In Oregon, Clinton Makes False Claim About Her Iraq Record Vs. Obama's

In the Political Headlines of ABC. Clinton is named 5 times. Obama once. Fair ?

The science department of a prestigious California university has devised a method to determine if Hillary is lying or not. It was field-tested and determined to be 100% accurate. Because of this accuracy, the inventors have been awarded the Nobel Prize in Mendacity Determination. The test works like this: If Hillary's lips are moving, she is lying.

This so-called "lie" is going to be true too. After all, Hillary was in an official capacity. Her letter meant something. His was a campaign tactic.

Here's a song for BHO to sing in honor of Wright. Envision Obama, taking the advice of his mentor, his hand on his heart:
"God, d--mn America,
Land that I hate.
Undermine her
Condemn her
May the voters
All take the bait.
From the lefties
At the caucuses
To the college girls, white ones too!
God d--mn America,
And Grandma too!"

I wouldn't count her out yet. I'm just waiting for the video of the Obamas' dancing in the aisle while pastor Wright delivered one of his hate sermons. It's out there somewhere.

Clinton is entering the "dementia praecox" phase of her campaign, one during which the hopelessness is so extreme that they feel anything goes. What's the worse that can happen? That she will lose the nomination? Well, that'll probably happen anyway. So they're trying ANYTHING that they can think of. They'll worry about the consequences later. Of course, one of these consequences is the field day that the Republican attack hordes will have with all of Clinton's gyrations. For all the fear of what the opponents will do with the Wright material, I think Clinton has provided them with ten times as much material, even during this election alone, let alone the massive amounts of material she and BIll provided over the last 35 years of so-called "experience".

What is wrong with this Hillary? I was against NAFTA before I voted for it. I was against the War before I voted for it.

I actually started criticizing the War in Iraq before he did. Look would I lie? So there I rest my case. Naaa Naaa Naaa

This is written down in my college bookbag for posterity just for you doubting Thomas's - Yuck yuck yuck!

Gotta go time for my meds.

To keepitreal-- Thank you for your post. Unfortunately, the political world and the dialogue that surrounds it is infused with attack. Witness the sarcasm, recriminations, diatribes, belittling, and general hostilities that dominate political blogging. It's the playground of the ego. The vast majority of people who contribute are not truly interested in an open-minded discourse. I truly believe that no votes are changed in the discourse here. Does an Obama or Clinton supporter really believe--in their heart of hearts--that by railing against the opposition candidate as "ignorant" or "un-American" or "deceptive" they will somehow lead the opposition's supporters to throw up their arms and say, "Oh yeah, you're right, I don't know what came over me. I will change my vote because you have now enlightened me"? Doubtful. Your point, however, directs us to a deeper level of understanding that many will likely deride as "psycho-spiritual babble" or "nonsense," but one which rings true to me. My favorite articulation comes out of A Course in Miracles: "Projection makes perception. The world you see is what you gave it, nothing more than that. But though it is no more than that, it is not less. Therefore, to you it is important. It is the witness to your state of mind, the outside picture of an inward condition. As a man thinketh, so does he perceive. Therefore, seek not to change the world, but choose to change your mind about the world." Essentially, this teaches that attack on another is an outward projection of an inner self-hatred.
Again, I appreciate your post. The buddhism quotes are real treasures. Thanks for sharing them.

Wars are not fought on speculation. What we do know and what we knew then is this: There were no real WMD in Iraq, and that Iraq/Saddam had nothing to do with 911. Nuclear is included in WMD.

JASON: Do you really think that if we had not gone into Iraq, that Saddam would not be "really" trying to get a nuclear weapon to counter the Iranians.

Also, if our Army was here at home, would there be an Al Queda in the USA? Probably not...

How did we go to war with the wrong country? Hillary said this:

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

Becky, you are correct on all but the most important point. To say the environment needs to change first before we see real change in our circumstances is to say in effect that we are controlled by our environment and that our true happiness is some how dependent on that environmental change. We must change our mentalities to the thinking and belief that we are ultimately responsible for everything that happens to us (whether we think so or not, WE ARE!), and that we are the ultimate deciders in whether we do create a positive environment or a negative one. To be controlled by our envirnment is to continue on the same path we are on now. One perfect example is how these political ads cause soooo many people to frame their own judgement based on its' message - whether the information happens to be right or wrong. We don't take enough control over making sure we know the truth, before we decide. That's a major flaw of our character that has got to change before any environmental circumstance will begin to truly work in our favor. Right now we don't respect our environment so how does it come first in the solution of how we become Truly Happy People. If you know anything about truly happy people, they don't wait for their environment to change - They change their thinking and belief system about life which gives rise for them to develop the courage and wisdom to know how to draw out, from with-in, the life-condition to handle whatever the environment has to throw at them. And as their stregnth, resolve and persistance remains constant, it pulsates outwardly to the minds of others. The positive environmental change is based on all of our collective positive efforts to see the world in its truest form and with one mind to create value in everything, even when we don't think we see any value there. Once that occurs we naturally will see that our environment will begin to follow suit. The environment is: nature, us and our universe. Nichiren Buddhism has a very profound passage that states: 'If the people's minds are pure so is their land. But if the people's minds are impure so is their land. There is neither a pure or impure land apart from the inner workings of our minds.' That there is no such thing as a pure land or impure land outside of us suggest a much deeper level of responsibility and understanding about the True Entity of Life than our current civilization is used to hearing. It all oringinates in the mind and the effects are by no means some accident or strange occurance. People have undergone a tremendously long period of time creating and trying to hide and disguise the effects of their actions. Buddhism says these effects will manifest themselves when the time and conditions are right just as flowers already embody the inherent cause for blooming in the spring, when the time and conditions are right! And this is a natural law just as gravity is. This law I speak of is and has been for centuries, proven to be the most fundamental law of any other. The most direct path to enlightenment or abosolute happiness that is not guided by our environments changing circumstances. The problem is, Americans like others around the world are so skeptical about learning other philosophies that we miss all of the true wonders to be experienced in our beautiful world.

Read the article by Peter Wehner in the February Issue of Commentary Magazine if you want a comprehensive outline of Obama's various positions on the War in Iraq. My favorite is:

Almost as soon as the war began in March 2003, Obama had second thoughts about his opposition to it. Watching the dramatic footage of the toppling of Saddam’s statue in Baghdad, and then the President’s speech aboard the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln, “I began to suspect,” he would write later in his autobiographical The Audacity of Hope (2006), “that I might have been wrong.” And these second thoughts seem to have stayed with him throughout the entire first phase of the occupation following our initial combat victory. As he told the Chicago Tribune in July 2004, “There’s not that much difference between my position and George Bush’s position at this stage.”

You know when you've hit saturation point on a politician? When the fact that she lied or misspoke or errored or whatever they are calling it this week isn't even shocking. No wonder the Republicans want to run against her so badly. She has impeached her character on her own. They don't have to dig up any dirt since she's bringing wheelbarrows full of it to them.

I am going to go out on a limb here and say that I am committed to the idea that WE have the ability to demand the type of insightful, truthful, contextually accurate, in depth factual and non corporate sponsored information that we have never had before. Each other. Now I say we have the right to speak openly about the core causes of the lies, smoke, mirrors, sexual deviance, and corporate take over of our country. If we do not demand that our candidates speak to these issues nothing they have or haven't said in this race will matter. Our government is putting on a show and these candidates are a part of it. I cannot stress enough, if we do not remove the false pretense and power that our two factions of government, our electoral collage and our courts are abusing, none of this will matter. Write to your news stations about your concern of legitimacy,write each candidate and tell them you wont vote unless they acknowlege these issues fully, make them talk about it.They are applying for a job with you. Make them earn it. write to your reps. write to the white house. Just write letters.Even to your family. If we are truly Americans we must show the factions we will work together to preserve this or they will take it away.Take away the extremists in our government and we are just people that want the same thing. Just like Mom and Dad. If you can't show reason and the ability to see the world for what it is and take care of or show real interest in what you have they take it away. You are considered a danger to yourself and others and now Mom and Dad sell off your favorite stuff to pay for the damages you did. We are spoiled and ignorant and Mom and Dad have become Conglom USA. They have to pay the bills somehow right.Just take a moment and ask yourself, should my candidate have the courage to look within the division of America and take a gash out of it by proving our votes count, and ONLY our votes. They have not answered my inquiries yet.

I agree with lyne-
Absolutes and extreme vilification of Democrats @the war now is unfair. Can anyone deny that we have not removed the core of the threat that attacked us in the first place. Short Attention Span Theater in this country is epidemic. Why only remember one side of an issue, how does that make you valuable to anyone in any situation. It just makes you shall we say a tool of the trade.

Hey, let's not forget a couple of things.
1. Obama in hateful Church for 20 years (anti-white church)
2. Obama's wife is anti-American, pro black liberation
3. Obama reveres Rev. Wright and "Minister Farrakhan"
4. obama tied to Syrain gangster Rezko, who helped him buy his home.
5. Obama slammed his white Grandma, you never see any of his white family.

Now, what is wrong with any white middle-class person who would vote for him? I ask you? The wealthy liberal whites can afford to put an anti-white in, because they have the $$$, it will not affect their jobs and their money.

WoaH, Bobo
Hold your horses! Democrats never said that we should not go to war at all. The issue at the time was is still is that we were going to war with the WRONG COUNTRY.

Congress approved for Bush to go to war against Bin Laden (who was is Afghanistan, not Iraq). Everyone agreed that he should go after the guilty, but not Iraq which it turns out never had the Weapons and was not supporting the terrorists who actually attacked US!

No American (Democrat, Republican, or Other) would deny the president the right to go to war with someone who just bombed the country.

But the issue being discussed here is Iraq, not Afghanistan. "Staying the course" to me means dont stop until you catch and punish Bin Laden. Dont stop and start a different war before you have done that!

To Kayla-
Your statement is false. The hospital in my hometown has a sign in their waiting room that reads: If you are not insured, you do not have money to pay your bill and you are not in immediate danger, Seek treatment elsewhere, you will not be admitted. So you are incorrect.

To the new yorker, thank you for acknowledging my sentiments, I just have no faith that my vote even counts, and I think in a way if no one voted on election day, but sent thier vote and reason to their representitive in writing. That would make faking anything hard and make quite a statement.

HRC is at it again. when will this woman stop? if hillary knew so much about our healthcare system she would know that NO ONE can be turned away due to lack of insurance. she doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt here. hillary knew it was false and she didnt care. a serious commander in chief would've made sure to have the story checked out and she DIDN'T DO THAT!
why she didn't make sure the story was checked out? hillary lacks the ability to make serious judgement. this has been shown time and time again with this woman. NO WAY should hillary be president of the U.S.