Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

Out West, Obama Faces Gun Battle

September 15, 2008 10:26 PM

DENVER, Colo. -- Colorado is home to more than 100,000 dues-paying members of the National Rifle Association, all of whom should have received THIS MAILER sometime in the last week, which says he would be "the most anti-gun president in American history," and refers gun rights enthusiasts to the website GunBanObama.com.

Obama is aware of this of course, and he's on the radio airwaves out here -- as well as, according to readers of Ben Smith at Politico -- Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Maryland. Virginia, Ohio, and New Hampshire.

The ad features former Washington Redskin Ray Schoenke, who helms the American Hunters and Shooters Association, which styles itself as a moderate alternative to the NRA, while the NRA deems it to be a bogus bunch of gun-grabbers.

"It's important to me that our next President protects our Second Amendment rights to own guns and defend ourselves," says Schoenke. "Barack Obama and John McCain will both make sure we can keep our guns. But what about keeping our jobs? Barack's got a real plan that invests in creating jobs here at home and cuts taxes a thousand bucks for working families. John McCain? I saw a lot of cheap shots in my day, but McCain's false attacks on Obama are just a fake to hide the ball. His plan sells out American workers. McCain will keep giving tax breaks to companies that ship our jobs overseas. And he'll look the other way while China breaks our trade deals. It's the same old Bush playbook. Look, when the coach loses eight years in a row, you don't bring him back for a ninth season! We just can't afford more of the same."

Listen to the ad HERE.

Obama's facing some tough skeptics out here, though, and comments like the ones he made in Duryea, Penn., earlier this month don't necessarily help.

"There’s rumors going around that you're going to take away the guns," said a hunter at a glass factory.

"I think this is a great question so I just want to clear it up," Obama said. "Because I know there are probably some sportsmen here in the audience. I believe in the Second Amendment, and if you are a law-abiding gun owner, you have nothing to fear from an Obama administration! I mean this has been this has been peddled again and again…

"I’ll be honest, and I’m sure there’s some NRA members here," Obama continued. "Their general attitude is 'Look, we don’t want anything, and if you even breathe the word "gun control" or "gun safety," then you must want to take away everybody’s guns.' Well, that’s just not true...

"The bottom line is this. If you’ve got a rifle, you’ve got a shotgun, you’ve got a gun in your house, I’m not taking it away. Alright? So they can keep on talking about it but this is just not true. And by the way, here’s another thing you’ve got to understand. Even if I wanted to take it away, I couldn’t get it done. I don’t have the votes in Congress."

That "I don't have the votes in Congress" line has ricocheted around the country…

- jpt

September 15, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (161)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

If you read the constitution,it says nothing about hunting or sporting.The second ammendment is there for regular people to protect themselves from government(abolish it if needed-second paragraph in the declaration of independence).That tells us AR's,AK's,ect....are much needed incase of an emergency.I could go on for a couple hours but I type slow and mispell words.

Posted by: Ben | Sep 20, 2008 2:58:46 PM

In Heller v. DC there was a petition signed by politicians which urged the justices to rule that the 2nd A was an individual right. There was also another one which countered that. Guess which one Obama signed?

John McCain urged the justices to rule for individual right. As a legal gun-owner, this is not rocket science. Actions speak louder than words!

Obama is a good man but he is no friend of gun-owners.

Posted by: Ro Luis | Sep 19, 2008 11:06:43 AM

So if he says I can't, I won't, I'm not...you won't believe him, because hey, he must be lying. And if he says 'and even if I wanted to, I couldn't because Congress would stop me', then that must mean that he IS going to. Okay. I see that now. He's lying, and whomever you elect to Congress, if they say they'll keep him from doing that, they must be lying, too.

I'm not going to rob your house tonight, incidentally. I have no plans to kick in your door and set fire to your couch. I won't steal your car. And even if I wanted to, the cops driving around would keep me from doing it.

Silly, right?

This is why gun people and non-gun people have so much trouble talking. Even the words mean different things.

Posted by: bill | Sep 18, 2008 12:57:50 PM

Howdy from Illinois,

If Mr. Obama is for gun ownership, then why pray tell is Illinois still without CCW? There are 2 states without CCW-Wisconsin & Illinois! Mr Obama has not introduced any bills in the senate. He has no record, other than to march-step with Democrats gun grabbing schemes.

On the other hand, Governor Palin has eliminated waste in government in Alaska. Selling the Jet on E-bay-Good show. Her words to the Alaska Senate was "I'm here to provide Adult Supervision for you!" Good show Madam Governor, You have my vote. Please start with my 2 Senators

To Scary Very Scary,

I think I would be crapping in my pants, if I thought I could buffalo the USA into anything that Mrs. Palin chaired. She is a stand up Lady, who gets things done, not like the wishy-washy tuck your tail and run Obama.

Posted by: johnk568 | Sep 18, 2008 12:37:05 AM

I wonder why no one seems to notice that Obama seems to always talk about sportsmen and guns together? I don't have to be a sportsman to own a or need a gun. To infer that the 2nd amendment has hunting/sport in mind is to not understand what the bill of rights and constitution are all about

Posted by: Turtletown | Sep 17, 2008 5:32:49 PM

Amy T. said:
"Anyone who has ever been held up at gunpoint understands why gun control is essential in our nation.

Anyone who has ever lost a child to a stray bullet in their neighborhood understands why gun control is essential in our nation.

Anyone who has buried a teacher, killed in a school shooting, understands why gun control is essential in our nation.

Anyone who has read a news story of a child killed by a sibling, because they got their hands on a parent's improperly stored firearm, understands why gun control is essential in our nation.

AND, anyone who is a hunter, sportsman, skeet shooter, soldier, or gun collector that CARES about the safety of their fellow countrymen, women, and children, should understand why gun control is essential in our nation.

This is not a black and white issue...it is time for ALL Americans to demand safe and logical consensus, an agreeable, compromised middle-ground from their elected officials on this issue of our Right to Bear Arms."
-----------

Anyone who's done or read peer-reviewed research into the effectiveness of gun-control and the benefits of gun-ownership understands the false premise of outlawing a defensive tool to inhibit the behavior of outlaws.

Such a person also recognizes the idiocy of banning categories of firearms deemed "especially dangerous" when there is a proven substitution effect among criminals nullifying any theoretical benefit.

Anyone who applies logic to their world recognizes that a gun-ban is useless in a country with HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of guns in circulation which is not a police state with a collectivist national philosophy and homogeneous cultural makeup sufficient to facilitate willing and complete confiscation even from previously law-abiding citizens.

Anyone who's experienced the scenarios described by Amy T. in a jurisdiction such as Chicago or DC or NYC, and actually has knowledge of gun laws where they live, UNDERSTANDS THAT GUN CONTROL IS WORTHLESS!

This is not a black and white issue... it's a right and wrong issue, an informed and ignorant issue, a rational and irrational issue, a policy and rhetoric issue, a truth and lies issue, a rights and repression issue, a self-defense and surrender issue, a life and death issue.

Posted by: Mike Abrams | Sep 17, 2008 2:01:47 PM

The National Rifle Association has listed and documented the anti-gun people who founded the American Hunters and Shooters Association. This organization IS a front for the gun grabbers. If the reporter would contact NRA they can supply him with the names and histories of the individuals involved. For a highroll financier of OBAMA check out GEORGE SOROS, a Hungarian gentleman, who has funneled perhaps 50 million dollars into American anti-gun organizations.
He uses his vast wealth, see the currency collapses in South East Asia which he profited off of, to destroy our 2nd Amendment rights.

Posted by: Linda | Sep 17, 2008 1:18:10 PM

Here is the kicker, ready? He said if you have a RIFLE, SHOTGUN, GUN in your house, I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT AWAY. He never mentioned HANDGUN, and for a reason. He has been quoted in the last couple years as saying (IF IT WAS UP TO ME I WOULD "BAN" ALL FIREARMS EXCEPT FOR A PUMP SHOTGUN! Now wake up everybody, this guy is a MAJOR DANGER! VERY VERY SCARY!

Posted by: Roger | Sep 17, 2008 10:07:30 AM

The writer of this article is surprised that people are not fooled by obama's "support" for the 2nd amendment?

He is supported by Ray Schoenke, who helms the American Hunters and Shooters Association. It's board members consist of gun banners from several gun ban lobbying groups.

The writer supposedly follows politics, but does not mention that obama was on the board of the joyce foundation, that funds groups that push for laws banning guns.

He does not seem to be familiar with obama's voting record, supporting every gun ban bill. He was in full support of DC's gun ban. Being from Chicago, he supports all gun bans affecting law abiding citizens, but has not supported any bills on enhanced penalties for armed gang members!

When teaching law, obama said the 2nd amendment refers to militias such as government forces like the national guard, and does not protect the rights of the citizens, like the rest of the amendments are intended to do.

So where in obama's career has he shown support for the 2nd amendment? His record shows constant attempts at infringing on citizen's rights, only his teleprompter says otherwise.

Why is the media showing this bias for obama?

Do we want more corrupt chicago politics?

I will be voting against osama biden laden

Posted by: silly "journalist" | Sep 17, 2008 6:23:03 AM

First off, I'm not all that certain that Mr. Tapper should be reporting on this subject given that he used to be the spokesman for the Brady Campaign, formerly known as Handgun Control,
INC. I'm not sure that he can be
objective about the issue.

Secondly, I don't trust Obama's bona
fides on the gun issue and I
definitely don't trust Biden's given
that he's never seen a gun
confiscation bill that he didn't
absolutely love.

Here's the thing that the gun
grabbers miss. Those of us who own
guns, especially those that are
military pattern weapons, tend to
be law abiding. Demanding that we
be disarmed because we can't be
trusted is tantamount to calling us
all criminals. I'm not going to vote
for somebody who's starting position
is that.

I might have given Obama some
consideration until he chose Biden
as his running mate. That told me
all that I need to know.

Posted by: Michael Shirley | Sep 16, 2008 11:58:07 PM

To all those pro-gun control folks posting on this thread: You make a lot of references to other countries that have less gun crime. Sure, they might have less gun crime, but they have much, much more government-perpetrated crimes than the US. Many people are murdered by their own governments EACH DAY because they don't have the means to defend themselves.

In the US, crime is perpetrated mostly by gangsters, gangster wannabes, and other lowlifes. In the "other" countries with "less gun crime", crime is perpertrated by the government.

So, I rather keep my freedom rather than relying upon some socialist/egalitarian garbage to "defend" me.

Most gun owners in the US are law abiding citizens and the most friendliest and kindest people you will meet. Those people who commit crimes with guns are not gun owners. They are simply criminals, using guns as an easy way out.

Don't try to distort history, gun-banners. You all know the truth. Just go research, how many people have been jailed, tortured, and killed by their own oppressive governments in the last 100 years alone?

Posted by: Rachen | Sep 16, 2008 9:04:29 PM

Said by ...: "No one wants to take away your guns. No One! If you are a law abiding citizen so why the fight...?"

Really?!?!? Where have you been lately:

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., on CBS "60 Minutes": "If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them -- Mr. and Mrs. America, turn them all in -- I would have done it."

Sounds like she wants to take my firearms away from me.

Posted by: Aardvark | Sep 16, 2008 7:56:24 PM

Actually, mec .. The vote was 9-0 that the Second Amendment protects a natural individual right that pre-exists the Constitution. It was 5-4 that said the government cannot limit that right to military service. Go figure?

Posted by: Charlie | Sep 16, 2008 4:36:47 PM

Well now there is a comment I love to see "Quit frankly the thought of Ms. Palin sitting across the table from the likes of a Mahmoud Ahmadinejad chills me to the bone."

Now go get yourself a nice warm coat because your going to need it.

Posted by: Jaded | Sep 16, 2008 2:59:05 PM

Obama has said that people should not be permitted to own guns. He supported the Chicago gun ban, he supported the D.C. gun ban. Now he wants us to believe that he's changed his mind? When Obama says he supports the Second Amendment he's lying.

Posted by: EyeDoc | Sep 16, 2008 2:16:21 PM

I get a kick out of the pro-Obama astroturfing that is going on here. Their posts are like T Ball to the majority of posters here.

Heller 5-4, that's all there is to it. No way Obama is going to appoint someone who won't make that 4-5, or 3-6.

"Ms. Palin could in deed become the President Of The United States
Scary Very Scary" Think of how we feel about three years out of the Illinois State Senate Obama, and he will take over from day one. This is a pretty poor argument for you. You have to believe it before you hear it in order to buy it.

Posted by: moptop | Sep 16, 2008 1:50:51 PM

Osama! Obama! He'll make Big Gov yo' Momma! Oh, Thank Heaven, for my AK-47!

Posted by: Wendy Weinbaum | Sep 16, 2008 1:43:19 PM

Obama says he would not have appointed Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court but would have appointed all of the leftist jurists who voted that the Second Amendment was a collective right rather than an individual one.
If Obama has his way, the next court will make the Second Amendment a dead letter.
Joe Biden is an anti-gun activist. He was a major supporter of the Clinton Anti-Gun agenda and did his very best (which is never very good) to keep Clarence Thomas off the Court.

Posted by: mec | Sep 16, 2008 1:26:21 PM

The "American Hunters and Shooters Association (AHSA)" is a fake organization. It is actually led by gun control advocates who just happen themselves to do some occasional hunting now and then. It was created by Democrats as a cynical attempt to lie about being pro-gun.

Ray Schoenke has personally donated money to Handgun Control, Inc. and to the Brady Campaign.

Jon Rosenthal founded Stop Handgun Violence in Massachusetts. When this was pointed out, Rosenthal was forced to resign from AHSA.

Posted by: SteveL | Sep 16, 2008 1:18:00 PM

"gun control" disarms innocent Americans...this allows the criminals to rampage. To lower crime, stop committing treason against the oath of office, and cease the infringements against our right to keep and bear arms. Then, arrest, prosecute and PUNISH the criminals. Liberals are hysterical and confused about the distinction between guilt and innocence.... unborn babies are innocent. People who criminally fire guns are not innocent. Abort the criminals, not the babies, problem solved. (ps: traitors who write & vote for gun control are criminals!!)

Posted by: ralpherus | Sep 16, 2008 1:13:35 PM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS