Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

For Obama at Saddleback, a Tough Crowd on Some Issues

August 16, 2008 10:38 PM

“What does it mean to you to trust in Christ?” Pastor Rick Warren asked Sen.. Barack Obama, D-Ill., Saturday evening.  “And what does it mean on a daily basis?  I mean, what does that really look like?”

For the crowd of more than 2,000 sitting at Saddleback Church, Obama had the right answer, on this one at least.

“As a starting point, it means I believe that Jesus Christ died for my sins and that I am redeemed through him. That is a source of strength and sustenance on a daily basis.  I know that I don't walk alone, and I know that if I can get myself out of the way, that I can maybe carry out in some small way what he intends. And it means that those sins that I have on a fairly regular basis hopefully will be washed away.” Quoting from the book of Matthew, Obama said it also meant an obligation to “the least of these.”

But where Obama had more trouble with the crowd – which sat politely throughout the forum – was when Warren delved into the social issues that put Obama and his liberal views at odds with the majority of white evangelicals.

“Forty million abortions since Roe v. Wade,” noted Warren. “At what point does a baby get human rights in your view?”

Obama said that “whether you are looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity, you know, is above my pay grade. “

“I am pro-choice,” the Democratic senator acknowledged.  I believe in Roe v. Wade and have come to that conclusion not because I'm pro-abortion, but because ultimately I don't think women make these decisions casually.  They wrestle with these things in profound ways.  In consultation with their pastors or spouses or their doctors and their family members.”

He mentioned that everyone could find common ground on the goal of reducing the number of abortions, which he’d put into the Democratic party platform. No one seemed to care much.

Likewise, Obama’s support for research involving embryonic stem cell research was met with the distant sound of crickets.

“Keep in mind the way that stem cell legislation that was vetoed by the president was structured, what it said was you could only use embryos that were about to be discarded, that had been created as a consequence of attempts at in vitro fertilization,” Obama pointed out. 

He also suggested that “it's not like people who are in favor of stem cell research are going around thinking to themselves, ‘Boy let's go destroy some embryos.’ That's not the perspective that I think people come to that issue on.”

Asked which existing Supreme Court Justice he, as president, would not have nominated, Obama immediately said he “would not have nominated Clarence Thomas…I don't think that he was a strong enough jurist or legal thinker at the time for that elevation. Setting aside the fact that I profoundly disagree with his interpretation of a lot of constitution.”

For good measure, he added he would not have nominated Antonin Scalia, “although I don't think there's any doubt about his intellectual brilliance.”

Chief Justice John Roberts, whose confirmation Obama voted against, “was a tougher question only because I find him to be a very compelling person.”

Another point of clear difference came when Obama was asked whether faith- based organizations should have to forfeit federal funds if they discriminate in hiring for those federally-funded programs -- an issue of importance for religious conservatives who want to be able to hire people of their own faith.

Obama said, “We do have to be careful to make sure that we are not creating a situation where people are being discriminated against using federal money. “

Warren tried to make Obama see the issue from his point of view. Imagine if Saddleback Church wanted to provide aid to Hurricane Katrina victims, he said, “and I wanted to hire some people to do relief…If I took federal money to help in that relief I wouldn't be able to say, ‘I only want people to believe like we do?’”

“We do want to make sure of is that as a general principal we're not using federal funding to discriminate,” Obama again said, “but that is only when it comes to the narrow program that is being funded by the federal government.  that does not affect any of the other ministries that are taking place.”

Obama found more support when he said, “I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. Now … for me as a Christian it's also a sacred union. God's in the mix.”

He received applause for that sentiment and also, interestingly enough, when he said he believed in civil unions for same sex couples, so that “gay partners to want to visit each other in the hospital for the state to say, you know what, that's all right, I don't think that in any way inhibits my core beliefs about what marriage is. I think my faith is strong enough and my marriage is strong enough that I can afford those civil rights to others even if I have a different perspective or a different view.”

A lighter moment came when Warren, a best-selling author, asked Obama how he defines rich when it comes to taxes.

“You know, if you've got book sales of $25 million…” Obama joked.

“Okay, all right, I'm not asking about me,” Warren laughed.

Obama said that those making more than $250,000 are doing well. 

“I’m not suggesting that everybody that is making over $250,000 is living on easy street," he said, "but the question that I think we have to ask ourselves is if we believe in good schools, if we believe in good roads, if we want to make sure that kids can go to college, if we don't want to leave a mountain of debt for the next generation, then we've got to pay for these things. They don't come for free. And it is irresponsible, I believe it is irresponsible intergenerationally for us to invest or for us to spend $10 billion a month on a war and not having a way to pay for it. That I think is unacceptable.”

The crowd clapped about that, too.

-- Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

August 16, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (152)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I read the comments and those of you who are Liberals are unbelievable. You think McCain pandered to the audience -- like Obama didn't citing a Bible verse -- no he only sat in a church for 20 years listening to a minister who preached hatred of whites, America and Israel along with his friend Flegler. He has never associated with anyone except radicals -- Ayers, Frank Marshall (his mentor who was a member of the Communist party in Hawaii). Maybe instead of taking him at face value, you should really investigate as to who this man is.

Posted by: Rene | Aug 26, 2008 3:39:41 PM

..."Too often, the issue of LGBT rights is exploited by those seeking to divide us. But at its core, this issue is about who we are as Americans..." Barack Obama

To Barack: While I could not vote for McCain, I am disgusted with your lack of integrity and support when it comes to the LGBTQ community and marriage. Either you want to give the LGBTQ community complete respect or none at all. A little respect is not good enough. Complete dignity and respect is showing support for our equality which obviously includes marriage. Sure, the issue of gay marriage is the 'third rail', but then don't say you're about "change" because in the end, when you can look the LGBTQ community in the eye, in front of evangelicals, and say boldly and proudly that you do not believe in gay marriage, you have rendered me invisible. You don't see me, then I won't see you. You're no better than the rest of the politicians.
At some point "change I can believe in" has got to include the rights of adult individuals to marry whether gay or straight.
Not that long ago, the marraige between white and black people was illegal too. You wouldn't exist if the people had not stood up to an inhumane law that had to eventually have the support of government.
Politicians are politicans. They say what they must to get elected. However, you claim to be different. Question: Why do you not believe in gay marriage? Why can't you say you personally support it? Is it because, deep down, the union of gay people wedded in holy matrimony repulses you? Could you actually befriend a gay married couple and not respect their choice? How is it that you can meet upstsanding, loving and accomplished gay people and not believe that two consenting, non-related adults have the right to marry? Are we less than human to you? Since we don't choose our gender, how could you not support a natural outgrowth of two consenting adults who want to pledge their lives to one another, gay or straight? What difference is there to you, really?
Because of your popularlity, your lack of respect sets us back.
Too many of us are silent right now because we're so often beat down but we need to fight you.
No complete recognition to LGBTQ, no vote from me or my friends.

Posted by: Bella | Aug 19, 2008 10:56:04 PM

If Baracko makes you feel safe and confident about the future, you must have missed this forum! He stutters like a child and dances around every question to make it warm and fuzzy. Very scary, America!!

Posted by: Janelle | Aug 19, 2008 10:54:16 PM

One last question; What does it tell you if someone admits he doesn’t know when life begins, BUT can tell everyone it can be terminated when you want it to be. That’s blunt… it looks like someone cares more about an issue than life itself.

Destroy an unborn human and its okay, step on an eagle’s egg and you get fined. What are we thinking?

Posted by: Thom | Aug 19, 2008 3:28:02 PM

Obama cannot string four words together without his teleprompter!!Talk about stammering, stuttering, and doubletalk..Jeez!

I never thought I would say this....BUT...
For once Jesse Jackson said ALL THE RIGHT THINGS!!!

Posted by: Jack | Aug 18, 2008 4:13:23 PM

Irony is obama supporters complaining about McCain sounding prepared and scripted.

Posted by: geevill | Aug 18, 2008 3:30:24 PM

Barry

You say you wonder if Evangelicals practice what they preach. How about it if you move away from your sheltered starbucks life and spend some time in a church. You will find that most live the life they talk. The work hard to ensure they are not living a dead faith. Meaning, that if you have faith, but do not do gods work, then your faith without works is dead.

Posted by: Larry | Aug 18, 2008 8:31:45 AM

I am relieved that there are people out there who are very observant. This was not an impartial forum because it was so clear that McCain was privy to the questions ahead of time. That is the reason he was grinning like a Cheshire cat and answering questions before they were asked. My opinion is that Rick Warren was complicit in the entire fiasco. This makes it crystal clear that evangelicals are not interested in fair play. If this had happened on Obama-supported turf and the tables were turned on McCain, it would have been equally unfair. Of course this behavior makes the USA highly favored among nations of the world. So the casting of other nations, e.g. Russia, in bad light needs to cease until the American government cleans up the filth in its backyard. Elect McCain and you will deserve every modicum of suffering that he and his cronies, including the Supreme Court Justices, will heap upon you. Of course, off-shore drilling will immediately reduce gas and food prices ---tee hee, tee hee....Stop being so naive.

Posted by: LaVerne H | Aug 18, 2008 7:00:19 AM

I was sitting front row at the Saddleback hosted event

I am a current member of Saddleback.

I sat in the front row at the forum and it was a experience I will cherish for the rest of my life.

I live within 1/4 mile of Saddleback.

All I can say is that, I have been blessed enough to have visited over 14 countries around the world. The memory I retain from the past weekend is something I will cherish for a lifetime.

And I was one of two people who was able to shake the hand of Obama. Yeah... McCain ignored me.


Posted by: Lisa | Aug 18, 2008 6:24:25 AM

After listening on the radio, I am very Very impressd with who John McCain IS and who B.Obama IS'NT. B.Obama IS NOT Presidential material, plain & simple. McCain's straightforward honest answers is what connected with me. I think he won the election tonight, he found his voice...

Posted by: `Percy of Los Angeles | Aug 18, 2008 2:15:50 AM

I thought it was mediated fairly although I don't agree with the views of many Evangenitals.

Posted by: s | Aug 18, 2008 1:46:39 AM

I think too many Evangelicals miss the boat when it comes to dealing with abortion. I think it's sad that hearing a candidate say he wants to work to reduce the number of abortions doesn't generate a more enthusiastic response.

Do ordinary Evangelicals understand the limited effect if Roe v. Wade were to be overturned? If Roe was reversed, that would not make abortion illegal, it would simply revert abortion back to the states. My total guess is that only about a third of the states would actually significantly outlaw abortion. In that case, women seeking abortions could just drive across state lines to a state where abortion was legal. I predict we would see abortion clinics built right along the borders of anti-abortion states.

All this energy is being spent on the political and legal arena, for an outcome that would change very little. Evangelicals should change their focus to transforming the hearts and minds of Americans to convince them that human life is sacred and abortion is wrong. (BTW, the sanctity of human life is a slightly separate question from whether human life begins at conception. I think the latter is a more problematic argument that doesn't need to be made to convince people that abortion is wrong.)

Shouldn't reducing the actual number of abortions be the goal? Not just some empty poltical/legal victory?

Posted by: Gene L | Aug 17, 2008 11:51:17 PM

im a true conservative and in no way was going to vote for McCain. i was going to sit this one out...but after last night, John doesn't seem as bad as i once had thought.
I can't believe the Messiah(barry) danced around the questions like he danced on the Ellen Degeneres show. I am voting for Mccain.... Obama is not ready to lead. he is great reading off a teleprompter or reciting a speech that someone else wrote, but he is not a non action guy...I am so glad hillary isn't running..she was definatly the more qualified of the democratic candidates...The only difference between oBama and oSama..is the BS!

Posted by: floridaconservative | Aug 17, 2008 11:22:54 PM

So did Reverend Warren even wonder WHY McCain was thirty minutes late? Did he even wonder IF someone fed him some of the questions as he strolled into the "cone of silence"?

Typical...McCain does not get challenged about his behavior and Obama is scrutinized because he takes the time to actually ponder and reflect on a question instead of shooting back a prepared and facile answer.

This country is hostile to thinkers and friendly to slogan talkers.

Posted by: vanessa Ament | Aug 17, 2008 10:13:51 PM

Barry blew it big time.

Posted by: Nobama | Aug 17, 2008 9:32:52 PM

I aplaud both of these gentleman for their courage in seeking this office in difficult days. I respect both of them and I acknowledge that I am not God and I don't know which will be the best president. But, please realize that these postings are saying a lot about our hearts and our true beliefs. Neither gentleman is anywhere near perfect. I will vote my conscience and try not to cast stones.

Posted by: Lovegirl | Aug 17, 2008 9:24:55 PM

I just heard that McCain was never in the "cone of silence" referred to by Pastor Warren. When asked by Rick if he was comfortable in that "cone of silence," McCain joked that he was in an adjacent room "listening through the wall"--when apparently he was not and could have heard all the questions in advance. It was clear to those of us watching impartially that he knew much of the early script in advance. Some of his answers were too pat to be spontaneous responses to tough questions--about moral failings, Supreme Court appointees, etc. Plain and simple, McCain lied to Warren's first question and probably had a huge unfair advantage. I assume that Pastor Warren was not complicit in this and that he will disavow any link to McCain, and throw his support to the honest candidate--Barack Obama. What is Warren's response to all this? Jack

Posted by: Jack | Aug 17, 2008 9:22:23 PM

I am a Democrat, but after tonight, hearing BHO and JMcCain, I definitely would vote for McCain, he is almost twice as old as BHO and has twice the smarts and does not hesitate to answer. His experience was in full swing tonight. Go, John, Go Hope from Pa.

Posted by: Hope | Aug 17, 2008 8:09:04 PM

"I thought it quite interesting the way Obama avoided the question of when an unborn child has rights... Come on, Barak, have the GUTS tpo say what you think."
What about the people who have the guts to take a provisional position when there is not enough evidence. That's the problem with fundamentalism: it is too uncomfortable with mystery and must have an absolute position on everything, no matter how irrational. But even the bible does not prescribe personhood to a fetus until it gets the "breath of life" at birth. Infants are not even counted in censuses either, and the only verse that mentions the death of a fetus requires only a fine, unless the mother is killed. The superimposition of personhood onto blastulas and zygotes and cells in petri dishes is not in any bible verse I've ever seen and so Obama does have wiggle room there- sorry. He also brings up the elephant in the room considering Christian's inharmonious acceptance of IVF and complacency over loss of fertalized eggs, yet aggression over stem cells. Think about it people. Oh, last, fans of Warren's best seller need to see it get DEMOLISHED by Robert Price's "The Reason Driven Life."

Posted by: Gatogreensleeves | Aug 17, 2008 8:03:18 PM

John McCain came across as the more seasoned, experienced, and decisive of the two candidates. When it comes to leadership and solving the numerous problems facing this country, John McCain stood head and shoulders above Obama.

Posted by: Howard | Aug 17, 2008 6:17:24 PM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS