Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper
RECENT POSTS
- POTUS Tells Michigan Things Will Get Tougher As He Introduces New Plan for Community Colleges
- Michelle Obama's Father NOT buried at Burr Oak
- Missing Mayor
- Obama Wants to Avoid the Dirt for First Pitch
- Michelle Obama's Burr Oak Cemetery Connection
- Obama Expects Unemployment Figures to “Tick Up for Several Months,” Despite Economy Stabilizing
- President Obama Joins With McCain to Eliminate Raptor Fighter Jets
- President Obama Tries to Get the Momentum Back on Health Care Reform
- Labor Leaders Push Obama for Second Stimulus Package
- President Obama to Jewish Leaders: Every Time I’m on Al Jazeera They Show Me at the Western Wall with a Yarmulke On
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
Rudy Asks: Where Are the Feminist Groups? Republicans Say Media Scared of Palin
September 03, 2008 9:14 AM
On "Fox and Friends" this morning, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani said the media has "savaged" Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.
Giuliani said he was "really angry and I am really upset. ... Where are these feminist groups? I mean, she is being asked questions like, 'Can you be a vice president and a mother?' But what about Barack Obama -- can you be a president and a father? Or John McCain? I was never asked that question, or George Bush or Al Gore. All these men have run, most of them had families -- some of them had young children -- none of them were ever asked, 'Can you be a father and can you be president or vice president?'"
The ex-New York Mayor pointed out that this week's cover of US Weekly, about Palin and her 17-year-old daughter Bristol's pregnancy, is titled "Babies Lies & Scandal."
Last week's cover, Giuliani said, was about Michelle Obama, and it was titled "Why Barack Loves Her."
"Anyone that says there isn't a media bias is living on Mars," Giuliani said. "And anyone that says a woman nominated by the Republican ticket isn't treated differently is also somewhere in outer space."
Giuliani noted that the attacks are because the Left is afraid.
"This is historic; they realize it is historic," Giuliani said.
The Wall Street Journal's editorial board elaborated on that notion today that "What's really going on here is that the Beltway class can see how popular the Palin pick is with Republicans outside Washington, and especially with middle-class conservatives. As Richard Land, a leader with the Southern Baptist Convention, said Monday, John McCain's selection of Sarah Palin closed the 'enthusiasm gap' between the two parties.
"There is nothing more dangerous to entrenched Washington power than a populist conservative who looks unlikely to buy into Washington's creature comforts. Take a close look at Governor Palin's record on ethics and energy in Alaska, and it becomes clear what this Beltway outburst is actually about. The irony is that, while Senator Obama is running on change, his acceptance speech made explicit that he's promising only more power and money for Washington. Sarah Palin's history of taking on the career politicians of a corrupt Alaskan GOP machine -- her own party -- shows that she's the more authentic change agent."
What do you think? Is that what's "really going on here"?
- jpt
September 3, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (249)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
What's really going on is that people are freaking out about Palin. 1 in 3 VPs have gone on to become President. She has a 1 in 3 chance of becoming President and people in her own party have never met her. Didn't even know how to pronounce her name!
So the media is vetting her, literally. People are scrambling to find out who she is so they can feel safe with her being a heartbeat away from the Presidency.
Posted by: cincyr | Sep 3, 2008 6:45:26 PM
anon,
the Iraquis did NOT agree with Barack's original plan. And we didnt implement it. Wake up and think for yourself.
Posted by: Keepyourheelsdown | Sep 3, 2008 6:35:59 PM
It is truly sad how we have all descended into a battle of red vs blue, left vs right, republican vs democrat. People, the game is rigged, the fix is in, and it doesn't matter who gets elected, the American people get hosed. While we argue over who is correct, and call each other names, the government of the wealthy, by the special interests and for big corporations is laughing all the way to the bank. Think I'm wrong? Write a letter to your senator and see what happens. Maybe a form letter response if you're lucky. More likely no response, unless you included a large "campaign" donation with your letter. Go ahead. prove me wrong, if you can.
Posted by: Steve Bateman | Sep 3, 2008 5:31:03 PM
Obama has no foreign policy experience or executive experience.
Palin has run a business, a city and a state. Obama has run his mouth.
Notice during the Dem convention that not one person could get up on stage and talk about what Obama accomplished as a community agitator.
Posted by: Sarah for president | Sep 3, 2008 4:19:55 PM
"Did you attend school with Obama?"
That's not fair.
Not everyone can get their BA in journalism from the venerated Univ of Idaho.
Or finish in the literal bottom five of their graduating class.
Oh wait. That's the Republicans.
Posted by: Ryan C | Sep 3, 2008 4:08:35 PM
"Real men like McCain aren't intimidated by strong women"
How would McCain even know? He met her once before picking her as VP.
Posted by: Ryan C | Sep 3, 2008 4:06:50 PM
We aren't there her because it is evident her policies are not there for us. Feminists are intelligent women that care about the direction of our country, are concerned with the legacy we are leaving our children, and embrace motherhood and career knowing that there is a delicate balance between the two for neither area to suffer. Maybe the Feminists have this one figured out already...despite her gender, she is bad for our nation and our future!
Posted by: Amy T | Sep 3, 2008 4:05:09 PM
look, if all the supposed controversies that obama had to go through were condensed to five days it would look a lot like this--but probably even worse. how long was the media stuck on reverend wright? "proud of america?" i hope journalists understand that the reason scrutiny is so high is because no one knows anything about her, so everything is coming out fast.
Posted by: phi | Sep 3, 2008 2:57:27 PM
The media and blogger attacks on Palin will backfire if they continue.
I think Palin is great, even if I don't share every single belief she has. We agree on the big picture.
I do look forward to 2012, and an exciting presidential race between Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin.
Wouldn't THAT be historic?
Posted by: KB | Sep 3, 2008 2:45:49 PM
Real men like McCain aren't intimidated by strong women.
Pretty much sums up why Obama didn't choose Hillary.
Posted by: cindy in nc | Sep 3, 2008 2:37:19 PM
Oh Brady. The writer is a well-known Palin critic, who took sides in the Palin vs Librarian issue. Not exactly an innocent bystander.
Posted by: Just | Sep 3, 2008 2:23:34 PM
anon:
Don't you mean "Lower 48?"
Did you attend school with Obama?
Posted by: SandyB | Sep 3, 2008 2:08:33 PM
Naveen:
Good thought. And, I agree. The social conservatives see Sarah Palin as the future of the party. They're enthused because McCain chose someone who's a radical pro-lifer like they are.
Posted by: Mary, MI | Sep 3, 2008 2:01:11 PM
Corsi is not ok. But just because he repeated pre-existing information doesn't discredit the factual basis of that information.
If Corsi says the sky is blue, does that mean the sky isn't blue?
Posted by: p0s3r | Sep 3, 2008 2:00:04 PM
If Palin has closed the "enthusiasm gap", doesn't that mean that conservatives aren't voting for McCain, but for Palin? SHE is essentially the head of the ticket now. What does that say about John McCain?
Posted by: Naveen | Sep 3, 2008 1:58:14 PM
Samantha Brown
is the Travel Channel Queen, a perky blonde with a whacked sense of humor.
Campbell Brown
is the CNN anchor who went into the tank early for Obama and has yet to crack a single joke that is funny.
Posted by: len | Sep 3, 2008 1:58:05 PM
The real question isn't where are the feminists, where's the decency? "Babies Lies & Scandals" says Lies ... what lie has been told? Jan Wenner & crew's liberal bent is showing through - they could have just said "Babies & Scandals" and left it that. Instead, they're at the forefront of a liberal stampede that's implying the woest, spreading allegations as fact, actually calling for paternity testing on Sara Palin's baby, release of confidential medical information, poring over photos to size baby bumps at different times. For anyone who thinks they are for human decency, privacy rights, and compassion - why aren't you more outraged that this is the state of your mainstream media?
The Obama bias was always in the air because it made for a great story (and that sells), but frankly, its beginning to stink up the room.
Posted by: LeeLee | Sep 3, 2008 1:51:32 PM
Why does Sarah Palin's husband hate America?
Posted by: Mary, MI | Sep 3, 2008 1:44:18 PM
I can't wait for Obama to be president so I can quit my job and get free things! Free health insurance finally!
Posted by: greg | Sep 3, 2008 1:41:20 PM
So posting racist and anti semitic comments and appearing on white nationalist radio is ok?
Posted by: Ryan C | Sep 3, 2008 1:37:16 PM
Post a comment

