Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

Clinton Pledges Voting Rights to Puerto Rico, Too

May 25, 2008 9:32 AM

You may recall how Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, stumping for votes in Guam, promised residents of that territory full voting rights. Pressed for details, the Clinton campaign acknowledged this would require amending the Constitution.

Saturday in Puerto Rico, Clinton told citizens there, "I believe you should have a vote in picking the president, too," per ABC News' Eloise Harper.

Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens, but they do not pay federal income taxes and they do not vote in the presidential election. Their representative to Congress is a Delegate who votes in committee but not on the floor of the House. Giving voting rights to Puerto Ricans to vote in presidential elections would likewise require a Constitutional amendment.

Writing at the History News Network, historian Robert KC Johnson writes: "Perhaps the Constitution should be amended to allow Puerto Ricans and Guamanians to vote in presidential elections. But Clinton has been in the Senate for eight years, and she doesn’t seem to have raised the issue. There’s something off-putting about a U.S. senator first proposing constitutional amendments a few days before the targets of these amendments go to the polls…

"It appears as if the Clinton campaign is going to come up short, but perhaps Sen. Clinton can work on these amendments in the next session of Congress. Somehow, however, I doubt that she’ll be as interested in making sure that Guamanians can vote for the presidency if she’s not on the presidential ballot."

At a campaign stop in Beaverton, Oregon, earlier this month, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., claimed he had visited 57 states. (Watch HERE.) The misstatement prompted a 57-state flag lapel pin and a suggestion on the conservative Powerline blog as to where the extra states might come from (Canada, Cuba and Jamaica.)

But I'm wondering if a President Hillary Clinton would actually lead to 57 states. ... Guam, Puerto Rico, Washington, D.C., the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa -- that's 55. ...

- jpt

May 25, 2008 in Clinton, Hillary | Permalink | Share | User Comments (83)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Pander. Pander. Lie. Pander.

Posted by: Walden Greenwood | May 25, 2008 7:00:01 PM

jake,
the last time i was on there was a story about the obama people saying
they needed bill clinton to help them win. what happened to that story?

or did you do just what the politico article said happens with stories?

Posted by: worldcitizen | May 25, 2008 6:30:55 PM

tina from florida,
thanks,

I always thought this is the way the modern day media works.
i hope every thinking person will read the politico article from john harris

and be careful from here on out in your rush to judgement.

Posted by: worldcitizen | May 25, 2008 6:28:57 PM

tina from florida,
thanks,

I always thought this is the way the modern day media works.
i hope every thinking person will read the politico article from john harris

and be careful from here on out in your rush to judgement.

Posted by: worldcitizen | May 25, 2008 6:28:55 PM

      "Jeff: Not sure where you get your 1/3rd statistic from
      of those in favor of statehood in Puerto Rico but that
      number is far from a 3rd. The last referendum 46.8%
      voted for statehood vs 48.2% to remain a
      commonwealth...that's less than a 2% difference
      between the 2 and makes it almost half of the
      population wanting statehood..."
      Eddie | May 25, 2008 12:59:01 PM

That vote left off the third option, independence, which also has a following.  If they'd been given the three-way choice the numbers likely wouldn't have come out 48% to 46% to 3%

Posted by: Lee C.   ―   U.S.A.    | May 25, 2008 5:17:33 PM

For those who complain, "Well, they don't pay federal income tax...blah blah blah!"...may I say something? It wasn't Guam who decided the tax code as it applies to Guam residents--it was Congress who made the rules and it is, in most cases, by fiat; that is, they dictate and usually don't consult.

Even now, 8 years into the 21st Century, Guamanians are still treated like colonial subjects rather than the Americans, U.S. citizenship and all, that they are. Other than in the party nomination process, they have NO say in national elections and little to no say in Congress. The prevailing attitude in Congress (and across America, apparently), is that Guamanians are just little pipsqueaks who can give up 1/3 of the land area in their 212-square-mile island for military and other federal facilities and send their sons and daughters to fight (and sometimes die in) America's wars, but when it comes to civic equality, they just blow them off like we're in the 1700's or something.

Can anyone please explain how Guamanians (and Puerto Ricans, et al) serve in the U.S. Armed Forces and sometimes pay the price of grievous injuries or even dying in the service of their country and NOT be able to vote for their Commander-in-Chief, the President of the United States???

Not that I would vote for her, but at least Hillary is on the right side on this one.

Frustrating, I tell ya.

Sincerely,

A retired U.S. Air Force Master Sergeant, originally from Guam

Posted by: Proud to be an American from the territories | May 25, 2008 5:09:35 PM

Can HRC embarrass herself anymore? Does she have no shame? How stupid does she think people are? She is an insult to my intelligence and she is a total JOKE! How can any sensible person take her seriously? She is beyond delusional and moving into the psychotic. Please can we make her go away to the paded room yet? I think she is qualified to wear a straight jacket now.

Posted by: Pete Rend | May 25, 2008 5:07:24 PM

Our flag can stand to include territories becoming states AND having every right that each state has accorded to them.

I'm with HRC doing her best to past a constitutional amendment on this issue. I will hold my breath long enough to watch her press forward this agenda.

Posted by: Genna | May 25, 2008 4:59:04 PM

Don't forget the island of Wake. I hear Hil is polling very well with the hard-working gecko population.

Posted by: Bill | May 25, 2008 3:42:57 PM

MarkieBee

Maybe you're just not looking hard enough. I think you're only interested in half the truth if any at all. Co Arthur, indeed!

Posted by: T | May 25, 2008 3:07:12 PM

Hey Help Us...you do realize that Obama has 50 percent more elected legislative experience than Hillary right? His resume is just as impressive as Hillary's in effecting change. Yes, she's 15 years older but we can discount her six years of doing nothing while on the WalMart board. So her life experience lead is just nine years. Anyway, while in the US senate, Obama has AUTHORED and had signed into law two substantive bills (Obama-Lugar non-proliferation and Obama-Coburn ethics reform and transparency) while I have yet to see one substantive bill that Hillary has AUTHORED and passed in her eight years in the senate. Can you HELP US with that?

Posted by: MarkieBee | May 25, 2008 3:04:04 PM

Puerto Rico is classified by the U.S. government as an independent taxation authority by mutual agreement with the U.S. Congress. A common misconception is that residents of Puerto Rico do not have to pay federal taxes. Residents of the island pay federal taxes (import/export taxes, federal commodity taxes, social security taxes, etc.) and some even pay federal income taxes (Puerto Rico residents who are federal employees, or who do business with the federal government, Puerto Rico-based corporations that intend to send funds to the U.S., etc). While most residents of the island do not pay federal income tax, they do pay federal payroll taxes (Social Security and Medicare), as well as Puerto Rico income taxes. In addition, because the cutoff point for income taxation is lower than that of the IRS code, and because the per-capita income in Puerto Rico is much lower than the average per-capita income on the mainland, more Puerto Rico residents pay income taxes to the local taxation authority than if the IRS code were applied to the island. Puerto Rico residents are eligible for Social Security benefits upon retirement. Puerto Rico is excluded from Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Puerto Rico receives less than 15% of the Medicaid funding it would be allotted as a state. For Medicare, Puerto Rico pays fully but only receives partial benefits

Posted by: Surelock Homes | May 25, 2008 3:02:45 PM

Is this why she's called a pander bear. And by the way, who needs the taxes?? For what? The right to vote for the lesser of evils? Big deal.

Posted by: jeffp | May 25, 2008 3:00:05 PM

Hillary is making 'Promises' again.

Have the people of Puerto Rico requested additional voting rights or is this a manufactured controversy/demand ?

Posted by: Xavier | May 25, 2008 2:58:25 PM

Hillary i voted for in NY because I wanted to see a female president but your lies and miss-speaks and then Terry blaming them on Obama has swayed me to think you are not the right person for the job if you will lie to us who support you what kind of president would you be ? A woman yes soon I hope but Obama now has my vote he has been honest and kind to you while you have attacked him unjustly..

Hillary I am not stupid the popular vote lie you have feed us who support you is the last straw….

The truth of the popular vote :

Popular Vote Total 16,685,941 49.1% 16,227,514 47.7% Obama +458,427 +1.4%

Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,020,025 49.1% 16,451,376 47.5% Obama +568,649 +1.6%

Popular Vote (w/FL) 17,262,155 48.3% 17,098,500 47.8% Obama +163,655 +0.5%

Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 17,596,239 48.3% 17,322,362 47.6% Obama +273,877 +0.7%

Posted by: Kate | May 25, 2008 2:41:43 PM

for those that would like to argue the tax point in pr. the medicare and ss amounts to about 7.6%... a far cry from the income tax that we pay on top of that.

Posted by: marianne | May 25, 2008 2:41:36 PM

Hillary agreed to avoid defiant states last September, your point is mute.

Posted by: Yohomegirl | May 25, 2008 2:31:14 PM

the pr people do no want to pay taxes. they like it just the way that it is... no vote=no taxes.

Posted by: marianne | May 25, 2008 2:28:40 PM

And the pandering continues. Why would she raise this issue now at this juncture? As a senator from New york, she could have introduced a bill for this to happen. There are more Puerto Ricans in New York, than in PR. So, this new offering is just another pandering moment just to get votes.

Posted by: Maria Boggiano | May 25, 2008 2:10:44 PM

Buford writes, "Sort of seems the same for Obama. His whole campaign is for "Hope" and "Change". Is it that he "hopes" we won't figure out what it is he wants to "change"?"
==================================

Considering Hillary's supporters are the LEAST educated of the groups voting I imagine MOST have had a difficult time figuring things out period.

It's pretty funny if you ask me. When she BEGAN her campaign she had the geriatric crowd, poor Whites, uneducated Whites and 40% of the African American vote in her pocket.

Low and behold, she CONTINUES because she still has geriatric Whites, poor Whites and uneducated Whites. Tell me something, since you've decided to challenge me on this, HOW EXACTLY did she lose the 40% Black vote she had when she started? Please tell me you're not one of those "idiots" who honestly believes Black voters woke up days later (unlike all those idiots who still things Obama is a Muslim) and said "Oh my gosh, he IS a Black man. I've got to change my vote now." Pure comedy at BEST.

Again...HOW DO YOU LOSE 40%? Sorry buddy, you have NO ARGUMENT and definitely NO WAY to challenge this. You have a good day. Ya' hear!

Posted by: Dems | May 25, 2008 1:56:13 PM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS