Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

Dobson to Attack Obama Tuesday for Distorting the Bible, Having a "Fruitcake" Interpretation of the Constitution

June 23, 2008 9:35 PM

Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family -- who has stayed unusually quiet in this election cycle likely due to his loathing of presumptive GOP presidential nominee Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. -- will tomorrow attack Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, on Tuesday for a speech the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee delivered in 2006 to the liberal Christian group Call to Renewal.

Abc_obama_080623_blog The AP was given an advance copy of Dobson's 18-minute radio segment, which has already been taped, and will air Tuesday.

In it, Dobson hammers Obama's views of religion, and says the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee is trying to govern by the "lowest common denominator of morality," and calls Obama's views "a fruitcake interpretation of the Constitution."

Obama's original speech, delivered on June 28, 2006, (you can listen to it HERE) started with a discussion of his 2004 Senate opponent, Alan Keyes, who said that "Jesus Christ would not vote for Barack Obama."

Obama said that he "was urged by some of my liberal supporters not to take this statement seriously, to essentially ignore it….But what they didn't understand, however, was that I had to take Mr. Keyes seriously, for he claimed to speak for my religion, and my God. He claimed knowledge of certain truths." Moreover, "Keyes's implicit accusation that I was not a true Christian nagged at me."

The speech delves into Obama's view of the constructive role religion plays in society, beseeching "work that progressive leaders need to do" on the subject, followed by his views of "what conservative leaders need to do -- some truths they need to acknowledge."

That included "the critical role that the separation of church and state has played in preserving not only our democracy, but the robustness of our religious practice," Obama said, as well as "the increasing diversity of America's population, the dangers of sectarianism have never been greater. Whatever we once were, we are no longer just a Christian nation; we are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers."

"And even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools?" Obama asked. "Would we go with James Dobson's, or Al Sharpton's? Which passages of Scripture should guide our public policy? Should we go with Leviticus, which suggests slavery is ok and that eating shellfish is abomination? How about Deuteronomy, which suggests stoning your child if he strays from the faith? Or should we just stick to the Sermon on the Mount - a passage that is so radical that it's doubtful that our own Defense Department would survive its application? So before we get carried away, let's read our bibles. Folks haven't been reading their bibles."

Dobson responds, per the AP, that "I think he's deliberately distorting the traditional understanding of the Bible to fit his own worldview, his own confused theology" and charges that Obama "is dragging Biblical understanding through the gutter."

"Am I required in a democracy to conform my efforts in the political arena to his bloody notion of what is right with regard to the lives of tiny babies?" Dobson asks. "What he's trying to say here is unless everybody agrees, we have no right to fight for what we believe."

In response to Dobson's comments, Joshua DuBois, national director of religious affairs for the Obama campaign responded in a statement: "Barack Obama is committed to reaching out to people of faith and standing up for American families, and a full reading of his 2006 Call to Renewal speech shows just that. Obama is proud to have the support of millions of Americans of faith and looks forward to working across religious lines to bring our country together."

- jpt

June 23, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (199)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jon Stewart said it best, Dobson is "just a hate filled guy who got lucky".

Posted by: will | Jun 26, 2008 10:34:10 PM

James, Thank you for standing for the Truth!

Posted by: Errol Peters | Jun 26, 2008 4:52:54 PM

Where was he when the Bush Administration propogated this facist war against all of ISLAM in the name of Jesus. Christians are known for their love not for who they can threaten and kill in his name. Jesus is a prophet to Islam...so in a sense they are simply unbaptized Christians required by Mohammed to beleive in him. Christians should concentrate on getting them baptised in his name not KILLED.That way the Holy Spirit can give them a new song and preserve their faith without the westernism that they TOTALLY HATE FOR GOOD REASON. At our rate Sodom with stand up with Gommorah and condemn us.
Rev Wright was right...Obama subconsciously knows our only hope is to CHANGE.

Posted by: Leslie Miller | Jun 26, 2008 4:28:32 AM

I forgot to mention that by sending Dobson to communist China we would at least get him out of the country. He should take all the other nut cases with him who try and force their brand of religion on others which includes depriving rights to the gay community and not allowing women control over their bodies.

Posted by: Let's be reasonable | Jun 26, 2008 1:57:52 AM

Mr. Dobson is clearly the fruitcake. He is yet another example of an over the edge, right wing religious fanatic who can't help but force his insane religious views and beliefs on others. Jokers like Dobson should be sent to communist China as missionaries.

Posted by: Let's be reasonable | Jun 26, 2008 1:54:28 AM

I am glad Dobson said something about his context for understanding scripture especially where he says Obama is twisting settled religious doctrine.

I'd prefer that pastors and theologians talk to politicians directly about matters of faith. When faith works through the media's filters it is usually who is up and who is down. Instead, I think it is better to talk about why the Sermon of the Mount is closer to the the theological basis for Jesus' time on earth than the old Testament's warnings of what could absolutely can not be done. When Dobson hits Obama on relativism, then it seems to me that Obama has to speak back to what is most important about being a believer and why it has gotten out of proportion in this time.

It is much more substantive than what the MSM does with it. Well, do Jews support him for his faith and his church? Do the Evangelical youth think he is right on most issues of faith? Well, media what issues of faith are we talking about specifically.

Posted by: Genna | Jun 25, 2008 6:14:58 PM

Those who say Barack Obama is heathen or not true Christian and should therefore not become president of America should propose an alternative that fits the description of a true Christian. Are Christians therefore going to abstain from voting because there is nobody who fits the description? Does Macain fulfil every description of Christian? Or in America the only description of a Christian is anyone who opposess gay marriages and abortion, all other things not withstanding? Even as we cast that stone against Obama, we who have answered the higher calling and are believers, do we pass the test of christianity as is? The bible is categorical that all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God; pray tell me one christian who hasn't. Rather than tear Obama into pieces, let us pray for the dear nation of America. Obama wasn't there when gays and pro-abortionists started clamouring for their rights. These evils are a product of society and Obama's support or opposition to it is of little consequence if Americans themselves don't repent. These things are a product of evil and more blamed on the failure of church rather than failure of state. The church has not provided leadership on these issues. Instead they are torn right in the middle. Ordination of gay clergy is not a decision of state, but squarely rests on the church. The church should turn a torch on itself, repent and trust God for deliverance rather than ad hoc attacks on people who have no effective control of the evils in our society. Even when gay marriages are banned by the state, gay relationships still thrive. Are we just concerned about the legality of the evil or its existence and proliferation?
Church please find better reason not to support Obama. At best this Dobson thing is absurd.

Posted by: master key | Jun 25, 2008 5:40:35 AM

Obama is looking at the big Picture. I find nothing wrong in Obama's speach. All I know that God see the heart and God will Judge Not Dobson. Religion is a personal. Who are we to say who is a Christian and who is not a Christian. Dobson said Obama's position is confused Religion,the way Dobson attack Obama in my opinion is not fair from a man that said he knows God. God said in the Bible Love and Kindness I will draw you. Meet with Obama and have a conversation with him Donot attack Obama show him where you disagree and Obama will help you see Dobson why he feel or think the way he does.

Posted by: Maxine | Jun 25, 2008 4:35:56 AM

The Senator and the Reverend deserve each other. Both are politicians first. That Obama could spend 20 years in a church that spouted such hatred amazes me. Then to keep denying it. And then to finally apologize for it. At least with Dobson, you know what you are going to get. Obama is wishy washy. He is an expert in playing the victim. But then, remember that he is from Chicago. St. Peter must be in hysterics.

Posted by: Linda Mae | Jun 25, 2008 3:38:01 AM

Dobson is like Kaiser Sosae. Fear him, for he will eat your soul.

Posted by: Hawanja | Jun 24, 2008 10:37:06 PM

Rev. Dobson has forgotten the heart of our faith...love the Lord, and then thy neighbor as thyself. Scripture does not say just love other Christians, nor love those with whom we share the same faith or views. As much as we are able, we are to live in fellowship with others. That's scripture. Obama is right. Dobson is wrong. Somehow Rev. Dobson has gotten so caught up in politics and his perceived power as a "Christian leader," that he has strayed from Christ's message. Love, mercy and respect for others is needed now more than ever. We don't have to agree. Everyone has a free will to believe or not. All need to learn to be civil and respectful. And...if calling Obama a liberal Dobson means that he is someone who cares for the poor, who has mercy for those sufffering without healthcare, and he is respectful of others of other faiths...I thank God that he is. And, if Dobson truly read his Bible, he would emulate him. By the way...I am a Baptist Minister. Rev. Dobson doesn't speak for me. The Lord does.

Posted by: Ministerzel | Jun 24, 2008 9:00:08 PM

Chriss. Wrong again on your Constitutional IQ. The separation of church and state is not a reference to the the Constitutional ban on establishing a religion by Congress. The separation mantra is one picked up by liberals from a letter that Jefferson wrote over two hundred years ago and is not a Constitutional point of law except in the midstream media and misguided liberals. Try reading it again.

Posted by: gee | Jun 24, 2008 6:58:14 PM

Obama should not fall into this debate with this man. What he should to is point out roman Chapter 14. We are not to judge each other on the basis of our faith and how we practice sich faith. it is a lesson that Dobson has forgotten. then he should end it neatly that we whould all pray for each other to have a better understand of gods teachings.

Posted by: Delvon | Jun 24, 2008 4:55:29 PM

Hucksters like Dobson have been peddling their brand of snake oil to the folks down on the farm for centuries. TV, radio, and the Internet just give them a national platform now. There's a sucker born every minute.

Posted by: DiggyZazz | Jun 24, 2008 3:47:59 PM

SpaceCat wrote - "I guess that means that gay marriage is cool now, given the fact that it's only mentioned in the Old Testament."

Not so - homosexuality is condemned in the New Testament, in 1 Corinthians and in 1 Timothy. And Dobson is correct - the New Testament records the events of the fulfillment of the Old Testament. The teachings of the New Testament are what guide us now.

Posted by: byablue | Jun 24, 2008 3:19:33 PM

A couple questions from The National Review:

Where are all of the Hollywood celebrities holding telethons asking for help in restoring Iowa and helping the folks affected by the floods?

Where is all the media asking the tough questions about why the federal government hasn't solved the problem? Asking where the FEMA trucks (and trailers) are?

Why isn't the Federal Government relocating Iowa people to free hotels in Chicago?

When will Spike Lee say that the Federal Government blew up the levees that failed in Des Moines?

Where are Sean Penn and the Dixie Chicks?

Where are all the looters stealing high-end tennis shoes and big screen television sets?

When will we hear Governor Chet Culver say that he wants to rebuild a 'vanilla' Iowa, because that's the way God wants it?

Where is the hysterical 24/7 media coverage complete with reports of cannibalism?

Where are the people declaring that George Bush hates white, rural people?

How come in 2 weeks, you will never hear about the Iowa flooding ever again?

Posted by: Aston | Jun 24, 2008 2:20:11 PM

I find it both interesting and amusing that Biblical literalists pick and choose which portions of the Bible are literal and which are not. In the classical training, I learned that the Bible and many other classical books were written in three to four layers: 1) the literal one, 2) the metaphorical one, 3) the moral one and 4) the anagogical one (ultimate spiritual or mystical sense).

The entire Bible is literal in the historical and sociological context as well as it is metaphorical, moral and mystical.

Obama is quite correct that the Sermon on the Mount is now understood as Jesus’ most powerful teaching of social justice and not as the altruistic fool who gives all of one’s possessions away and eagerly becomes a doormat or scapegoat to society.

Posted by: LydiaG | Jun 24, 2008 2:12:57 PM

You have to be kidding me. James Dobson said what? This guy is the laughing stock (and perhaps the biggest fruitcake) of the Universe. If you support him, you probably still think the world is flat, evolution doesn't exist, and we are NOT in a recession. I agree with algwriter above,VERY VERY DANGEROUS TO SOCIETY. James Dobson has misinterpreted the bible for years to successfully brainwash the masses and line his own pockets with millions.

Posted by: interesting | Jun 24, 2008 1:39:00 PM

Dobson is an extremist within his tradition as Wright is within his tradition (Black Liberation Theology). Both have accumulated power and power can corrupt. Both have made outrageous statements which appeal to the haters among their respective followers. Both have been overtaken by hubris. Christians and Americans in general need to disassociate ourselves from such people.

Posted by: Dave | Jun 24, 2008 1:26:22 PM

Dobson thinks he's the Protestant Pope. It's so sad what he's doing to Christianity.

Posted by: Luke Colman | Jun 24, 2008 1:09:53 PM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS