RECENT POSTS
- White House Study Looks at Job Creation in Illinois if Gitmo Prisoners Transferred There
- President Obama: Asia Trip Helped Usher in a New Era of American Engagement
- Secretary Sebelius Celebrates the Tenth Anniversary of National Adoption Day
- Organizing for America Targets Sarah Palin
- Obama Administration Starts to Publicly Raise Issue of Detained US Citizen Xue Feng
- President Obama Gives Interview (of Sorts) to Dissident Cuban Blogger
- "You Guys Make a Pretty Good Photo Op," President Obama Jokes to Troops at Osan Air Base
- Did the Chinese Government Crack Down on an Obama Interview?
- Our Trip to the DMZ
- President Obama Greets U.S. Troops in South Korea, Wraps Up Week in Asia
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Weaver on McCain Ad: "Childish"; On New Negative McCain: "Like Asking Wilt Chamberlain to Play Point Guard"
July 30, 2008 7:50 PM
John Weaver, the former top political aide for Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz, who left the campaign amidst some acrimony last Summer, tells ABC News that McCain's new ad attacking Sen. Barack Obama, R-Illinois, as a celebrity akin to Britney Spears and Paris Hilton is "childish."
Weaver says that McCain campaign's new strategy of going negative against Obama "reduces McCain. John is capable of inspiring Americans."
Likewise, Weaver said that McCain's attack against Obama for canceling a trip to visit wounded soldiers -- an ad that McCain friend Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., called "inappropriate" -- is "very not John. It's not the John brand at all."
The new negative McCain, Weaver said, doesn't work. "It's like asking Wilt Chamberlain to play point guard."
Weaver earlier today took issue with the McCain ad in an interview with Marc Ambinder of The Atlantic.
Earlier today, Obama responded to McCain's new ad in Lebanon, Missouri, saying, "You know, I don't pay attention to John McCain's ads, although I do notice he doesn't seem to have anything to say very positive about himself. He seems to only be talking about me. You need to ask John McCain what he's for and not just what he's against."
He also said to a crowd in Rolla, Missouri, per ABC News' Sunlen Miller, "John McCain right now - he's spending an awful lot of time talking about me. You notice that? I haven’t seen an ad yet where he talks about what he’s gonna do."
- jpt
July 30, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (39)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
the ads are idiotic. not a good move for the mccain camp. even though they hit home on the message they are conveying, the mccain camp should be doing better. there are lots of good things they could be promoting instead.
almost every pundit for obama is saying that mccain is running a negative campaign but obama is not. that is bs. everytime obama states an obvious lie in an attack, it gets repeated over and over by the media, with no correction on the obvious lie. the affect is the same. obama gets to put out a negative political advertisement, it gets repeated by the media for free, any response by the mccain camp gets a partial sound bite and is then buried. make no doubt about it, obama is running a negative campaign against mccain and the republicans at the same time.
Posted by: infinitewisdom4u | Aug 27, 2008 9:23:04 AM
I always amazes when Senator Obama asks Senator John McCain to do something that he himself has never done. We know all about Senator McCain's career and where he stands on issues from his longtime Senatorial Record. But exactly what do we know about Senator Obama's? Let's just say that when I ask anybody that I come into contact with if they can tell me where he stands on the most important issues of the day, they fumble around and talk about change. One thing is true, his message has been swallowed hook, line, and sinker by many who like the idea of change but do not question just what change Sen. Obama will bring.
Posted by: TigerLady | Jul 31, 2008 2:29:33 PM
I would bet Obama's pastors, shady friends, and rap buddy Ludacris scare away far more voters than any McCain attack Ad.
Posted by: riley | Jul 31, 2008 11:13:11 AM
My advise to Senator Obama is to borrow a leaf from President Abe Lincoln's letter to his son's Teacher - "be gentle with the gentle and be tough with the tough.
If mudslinging is now the rule of the game, Obama should throw it in good measure.
He should not allow them to play him the way they did with Senator Kerry in 2004.
Posted by: Dare Nigeria | Jul 31, 2008 10:46:10 AM
This is a strategic suggestion for the Obama campaign.
The best way to respond to these ads is to say:
"This is not the McCain we though we knew. John McCain has served our country honorably and has promised to run a clean, respectful campaign. These types of attack ads are beneath him and diminish his reputation as a person of decency and bipartisanship. The question people should be asking is: why is John McCain choosing to attack the purported perception of Barack Obama as a celebrity? What does this say about McCain? Where is the old McCain? And just who is this new McCain."
I think it is imperative to flip the attack ads back onto McCain to show how it reflects on his character, his (perhaps) uncomfortableness with sending such a message, and the fact that this hard-line is being pushed by a former Bush advisor who may not reflect what was appealing to independents (and frankly many liberals) about McCain.
Posted by: ptu | Jul 31, 2008 10:20:48 AM
Obama's criticism falls flat since his ads don't tell us what he's going to do. They talk in general terms, never specifics, so that we all may feel warm and fuzzy projecting onto him our hopes and dreams. Two differences between the candidates I do know-
McCain's energy plan includes wind, solar, alternative fuels, and domestic drilling to cut our dependence on foreign oil. Obama refuses to drill so that we can continue to support terrorism in the Middle East and Hugo Chavez with our oil dollars.
McCain credits our men and women in uniform for the success of the surge in Iraq, which he supported very vocally. Obama not only insists that the surge (which he opposed) didn't work, but goes on to say that any reduction in violence had absolutely nothing to do with the efforts of our troops.
Which man would you rather have looking out for America's interests and serving as Commander-in-Chief?
Posted by: marylou | Jul 31, 2008 9:52:56 AM
BJINCHICAGO,
Senator Mccain knows that their are "simple hearted" folks out there who he can still play on their "simple intelligence". With Schmidts on his Campaign, it is goodbye to positive campaign and a big welcome to politics of Fear and Machinations.
If Senator Mccain where to be a younger man, the drift of his Campaign from the high road can be pardoned, but for a man of his age and standing, it leaves much to be desired.
President Bush used the same tactics to hoodwink Voters in 2004 and his second term brought great fortune to the US, Inflationary rate is at its lowest in History and Osama bin Laden, the Man that gave President Bush is second Term, is holed up in a US Jail.
Please let us do what is right this time around. If we allow Politicians to continue to exploit our fear and insecurity to win Elections, we can as well give up our rights to vote responsibly.
Posted by: Dare Nigeria | Jul 31, 2008 8:01:42 AM
Good for McCain; the MSM has given Obamarama a free pass. Obama does not have the experience to be POTUS, that is the bottomline, and speechmaking in Germany is not going to correct his lack of a resume. America cannot afford another four years under an arrogant incompetent POTUS.
Posted by: BJinChicago | Jul 31, 2008 3:38:04 AM
It does indeed look very small of McCain and his campaign to ridicule Obama's international tour by juxtaposing him with Brit and Paris. It was once again, another self-defeating act.
Posted by: kat | Jul 31, 2008 2:09:14 AM
About this ad: is it means that Obama is a dumb blonde-haired woman? Is McCain stereotyping about blond women? Is McCain wife has blond hair? How can he be a good leader if he is looking down on people that he is going to lead? As an independent voter, the ad has a negative effect of how I view John McCain. The ad is not inspiring me. I am disappointed that he cannot inspire people. Good leader inspire and move people. He has no respect for others. He need an ad that will touch me. Now I no longer view him as the soldier. Well, I guess he could just be a great military man. Start acting like a leader.
Posted by: Indy | Jul 31, 2008 2:08:46 AM
"He did not visit wounded troops in Germany because cameras were not allowed in the hospital”.
That much is true.
I believe, "to thine self be true",
No matter how Obama tries to explain away his absences last week.... he had no valid reason.
With him, the only expedient goal is the winning of this election.
Let the soldiers and the flotsam... fall where it may!
Posted by: Just thinking: | Jul 31, 2008 12:50:11 AM
It's sad that McCain is willing to sacrifice his great past and make deals with the Rove machine, with cue-cards and all, in order to get into the WH. He has apparently forgotten what they did to him in 2000. Everyone forgets in their old age but this condition
shouldn't exist in the WH; it could be catastrophic for all of us. Plus, those other guys don't do anything for nothing. McCain has probably made deals to continue the Bush policies that got us in the mess we're in today. Are we better off now than in 2000? Don't think so!
Posted by: all | Jul 31, 2008 12:34:19 AM
Good for Mac! The media is so "in the tank" for Obama. Just as they did to Hillary in the primary, pundits and columnists will do Obama's dirty work for him, smearing his opponent while allowing The Anointed One to appear clean as the wind-driven snow. McCain doesn't have that luxury. We all know what happened to John Kerry when he refused to fight the SBVT attacks. He lost.
Go Johnny Mac! PUMA - NObama!
Posted by: concerned american | Jul 30, 2008 11:33:25 PM
Has Sen. McCain suddenly decided to take a page from the playbook of the much vilified--and deservedly so--Karl Rove to focus on irrelevancies such as these in attacking his opponent? Sen. McCain is making a good case for what he doesn't represent, but he has made absolutely no case for what he does stand for. Unlike Sen. Obama, it appears Sen. McCain will stand for anything!
Posted by: chuck | Jul 30, 2008 9:54:46 PM
I don't understand, who advised McCain to do this. This seems so out of character for him. It's almost like he is jealous of Obama. He really is looking like a fool which is sad.
Posted by: erin | Jul 30, 2008 9:36:49 PM
Hilarious! Of all celebrities in the world the McCain camp had to pick two solid Republican "family values" baby dolls to compare Obama to.
Britney openly endorsed Bush on CNN in 2003 and I guess Paris inherited both money and a conservative mindset from her father and grandfather. Her father even donated some 7,000 $ to McCain's own primary campaign, according to NewsMeat.
The Obama spokesman said it well:
"Oops! He did it again."
Posted by: El_Pajaro | Jul 30, 2008 9:31:45 PM
Regardless of which side you on; even his so call republican base can't stand him,because he DOESN'T know what he stands for he is all over the place.
That AD was on the same footing of high school.very strange attacking someone because he is popular; very strange.
And this FAKE CLAIM of NO SUBSTANCE.
PLEASE ADVICE John McCain to go to Barack SITE, he does LAY out HIS platform/ ISSUES which is quiet BOLD with a VISION heading into the 21st century.
On the other side McCain site deliver nothing but.. VOTE FOR ME or ELSE the TERRORIST WILL HIDE UNDER YOUR BED.
JUST fear . fear . fear . fear .
nothing is optimistic. its the tired same ole policies.
Posted by: mike | Jul 30, 2008 9:25:42 PM
Silly McCain. At the first whiff of Karl Rove's influence he is losing voters who formerly respected him.
Posted by: Colorado Dem | Jul 30, 2008 9:24:04 PM
This board is moderated like Mickey Mouse own's the joint. ;)-
Posted by: BarackStar | Jul 30, 2008 9:21:49 PM
Posted by: Julian | Jul 30, 2008 9:14:37 PM
And McSenile said, "If I only had a brain."
Posted by: BarackStar | Jul 30, 2008 9:16:16 PM
Post a comment


