RECENT POSTS
- Oprah, Health Care Lobbyists, Among Recent Visitors to White House
- An Obama Thanksgiving Menu, with an Extra Serving of Pie
- White House Thanksgiving Traditions: Broken and Observed
- Obama, GOP Air Differences Over Jobs, Economy In Thanksgiving Addresses
- White House State Dinner Party Crashers
- Obama to Lay Out Emissions Goals in Copenhagen
- Free Bird
- The "Good" War
- The Presidential Planner
- Under the Stars, Obama Toasts India’s Prime Minister
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Obama's Inability to Hire Good Help Rears Its Head … Again
May 12, 2008 12:28 PM
We started covering Sen. Barack Obama's inability to hire good staffers in June 2007, when he blamed staffers for some opposition research trying to link Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, to outsourcing in India; for injecting some venom in the David Geffen/Hillary Clinton fight; and for missing an event with firefighters in New Hampshire.
In December, we noted again that Obama was blaming the answers on a 1996 questionnaire on a staffer; and was blaming his touring with "cured" ex-gay gospel singer Donnie McClurkin (which antagonized gays and lesbians) on bad vetting by his staff.
Those five buck-passing incidents were apparently not enough.
Yesterday, in an interesting New York Times look at Obama's rise in Chicago politics, we learned that in 2004 some Jewish supporters became alarmed to learn that in a questionnaire Obama refrained from denouncing Yasir Arafat, or from expressing strong support for Israel's security fence.
Reports the Times: "In an e-mail message, Mr. Obama blamed a staff member for the oversight, and expressed the hope that 'none of this has raised any questions on your part regarding my fundamental commitment to Israel’s security.'"
In January, during MSNBC's presidential debate in Las Vegas, Obama was asked about a document put together by one of his South Carolina staffers that listed comments made by the Clinton campaign that some perceived to be attempting to stoke racial fires. "In hindsight, do you regret pushing this story?” asked Tim Russert.
"Our supporters, our staff get overzealous," Obama said. "They start saying things that I would not say, and it is my responsibility to make sure that we're setting a clear tone in our campaign.”
In February in a meeting with the Chicago Tribune, Obama was asked about an earmark that went to the University of Chicago while his wife Michelle Obama worked there.
"I don’t think that I was obligated to recuse myself from anything related to the university," Obama said, adding, "when it comes to earmarks because of those concerns, it’s probably something that should have been passed on to [U.S. Sen.] Dick Durbin, and I think probably something that slipped through the cracks. It did not come through us, through me or Michelle, and Michelle has been very careful about staying separate and apart from any government work. But you could make a good argument that this is something that slipped through our cracks, through our screening system.”
In a March 2008 interview with the Chicago Sun-Times to answer questions about Tony Rezko, Obama was asked about the fact that Obama had told the newspaper in November 2006 that he had never been asked to do anything to advance Rezko's business interests. But the Sun-Times had subsequently learned about a October 28, 1998 letter Obama wrote to city and state housing officials on behalf of a housing project for seniors that Rezko was working on.
The letter, Obama said, "was essentially a form letter of the sort that I did all time. And that I wasn’t, by the way, aware of.”
A reporter asked: You weren't aware that he was associated with the project?
Responded Obama: "I wasn't even aware that we wrote the letter. The answer that I gave at the time was accurate as far as I knew...This was one of many form letters, or letters of recommendation we would send out constantly for all sorts of projects. And my understanding is that our letter was just one of many. And I wasn’t a decision maker in any of this process.”
The Sun-Times also pointed out that in November 2006 Obama estimated that Rezko had raised somewhere between $50,000 and $60,000 for him during his political career.
But since that answer, Obama has given back almost $160,000 in Rezko-related contributions.
"The original estimate was based on, I asked my staff to find what monies they attributed to Rezko, and this was the figure given to me," Obama said.
So, for those keeping track at home, that's ten instances of Obama publicly blaming his staff for various screw-ups.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10!
(You of course could also add Austan Goolsbee, Samantha Power, Gordon Fischer, and retired Gen. Tony McPeak.)
That would be 14. We will continue to keep track.
And for the record, yet again, let me state that I find Sen. Obama's staff unfailingly competent and polite, courteous and efficient, and I once again express my regret that Sen. Obama does apparently not feel the same way.
- jpt
May 12, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (224)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
I am so done with you networks and Cable news channels that have the nerve to call yourselves journalists. You have done the american public a real disservice with what you call reporting. I have never been so disappointed, felt so shortchanged, as I do now. I hope you're enjoying your cushy life, while the rest of America is SUFFERING! Suffering and in real need of a real president and instead you are talking about Obama blaming his staff!! For crying out loud-- do you think that you're untouchable? That if McCain wins in the fall only the "little people" will be affected you're head is buried even further in the sand than it appears!!!!!
You SUCK! This article sucks! I can't believe you think this is a critical analysis of ANYTHING. I am sure this won't make it past your staff censors--talk about blaming your staff!
God, I am done reading your drivel.
Good LUCK!
Posted by: Lucy Mends | May 13, 2008 11:11:43 PM
First off, the article is silly and will get no play in the national media.
Second, Hillary is done in the democratic party. Even if she steals the nomination from Obama, she will not win the general. There is a massive grass roots movement in MD, DC, VA, NC, SC, NY, and NJ among angry black and white Obama supporters to make certain that Hillary loses all those states in the general. The media will not cover it as they focus only on Obama's problem getting working class whites. They fail to realize the impact of 91% of black voters (who form probably at least 30 to 40% of the overall Democratic vote) staying home or voting for McCain. The buzz on black talk radio shows has been nuts!! Blacks will not vote for Hillary and she has no chance.
Third, while the media refuses to cover this story as well, Ron Paul has pulling about 25% of the Republican vote even though McCain has had the nomination wrapped up for months. Paul is planning a riot at the Republican convention and the national press has finally had to recognize the bid of Bob Barr who is seriously a threat to pull votes from McCain. Barr is the genuine article for many conservatives and had he been in the race earlier, McCain wouldn't even be the nominee right now. You couple the influence of Barr, Alan Keyes, and possibly even Paul in the race all pulling votes from McCain in November and then tell me about who is electable.
Obama's prospects are far better than people realize but I am happy that people are so eager to go after the "black guy" too early. You should have saved that Wright video for October. Dumb move.
Posted by: Ray | May 13, 2008 11:03:21 PM
"And for the record, yet again, let me state that I find Sen. Obama's staff unfailingly competent and polite, courteous and efficient, and I once again express my regret that Sen. Obama does apparently not feel the same way."
This is more than silly. It's just plain dumb. Who do you think Tapper has to blame (or credit) for the quality of Obama's campaign staff and how well managed his campaign has been? Who should we blame for how poorly Clinton's campaign has been run?...or for why she has so much less money? Half of Obama's campaign money comes from people like me who donate less than $200.
Who should we blame for the gutter level political gameswomanship that desperately tries to show guilt by association and distracts from substantive issues? Who should we credit for not stooping to the same thing, but who continues to congratulate her for her victories and hush his supporters when they boo her?
Some of the examples Tapper provides are perfectly reasonable responses from Obama, and do not go any further than claiming simple human errors and oversights to which any staff, no matter how capable, is vulnerable. Some comments here are clearly coming from people wearing very deeply colored glasses, people who fail to show the slightest hint of objectivity.
How can some be so poor at reading body language and clearly radiated low-ball attitudes that they can't see through either of the Clintons even if they are completely ignorant of the Clintons' totally sold-out status with regard to some pretty rotten corporate interests? (Monsanto comes to mind with their aggressive suing for patent violation of farmers whose pureline crops they contaminate and ruin with their genetically engineered pollen).
Have some of us completely lost any feel at all for reading basic human character (or utter lack of it). Clinton acts like a spoiled rotten brat who thinks she has a God-given right to the presidency and telegraphs her stinky attitude with body language that cries, "But I'M supposed to be president. This isnt' fair! Wha-a-a-a-a!!!
But far worse, I'm talking total corruption, and that's precisely what we need to get rid of in this country. We need people of character and moral fiber who don't forget that they weren't shot at in Bosnia (a relatively mild example of her lies!!!). Hsven't we had enough of liars in the presidency?
We don't need another intelligent but corrupt dingbat that pretends to be one more "bubba" so she can get elected. Some of us have matured beyond that stage. We've had enough of bubbas. Those who vote for bubbas need to have their heads examined.
The presidency doesn't call for a bubba and election campaigns shouldn't be a high school popularity contest. That's a big part of how we got into the mess we're in, and I blame us, the voters. JFK said there were only two qualifications for becoming president in this country: to be over 35 and to win a presidential election.
We need to put our heads on straight and vote for a real leader with character and integrity and quit voting for bubbas.
Posted by: Straight_t;alk | May 13, 2008 10:55:23 PM
Obama is the liberal version of Bush. Out of touch, stubborn, inexperienced, dangerous, idealistic, made of teflon, etc. Do we really want to make the same mistake again? Same kind of person, different perspective. I'm not willing to take that risk!
Posted by: Sara in PA | May 13, 2008 10:39:14 PM
This has bugged me about Obama since day 1. It's ok to blame your staff for mistakes but a real leader takes responsibility for decisions made by his staff. I don't feel comfortable when he says he has no knowledge about goings on in his organization. The closest Obama has ever come to (grudgingly) admitting a mistake was following the San Francisco comments and that was only after he tried very hard to deflect ownership in his first couple of press conferences.
I am reminded of the way Bush has never expressed regret for the way he bungled Iraq.
Posted by: CAS | May 13, 2008 10:35:55 PM
Obama is okay wtih admitting mistakes... other people's mistakes. He's a hypocrite and the people posting here seem to have a blind loyalty to a guy they don't even know. I'd be having serious buyer's remorse if I were an Iowan right about now.
Posted by: Jeremy | May 13, 2008 10:22:06 PM
Look at the electoral map people. This man cannot win the general. The Republicans are going to beat him over the head that he cannot win the WHITE blue collar vote. We are dreaming if we think these people are kidding. Just remember Tom Bradley and as Doug Wilder admitted on a recent talk show it is there and they have to find a way to deal with it. I believe the results of WV showed that tonight. The strategy they are using now that is to try to appeal to blue collar workers by visiting a few will not work.
Posted by: James | May 13, 2008 10:19:41 PM
Could Jake Tapper sink any lower? This is a journalist? What a hack job this bozo turned out to be. I was once an ABC News watcher -- Peter Jennings was a hero of mine -- but these days they are behaving as utter hacks.
Posted by: Jesse | May 13, 2008 10:02:45 PM
What a joke calling Obama's campaign incompetent when they ran the best campaign since a little know governor named Bill Clinton.
Posted by: KQuark | May 13, 2008 9:59:18 PM
I wonder which staffer's fault it is that rev. Wright is a racist.
Posted by: Logan H | May 13, 2008 9:42:16 PM
Richard Cohen wrote a horrible op-ed in the post today about how McCain has lost his values because his staff sent out an email containing the Hamas leaders quote endorsing Obama. Cohen acted as if this was an act by McCain and McCain only dispite the fact that McCain has said repeatedly that he does not believe that Hamas would be happy with an Obama presidency, just that Hamas would be very unhappy with a McCain presidency. This in contrast to Obama who repeatedly refuses to condemn his own campaign's missteps and instead blames his staffers at evey possible moment.
Posted by: Logan | May 13, 2008 9:29:10 PM
I suppose it is also his staff's fault that Obama thinks there are 57 states.
Posted by: Scott D | May 13, 2008 9:23:06 PM
I supposed it was also his staff's fault he thinks there are 57 states!!!!!
Posted by: Scott D | May 13, 2008 9:21:49 PM
Wow! Sen. Obama made reference to mistakes made by his staff 10-14 times in 12 years? Really? They made 14 mistakes in 12 years and because he mentioned them he thinks they're incompetent? What a monster! Way to spread the propaganda. . .
Posted by: Jon | May 13, 2008 8:58:58 PM
Name one 'big' mistake Obama has fessed up to... Still trying to think of one? Yeah that's because he hasn't.
Obama runs on no record and viciously attacks any mistakes his opponents have ever made. He wants to hold both sides of every issue. He wants to say he is for universal health care becuase that is popular, but his plan doesn't call for universal health care then he attacks Hillary for the provisions of her plan that make it universal health care.
He ran for 8 months on Hillary's Iraq vote but when asked how he would have voted in 2004 (when the war was going well) he said he didn't know how he would have voted.
Obama skips hundreds of contentious votes in the Illinois State Senate to leave no record of anything anyone could criticize him for.
Obama is no leader. He is a cheerleader. (Wow, one more similarity between him and George W).
Posted by: Michaelp0429 | May 13, 2008 8:40:25 PM
Let's see, Clinton's top strategist didn't know that the Dem. primaries delegates were allotted proportionally,
her campaign got beat by an unknown, African American, first term senator and you say he has staffing problems...great laugh, thanks.
bdu
Posted by: bdavid | May 13, 2008 7:53:15 PM
wow, this is news? of all the important things to talk about, this is what have to report on?
this news team has lost ALL of my respect this year. I think the real team who has failed to hire good help is ABC News!
another viewer sayin bye bye
Posted by: Zaggy | May 13, 2008 7:48:42 PM
All you Obama supporters ...
Please wake up ...
Obama is conning you ...
He claims to be a healer, a uniter and a moderate ...
Yet you know he has never acted on any of those claims ... EVER ...
Why is that ?
Its a con folks ... pure and simple ...
Wake up before you do the stupidist thing in your life ...
Posted by: Jeff | May 13, 2008 6:27:24 PM
This is such a joke. Obama is the only candidate who has admitted a mistake since Bush has been in office.
Posted by: KQuark | May 13, 2008 5:55:40 PM
Obama has been given a free pass since Iowa by the lame stream media and the DNC. He is inexperienced and unvetted. This takes AFFIRMATIVE ACTION to a whole new level!
Posted by: NYSmike | May 13, 2008 5:52:52 PM
Post a comment


