.

Posted by: geevill | Apr 4, 2008 1:15:13 PM

McCain voted how his constituents wanted.

Posted by: geevill | Apr 4, 2008 1:13:37 PM

Democrats United:

I read the boston papers, I think they are the relaible source on this issue.

Posted by: countallthevotes | Apr 4, 2008 1:13:25 PM

"I had not been involved in the issue"...

How could ANY American who truly cared about the rights and values in our society and about all the citizens of the USA say such a thing?

Posted by: greg | Apr 4, 2008 12:57:44 PM

Juan Williams of all people has a good article about Obama's two-faced campaign. One for blacks and another for whites.

to the conscience and highest ideals of the nation. He no longer asks black people to let go of the grievance culture to transcend racial arguments and transform the world.

He has stopped all mention of government's inability to create strong black families, while the black community accepts a 70% out-of-wedlock birth rate. Half of black and Hispanic children drop out of high school, but he no longer touches on the need for parents to convey a love of learning to their children. There is no mention in his speeches of the history of expensive but ineffective government programs that encourage dependency. He fails to point out the failures of too many poverty programs, given the 25% poverty rate in black America.

And he chooses not to confront the poisonous "thug life" culture in rap music that glorifies drug use and crime.

Instead the senator, in a full political pander, is busy excusing Rev. Wright's racial attacks as the right of the Rev.-Wright generation of black Americans to define the nation's future by their past. He stretches compassion to the breaking point by equating his white grandmother's private concerns about black men on the street with Rev. Wright's public stirring of racial division.

And he wasted time in his Philadelphia speech on race by saying he can't "disown" Rev. Wright any more than he could "disown the black community." No one has asked him to disown Rev. Wright. Only in a later appearance on "The View" television show did he say that he would have left the church if Rev. Wright had not retired and not acknowledged his offensive language.

Posted by: geevill | Apr 4, 2008 12:54:40 PM

Ummm Countallthevotes,---------- No, that is NOT what P'ed off kennedy. Clinton's tone in her statement seemes to downplay the role that Dr. King played in getting the Civil Rights act Passed. Yeah, Johnson signed it into law, but Dr. king played a much bigger role than Clinton insuated. Now, I do believe Clinton misspoke. She was probably, no doubt, suffering from fatigue and sleep deprivation, just like Obama. I understood what she was trying to say, but the Press made such a big deal about it. The MEDIA created this firestorm about RACE. I WILL CONTINUE TO BLAME THEM FOR IT. What P'ed off Ted kennedy was Bill Clinton's actions. He put his foot in his own mouth and the Media had nothing to do with it. He let his ego and temper get the best of him. He tried to (once again) downplay the significance of Obama's S.C. victory, saying that Jesse Jackson won the states when he ran both times. Why Jesse Jackson? Bill Clinton, himself, also won the state, as have other democrats.

Kennedy did not like the fact that Clinton was race baiting (trying to paint Obama as the "Black candidate" in order to tear into his "white" support.) It's an ugly method - especially amongst democrats.

Posted by: Democrats United | Apr 4, 2008 12:52:57 PM

Joseph posted:

"Jesse Jackson just said that Dr. King endorsed Lyndon Johnson in 1964 because he needed an "ally" in the White House "to get the Voting Rights Act passed."

Wasn'that exactly what Hillary said months ago - and was accused of denigrating MLK in South Carolina by Obama supporters?"

Yes, that is precisely what Hillary Clinton said. Johnson got VRA passed, not Kennedy. Had JFK lived, he would not have had the success that Johnson did. JFK could never have pulled the Southern Democrats along. It simply never would have happened, though he wanted it.

This is what p***ed off Ted Kennedy and led to his endorsement of Obama. It was all over the Boston papers that Ted had a "melt down" about Hillary's crediting Pres. Johnson. Then came Ted Kennedy's endorsement.

Posted by: countallthevotes | Apr 4, 2008 12:28:41 PM

Obama is going lose!

It is the "JOHN KERRY EFFECT"!

Posted by: John | Apr 4, 2008 12:23:11 PM

Ah yes the GOP talking race...It's such a warm fuzzy feeling for ALL Americans...right. When the subject comes up it's always Rev. Wright, blah, blah. The fact remains that McCain and the grand old party will continue to brush race under the rug because a meaningful conversation has no benefit to them, period. They all but given up an the black vote so screw em. They will continue to put blacks and other minorities on the back burner because like Arizona in the 80's blacks just don't matter enough in the big picture for them to give a hoot. Obama had the courage to face the country honestly, and with personal humility. It takes courage to face that 800 pound gorrilla in the room called race. It could have cost him the election. McCain and the rest of these ultra-careful Republicans wouldn't dare face reality, they would much rather squeeze their eye's tightly together and just wish, wish, wish it would all just go away. Real leadership there.

Posted by: mims | Apr 4, 2008 12:11:32 PM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS