RECENT POSTS
- Oprah, Health Care Lobbyists, Among Recent Visitors to White House
- An Obama Thanksgiving Menu, with an Extra Serving of Pie
- White House Thanksgiving Traditions: Broken and Observed
- Obama, GOP Air Differences Over Jobs, Economy In Thanksgiving Addresses
- White House State Dinner Party Crashers
- Obama to Lay Out Emissions Goals in Copenhagen
- Free Bird
- The "Good" War
- The Presidential Planner
- Under the Stars, Obama Toasts India’s Prime Minister
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
That House Vote -- By the Numbers
September 30, 2008 2:43 PM
The final vote was 205 in favor of the bailout bill, 228 against.
140 Democrats voted for it, 95 Democrats voted against it
65 Republicans voted for it, 133 Republicans voted against it as well.
60% of the Democrats voted for it; 66% of the Republicans voted against it.
The entire state delegation of Arizona -- Sen. John McCain's home state -- voted against the bill. 4 Democrats, 4 Republicans. All No.
Of the 19 members of Sen. Barack Obama's home delegation of Illinois, 9 voted against it, 10 voted for it. Of the 9 who voted against it, 4 were Democrats -- including Obama's close ally Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr. -- and 5 were Republicans.
Of the 19 House Republicans from President Bush's home state of Texas, only 4 voted for it, 15 voted against it.
Of the 34 House Democrats from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's home state of California, 19 voted for it, 15 voted against it.
Of the 8 House Republicans from House Minority Leader John Boehner's home state of Ohio, every one of them except for Boehner -- all 7 -- voted against it.
Of the 37 Democratic members of the House Financial Services Committee, 25 voted for the bill, 12 voted against it.
Of the 33 Republican members of the House Financial Services Committee, only 8 voted for the bill, 25 voted against it. Meaning 76% of the Republicans on the committee where the bill originated voted against it -- a worse percentage than the House GOP as a whole.
Of the 31 Members of Congress whom ABC News has judged to be vulnerable in their re-election races, 7 voted for the bill, 24 voted against it. (11 of 15 Democrats voted against the bill; 13 of 16 Republicans voted against the bill.)
Of the House Democratic freshmen, 23 voted for the bill, 25 against it.
Of the House Republican freshman, all 17 voted against it.
-- Jake Tapper, Z. Byron Wolf, and Lisa Chinn
September 30, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (89)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Jopek e-mailed Obama in February asking that he not mention her son's name while campaigning; however, she now says she is thrilled Obama did so in order to respond to McCain in a debate. She can't make up her mind. Just like Obama.
Too bad Obama couldn't remember her son's name and had to check the bracelet for it.
Posted by: marylou | Sep 30, 2008 4:55:39 PM
Even Limbaugh called out the House GOP who said they voted "no" on the bill because their feelings got hurt:
The Republicans in Congress, I think went out there and said some things about Pelosi's speech yesterday that a lot of Republicans, a lot of conservatives, "Come on, you guys, can you grow up? Don't tell us that you changed your vote on saving the country because Pelosi delivered a partisan speech."
Posted by: Paige | Sep 30, 2008 4:54:43 PM
I think people take the phrase "free market" a bit too literally.
Pure free markets do not work. They have never worked. Even the biggest free market advocate agrees to some regulation.
In a pure free market, there would be a handful of monopolies that owned everything. Potential competition would be stifled by dumping products at below cost and promptly raising the price back up after the competition went bankrupt. Companies would use their monopoly on a product to extend their reach into new markets by tying their products together.
So get it out of your head that we have a pure free market. We do not.
Furthermore, this rescue plan isn't even close to socialism. We are buying debt to sell at a later time. We did it during the Great Depression and during the S&L scandal. We buy the stuff, restructure it, wait a while and then sell it.
Posted by: johnTX | Sep 30, 2008 4:45:16 PM
I'd like to see the bill go before the House again just to see Boehner cry again...
Posted by: Blue in Michigan | Sep 30, 2008 4:32:26 PM
"Obama froze like a deer in headlights when it came time to remember her son's name"
I think Obama was taken aback by McCain's crass mentioning dead soldiers to distract the audience after Obama nailed him on signing songs about bombing Iran.
Posted by: Ryan C | Sep 30, 2008 4:25:55 PM
"If goverment steps in is it still a free market"
If the government has any regulation at all, is it still a free market?
Posted by: Ryan C | Sep 30, 2008 4:21:55 PM
"Obama knows the FDIC petitioned to raise the limit and is trying to steal the idea as his own."
So McCain calling for the same idea after Obama did would also be stealing?
You guys are too predictable.
Obama gave a 35 minute speech about the bailout and its impact today.
John mcCain considered "suspending" his campaign again.
Posted by: Ryan C | Sep 30, 2008 4:20:20 PM
well I pray that they never get back to the table on this one .
Posted by: Bishop | Sep 30, 2008 4:19:20 PM
“I wanted him to know my son’s name for one thing, for when he’s commander in chief,” Mrs. Jopek said during a telephone interview
Poor woman. Obama froze like a deer in headlights when it came time to remember her son's name. I gotta brace too it was given to me by Sgt. uh, the mother,, uh, of uh
Posted by: geevill | Sep 30, 2008 4:16:41 PM
Obama knows the FDIC petitioned to raise the limit and is trying to steal the idea as his own.
Posted by: geevill | Sep 30, 2008 4:14:06 PM
What Middle class it is more like the working class
Posted by: Bishop | Sep 30, 2008 4:13:15 PM
obama is as big of a phony as mccain is....he's just more careful with his words and speeches to charm everyone away from the skeletons in his closet
Posted by: chris | Sep 30, 2008 4:06:44 PM
If goverment steps in is it still a free market?
Posted by: Bishop | Sep 30, 2008 4:06:04 PM
"This plan was so poorly sold to the American people that it is somewhat understandable to those Representatives who voted against it because they feared for their re-election. They are still cowards, but they aren't completely without reason."
I agree with this especially the first part.
All people heard was a price tag ($700B), a urgency to act immediately and a beneficiary (Wall Street).
Nobody "sold" this bill because in the end they were unwilling to "buy" it themselves.
Posted by: Ryan C | Sep 30, 2008 4:05:44 PM
Bishop
Just suppose the Right Wing, self-interest lobbiest are setting OBAMA UP FOR FAILURE..
AT THE RISK OF AMERICAN'S ABLILITY TO LIVE AS PEOPLE OF A MIDDLE CLASS..
DO YOU HATE THE MIDDLE CLASS WORKER
'BISHOP'.
Posted by: Underdog | Sep 30, 2008 4:04:31 PM
We need a just say no to congress pac.
Posted by: Bishop | Sep 30, 2008 4:04:30 PM
yippee.....incompetence from the leadership of both parties and two pathetic candidates for President...."happy days are here again"
Posted by: chris | Sep 30, 2008 4:02:32 PM
johnTX
You are right, this all smells of a scam.
Gloom and Doom, they really have faith in the American people's ability to survive bad times.
Posted by: Underdog | Sep 30, 2008 4:02:03 PM
The credit market has been tight before so what bunch of liars this whole thing is so bogus so Obama can go up in polls I'm not buying it.
Posted by: Bishop | Sep 30, 2008 4:00:50 PM
Who wins and who loses?
Winners: Obama, Obama and Obama. All he had to do was be quiet and let everyone else bloody each other up. Sometimes inaction is the best political move.
Losers: McCain, Bush, Paulson, Pelosi for a day or two, Boehner, free markets and every American.
McCain looks like a complete fool in all of this. Clueless.
Bush and Paulson (D) tried to ram their plan (plus Democratic add-ons) down the throats of House Republicans. Republicans said no way, pushed Bush aside, worked with Democrats on joint version. Bush and Paulson are marginalized.
Pelosi looks like a weak leader for the short term but it doesn't matter. She gets re-elected in a landslide and all is forgotten.
Boehner just plain got snookered. Couldn't stop the bleeding when the voting started.
All in all a great political move by Pelosi even if it sent world financial markets into the tank and perhaps extended and deepened the global recession. The end justifies the means, right?
Posted by: Woody | Sep 30, 2008 4:00:02 PM
Post a comment


