RECENT POSTS
- Oprah, Health Care Lobbyists, Among Recent Visitors to White House
- An Obama Thanksgiving Menu, with an Extra Serving of Pie
- White House Thanksgiving Traditions: Broken and Observed
- Obama, GOP Air Differences Over Jobs, Economy In Thanksgiving Addresses
- White House State Dinner Party Crashers
- Obama to Lay Out Emissions Goals in Copenhagen
- Free Bird
- The "Good" War
- The Presidential Planner
- Under the Stars, Obama Toasts India’s Prime Minister
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Tom Hayden Looks at Clinton's 60s Past
April 27, 2008 12:35 PM
In The Nation, former 60s radical Tom Hayden -- in an essay called "Why Hillary Makes My Wife Scream" -- hammers Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, for attacking Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, for his association with former Weather Underground member William Ayers. "Hillary is blind to her own roots in the sixties," Hayden writes. "She was in Chicago for three nights during the 1968 street confrontations. She chaired the 1970 Yale law school meeting where students voted to join a national student strike again an 'unconscionable expansion of a war that should never have been waged.' She was involved in the New Haven defense of Bobby Seale during his murder trial in 1970, as the lead scheduler of student monitors. ... She wrote that abused children were citizens with the same rights as their parents.
"Most significantly in terms of her recent attacks on Barack, after Yale law school, Hillary went to work for the left-wing Bay Area law firm of Treuhaft, Walker and Burnstein, which specialized in Black Panthers and West Coast labor leaders prosecuted for being communists. Two of the firm's partners, according to Treuhaft, were communists and the two others 'tolerated communists'. Then she went on to Washington to help impeach Richard Nixon, whose career was built on smearing and destroying the careers of people through vague insinuations about their backgrounds and associates. ...
"All these were honorable words and associations in my mind, but doesn't she see how the Hillary of today would accuse the Hillary of the sixties of associating with black revolutionaries who fought gun battles with police officers, and defending pro-communist lawyers who backed communists? Doesn't the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, whom Hillary attacks today, represent the very essence of the black radicals Hillary was associating with in those days? And isn't the Hillary of today becoming the same kind of guilt-by-association insinuator as the Richard Nixon she worked to impeach?"
April 27, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (142)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Oh is this a contest about who has more 60's cred? PUHLEAZE. what did this generation do with those high ideals, well in the seventies they started to clean up the earth, in the 80's they made alot of junk bond $ so they could buy deloreans and blow the rest up their nose, in the 90's they continued to fight the 60's battle and both side showed their lack of morals. meanwhile their children are not voting based on 60's cred but on what ideals passed onto them where actually put into effect. we like John Edwards and we like Barak Obama. why? Barack does not say I will do the work for you instead we must all work to improve ours and others lives. we are looking forwards to John Edwards poverty tour.
Posted by: brenda | Apr 28, 2008 11:06:43 AM
Let's face it! Hillary is a lair. I voted for Bill Clinton twice, and at the end of his administration, there was money in the bank. Good ole GWB ate that up real fast!
Hillary can't be trusted! She could not beat McCain!
A vote for McCain means more wars in GWB's name.
Obama is the Democrat's best bet!
Posted by: TM | Apr 28, 2008 10:56:06 AM
Stop trying to kill the messenger boys and girls. Tom Hayden had a decent run as a CA State Assemblyman and he has as much right to his opinions as any of us on this post!. Hillary Clinton is a liar flat out with no sugar-coating and she will change up her story the moment she seems to be in trouble. She has with her vaunted 35 years experience run the worst primary race campaign for someone who was the frontrunner that anyone can remember. Hayden has told the truth. I suspect given Hillary's supporters inability to acknowledge her out and out pandering and lying...she deserves them as her supporters and they deserve her as their candidate. But the outcome is going to be different this time folks...the rest of us are not willing the take the hit for your misguided commitment to a woman who would drop the lot of you today, if we offered her the nomination to do just that. Remember Hill supporters, you are simply a means to an end. The corporations own Mrs. Clinton lock stock and barrel.
Posted by: anghiari | Apr 28, 2008 10:42:39 AM
I am 69 years old and was and still am a great admirer of Tom Hayden and his ex-wife Jane Fonda. I agree that Hillary, was probably what one would term a 'radical' in those days. Now she seems to be a factory girl from Indiana or Pennsylvania, i.e. any state that consists of heavy industry. Oh how the leopard changes its spots in Clinton's case. I just hope when all is said and done, someone will send the old gal through a car wash and remove the stripes and colors she has painted herself with in an attempt to be EVERYONE'S dream candidate.
Posted by: Mary M. Mansour | Apr 28, 2008 9:12:11 AM
I am 69 years old and was and still am a great admirer of Tom Hayden and his ex-wife Jane Fonda. I agree that Hillary, was probably what one would term a 'radical' in those days. Now she seems to be a factory girl from Indiana or Pennsylvania, i.e. any state that consists of heavy industry. Oh how the leopard changes its spots in Clinton's case. I just hope when all is said and done, someone will send the old gal through a car wash and remove the stripes and colors she has painted herself with in an attempt to be EVERYONE'S dream candidate.
Posted by: Mary M. Mansour | Apr 28, 2008 9:12:02 AM
This is the kind of ammunition the Obama camp needs against Hillary Clinton. The level of her hypocrisy is astounding and it paints her in a terrible light.
Someone this blind to her own past has no business leading the country into the future.
Posted by: Alicia | Apr 28, 2008 9:02:04 AM
mark kraft,
check your elections
jane fonda endorsed obama for president.
Posted by: middle of the road | Apr 28, 2008 2:13:13 AM
why doesnt everyone understand that running for president is not about statesmanship but rather ego greed or insanity. I'm voting for Gore for VP. After all, with 8 years on the job experience, internet inventor and global warming saviour he has better credntials than all of them.
Posted by: gianis | Apr 28, 2008 2:09:18 AM
oh my, never thought i'd see the day 40 years later when ANYONE would listen to tom hayden on any subject. very few of us even listened to him way back when. he must be desperate for a little attention.
Posted by: so saddened | Apr 28, 2008 1:47:16 AM
Funny how one of the commenters went off on "Hanoi" Jane Fonda... who, incidentally, Hillary Clinton supporter.
Last I heard, Ayers was just this guy who was once on the board of a quite respectable local Chicago charity along with Obama and about a dozen other people, and not an Obama supporter at all... whereas Hanoi Jane "hopes for a Hillary Clinton presidency" and donated $2000 to her campaign. She was even one of those people who donated to the Clintons in order to stay in the Lincoln Bedroom.
So, in what way isn't that a considerably closer friendship / financial partnership to Hillary?
Posted by: Mark Kraft | Apr 28, 2008 12:44:13 AM
Get back to me when Hayden discovers proof that Hillary constructed bombs, then detonated them in attacks against American institutions.
The far left in this country are truly despicable people. People like Hayden, Fonda and Ayers should go live in some South American banana Republic, They don't deserve a country like ours.
Posted by: OxyCon | Apr 28, 2008 12:20:47 AM
Tom Hayden has a good memory. But I do too. I was there in Chicago in '68 as well, only I was a campaigner for Gene McCarthy trying to stop the war by working within the political process, not in the streets trying to tear the country apart. I understood the frustration that so many of my friends and co-conspirators felt at that divisive time, but I was never very comfortable with confrontation for confrontations sake.
I have great respect for Hillary and Bill Clinton because they have always worked within the system as well. They are both liberal people who understand that great change in politics demands skillful compromise. They are both appreciate the realities that face any administration that wishes to move the American government and electorate in a different direction.
I didn't fundamentally disagree with Tom and the rest of the signers of the SDS manifesto, the Port Huron Statement, some 40 years ago because I thought their goals were the same as mine, although their means were a bit more radical. I've watched as Tom mellowed in his later years - still on the far left, but solidly within the visible spectrum of political thought.
I don't think Hillary has mellowed. I still see her in the same light as when she came to Washington 16 years ago. What I think has happened to her is that she has learned how to play the game...and she plays it pretty well.
I haven't decided whether to support Hillary or Obama yet, (my favored candidate chose not to run) but I believe we will be well served by either.
Let's just get on with it and debate the issues.
Posted by: Hunkmiller | Apr 28, 2008 12:12:21 AM
COMMANDER GUY:
so Clinton was coddling commies while cavorting during the cold cold war.
Was she cavorting casually or carefully?
And, Sir.....ARE YOU BLOODY OUT OF YOUR MIND?
Posted by: eyes extremely wide open | Apr 27, 2008 11:34:42 PM
Don't like this tread EYES who may or may not be open?
Reap. Sow. Deal with it.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | Apr 27, 2008 11:31:49 PM
eyes ALLEGEDLY wide open
Its called McRezkoism among other things.
And this is a Baby you and your Friends HATCHED.
So enjoy, babe.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | Apr 27, 2008 11:29:24 PM
When will Hillary find her voice?
She's 60 and still doesn't know who the hell she is! Were her medical records released, and, if so, did it mention anything about bipolar disorder?
Posted by: Roxanne | Apr 27, 2008 11:28:09 PM
eyes which are ALLEGEDLY wide open say_
"well you can come out of the closet for now; their gone....... All those Russians are now rich fat cats."
Ya Babe, SOME of the Ruskies doing some serious robber barronism right now. Eventually they figured out the Coddling Communism didn't work so well.
Which goes back to Hills. Why was she coddling the Commies and their FAILED ideology in a time of war?
Everybody knows communism is a losing proposition, apparently it took Hills a little longer than everyone else.
And Ya I gotts the hate for the Commies. You I can agree to disagree, here. To each his/her own.
Posted by: The Commander Guy | Apr 27, 2008 11:25:19 PM
what kind of cavorting with communists did clinton do?
was it kind of a soft shoe cavorting?
or a Virginia reel type of cavorting?
enquiring people really want to know....
ps.
my REAL name is "MCcarthy"
Posted by: eyes extremely wide open | Apr 27, 2008 11:20:49 PM
We all know the difference is that he's a black man. When he's mentioned, black, african american is usually in there, rev wright, black liberationist theology which is all bogus crap to frame a false debate with the "hero" john mccain. She is allowed to associate with radicals because she has convinced the media that her story line of fall and comeback is better than real issues.
Posted by: knowthetruth | Apr 27, 2008 10:36:57 PM
@Dan,
"Hillary worked for Walmart and was in attendance during meetings where Walmart executives blamed unions for all of America's problems. Walmart sells our country to China. Hillary's past shows she will continue selling American jobs to other countries."
It would be difficult to dislike Hillary more than I do but there are some additional qualifications I'd like to make regarding your comments.
Hillary may very well have gone along with Walmart's profit motives regarding US union labor v. China, but it wouldn't have worked had not so many Americans shopped there - including, I bet, lots of union members. If we the people would buy American we could have stopped this in it's infancy.
Posted by: SuziQ | Apr 27, 2008 9:38:02 PM
Post a comment


