Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

Palin Zings Obama for Not Picking Hillary

September 12, 2008 8:18 PM

Are there smiles in Chappaqua tonight?

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin had a little riff on how Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., must be having second-thoughts about not picking Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, as his running mate.

"I think he's regretting not picking her now, I do," Palin told Charlie Gibson tonight on World News with Charles Gibson. "What, what determination, and grit, and even grace through some tough shots that were fired her way -- she handled those well."

In response, the Obama campaign sent out a statement from former Clinton supporter Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., who said, "Sarah Palin should spare us the phony sentiment and respect.  Governor Palin accused Senator Clinton of whining and John McCain laughed when a questioner referred to her by using a demeaning expletive. John McCain and Sarah Palin represent no meaningful change, just the same failed  policies and same divisive, demeaning politics that has devastated the middle class."

And the Obama campaign helpfully provided links to the aforementioned "demeaning expletive"  and Palin talking about Clinton (in which Palin does not really accuse Palin of whining, but rather expresses the opinion that when a woman in politics says anything about harsh scrutiny that can be "perceived" as a "whine," it hurts women in politics generally.  A better source of this is the actually Newsweek video, which you can access HERE.)

I, too, wonder if Obama regrets not picking Clinton and perhaps I'm not alone.

In Nashua, NH, this week, the man Obama did pick, Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., defended Clinton from a man who said how glad he was that Obama picked him over Hillary, "not because she's a woman, but because, look at the things she did in the past."

"Make no mistake about this," Biden responded. "Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be vice president of the United States of America. Let’s get that straight. She’s a truly close personal friend, she is qualified to be president of the United States of America, she’s easily qualified to be vice president of the United States of America, and quite frankly, it might have been a better pick than me. But she’s first rate, I mean that sincerely, she’s first rate, so let’s get that straight."

So much of the Palin pick seemed reactive -- a response to Obama not picking Clinton by McCain, who was very focused during the primaries on the white women whom Obama has had trouble wooing. I wonder if McCain would have picked Palin had Obama selected Clinton.

- jpt

September 12, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (660)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jake,

You are giving Sarah Palin a free ride on the legislative investigation against her in Alaska as Governor for over reaching her duties. The FBI has been investigation Alaska Republican Political Corruption since 2004. And Alaska government is not doing this. Only the FBI is conducting investigation. Alaska government are ones being investigated. FBI to date has indicted 11 Republican officials.

Jake, why is this not being addressed?? Americans have a right to know. Is it fair not to let Americans know when a candidate for Vice President is currently being investigated??

Whether we are Republican or Democrat everyone should know what is going on!!!

Posted by: Sharonklim | Sep 14, 2008 10:10:53 AM

Moderate writes, "Well, we have no idea what sort of grades Obama had as an undergraduate, as he will not release them. His years at columbia are rather a mystery."
================================
Are you kidding? Obama was only able to go to Columbia with SCHOLARSHIP money. You have to maintain at a minimum a "B" average to KEEP your scholarship in most cases. Knowing that FACT, please tell all of of us (who actually went to college) what so "mysterious" about that?

Better yet..Considering he had to use those same TRANSCRIPTS to get into Harvard Law School I think it is safe to say they were pretty exceptional, right? By the way...he graduated with honors.

Please...Don't embarrass McCain by trying to compare him academically to Obama. There's no contest.

Posted by: Dems | Sep 14, 2008 10:09:54 AM

Festygreat,

I'm sorry you are so concerned that McCain would make the world less safe. I cannot possible disagree with you more. As he said in his acceptance speech at the convention, and has said repeatedly in the past, having been intimately involved in war, having suffered and having witnessed suffering caused by war, McCain has a clear knowledge of what war means and why it must be avoided as the last option at all times. That is his philosophy and that is how he would govern. He would not rush to war, but if war became necessary, he would commit to it with sufficient resources to ensure quicker, more decisive victories than the slog we had in Iraq. In addition, McCain has spoken out against Guantanamo and the torture of prisoners. He would not feel the need to prove his toughness through the use of military force. He would concentrate on creating an efficient, well-equipped military and on working to make sure that military was used sparingly around the world. That's the sort of balance I find reassuring and that strengthens my support of McCain as commander in chief. I'm sorry you do not share my confidence.

Posted by: moderate | Sep 14, 2008 10:00:30 AM

gluvnast,

Nice talking to you. People can disagree without getting ugly about it and I enjoy engaging on that level.

I am curious about your statement that McCain overlooked other Republican women for the VP slot who would have been better picks than Palin. This is something I have thought about a lot, because I wanted all along for McCain to pick a female VP for strategic reasons. But when I looked at the possibilities, Palin kept topping my list, although I thought that she would turn down such an offer because of her new baby.

Here's my take-- the Republicans don't have a strong bench of female contenders. Condi wants to head back to Stanford and is sincerely disinterested in elective office. Liddy Dole and Kay Bailey Hutchinson seemed older than the ideal, since McCain was looking for some youth. They are both also a bit too establishment for the purpose. I know KBH got a lot of buzz toward the end, but that was never going to fly, given the disdain she and McCain share for one another (witness her snippy, less-than-helpful comments in the early hours after the Palin pick was announced). Then there's Carly Fiorini and Meg Whitman-- fabulous businesswomen and I actually thought he might go in that direction. I do think, however, that Palin edges out these businesswomen in usefulness to the campaign.

So who did you have in mind as stronger Republican women?

Posted by: moderate | Sep 14, 2008 9:37:55 AM

Leonard Peltier have you read the new york times report on palin, its tasteful and interesting to me

Posted by: festygreat | Sep 14, 2008 8:54:03 AM

T,

Forget Hillary unless she gets into this fight like it's her own.

The thing to do is concentrate on NOW.

BTW, I agree completely and that is precisely how I decided on Obama.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | Sep 14, 2008 8:36:35 AM

Why does everyone forget how much negative baggage Hillary Clinton would have brought to the ticket? The Republicans have a thousand page dossier of information they would have used against her if she had been on the ticket in either position. Not to mention Bill's sketchy financial dealings... She has escaped serious scrutiny, because she did not win the nomination. She has very high negatives, probably even more after the primary season...

Posted by: T | Sep 14, 2008 8:27:08 AM

Why would Obama regret not picking Hillary? Because she's a woman? Are female politicians an interchangeable commodity? The question is foolishness underpinned by some degree of sexism in the unspoken assumptions. As long as the conversation is about sex, race, personality, etc, it isn't about the issues and how the candidates' policy proposals would impact working class and middle class Americans. McCain and Palin are seeking to distract you, and it's working.

Posted by: Steve Collins | Sep 14, 2008 8:25:41 AM

Thanks,

That's both interesting and funny.
We have a publication of the same name and everyone would assume that it came from there.

Well written and an excellent, impartial analysis that might get through some of the chatter, but some will discount it without a read I am sorry to say.

Thanks Again festygreat.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | Sep 14, 2008 8:17:03 AM

Can that article get a wider circulation, I will be glad that majority of Americans read this. As a Nigerian who lean towards American global leadership, it will be so painful to have as an elected leader of great Nation someone who would make the world less safer than Bush is leaving it. Thats my fear about John McCain

Posted by: festygreat | Sep 14, 2008 8:15:25 AM

Its a Nigerian Newspaper "The Nation"

Posted by: festygreat | Sep 14, 2008 8:11:20 AM

No, thank YOU festygreat.

Can you provide the source of this article?

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | Sep 14, 2008 8:08:54 AM

festy,

No argument there.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | Sep 14, 2008 7:32:30 AM

Leonard Peltie i don't care what your poll says,i just care about having a safe world. McCain is as dangerous as Osama Bin Laden. I say NO to violence whether in America, Afganistan or Iraq

Posted by: festygreat | Sep 14, 2008 7:22:43 AM

I meant to say that I believe Gibson erred on the side of the fourth estate.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | Sep 14, 2008 1:35:49 AM

Okay,

Now back to our program.

Disambiguates,

There are two Charie Gibsons and while I'm not crazy about either of them I think the one who showed up took his job seriously. I think many who follow these things were expecting tea and cookies with that interview. So while no one is perfect I think he Gibson on the side of the fourth estate.

No one will ever again agree on what constitutes "unbiased" media. Once news departments became financially accountable to the shareholders, that high ground was lost forever. So in my view Gibson represents the first tentative steps at relocating a place where the mainstream media can claim some degree of impartiality without being used as a vehicle for propaganda.
I expect it to be a long road with a lot of unhappy campers along the way.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | Sep 14, 2008 1:34:33 AM

PALINS AN IDIOT SHE IS NO HILLARY CLINTON...


MCCAIN IS SEXIST AND IS A CLONE OF BUSH!

REPUBLICANS ARE CHANGE ? YEAH RIGHT GIVE ME A BREAK 8 YEARS THEY HAVE CONTROL THIS COUNTRY AND MADE IT A MESS!
KNOW THE WANT TO BE THE PARTY OF CHANGE!

WHAT A JOKE!

THE REPUBLICANS MUST THINK WE ARE ALL IDIOTS!


VOTE FOR TURTH VOTE FOR SOLUTIONS NOT LIES. VOTE DEM 2008

Posted by: Deb | Sep 14, 2008 1:24:50 AM

Mary K - I agree with you on the media's snobbery. Charles Gibson with is academic glasses came off as if he were some high achieving super human who knows what is right for America. And what has he ever done? He certainly has never produced anything of value nor was he ever in political office. I am a democrat, but I was appalled at his demeanor.

Posted by: disambiguates | Sep 14, 2008 12:41:28 AM

Mary,

Either way we will get the one that half of us deserve.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | Sep 14, 2008 12:17:02 AM

Many of the news media behave as if they were sitting on a throne looking down upon those of us who may have far more education that they do and have have had many more experiences that they. As mother of five who supported an ill husband, sent five children to college and earned 3 degrees while taking care of my family, teaching Sunday School, attending Little League games, gymnastic meets, cooking for the family, and teaching school for 29 years simultaneously, I challenge the media gods to be able to multi-task in the way many women do. Sure Sarah Palin is qualified to be president. I believe our next president will be God's will whether it is Obama or McCain. We will get the one we deserve.


Posted by: Mary K. Wyrick | Sep 14, 2008 12:12:58 AM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS