RECENT POSTS
- Oprah, Health Care Lobbyists, Among Recent Visitors to White House
- An Obama Thanksgiving Menu, with an Extra Serving of Pie
- White House Thanksgiving Traditions: Broken and Observed
- Obama, GOP Air Differences Over Jobs, Economy In Thanksgiving Addresses
- White House State Dinner Party Crashers
- Obama to Lay Out Emissions Goals in Copenhagen
- Free Bird
- The "Good" War
- The Presidential Planner
- Under the Stars, Obama Toasts India’s Prime Minister
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Obama Does Hollywood
September 17, 2008 7:06 AM
Many a film scene has been shot at the Greystone Mansion in Los Angeles, Calif., where a 55-room Tudor mansion tonight beckoned Hollywood glitterati to contribute $28,500 per person to the Democratic National Committee/Obama for America joint Victory Fund.
In "Indecent Proposal," the tycoon played by Robert Redford was seduced by the real estate agent played by Demi Moore as she showed him through the empty living room of the Greystone Mansion. He didn't much care for the house, but her he liked.
Film buffs might also recognize the manse from "What Women Want," "The Witches of Eastwick," "The Big Lebowski," "Death Becomes Her," and "Batman & Robin," among others.
And it was here that Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., Arrived shortly before 7 p.m. Pacific for a fundraising reception and dinner -- salad with goat cheese, roasted potatoes, filet of beef and asparagus, apple crisp and chocolate lava cake.
Somewhere between 250 and 300 others signed up for the dinner, including Leonardo DiCaprio, Jamie Lee Curtis, Will Farrell -- known for, among other characters, his devastating impersonation of President George W. Bush -- as well as Jodie Foster, Toby McGuire, and Chris Rock.
Not to mention the man Sen. John McCain, D-Ariz., said was his favorite Hollywood "president," Dennis Haysbert, who played the assassinated President David Palmer on Fox's "24."
At an outdoor courtyard within the Greystone compound, Obama told the gathered masses that his campaign offered a rather sobering look at the economic problems the nation now faces.
“It's reminded people that this is not a game," Obama said. "This is not a reality show, no offense to any of you. This is not a sitcom.”
Many Democrats were apparently worried about the prospects of losing (again) in the fall.
“I know that a lot of you, just in conversations while we were in the photo lines, had all sorts of suggestions,” Obama said. “I know that won't surprise you. And a lot of people have gotten nervous and concerned. Why is this as close as it is? And what's going on? We always knew this was going to be hard, and this is a leap for the American people. And we're running against somebody who has a formidable biography, a compelling biography. He's a genuine American hero, somebody who served in uniform and suffered through some things that very few of us can imagine.
“And so he is a worthy opponent," Obama said. "And this should be hard, because what we're asking of the American people is a fundamental shift away from an economic theory that has dominated over the last eight years, that says, ‘You give more to the most and hope that it trickles down for everybody else,' an economic theory that basically says, 'you're on your own if you don't have health care, you're on your own if you don't have a job; if you're born into poverty, lift yourself up by your own bootstraps, you are on your own.'"
“If we can cut through the nonsense and the lipstick and the pigs and the silliness, then I'm absolutely convinced that we're going to win,” Obama said to laughter and applause.
“We’ve still got enormous work to do because of the enormous resistance out there -- resistance because people have been fed cynicism for a long time,” Obama continued. “When my opponent, and the operation that they’ve put together, starts feeding into that cynicism and starts feeding into that resentment, it’s not always clear which way things are going to tip.”
The senator said he was confident about winning because "I've looked at John McCain, I've looked at Sarah Palin, I've looked at their agenda, and they don't have one.”
Ha ha ha ha, said the crowd.
"They don't have answers to our economic problems," he said, “and they don't have answers to our foreign policy problems." Obama asked the crowd to "keep steady" in the remaining 48 days until Election Day and to remember that his campaign "is about those who will never see the inside of a building like this and don't resent the success that's represented in this room, but just want the simple chance to be able to find a job that pays a living wage."
Obama then went to the ballroom at the Regent Beverly Wilshire.
Around 800 people -- including Sarah Silverman, Ron Howard, Magic Johnson, and Pierce Brosnan -- were there, eaching paying $2,500 to the Obama Victory Fund.
We are told, though the press was not permitted (inflicted?) with permission to hear her, that Barbra Streisand ran through little parts of songs, though not entire numbers.
Obama thanked everyone, then was serious.
“This should be a celebratory evening," he said. "We’ve got 48 days to go in a campaign, a campaign that started 19 months ago, at a time when a lot of folks thought we might not get here." But, he added, “I’m not in a celebratory mood.”
Obama listed the depressing headlines -- Wall Street in crisis, hurricanes, the deadly train crash in nearby Los Angeles.
Obama offfered the Tinseltown big wigs his stump speech, and then told them not to worry about his calm demeanor.
“The reason I’m calm,” Obama said, “is I have confidence in the American people.”
Obama asked supporters “to keep on going out there, arguing and fighting” in the final 48 days.
- jpt
September 17, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (262)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The bottom line is that Obama's ideas are no different than any other Demo. He believes in "Income redistribution" and taking money away from hard working Americas that earned it honestly (and worked hard to get an education) and giving it to people that don't. I would love to see every kid, handicapped, and elderly person in this country have insurance. But, others need to get a job and pay for it like I do. I have a simple proposal, if Obama wants to insure all Americans, let's eliminate Welfare and food stamps and fund it that way. What do you think? Additionally, he has less than 140 days of experience in the Senate. He never did have a real job before that and does not understand the military
Posted by: Ed | Sep 17, 2008 5:38:59 PM
traci's commentary on celebs that endorse Obama is hilarious. What's Matt Damon done? Tell us about those celebs that endorse McCain...Patricia Heaton...Ray Romano's tv wife. Chuck Norris? Wow. Jon Voigt...he did donate sperm to make Angelina Jolie, which men everywhere appreciate. The truth is, everybody is behind a candidate. Some are smarter than others and support the guy who isn't going to keep our country on a path down the toilet.
Obama! O-8! Oh yeah!
Posted by: Karl | Sep 17, 2008 5:32:16 PM
A lot of things have been said about Barack Obama in the past, and I'm not sure I agree with all of them, but one thing is beyond question: the man is a socialist. There is no argument there. Everything in his life up to this point has involved the advancement of socialism. The problem is, the US cannot afford to have a socialist president at this time. Our country is 9 trillion dollars in debt and the last thing we can afford to do is elect a president that is promising trillions in new spending. We have to go in the opposite direction. We have to cut back on spending so we can start paying down the enormous debt. It is also unfair to saddle future generations with debt to pay for social welfare programs for people today. If we continue down the path to full socialism at this time by implementing Obama's socialist healthcare system, we will destroy any chance the nation has to balance the budget and pay down the debt. If we enact the oppressive tax increases that Obama is proposing, we will bring the economy to a screeching halt and people's retirement funds will plummet in value. We just can't afford any more socialism in America at this time.
Posted by: Don't do it | Sep 17, 2008 5:29:12 PM
The filthy rich Hollywood crowd that threw this fundraiser can't be bothered to give a dime to help the thousands of Americans displaced by Hurricane Ike. Just shows where their priorities are.
Posted by: Asia2PA | Sep 17, 2008 5:26:26 PM
obama is a fool if he thinks I will vote for him. I keep abreast of all that goes on in govt., he hasen't got a snowballs chance to win- when you look at his record. I can't even be shure he is even an american born citizen. I have more experience than he does.
Posted by: Jessie Hamby | Sep 17, 2008 5:26:16 PM
I honestly feel sad for McCain. He is starting to look 82 instead of 72.. He knows he has no chance in hell of beating Barack!
Posted by: Bushwacker08 | Sep 17, 2008 5:12:54 PM
I honestly feel sad for McCain. He is starting to look 82 instead of 72.. He knows he has no chance in hell of beating Barack!
Posted by: Bushwacker08 | Sep 17, 2008 5:11:41 PM
You people are stuck in a passing time. How sad! McCain voted the same as Bush. Therefore its safe to say that if McCain was president for the last 8 years we would be in the same condition.
Posted by: Bushwacker08 | Sep 17, 2008 5:09:23 PM
Obama is for change? He voted 'Present' how many times? Give me a break! I can't wait for the debates. (no teleprompters allowed) McCain 2008 ~ Clinton 2012
Posted by: Michelle | Sep 17, 2008 4:41:52 PM
Obama said. "And this [campaign] should be hard, because what we're asking of the American people is a fundamental shift away from an economic theory that has dominated over the last eight years, that says, ‘You give more to the most and hope that it trickles down for everybody else.'" "You" give more to the most. Who is you??? I always thought people earned their money directly from their business or employer. I didn't know that we only get money because the government let's us have it. I also didn't know that the government can just decide that we shouldn't get as much anymore and that some of our earnings have to go to somebody else. Somehow I don't think this is what the founding father's contemplated for the US. I thought it was all about liberty and freedom from the abuses of government.
Posted by: Vern | Sep 17, 2008 4:31:50 PM
Obama is the least qualified candidate ever in history. He does not have any records to show off...
Posted by: Steve | Sep 17, 2008 4:23:40 PM
Why does Obama continually use the phrase "Economic Justice." I just looked into it and found a book online called "Economic Justice: The Market Socialist Vision" by James Yunker. Basically the book states that the concept of Economic Justice is a tool that can be used to slowly change a capitalist country into a socialist country. The author takes the view that, because socialism has become a dirty word in most prosperous capitalist countries, direct cries for socialism won't work. You have to first posit it as a market based economic strategy so that people can see how they will profit from it (i.e.,when the government takes from others to give to them). Then, once people see how they profit from it, it will be easier to implement a more traditional socialist economy. This is what Obama was talking about when he said middle Americans don't know what is best for them. I am sure Obama has studied the above book in detail, because most of his economic policies (the few we have seen) come straight out of this book. It's an eye opener.
Posted by: Wisdom767 | Sep 17, 2008 4:19:36 PM
Why is the media not calling Obama out about his role in the Fannie Freddie catastrophe? Obama is the number two recipient of campaign contributions from Fannie and Freddie. Obama has never introduced any legislation that would have regulated Fannie and Freddie's loan practices of making loans to high risk borrowers. Yet Obama is saying now as President he will take the action necessary to regulated Fannie and Freddie. Problem is Obama is not credible on this issue or any other issue for that manner. Obama's top two economic advisers are former Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac CEO’s who may have pulled strings to give Obama a “heads up”on the recent government bail-out plan. Washington Prowler has the story: Obama’s economic advisers from day one and who have raised him a ton of money: are Franklin Raines and Jim Johnson. Both of them are up to their eyeballs in the mortgage debacle. Both Raines and Johnson have served as CEO of Fannie Mae, with Raines taking over from Johnson. How Obama can say with a straight face that Republicans are responsible for the mess, when it is his key advisers who ran the agencies that that are the primary people behind the mess is beyond belief. The people who are responsible for what may well be the single largest government bailout in history are Obama‘s top economic advisors.. And every single one of them made millions off the collapse that are lining Obama’s campaign coffers. If McCain had Raines and Johnson as his campaign advisers you can bet the farm that the media would be all over it. Why the silence? Beware the Obama/Media complex.
Posted by: sam | Sep 17, 2008 4:13:30 PM
Emilly -
Michelle Obama isn't running for office.
Posted by: jb | Sep 17, 2008 4:12:14 PM
philosopherkingtomas -
I'll go you one further. Not only was McCain not a hero. Just before being shot down he was dropping bombs on people who's faces he could not even see. If he was a victim, he was a victim of his own government which sent him to do what he was doing.
Posted by: jb | Sep 17, 2008 4:04:53 PM
So John McCain having a Hollywood fundraiser on Monday with Patricia Heaton and Robert Duvall that brings in 4.7 Million is NOT news-worthy but the fact that "elitist" Barack Obama has one that pulls in 9 million is subject to defamation and ridicule. I just don't get you Republicans and you're I can do it but no one else can attitude. But I suppose if I were stuck with EXACTLY the same kind of candidates that brought us the last 8 years, I'd chew on any little bit of meat I could find. And now with the cover-up with the Trooper scandal...well its brought to you by the same folks that brought us the AG scandal and the Iraq war. What do we expect?!!?!?
Posted by: Suz in KS | Sep 17, 2008 4:00:22 PM
Hey Mack -
Where exactly is Obama's "district" ?
Posted by: jb | Sep 17, 2008 3:58:05 PM
Women4Palin,
I think some women hate Governor Palin because she has a Barbie Doll quality about her. That is not generally a reason to hate a person, but I think it gets combined with a feeling that it has all come too easy for her; a feeling that she hasn't paid her dues.
Combining beauty and easy success gives Governor Palin an elitist aura which clashes with her "homier"-then-thou persona in a way that leaves a hypocritical taste in the mouth.
Todd
Posted by: Todd Gatts | Sep 17, 2008 3:56:48 PM
If Obama really cared about the suffering of Americans, why didn't he scale back the extravaganza called the DNC convention, rather than paying for high-priced ornamental columns to match his overflated ego?
Hollywood has always been predominantly Democrat - and they can afford to be. They can sit and preach about their high morals while raking in giant salaries, even when it's people with questionable moral compasses and frankly psychological problems. It's interesting that many of the people being so outspoken about how great Obama is - or how bad John McCain and particularly Sarah Palin are - are the "stars" who haven't accomplished anything noteworthy in years, if ever. Think about it:
-Matt Damon - what's he done lately?
-Meg Ryan - a promising career that just died and then she pretty much capped it cheating on Dennis Quaid and breaking his heart.
-Lindsay Lohan - I feel sorry for her because she seems truly troubled, but anyone who is going to listen to her for political advice has some problems.
-Barbra Streisand - Sadly, she was a true talent, but I've never agreed with her politics and never will. She's known as one of the most liberal (far, far, far, far left) celebrities around.
-Jada Pinkett - Her biggest accomplishment is being Will Smith's wife, and she said she's voting for MICHELLE Obama (hope she's not homeschooling their kids).
-Oprah Winfrey - Well, she's a racist, pure and simple. Enough said.
-The View co-hosts - They certainly showed their true natures in the McCain "grilling." I've never watched the View, but you can be certain I never will. Too bad, I liked Whoopi.
-Chevy Chase - Love his old movies, but is this just a chance to get a little limelight in a dead career. I was really disappointed at the nastiness of his comments.
-MSNBC - In our household, this is now known as the "Obama Network," and we don't watch it - not only because we don't support Obama, but we're not going to support "journalists" who really aren't journalists at all.
For me, I've chosen to tick these things away for the "celebrities" who come out with their nasty, hateful comments and do the only thing I can to let them know how I feel - refuse to fund anything they appear in. Of course, that doesn't appear to others who support Obama, just because they do support them. They have that right, and I don't have a problem with that.
Posted by: traci | Sep 17, 2008 3:52:13 PM
This post probably will be moderated out or severely edited, but why do you people think JT wrote it in the style he did? How many anti-Obama comments would he have gotten if the headline read: "Obama Collects Money from Rich People who Would Pay More Taxes Under His Economic Plan"? Aside from being too wordy, you can't encourage a political "horserace" with honest reporting. The so-called "liberal media" are doing exactly what their corporate owners want them to by offering skewed reports that clearly are designed to ellicit some of the anti-Obama posts on this blog. Don't forget this is the same "liberal" media that helped the current Republican president lie us into Iraq. Maybe we should take these articles with a grain of salt. Is the public that dumb? That easily led -- again?? Well, apparently so.
Posted by: ndo | Sep 17, 2008 3:48:44 PM
Post a comment


