Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper
RECENT POSTS
- The Health Care Reform Price Tag
- President Obama: It's Getting Hot In Here
- President Obama Continues Questionable “You Can Keep Your Health Care” Promise
- Should They Have Called It The 'Stabilization' Act?
- Welcome to the Garden State, Mr. President
- Snowe Dampens President Obama’s Timeline on Health Care Reform
- Study: House Democrats’ Health Care Bill Pushes Top Tax Rates to Over 50% in Most States
- What's the Rush? Asks Moderate GOPer Snowe
- President Obama's Full Court Press on Health Care Reform
- Obama’s Global Reach via Movie Theaters, Bikes Messengers, Text and Mobile Networks
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Oh, Yucca
May 29, 2008 10:12 AM
Sen. John McCain's support for a nuclear waste depository in Nevada at the Yucca Mountain site is pretty clear.
In March 2007, according to the Deseret News, McCain even "mocked a question about the dangers of transporting nuclear waste while speaking with Utah reporters. 'Oh, you have to travel through states ... I am for Yucca Mountain. I'm for storage facilities. It's a lot better than sitting outside power plants all over America,' he said, then added, 'I don't mean to be sarcastic. I apologize. But I believe we can transport waste safely.'"
But during a campaign stop in Nevada where he continued to reaffirm his support for Yucca -- which is quite unpopular with Nevadans -- McCain also said that he "would seek to establish an international repository for spent nuclear fuel that could collect and safely store materials overseas that might otherwise be reprocessed to acquire bomb-grade materials. It is even possible that such an international center could make it unnecessary to open the proposed spent nuclear fuel storage facility at Yucca Mountain in Nevada.”
The Las Vegas Sun's influential columnist Jon Ralston found this a bit disingenuous, writing that "in the past few weeks, McCain has experienced an epiphany and decided there should be some sort of international repository for the fuel that he had so long wanted to come here? This is believable? And such a cockamamie solution, too. We are going to ship nuclear waste overseas?"
The implication is that McCain, looking at the electoral map has realized that he needs Nevada's five electoral votes in order to beat Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois.
Obama for his part opposes Yucca, though his second-biggest campaign contributor is the nation's largest nuclear power operator, Exelon Corp., whose CEO is a big Yucca booster.
- jpt
May 29, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (8)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
As a Nevadan, one of the things I've noticed about support for Yucca Mountain is the lack of understanding about the realities of transporting the nuclear waste to Nevada. Scottie is not going to beam it up! It will travel by truck or train, cross country. That's through your backyards folks! Oh wait. . .it's OK! The government says so. Just like waste, put undergraound, over multiple earthquake faults, in the 3rd most seismically active state is safe. Whew, I was worried for a minute there, but the government says it's safe . . .
Posted by: anita | May 29, 2008 5:04:58 PM
well, we could build a breeder reactor and reprocess some of this waste in order to reduce it and at the very least make it less toxic. Also, if we really invested in nuclear power the advances in technology make them more efficient and with less waste in the end anyway.
Posted by: Louis | May 29, 2008 2:23:42 PM
Hanford is the nation's most contaminated nuclear waste site and the nation's largest environmental cleanup operation. It is not refreshing that a person who aspires to be president would not have heard about it -- it's scary!
Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 29, 2008 12:11:54 PM
Many people have not heard of Hanford or Yucca. Running for president does not mean you are omnipotent, it means you are smart enough to grasp ideas and to learn.
If a candidate says, "oh, I know all about that", on every subject raised, then they are lying.
I much prefer the truthful answer of I don't know, but I'll find out.
Posted by: HUH? | May 29, 2008 11:40:29 AM
At least this is a real issue.
America needs a realistic energy policy that meets our strategic objective of energy independence. That won't happen overnight but it will never happen if we don't make some smart adjustments to our current thinking. The Europeans got this a long time ago and as a result drive better fuel efficient cars and use nuclear energy effectively.
If we aren't at least that smart, then we probably are a nation in decline. I don't think that has to be the case but stupid pandering leaders are the harbinger of precisely that.
We will increase our use of nuclear energy. It is a matter of smarts in regulating to ensure safety. Get to it.
The other part of this is creating systems that cascade the energy conversion upward to create fuels, in particular, chaining solar to create hydrogen to power coal conversion. Quit thinking in terms of simple one-off source and think systematically. That meets the objectives of energy indepence, a cleaner environment, and it creates jobs.
America can if it just will.
Posted by: len | May 29, 2008 11:39:45 AM
Do a search, Jake. Obama supported Yucca UNTIL he decided to run for President. The day Barbara Boxer held her hearing about the Environment/Yucca Mountain, BO sent her a letter telling her has has changed his mind about Yucca and opposed it, but, of course, that was for political expediency.
My brother, my SIL, my 2 nieces and my nephew lived in Godley, Illinois during the Tritium Water leak cover up. My nephew was born when they lived there. My 2 nieces grew up there and have been sickly their entire lives.
Obama DID NOTHING for that town,except continue to take Exelon's HUGE $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$, $270,000, to be exact. Do you know what Tritium is and what it can do to babies? children? adults? Google it. You'll find out. Obama is a sleaze. PURE SLEAZE.
Posted by: Vickie | May 29, 2008 10:38:18 AM
ALL CANDIDATES FLIP FLOP. That is just the way it is. They call it "clarifying" their positions.
In terms of Obama not knowing about Hanford, at least he was honest about it and said instead B.S. his way through it, he said he will learn about it.
I actually find that refreshing. I am liking the new politics.
Posted by: Stacey | May 29, 2008 10:30:29 AM
I understand this is a flip-flop and McCain is all over the map on this. But remember Obama had never even heard of Hanford, the nation's largest contaminated nuclear waste site. So on one hand you have McCain who flip flops and Obama who doesn't know the basics.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 29, 2008 10:26:19 AM
Post a comment

