Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

Obama Hammers McCain on Lobbyists; McCain Fires Back on Ayers

May 18, 2008 8:36 PM

"It appears that John McCain is very much a creature of Washington," Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, said today in Milwaukie, Oregon, in response to news stories about the 5th lobbyist to leave McCain's campaign amidst what has become a sort of lobbyist purge.

"And one of the things that we have said at the outset of this campaign is that if we are going to change policies, if we are going to deliver on universal healthcare or have an energy policy that over the long term could bring down gas prices, that we were going to have to change how Washington works," Obama said. "We can’t have special interests dictating what’s happening there. And that’s why I said at the beginning I wouldn’t take PAC money and I wouldn’t take money from federal lobbyists."

Obama went on: "And it does appear that over the last several weeks John McCain keeps on having problems with his top advisers being lobbyists -- in some cases for foreign governments or other big interests that are doing business in Washington," the Democrat said. "That I don’t think represents the kind of change that the American people are looking for."

The McCain campaign fired back, with spokesman Tucker Bounds going after Obama for his relationship with former Weather Underground member William Ayers. Given former President Bill Clinton's commutation of the prison sentences of two of the former members of the domestic terrorist organization, Ayers hasn't gotten a lot of play in recent days.

But McCain clearly intends to make a campaign issue out of his and Obama's relationship.

Bounds said that "just a few years ago when Barack Obama was beginning his career in politics he was launching it at the home of William Ayers, an unrepentant domestic terrorist who his chief strategist said Senator Obama was certainly friendly with.  If Barack Obama is going to make associations the issue, we look forward to the debate about Senator Obama's associations and what they say about his judgment and readiness to be commander in chief."

**

The McCain Lobbyist Purge began about a week ago, after McCain's campaign parted ways with two senior members of the team who had worked for a firm that had lobbied in the past for Burma.

Doug Goodyear was McCain's liaison to run the GOP convention this Summer in Minnesota, but both he and Doug Davenport, the former regional McCain campaign manager for the mid-Atlantic states, last week  vamoosed because of their work for DCI Group, which once had Burma (nee Myanmar) as a client.

But as we pointed out in that May 12 blog post, Josh Gerstein of the New York Sun had noted that other McCainiacs had lobbied for other nations whose leaders may not be taking any direct flights to Valhalla come Judgment Day. Specifically, McCain campaign national finance co-chair Tom Loeffler had lobbied for Saudi Arabia and senior adviser Charlie Black had chaired the BKSH & Associates lobbying firm when it had the China National Offshore Oil Corporation, which is largely state owned, as a client.

Since McCain has worked hard on campaign finance reform and has worked hard to promote himself as a reformer in the tradition of Teddy Roosevelt, this created some problems for him. And reportedly, the Senator was angry that this has happened. On May 15, McCain announced that campaign staffers "will be thoroughly, more thoroughly, vetted, and we'll make sure that that is the case," and campaign manager Rick Davis announced a new "Conflict Policy":

"1.) No person working for the Campaign may be a registered lobbyist or foreign agent, or receive compensation for any such activity.

"2.) Part-time volunteers for the Campaign must disclose to the Campaign any status as registered lobbyists or foreign agents. Such persons are prohibited from involvement in any Campaign policy-making on the subjects on which they are registered, including service on policy task forces or participation in policy discussions on those subjects.  Such persons are also prohibited from lobbying Senator McCain or his Senate personal office or committee staffs during the period they are volunteering for the campaign.

"3.) No person with a McCain Campaign title or position may participate in a 527 or other independent entity that makes public communications that support or oppose any presidential candidate.

"4.) No vendor to the McCain Campaign may also be a vendor to a 527 or other independent entity that makes public communications that support or oppose any presidential candidate without a pre-approved firewall pursuant to FEC regulations.

"5.) Senator McCain has also announced that it will be his policy that anyone serving in a McCain Administration must commit not to lobby the Administration during his presidency."

One day after this memo, it was reported that Craig Shirley, on McCain's Virginia Leadership Team, had in fact worked on an anti-Hillary Clinton 527, in direct violation of Conflict Policy rule No. 3.

Two days later, Newsweek added to what Gerstein had reported, noting that not only had Loeffler lobbied for the Saudis, he had told a reporter "at no time have I discussed my clients with John McCain" though lobbying disclosure forms indicated that Loeffler had listed a May 2006 meeting with the Saudi ambassador and McCain with the notation: "discuss US-Kingdom of Saudi Arabia relations." Moreover, Loeffler's firm began paying $15,000 a month to Susan Nelson, one of its lobbyists, after she left the firm to become McCain's finance director.

Sunday morning, Politico's tireless Mike Allen reported that Loeffler resigned. Combined with the others and the sayonara of McCain campaign energy adviser Eric Burgeson, at least five McCain aides or advisers have resigned within the last few days in this Lobbyist Purge.

**

The McCain campaign is now heralding the fact that it has the most restrictive lobbying policy of any of the three candidates in the race.

Sen. Barack Obama's campaign says it does not allow registered federal lobbyists to work on his campaign. It does not have a policy about 527 groups.

You may recall Obama used to say that lobbyists would never work in his White House. Then last December he suddenly flip-flopped on that pledge, saying instead they wouldn't run his White House. Notably, an Obama TV ad in Iowa replayed an excerpt from his well-received speech to the Iowa Democratic party's Jefferson-Jackson Day Dinner in which he railed against lobbyists -- but the ad removed the mid-sentence clause from his speech in which he said lobbyists "will not get a job in my White House."

The Obama campaign claimed they'd made the cut purely for time, though it happened to coincide with his flip-flop on that very clause.

- jpt

May 18, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (111)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I have been struck by what appears to be an odd contradiction in the response of some commentators to Senator Obama's connection to William Ayers.
Senator McCain is widely admired for his actions in healing the rift remaining between the US and North Vietnam because it shows that he puts the country first, though they are unrepentant communists.
Obama is suspiscious because he has met and worked with with Ayers in assisting the poor.

Posted by: Ray Torkelson | Sep 10, 2008 5:48:31 AM

I personally don't think Obama can win the GE with the Electoral College. The majority of the states he has taken in the primary will go Republican and the important swing states will have moderate independents throw the election to the Republicans too. Obama is too far left for many and they will choose McCain, known to at least be a Republican who does not always vote the party line in the Senate. I am disappointed that as a Democrat I will have to endure another four years of Republican executive leadership. I'll be campaigning hard for the Democratic candidates for House and Senate in my state in the hopes that we at least can keep a balance of power to keep stupid policies to a minimum.

Posted by: Amy | May 21, 2008 4:15:46 PM

I personally don't think Obama can win the GE with the Electoral College. The majority of the states he has taken in the primary will go Republican and the important swing states will have moderate independents throw the election to the Republicans too. Obama is too far left for many and they will choose McCain, known to at least be a Republican who does not always vote the party line in the Senate. I am disappointed that as a Democrat I will have to endure another four years of Republican executive leadership. I'll be campaigning hard for the Democratic candidates for House and Senate in my state in the hopes that we at least can keep a balance of power to keep stupid policies to a minimum.

Posted by: Amy | May 21, 2008 4:13:26 PM

Janice and fondh,

I attended the Democratic Convention in Reno NV. Hundreds of Hillary delegates were disenfranchised and not allowed to be seated. The Excuses: They were not on the computer print outs at registration time. When 2 days earlier they were on the computer print outs go figure. 98% of the people who hold office in DNC in Nevada and 100% percent of the credential committee were Obama supporters. Hundreds of Delegates were promised bus transportation from Las Vegas. At the last minute the Obama people in charge of getting transportation on those busses for Obama delegates and Hillary delegates claimed to get a better deal with the airlines at the last minute and didn't bother informing the Hillary delegates and alternate delegates. They also missed a few of the Obama delegates not very many though. As a reporter when I submitted this infomation to my paper it was edited out because my editor is an Obama supporter. The Hillary campaign is aware of the problems in Nevada and many other caucus states I have covered. At this late stage in the game the cheating the Obama campaign has been doing is really a mute point unless you have integrity and believe in principles as I do. I strongly dislike cheating of any kind. I'm sure not all of the Obama supporters are cheaters. All of the Nevada Obama Delegates and alternate delegates "Received Money" to attend the convention from the Obama campaign. None of the Hillary delegates or alternate delegates received any money from the Hillary campaign. Just proves that Obama who has the money can buy the election, the pledged delegates and the super-delegates.

Posted by: Bob4USA | May 20, 2008 2:31:06 AM

The reckoning is coming for Republicans.....
They are not ready to govern and honestly they will never be ready.

They have too many flaws, too many mistakes, too many bad issues and too many don't knows. Too bad the Republicans are heading to another Illinois,Louisiana and Mississippi soap opera..Republicans just never learned...What else can i say?!!

Posted by: LG | May 20, 2008 1:49:41 AM

The reckoning is coming for OBAMA.....
He is not ready to be a President and honestly he will never be ready to be..
He has too many flaws, too many mistakes, too many bad issues and too many don't knows. Too bad the democrats are heading to another GORE and KERRY soap opera..Democrats just never learned...What else can i say?!!

Posted by: James, Independent, KY | May 19, 2008 8:07:59 PM

ABC still sucks. The boycott remains.

Posted by: Ken | May 19, 2008 7:17:00 PM

If having lobbyists run your campaign is less fearful to you than being friendly with someone like Ayres, no matter how personal the relationship you deserve the same kind of mismanaged goverment you've got.

Gimme a break. The lobbyists were patsies for our good friends in Saudi Arabia and Myanmar.

Every time I go to a gas station I'm being victimized by Domestic Terrorism far worse than anything Ayres could ever have possibly dreamed!

Posted by: EthanQ | May 19, 2008 7:10:30 PM

Jeremy: Please look up The Weathermen or The Weather Underground. You can read all about William Ayers. Some of us remember them and their terrorist activities in the 60's and 70's. Please check the association with him and Obama in the last 10 years. Way more than "sorta knew and friendly with." The Republicans are going to have a field day.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 19, 2008 1:58:30 PM

Dear Really? Did you also know that Republican fundraisers raised $100 million for Obama in 2007 to try to knock off Hillary Clinton? Do you think they regret that now?

Posted by: RL in Illinois | May 19, 2008 1:46:21 PM

Obama STOP using Fear tactics !!

Posted by: spock | May 19, 2008 10:34:09 AM

Lobbying includes all attempts to influence legislators and officials, whether by other legislators, constituents or organized groups. Governments often define and regulate organized group lobbying.

So the Dems do not constituents to determine policy, they think the People work for the Government not the Government for the People!!

McCain may have Lobbyist working on his campaign but he never took from them, on the other hand Obama get a million dollar house from one!! Obama funeeled 1 million dollars to his wife over 4 five years (1 million tax payers money to hospital his wife worked for and then his wife got a 250,000 dollar raise).

Obama talks with a terrorist to organize his campaign!

Yes Obama you are above politics!!

Posted by: spock | May 19, 2008 10:33:37 AM

That's the best McCain could come up with? Some guy that Obama sort of knew and was friendly with? Weak.

McCain needs to deal with his lobbyist problems not deflect and distract. It is really dishonorable to not confront one's issues directly. When I read McCain's health plan to raise taxes on employer health benefits and mail the proceeds directly to insurers I'm not surprised by his extensive lobbyist ties. That's the kind of thing only an industry lobbyist could come up with. I guess we know who McCain's "friends" are. . . Lobbyists.

Posted by: Jeremy | May 19, 2008 10:19:18 AM

I'd rather have a candidate with an advisor who's a lobbyist than one with an advisor who's talking secretly with Hamas.

Posted by: HoosierSue | May 19, 2008 10:16:26 AM

McCain can't get out of bed without tripping over a lobbyist. Ayers has never been on Obama's campaign staff..and it certainly does not rise to the level of McCain's incestous relationship with the lobbyists.

Posted by: Michael | May 19, 2008 9:47:28 AM

Lezident....

But isn't he right? Obesity is an epidemic in this country, we need to buy smaller cars to reduce consumption, smaller homes, eat better, exercise more. Why do people find common sense so offensive?

Posted by: Really? | May 19, 2008 9:38:37 AM

Wherever this ends, August or November, it will be Obama's arrogance that defeats him. He believe's his own hype machine and nothing is more dangerous in a man of public prominence. Making threats on GMA this morning regards his wife is ample evidence of the instability of his character and his inexperience.

It's going to be McCain if not Clinton. Don't believe the 'swooning' media support will continue once his numbers and ability to feed the media millions drop.

But the entertainment value is enormous.

Posted by: len | May 19, 2008 9:26:59 AM

"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK," Obama said.

Says a lot about his world view....and view of the US and its people.

Obama is not who he says he is.

Posted by: Lezident | May 19, 2008 9:22:41 AM

Clinton ran a horrible campaign, this nomination was hers to lose and she did. The press was fawing over her last year. She was up 40% in the polls and had raised $100 million in 2007. She ignored small states, she ignored caucus states. She had bad advise and she took it. She insulated herself with faithful friends who weren't qualified to run a national campaign. They are now over $20 million in debt (some say it's more like $35 mill, we will find out this week). So tell me, it you can't hire the right people, take good advice, listen to people, or manage a budget, what gives you the right to run our country?? Because she "deserves it"? WHY?

Posted by: Really? | May 19, 2008 8:51:38 AM

and welcome back jake,

and tell your sub just because we are glad you are back, does not mean we do not like him.we liked him, we really liked him.
or what i meant to say is..oh well

stay tuned, i will be giving a speech about it soon.

Posted by: jgaw | May 19, 2008 8:46:15 AM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS