Political Punch

How can you tell when a lawyer is lying? The same way you can tell when Obama is lying. When he moves his lips. I'm a non-partisan voter but although I don't care for McCain, I'll vote for him any day over some one who doesn't even know how many states we have. My first grade grandson can help him on that. Since we can't attribute Obama's numerous gaffes to advanced age, I would have to say it must be stupidity. How many fallen vets do we have in the audience? Leno would love to have him for president, new material every day.

Obama must have been a protege of Bill Clinton. He has lied so much and been protected by the liberal media for so long that he actually believes himself.
He is no more qualified to lead this country than Ray Nagy is to lead Old Orleans. Hillary as his veep? Dumb and dumber...would Obama install Osama in his Cabinet? Probably would, by proxy.
Come on Obama, tell us the truth for a change, even the people in Chicago know what you're about. "Change we can believe in" my a--.

At least McCain loves his country.

Hillary Clinton was "delusional" for thinking she could win the popular vote and convince the superdelegates she was a better candidate. She won the vote, but 352 Dems Elders got him the presumtive nominee status anyway. Clinton was also "stirring for a fight" because she wanted votes to count, and "thinking she was entitled" for exercising her right to run for president. It's easy to win elections if you push the candidates out before election day. Obama's a thug, he's done it before. The way Obama-campaign uses the internet to disgrace the election process should be addressed. Members of the Internet community must stop this type of characterizations and force the Obama into debating where presumptive presidents candidates are suppose to debate - out in the open - candidate vs. candidate.

McCain is clearly confused !!!
He has flip flopped so many times.
As a republican, I am ashamed.
Will the real McCain pls stand up and stop embarassing us.

SEN McCAIN SAYS SEN OBAMA IS INEXPERIENCED, CAN SOMEBODY TELL ME WHAT ARE THE SO CALLED EXPERIENCE THAT SEN McCAIN HAD!!!!!!

Here's our biggest problem: hundreds of millions of dollar spent on these endless campaigns, and we get one candidate who at times does seem to be bordering on senility while the moron Lieberman stands behind him ready to whisper "corrections" in his ear when McCain gets confused. On the other side we have a candidate showing disturbing signs of not being the sharpest tool in the shed when he seems confused about the number of states in the union or calls for more Arab translators in Afganistan where of course no one speaks Arabic. Can these two REALLY be the cream rising to the top. It's scary in my opinion.

How can he said something fool like that while he admits ``i hate war``.

People like to cite examples of an occasional Obama gaffe as somehow equivalent to, or even "worse than" the kind of persistent confusion evidenced by McCain on the campaign trail. This is ludicrous. Anyone can get tired and misspeak. Anyone can say something stupid once in a while. With reporters breathing constantly down their necks, both of these candidates are subject to constant scrutiny, and it's not surprising that we end up hearing about their every out-of-place word.

The difference is that most of Obama's "gaffes" tend to fall into the "jumbled words" category of misspeak, whereas most of McCain's tend to fall into the "jumbled ideas" category. This is a major difference.

For example, Obama *knows* that there aren't 57 states - he was saying that he had visited "47" states (something he repeats often) and it came out wrong). McCain, on the other hand, mixed up the relationship between Al Qaeda and Shi'a/Sunnis on _more than one occasion_. This would seem to indicate that he *might not know* the difference, or that he might be having some difficulty keeping his facts straight about the differences.

Thus, the "57 states" gaffe is a "misspeak." The "Shi'a/Sunni" gaffe - because repeated and not corrected - seems more like a "misunderstanding." These are not in the same class of gaffe, and they are not worthy of the same level of concern. I don't care if McCain says "beer-mark" instead of "earmark" - that's a "misspeak," not a misunderstanding.

But I DO care if he says that it's "not too important" when troops come home from Iraq. That was neither a misspeak nor a misunderstanding, but McCain's true position. And yes, it is confused. His war is a MISTAKE. There's no talking your way out of a "gaffe" of that degree.

Obama is DUMB:
"I see many fallen vets sitting in the audience today"
"Beautiful Great Lakes of Oregon"
"57 or 58 States"
"Truman was a great peace negotiator"
Obama is a LIAR:
"I never heard Wright say those things"
"My father was a goat herder"
"My uncle liberated Auschwitz"
"I only worked for Rezko for 6 hours"
"Selma got me born"
The stupid liar trying to make it look as if he holds some advantage in the intellect department just does not hold water. McCain's 135 IQ trounces Obama's 112.
Even the Democratic caucus rules were called "affirmative action", just like Obama's ejumification. If delegates were assigned like electoral college votes, Hillary would've won 7 weeks ago.

Everyone knows who he or she is voting for, so WHY SPEND THE MONEY ON THESE CAMPAIGNS?

Does anyone know how we get "natural gas"? Our public transportation in Riverside, CA uses ONLY natural gas, and NO BLACK STUFF comes out of the back. Why can't we use natural gas in our cars?

It's better to call McCain confused rather than stupid. I think "confused" is extremely GENEROUS.

Kerry keeps "forgetting" he wanted McCain for his VP.

Here's what we know about McCain's timetable: talk to the General in July and "maybe 100 years" like Japan, Germany & South Korea. So from this we can gather that he has no timetable and actually it appears the troops will be there for a really long time but it's okay for him as long as no one dies.

Confused. Why are you opposed to the surge? Because it worked? Do you want the US to lose? Do you want the terrorists to continue to murder Iraqis? Do you want them to develop a base from which to attack the US? How many people are you ready to have murdered so that you can feel justified in your irrational hate for Bush and for the US?

Obama will destroy America. Do not trust him at all.

Barack Obama gave an interview in April to a Chicago television station and talked about his policy on Iraq.Obama tries to explain that he has never called for a withdrawal of troops from Iraq, but wants to complete the mission there:
Q: But you’ve said troops should be withdrawn (from Iraq).
A: No, no, I’ve never said troops should be withdrawn

Really? This is what his website offers for his Iraq policy: Obama will immediately begin to remove our troops from Iraq. He will remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months. Obama will make it clear that we will not build any permanent bases in Iraq. He will keep some troops in Iraq to protect our embassy and diplomats; if al Qaeda attempts to build a base within Iraq, he will keep troops in Iraq or elsewhere in the region to carry out targeted strikes on al Qaeda.

Duh!

Democrats are grasping at straws here - they know that the surge that McCain advocated is working, calm and order is being restored in Iraq (finally). Their great idea of giving up and getting out asap is looking pretty foolish. They're taking statements of of context to try to distract and confuse people from the real issues that matter.

What an Ignorant approach for Sen.Obama’s campaign to take. They are fully aware of the Anhauser Bush buy out bid. They knew that that would be on Sen.McCains mind, yet they are trying to trick people into thinking its due to age. They are attacking the elderly and have forgotten that many people who supported him are just as mature as Sen. McCain. In the case of Democratic senators many were older.