Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

Obama Watched Palin Speech

September 04, 2008 11:57 AM

HARRISBURG, Pa. -- Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., watched just a "little bit" of Gov. Sarah Palin's, R-Alaska, speech last night, his top political strategist David Axelrod told reporters today.

"As she proved last night, she's deft at going on the attack," Axelrod said. "For someone who makes the point that she's not from Washington, she looks very much like she would fit in very well there. When you see how she brings these attacks, it all felt very familiar to Americans; we're used to this kind of thing from Washington."

When asked if it's challenging to respond to attacks from a woman, Axelrod said that they respect her, she's a skilled politician, and they are more than happy to respond to her or anyone.

"Sen. Obama is taking the whole thing in stride," Axelrod said. "To be very honest with you, I don't think he expected gingerly treatment. I think he understands they don't really have a record to run on, and this is what politicians do when they don't have a record to run on."

Axelrod said that Palin's claim last night that Obama "is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or even a reform, not even in the state Senate," is false.

"Maybe that's what she was told," Axelrod said, "but she should talk to Sen. (Dick) Lugar (R-Ind.), talk to Sen. (Tom) Coburn (R-Okla.), talk to the people across the aisle in Illinois where he passed dozens of major laws to expand health care reform, welfare, reduce taxes on working families. So, you know, I think that she had an assignment and she discharged it."

Axelrod called Palin's assertion a "blatant distortion on fact."

"There wasn't one thing that she said about Sen. Obama or what he's proposing that's true," he said of her description of Obama's proposals.

Axelrod downplayed the significance of how Palin and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani belittled Obama's time as a community organizer, helping citizens on the South Side of Chicago deal with the closing of a steel mill.

"I'm not concerned about that," said Axelrod. "That may seem like time poorly spent for Rudy Giuliani, who gets paid millions of dollars to keep low cost drugs from being imported into the country, when he's working as an agent for (the pharmaceutical lobby) Pharma, or you know, some of the other chores he's done for corporate America. But for everyday people, the notion of rebuilding communities, of helping people when plant closings happen, deal with issues like health care and education and job training –- that seems like real work. It may not pay the millions of dollars that Rudy gets shilling for Pharma, but it is significant work."

Axelrod said the speech was "red meat for the base," but he doubted it would appeal to independents, since the speech said little about what the McCain-Palin ticket would do if entrusted with the White House.

"If you believe the Rick Davis notion, not about anything substantive –- it's all about personality -– and maybe they do believe that, then I'm sure they're happy" with Palin's speech, Axelrod said. "But ultimately, the question is, 'Where is the McCain-Palin ticket going to lead the country?' And it is backward not forward."

- Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

September 4, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (214)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

QUESTION:
IS PALIN QUALIFIED COMPARED TO OBAMA ?

Posted by: Howard | Sep 7, 2008 1:33:51 PM

Palin/McCain...I think he's the VP. I feel sorry for you folks that just don't understand that McCain doesnot care about this country. You must see McCain revealed on CNN. Obama is has a stuttering problem. His stammering is not dishonest and calculating. You must check-out McCain and Obama revealed on CNN. This country is in really bad shape. War is not not
what's up. Bushes dad bought him a Yale degree. The boy does not have a clue. Obama can get the job done. You will see because he is going to win.

Posted by: B.Williams | Sep 4, 2008 8:14:08 PM

rodney: You must be short of hearing. Palin's son enlisted on his own. She doesn't not tell her children what to do if they are old enough because they would feel like kids.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | Sep 4, 2008 7:47:44 PM

Samatha: Yes, Obama did throw Hillary under the bus. He, Pelosi, Dean and Reid talked to the superdelegates about their voting. I would take bets on it that they promised them favors for voting Obama. Pelosi was so feared that she told Hillary to count only 32 states and cancel the roll call because she suspected Hillary would win over Obama. The DNC are underhanded and worse than a rat. Especially Nancy Pelosi who whats to be the woman in charge. I hope McCain wins this election and the republicans take back the house.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | Sep 4, 2008 7:09:29 PM

Indy Voter: I think you are a confused man. Obama stutters and hesitates before answering questions because he doesn't know how to answer them. He has to think first. Its a good thing he has Biden to think for him or he would be in a mess like this country will be if he is elected. Both Obama and Biden are the biggest joke of the democrats.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | Sep 4, 2008 7:00:23 PM

Off the subject here and a break from politics, did people see the little daughter of Sarah lick her hands to comb baby Palin's hair.?? This probably was the best NON-political moment.

Posted by: toni | Sep 4, 2008 6:10:01 PM

The blogs seem full of questions about what Community Organizers do. Well I don't know about Chicago. But I can tell you what they do here in Albuquerque, n.m. They usually come around every Saturday morning knocking on doors and asking for hand outs of groceries, food, money or anything that is useful. They are also looking for newcomers to the area (especially poor people from Mexico). They hand out brochures printed in Spanish and English with a lot of important phone numbers, police dept., ambulance, who to call for free medical service, schedule and location of local city park parties (where there is free commodity hand outs, free hot dogs for the kids) and the location and phone numbers of the local welfare office. Also these brochures list all the things you need to take with you to apply for welfare. I am so damn sick of picking these things out of my rose bushes and flower beds every week. I am not knocking any one, I have not voted in 50 years, and will not vote this year. I could not live with my conscience. Just telling you what a community organizer does. At least that is what they are called here in Albuquerque.

Posted by: old mo | Sep 4, 2008 5:07:30 PM

After reading these entries (when I should be doing something much more productive) I am really struck by how people can come away from last night with 2 completely different takes on what actually happened. But, for those who have blinders on, here's what actually happened last night:

1. A GOP-groomed politician with no real substance and off-the-map radical social policies read a speech off a teleprompter that was written by somebody else for somebody else. She read it well, hit all the write pauses and applause lines, but it was recitation nonetheless.

2. This politician was picked by another politician - one who is aging, outdated, and doing whatever he feels necessary in his last chance to succeed. This includes placating a ultra-conservative, ultra-religious wing part of his party that really he does not agree with, but is willing to side with for political expediancy.

3. Rather than pursue an honest discussion about issues of consequence to this country, which would require knowledgable, experienced, confident discourse, she resorted to name-calling and insults. No policy, only pandering.

So, where does that leave us? Well (and I'm paraphrasing here), when the cloud of rhetoric dissipates, and the words end, and the soaring speeches are over, we'll see her for what she truly is: an empty (pants)suit. And all her so-called historic candidacy proves is that a woman can be every bit as hateful, close-minded, and misguided in her vision for the country as a man.

Posted by: P-Sax | Sep 4, 2008 5:02:23 PM

Posted by dl: "you see obama answered questions and wrote his speech

and he actually answers those questions when he is asked...and actually daily lets people ask...

he answers discussions...and 2 or 3 follow ups..."

If you had ever seen Senator Obama give unscripted responses to candid questions you would know that the man stammers and stumbles all over himself in that scenario. Broadcast events with him responding to questions are staged to make him look far better than he is. And no, he did not write his acceptance speech. He does not write any of his speeches, and in fact, content of a good number of his speeches is not even original, but rather has been "borrowed" from speeches of other notable politicians.

I have no doubt he will give a flawless performance tonight on the O'Reilly show. Having refused repeated invitations to appear on the show for months, apparently O'Reilly has finally given in to Obama's demands of a scripted interview. Obama would never agree to do the show otherwise. If he did, he would be exposed for the fraud he is.

Posted by: LC | Sep 4, 2008 3:30:37 PM

sending her son to iraq--wonder how she would feel if he gets killed for the benifit of ---CHINA---

Posted by: rodney | Sep 4, 2008 3:20:01 PM

Palin ticked off the Alaska GOP by running to the right of them.

If you are too conservative for a state Republican Party in Alaska... you probably will be too conservative for the rest of the country.

Sure, they try to make her out like an everymom... but she is a hard-right ideologue... more like Michelle Bachman or Jean Schmidt. The GOP is fulling these "rising stars" who really are just hyped and backed by well-heeled interests of the party, looking out for future leaders to dump on our heads. GWB was the same... he was new, different, inspirational, etc. But to close observers, you could see he was beholden to those who "made" him. Palin's the same.

As this sinks in, McCain is going to see his polling numbers sink.

Posted by: bluto | Sep 4, 2008 3:19:24 PM

More than likley Indy voted for Bush or Nader in 2000. End of story.

Posted by: Samantha | Sep 4, 2008 3:12:24 PM

Debra,
I grant you McCain does okay when given softball questions by Republican supporters in a town hall setting. He stammers and his face reddens when he is challenged with tough questions though. I thought he fumbled badly when explaining his choice of Palin to Charles Gibson the other night. Maybe it was because he could not say with a straight face that she was the best choice for the job...

Posted by: indy_voter | Sep 4, 2008 3:09:33 PM

My uncle did not die on the beach at Normandy to see a marxist, community organizer in the white house. Go John and Sarah!

Posted by: Texas Bob | Sep 4, 2008 3:05:24 PM

Samantha,
The reason folks are getting on Palin's case is the hypocrisy that is inherent to the Republican party. I think it is written into their somewhere. "Do as I say not as I do". Democrats have their hypocrisy too but the reaction to Palin's bringing in her children is more about making a mockery out of Republican so-called family values and conveniently they are forgotten by Republicans when they stand in the way of ambition.

Posted by: indy_voter | Sep 4, 2008 3:04:53 PM

samanta

can you get me a callendar

Posted by: rodney | Sep 4, 2008 3:04:14 PM

Samantha,
Obama didn't throw Clinton under the bus. They crawled under the bus 10 years when he was impeached. I voted for Clinton twice. What he did was shameful. Bill and Hillary should ease silently into the twilight. But that has never been their style. Hillary and Bill our kindred spirts of McCain not in policy but it their pandering...If you want to vote for McCain that is your choice. But understand you are voting to continue the morass this country has been the last 8 years. McCain will not change that since his policies mirror Bushes.

Posted by: indy_voter | Sep 4, 2008 2:59:07 PM

The same lack of shame you Obamabots show in accusing a women of being a neglectful mother because she brings her baby to her acceptance speech as VP candidate and the convention noise is deafening. I am sure someday that young man will see that tape and be glad that he was visibly a part of history and that very important moment in his mom's life.

The trouble with BOTs is that fairness has no part in your repertoire of fear. I am fine with Obama's kids being on stage and I don't accuse him of exploiting or endangering his kids. Obama could have come up with tons of hypothetical nonsense to not allow his daughters to share that moment. God forbid they are harmed. God forbid McCain or anyone dies in office.

Clean up your act Obamabots and stop being whining hypocrites. You sound like such a bunch of losers.

Posted by: Samantha | Sep 4, 2008 2:58:39 PM

ryan,

The Democrats have done a miserable job with the concerns of minorities.

And it shows in their failed programs.

Posted by: Samantha | Sep 4, 2008 2:52:43 PM

Again your proof for Denzel being a Republican is that you are Vp of his midwest fan club right?

Even though he's never sent a dime to any candidate until Obama.

Posted by: Ryan C | Sep 4, 2008 2:52:38 PM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS