CONTRIBUTORS
RECENT POSTS
- A Day in the Life of Joe Biden: Landing in North Carolina
- A Day in the Life of Joe Biden
- The Big Sell
- The Presidential Planner
- Obama Dismisses Talk of “Crisis” with Israel
- Obama Says Tiger Woods Would Still be “a Terrific Golfer”
- Obama Says Tiger Woods Still be “a Terrific Golfer”
- Turf War: Bernanke Fights For Fed's Powers
- Obama Not Worried About “Procedural Rules” like “Deem and Pass” for Health Care
- Turf War: Bernanke Fights For Fed's Powers
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Obama to Break Promise, Opt Out of Public Financing for General Election
June 19, 2008 8:58 AM
In a web video to supporters -- "the people who built this movement from the bottom up" -- Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, announced this morning that he will not enter into the public financing system, despite a previous pledge to do so.
"We've made the decision not to participate in the public financing system for the general election," Obama says in the video, blaming it on the need to combat Republicans, saying "we face opponents who’ve become masters at gaming this broken system. John McCain’s campaign and the Republican National Committee are fueled by contributions from Washington lobbyists and special interest PACs. And we’ve already seen that he’s not going to stop the smears and attacks from his allies running so-called 527 groups, who will spend millions and millions of dollars in unlimited donations."
In November 2007, Obama answered "Yes" to Common Cause when asked "If you are nominated for President in 2008 and your major opponents agree to forgo private funding in the general election campaign, will you participate in the presidential public financing system?"
Obama wrote: "In February 2007, I proposed a novel way to preserve the strength of the public financing system in the 2008 election. My plan requires both major party candidates to agree on a fundraising truce, return excess money from donors, and stay within the public financing system for the general election. My proposal followed announcements by some presidential candidates that they would forgo public financing so they could raise unlimited funds in the general election. The Federal Election Commission ruled the proposal legal, and Senator John McCain (R-AZ) has already pledged to accept this fundraising pledge. If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election."
Not so "aggressively," according to the McCain campaign, which argues that Obama did not discuss this or try to negotiate at all with the McCain campaign, despite writing that he would "aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election."
The Obama campaign disputes this. Obama campaign counsel Bob Bauer met with McCain campaign counsel Trevor Potter and, according to Obama spox Bill Burton, Potter "immediately made it clear there was no basis for further discussion," that they weren't interested in any sort of agreement. "McCain and the RNC had spent months raising and spending money for the general election, and their basic attitude was 'You'll catch up,'" Burton says, suggesting that the Republicans were also turning a blind eye to the activities of 527s.
In April Obama seemed to be preparing an argument to opt out, as we noted at the time.
"We have created a parallel public financing system where the American people decide if they want to support a campaign they can get on the Internet and finance it, and they will have as much access and influence over the course and direction of our campaign that has traditionally been reserved for the wealthy and the powerful," Obama said at the time.
Today he said something similar, telling supporters, "Instead of forcing us to rely on millions from Washington lobbyists and special interest PACs, you’ve fueled this campaign with donations of $5, $10, $20, whatever you can afford. And because you did, we’ve built a grassroots movement of over 1.5 million Americans. ...You’ve already changed the way campaigns are funded because you know that’s the only way we can truly change how Washington works."
Obama said, "I’m asking you to try to do something that’s never been done before. Declare our independence from a broken system, and run the type of campaign that reflects the grassroots values that have already changed our politics and brought us this far."
Declaring independence from a "broken system" by breaking a promise. Obama hopes you'll care more about the former than the latter.
- jpt
UPDATE: McCain campaign communications director Jill Hazelbaker emails: “Today, Barack Obama has revealed himself to be just another typical politician who will do and say whatever is most expedient for Barack Obama. The true test of a candidate for President is whether he will stand on principle and keep his word to the American people. Barack Obama has failed that test today, and his reversal of his promise to participate in the public finance system undermines his call for a new type of politics. Barack Obama is now the first presidential candidate since Watergate to run a campaign entirely on private funds. This decision will have far-reaching and extraordinary consequences that will weaken and undermine the public financing system.”
June 19, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (773)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
OB is now president and i was reading through this but from keeping up with all the politics i feel OB is a dreamer not a do-er. Lets see if he is just a good talker or not
Posted by: Christine | Nov 5, 2008 10:26:57 AM
Wow that trash that I am reading in these comments. "We don't know who Barack Obama is" because three books is not enough. OMG he broke his promise to not except tax payer money to finance his campaign, the horror. "Palin is more experienced than Barack Obama." Sure so is my four year old little sister. This on cracks me up. More experienced because she was city mayor of 7,000 people? Rookie governor of Alaska population 670,000? Columbus Ohio has a greater population. You really want four more years of Bush? McCain is no maverick. If he was he would not have chosen an inexperienced hack to be his running mate. You can't see the publicity stunt? If he was a maverick he would have asked Joe Lieberman to be on his ticket or one of the countless republican women that have better qualifications than Palin.
Posted by: republicans are | Oct 30, 2008 5:05:02 PM
Obama is not "sharp". He is very charismatic and "slick". So are many people who are sociopaths and serial killers. People should vote for someone who has character and experience, not just charisma. This is a Presidential election, not a high school popularity contest...we are not voting on the Homecoming King. Furthermore, people say that Palin does not have enough experience to be president. So what? She is not running for president. But, Obabma is and he has much less experience that Palin. He has only served as a senator. And, he has missed 23% of his voting opportunities in the senate meetings since 2005. Missing in action 23% of the time in just under 3 years is not a very good track record. Most people would be fired for that! Vote for someone who wants to serve others, not just himself. Vote McCain!
Posted by: Michelle | Oct 30, 2008 3:25:06 AM
"Obama on the other hand is sharp as Bill Clinton ... "
-----
If Clinton were on a Demerol drip with a mess o' marbles in his mouth, maybe.
Posted by: Belle Starr | Sep 16, 2008 1:54:43 PM
Seems that a lot of people supporting BO,are his campaign workers, who are assigned to rebuttle, comments on the internet made against Obomination. BO,cannot be trusted because he consistently lies and goes back on his words. He seems to do and say anything to win the election, no matter what it takes. That is called desperation. There are a lot of hard working people who do not want high taxes, because BO wants a lot of Government handouts, for people who don't want to really work hard and make it own their own, like most of us. They are young and imatured have no idea on living on their own, making their own way in this world. They feel that the GOv. and their parents owe them a living, shame on those young people who want these handouts. So they are out there clinging to their false illusion about Borak.
Posted by: cecimor | Jun 25, 2008 4:07:01 PM
Barak Obama broke what is known as a campaign promise. It is a promise and when you are running for President of the most powerful country on earth, who and what you agree to support has huge implications and consequences. This wasn't some little postcard in the mail, this is a massive issue.
Wake up Democrats! You are being sold the same way Republicans were sold Bush. With pressure tactics to vote along party lines, just because. Or "he's better than the other guy".
Obama represents a dictatorship because you don't even know what you are voting for. A huge unknown. And Obama wants it that way. Because then he has unrestricted power. He doesn't have to do what he said, because A. he rarely says anything specific and B. he can just 'change his mind' and the sheep will believe the wolf. He has been given every opportunity to give specifics and has been urged with many, many questions and yet, he gives the vaguest of answers. Obama is taking a page straight out of Dubya's playbook, the page on dodging accountability.
Obama sold out his congregation, his pastor, and now Common Cause and the American People.
It's not that Obama doesn't need funding, he does he would just rather not touch the public pot because then he would be subject to disclosure laws about who gives to his campaign and how much.
It's massive spin (and totally untrue) to say he is doing it to save the American people money. At best he is gambling that he will make more money (though the money won't be clean or he could get it in addition to the public fund) by private (dirty) means than by accepting into a legit system.
The system is in place to entice candidates to run a clean campaign. If Obama had character, he would stick to his campaign promise, regardless of what McCain does. His words to McCain were simply a bluff to "appear" better than McCain. He isn't fooling me. Truth be told he is a dirty politician like the bunch, but a sociopath as well.
Posted by: malik | Jun 24, 2008 5:17:12 PM
The Obama camp loves to make statements and say 'vote Obama, we can always go back.' Which is very misleading and false, it's a pressure tactic. Can we go back on 8 years of Bush? Never. Things are much different then they were 8 years ago. 9-11, Iraq war, huge losses of life both American and other nationalities. These people can't come back. EPA has been gutted of the knowledgeable and unbiased Scientists (i.e. the deck has been stacked with "Yes" men and Neocons). Environmental protections have been rolled back and there is drilling in Alaska's last wilderness (public owned land, mind you) in a huge unprecedented way. In a similar way to the Environmental Protection Agency, new laws, staff and Supreme Court justices actions will last long into the future and dictate policy for years to come. On every possibly front, Life in the USA has been permanently altered.
Even attempted changes to this lasting impact (i.e. fanatics urging you to vote Obama) are impacted by Bush's policy, because voters tend to over-react and swing for some other ideas just because they 'might be' different. Different can actually mean worse.
Posted by: yuri | Jun 24, 2008 4:44:41 PM
Obama's Rev knows him better than anyone and he said"Obama will say what a politian has to say" Enough said.
Posted by: roncraw | Jun 23, 2008 5:48:14 PM
Hey! Do you think Barack would be interested in a new bumper sticker I am having made up: CHANGE....IF CONVENIENT FOR ME. Hell, I will even split the proceeds with him.
Posted by: justjoe | Jun 23, 2008 9:52:32 AM
When John McCain speaks he sounds tired. Its like he has trouble getting the energy to talk. If Joe is not around he is lost in corrective speech help. Can you emagine John McCain and Joe Lieberman running the white house. Please lets not be Republican for Republican sack. Lets vote Obama this time we can always go back.
Posted by: Jordan | Jun 22, 2008 12:46:09 AM
We don't have the luxury for John McCain to be sleeping in meetings like Ronald Reagan. We have to much work to do after the Bush regime of criminal treators. John McCain is unstable, and will increase the hatred for this country, if elected. I can tell you with absolute accuracy this man will lead us to a nuclear war. Why would you vote for this Bush like prisoner of war sell out. He may have some good qualities, but not president.
Posted by: Jordan | Jun 22, 2008 12:27:40 AM
I see the hired Obama bloggers are out tonight all over the blogs trying to defend their flip-flopper. Obama more than once supported public financing. He even talked about it on his web site until it was erased off the other day. He has changed his mind on 3 issues just this week, public financing, NAFTA and the FISA. He starts to feel a little pressure and he throws out the race card.
Posted by: PJH | Jun 21, 2008 10:41:45 PM
McCain is currently on sleeping pills. Common side effect of sleeping pills is amnesia (short term memory loss). We have an on going sluaghter in Iraq. He remembers nothing...gosh something is going on but I do not rememeber.
Obama on the other hand is sharp as Bill Clinton, the most loved American president of modern political era. McCain is an old fart whose speech is a lullaby. McCain is trying to curb the anger by taking sleeping / anti-anxiety pills...but watch his fowl mouth starting to stink...in few short weeks after July 4th
Posted by: say_something | Jun 21, 2008 3:15:44 PM
Obama never "promised" anything.It is amazing to me how people will latch onto others words and represent them as fact. Answering "yes" on a Common Cause questionaire with a follow up elaboration of the answer with conditions does not a promise make. It became clear to Obama that McCain had every intention of gaming the system (including borrowing money by using public financing as collateral). It is about time a Democrat doesn't cave into the hypocritical rantings of the Republicans. Go get 'em Barack!
Posted by: dan in scottsdale | Jun 20, 2008 7:28:56 PM
Obama did not broke a promise especially since he didn't make one. And I see nothing wrong if he doesn't want to go ahead with public financing at least thats one thing we are glad about he is looking out for our interest at heart imagine when he becomes elected..
Posted by: Kathryn Forbes | Jun 20, 2008 3:33:29 PM
He didn't break a promise. He answered yes to the question " "If you are nominated for President in 2008 and your major opponents agree to forgo private funding in the general election campaign, will you participate in the presidential public financing system?"
McCain did not agree to a publicly financed campaign, Barak's campaign tried to get him to do so and he would not. So Barak isn't taking public financing either, just as he said he wouldn't if his opponent didn't either. How can anyone call that a lie? He did exactly what he said he would do.
Posted by: You're All Idiots | Jun 20, 2008 1:57:34 PM
Just another warning bell that Obama is not "change" at all. He lies, changes his position and does whatever is politically expedient. If that isn't "politics as usual," I don't know what is.
Posted by: Traci | Jun 20, 2008 1:20:07 PM
Hey Maeine , You said Nobama needs to fight the 527, You mean like the stuff MOVEON.org and its TV spots going after Mccain. The teamsters are also making ads that benifit Nobama. I would say its a pretty much a special interest group.
Posted by: scot | Jun 20, 2008 12:41:13 PM
Like they say a man is as good as his word...And Obama has shown time and times over he is not a man of his word..
Posted by: PCC | Jun 20, 2008 10:12:42 AM
Why does Obama assume that all women are pro-choice? Many are very pro-life, many women are anti-welfare, anti-gun control and pro-military. A lot of American women want closed borders and don’t like NAFTA one little bit. A lot of women want to send illegal aliens back home and certainly don’t want to provide medical care for them at taxpayer expense. I am insulted that Sen. Obama has such a simplistic opinion of my wife, daughter and other women in my family.
Sorry Senator, women are multi-faceted, and I like them that way. Each is unique. Not all women want abortions, not all men watch football, not all black people draw welfare and go to prison, not all whites belong to the KKK. Not all Californians are surfers and not all Texans own cattle and oil wells. Not all Indians live in a tee-pee full of whiskey bottles. Your stereotyping would be funny in stand up comedy, not in a serious context.
Posted by: Royce | Jun 20, 2008 9:57:09 AM
Post a comment


