Political Punch

Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

NARAL Chooses Obama -- Why Now?

May 14, 2008 3:38 PM

FROM GUEST-BLOGGER RICK KLEIN, OF ABC'S THE NOTE

One of the nation's leading abortion-rights groups endorsed Sen. Barack Obama on  Wednesday -- in an announcement that's raising eyebrows as much for its timing as for its substance.

NARAL Pro-Choice America's political action committee has decided to drop its neutral stance in the Democratic primary  -- in large part to send a signal that it's ready to get behind the candidate board members view as the likely  nominee, according to the group's political director, Elizabeth Shipp.

"A political organization always looks at viability -- who has the most delegates, the most votes, and the most cash  on hand," Shipp told ABC News. "As a political organization, we're not going to say it's an easy decision, but it's  the right one."

NARAL has been consistently supportive of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton in her previous runs, for the Senate, and Shipp said the group supports her decision to stay in the race as long as she wants. Both Democratic candidate are "100  percent pro-choice," she said, and NARAL will not run any anti-Clinton advertisements, as it saves its resources for the general election.

Shipp said the PAC's nine-member board made the unanimous decision to endorse Obama on Friday, after Clinton lost the North Carolina primary and won only narrowly in Indiana, leaving her with a steeper mathematical hurdle in her effort to catch Obama.

Shipp said the board wanted to send a signal that female voters are  ready to work for Obama -- and said NARAL sees the value in having the Democratic nomination settled, to help make the case against Republican candidate John McCain.

"There was this growing perceived rift -- 'Are women going to be there for Barack Obama?' " she said. "We know that at  the end of the day, we're going to have to go after John McCain. We want people to know, 'It's OK, we trust [Obama.]'  "

While NARAL does not make public the names of its board members, Shipp said the board includes both Democrats and  Republicans, as well as supporters of both Clinton and Obama -- including one Clinton superdelegate.

The decision brought a sharp rebuke from a regular NARAL ally, EMILY's List, a Clinton-backing group that's dedicated to electing "pro-choice" Democratic women.

"I think it is tremendously disrespectful to Sen. Clinton -- who held up the nomination of a FDA commissioner in order to force approval of Plan B and who spoke so eloquently during the Supreme Court nomination about the importance of  protecting Roe vs. Wade -- to not give her the courtesy to finish the final three weeks of the primary process,"  EMILY's List president Ellen R. Malcolm said in a statement. "It certainly must be disconcerting for elected leaders who stand up for reproductive rights and expect the choice community will stand with them."

In its endorsement announcement, NARAL was careful not to denigrate Clinton.

"Pro-choice Americans have been fortunate to have two strong pro-choice candidates in Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton,  both of whom have inspired millions of new voters to participate in this historic presidential race," NARAL president  Nancy Keenan said in a statement. "Today, we are proud to put our organization's grass-roots and political support  behind the pro-choice candidate whom we believe will secure the Democratic nomination and advance to the general  election. That candidate is Sen. Obama."

-- Rick Klein

May 14, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (123)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Just as with the super-delegates needing campaign money.

So did NARAL. Money changed hands, endorsement was given.

Keenan lit an explosive charge that has already blown back in NARAL's face.

She had better hope for alot more from Soros/MoveOn because much of NARAL's grassroots became dried out grass yesterday.

Posted by: Skeptic | May 16, 2008 3:18:53 AM

Jackie said, Once Senator McCain is sworn in in January 2009, let Senator Obama's young, female former supporters fight for their own reproductive rights.

Ditto Ditto Ditto

Let those young Naral staff members in the video made by the giggly old lady at Naral fight for their rights. Maybe tthey will respect a woman like Hillary wwho has spent years working for women's rights and wish they had understood how hard the fight was! Nope, Howard Dean, the Democrats will not come together!

Posted by: Susan | May 16, 2008 2:53:04 AM

It's not a question of "why now" -- it's a question of why support Obama at all? This is NARAL we're talking about, an organization by women, for women. And they sell-out on the first electable female candidate?

Maybe NARAL's national powerbrokers would like to see the whole nomination process over already, and so they're attempting a coup-de-grace on Hillary, but endorsing a male egotist who just called a grown woman "sweetie" on the job--! (And that's twice now he's done it, too.)

Does it get much dumber than that???

Posted by: J Cline | May 15, 2008 9:46:28 PM

Please provide examples of HRC's "overwhelming support of women"
Six years on Walmart board during period when conditions for largest gender discrimination lawsuit in history?
Attacking victims of sexual harassment?

Posted by: Miri | May 15, 2008 5:23:37 PM

What a big mistake by them to do this now. I wonder who twisted their arm?

It just makes no sense...it is equivalent to what Edwards chose to do and when...how convenient.

Just because a Pro Choice group endorses Obama, gives him no more credibility. Abortion will be the least of my worries when I go to the voting booth.

It is just another political ploy for Obama to win over Clinton's female supporters.

Well, they chose a person who cannot bring it home for them. Obama will be exposed for the weak man that he really is. I cannot in good conscience vote for "the most unknown presidential candidate ever".

Posted by: memyselfandI | May 15, 2008 5:16:16 PM

NARAL will never get another cent from me. They can trust Obama...but I don't trust them with my money. I'm not alone.

Posted by: Kathy Corey | May 15, 2008 4:53:47 PM

Adi,
To most of us your candidate is a piece of land where waste materials are dumped.

Obamites are too ignorant to see their stupidity. To them, it's so cool to vote on an empty promise.

Posted by: Dallas | May 15, 2008 4:52:40 PM

NARAL will never get another cent from me. They can trust Obama...but I don't trust them with my money. I'm not alone.

Posted by: Kathy Corey | May 15, 2008 4:52:10 PM

All you obamabots have got to pick up the slack in donations that they will lose over this foolish move.

Posted by: justme2see | May 15, 2008 3:03:26 PM

All you obamabots have got to pick up the slack in donations that they will lose over this foolish move.

Posted by: justme2see | May 15, 2008 3:02:38 PM

All you obamabots have got to pick up the slack in donations that they will lose by this foolish move.

Posted by: justme2see | May 15, 2008 3:01:22 PM

Hello cappamore thanks for quoting me:

"Quite the contrary, Carolyn P. who said: "On the other hand, if so many are really willing to throw our daughters, grandaughters, nieces and friends under the bus for Hillary... go ahead.
______________________

We do care about the future of our children and are strongly pro-choice. That is why we believe that Hillary is the best candidate to win against John McCain. There was no reason for NARAL to make this endorsement now, knowing full well that either candidate would support pro-choice endeavors. It reeks of disrespect for Hillary, someone who has a longer and stronger record of support than Obama."
_________________________

Cappamore, I think I can agree with you that their timing was poor. I can't think of a single intelligent woman, who doesn't want to see a woman in the White House. Unfortunately, mathematically the only way for Hillary to win now is to ask the Superdelegates to deny the clear winner (who won fair and square) and award the nomination to her. Chaos would ensue, the party would be fractured for years to come, if not permanently.

Let's take Obama out of the equation for a moment.. Let's say Nancy Pelosi and Hillary were competing, only Clinton has Obama's #'s and Pelosi has Hillary's. Would you support Pelosi if she kept spouting that she was the stronger candidate, went to the Superdelegates and took the nomination from Hillary??

It's time to get real ladies, why aren't we celebrating how far Hillary has gotten as a formidable stand-alone candidate without being shored up by a man??

Remember this, Geraldine Ferraro's VP spot on the ticket garnered massive respect for women in office, making it possible for Pelosi to become House Speaker and Hillary to run for President and be taken seriously.

I believe, Hillary has made it possible for the next woman to actually win. Who knows, I might be overly optomistic (and slightly crazy), but there may yet be a Clinton in our very, very near future... CHELSEA CLINTON. It appears that grooming has already begun.

Meanwhile.. we need to vote Democrat in November.

Posted by: Carolyn P | May 15, 2008 2:50:49 PM

All people who are trashing Hillary, just look at the number from ABC News. If she is so bad why so many people are still voting for her????? get a good answer? Obama wins more states than Hillary why she is still ahead at a total votes???

Posted by: Ann | May 15, 2008 12:43:53 PM

Vote for Hillary to have a real change.
Vote for Obama to see his words of hope and dream flushing down to the toilet!

Posted by: Jetblue | May 15, 2008 12:16:31 PM

John Edward and Naral's endorsement is matter to the voters???? Hell no!

Just look at Massachusetts, despite the endorsement of Ted Kennedy and John Kerry, people voted Hillary!

By the way, just see the path that John Edward has gone through. First time running for President, he failed miserably! Then John Kerry picked him as Vice President, failed again. This year he was running for President the second times just to get knocked out of the race at the first route.....so who wants the support from this looser? Anyone???

Posted by: Jetblue | May 15, 2008 12:08:00 PM

Vote McCain and watch him appease the right wing of the GOP with his Supreme court selections. Say GOODBYE to Roe v. Wade. Do women really want the Federal government sitting in on their doctor visits, monitoring their medical charts?

Posted by: Steve from Danville | May 15, 2008 11:59:41 AM

Vote McCain and watch him appease the right wing of the GOP with his Supreme court selections. Say GOODBYE to Roe v. Wade. Do women really want the Federal government sitting in on their doctor visits, monitoring their medical charts?

Posted by: Steve from Danville | May 15, 2008 11:42:31 AM

Who cares about all ENDORSEMENTS, just go to the polls and vote Obama out of the primary election in November if Hillary gives up this race.
Can we help to buy a one-way ticket to Kenya for Obama and wish that he will stay there for the rest of his life, can't we???? YES WE CAN!

Posted by: one-wayticket | May 15, 2008 11:37:37 AM

The timing of Naral's announcement to endorse Obama - as has been noted by many on this blog- seems strange. The 'need' to announce support for Obama at such a late stage seems wasted - but the slap to Hillary Clinton is real. The greater danger is that Naral has shown a lack of grace and respect to many women who sincerely feel strongly in Clinton's candidacy - and therefore jeopardized goodwill to a cause that those same Clinton supporters would likely naturally support. What was the benefit ?

Posted by: Sandy | May 15, 2008 11:26:50 AM

As a feminist and activist I too came to the realization that Obama, by far, is a better candidate than Clinton. Unfortunately, Clinton has sold out to big business, and other shady interest groups. We need new and real CHANGE! Obama has energize the youth, and that is exactly what the democratic party needs, or we will all lose greatly!

Posted by: Elsa35 | May 15, 2008 10:54:22 AM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS