RECENT POSTS
- Lobbyists Furiously Lobby White House to Preserve Lobbyist Power
- Justice Department Questions Retroactive Ban on Federal Funds to ACORN
- White House Crashers Met the President
- White House Christmas Tree Arrives
- White House Praises IAEA Rebuke Of Iran
- Oprah, Health Care Lobbyists, Among Recent Visitors to White House
- An Obama Thanksgiving Menu, with an Extra Serving of Pie
- White House Thanksgiving Traditions: Broken and Observed
- Obama, GOP Air Differences Over Jobs, Economy In Thanksgiving Addresses
- White House State Dinner Party Crashers
MONTHLY ARCHIVES
« Previous | Main | Next »
The Pork Wars
September 06, 2008 3:11 PM
In Indiana today, a state known for its pork cutlets, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, attacked the GOP ticket as less than sincere about combatting wasteful pork barrel projects.
"I know the governor of Alaska has been, you know, saying she is change," Obama said of Gov. Sarah Palin. "And that is great. She is a skillful politician.
"But when you've been taking all these earmarks when it is convenient and then suddenly you are the champion anti-earmark person, that is not change, come on!" Obama said. "I mean, words mean something. You can't just make stuff up. You can't just make stuff up. We have a choice to make and the choice is clear."
Obama was referring quite factually to the fact that despite her self-styled anti-pork image, Palin was quite active in seeking pork in the past.
In two years as governor, Palin sought 83 federal earmarks at a cost of $453 million, according to the Anchorage Daily News. "The federal budget, in its various manifestations, is incredibly important to us, and congressional earmarks are one aspect of this relationship," Palin wrote in a newspaper column, according to the Los Angeles Times.
As the mayor of Wasilla, Palin hired lobbyist Steve Silver, a former aide to Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, to secure earmarks for the town.
In fact, the Los Angeles Times reports today that three times in recent years, McCain himself listed Palin-requested projects for Wasilla as "objectionable" spending.
"While Sen. McCain was going after cutting earmarks in Washington, Gov. Palin was going after getting earmarks," Steve Ellis of Taxpayers for Common Sense told the Times.
McCain's 2001 list included Wasilla's $500,000 earmark for a public transportation project; his 2002 list included Wasilla's $1 million for what law enforcement called a redundant emergency communications center and a$450,000 agricultural processing facility.
McCain campaign spokesman Taylor Griffin told the LA Times that as mayor, Palin "faced a system that was broken. Small towns like Wasilla in Alaska depended on earmarks to take care of basic needs. . . . That was something that Gov. Palin was alarmed about and was one of the formative experiences that led her toward the reform-oriented stance that she has taken as her career has progressed."
When it comes to pork, Obama, it should be noted, is hardly kosher.
Since joining the Senate in January 2005 he has requested 330 projects totaling $931.3 million, according to his Senate website where he discloses all his requests.
"Barack Obama has requested the equivalent of one million dollars in new pork barrel spending for every working day he's been in the U.S Senate," said McCain spox Tucker Bounds, "while John McCain has never once asked for an earmark, and Governor Palin has vetoed hundreds of millions in government spending including killing the infamous 'bridge to nowhere'. Just like so many other issues Barack Obama is all talk, has no record to back it up and isn't ready to make change."
Palin originally had supported the "Bridge to Nowhere," though she ultimately came to oppose it.
- jpt
September 6, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (201)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Sorry- you can take that out. I got the wrong thread.
Posted by: drjohn | Sep 8, 2008 7:37:24 PM
"Obama said his position on this was simple. "If you got a terrorist -- take him out. Anybody who was involved in 9/11? Take him out.""
But how do know if they had anything to do with 9-11 unless you CATCH THEM?
>smirk<
Posted by: drjohn | Sep 8, 2008 7:36:32 PM
Yup, I think a lot of politicians are guilty for earmarks. However, which Governor, and or Senator were actually trying to create jobs, and energy for the nation, and which was claiming their earmarks for for those poor and destitute?
As for Michelle....she got the raise, when the hospital got the earmark. Coincidence? Also to note... they turn away those constituents they say they are trying to help, if said constituents don't have valid insurance.
It must be nice to sit on the pedestal of hypocrisy, and look down your nose, at everyone else.
Posted by: Jeanie | Sep 7, 2008 3:28:42 PM
Geevill said: Governor Palin can not spend federal tax dollars unless they are appropriated by Congress.
--------------
And she doesn't get them unless she asks for them.
Palin and McCain have made earmarks an issue. If she is such a champion of the taxpayers' money why did she go ahead and build the road-to-nowhere instead of returning that money. That road was supposed to lead to the bridge to nowhere but now it ends at an empty beach.
The earmark for the road required it either be spent on the road or returned to the federal treasury. She chose to build the road.
Posted by: Sandy | Sep 7, 2008 8:12:44 AM
'Here's one highlight: Obama sought money for the University of Chicago Hospitals. Wife Michelle works for the University of Chicago Hospitals, appointed in spring 2005 as vice president for community and external affairs at the University of Chicago Hospitals. She is now on leave from the job to campaign for her husband. Top campaign adviser and friend Valerie Jarrett is the Chair of the University of Chicago Medical Center Board and also Chair of the Executive Committee of that board. She has also been named Vice-Chair of the University's Board of Trustees. "
Posted by: america*centric | Sep 7, 2008 4:53:30 AM
I still cannot get over the fact that she allows people to shoot Polar Bears from low flying planes and is sueing the goverment because Polar Bears are on the extinct list and she want them taken off the list so she can drill for more oil.
How sad is this.
Posted by: Mike | Sep 7, 2008 1:44:13 AM
Some context might be helpful. Illinois has nearly 13 million residence, Alaska fewer then 700,000. Obama has been in the Senate 3-1/2 years, while Palin has been Governor less than 2. So Palin's requests amount to $330 per person per year, dwarfing Obama's $20 per person per year.
Posted by: John | Sep 6, 2008 11:02:57 PM
According to a CNN Special, Obama was a failure as a community organizer. Later he would use a political colleague one day for political gain, then back-stabbed them the next week. Something like throwing so many associates or friends under the bus.
Obama need for political power is scary. He care not about Americans, but for the political power of Obama. All the CNN people have been for the candidate Obama. He is a political mad man. No way, Obama.
Posted by: Mary | Sep 6, 2008 10:31:10 PM
>>> future imperfect:
Mary Anne--
How wise was it for Sarah Palin to mock tens of thousands of people who work for little or no money?
______________
Sarah Palin mocked ONE man who made a big "magillah" about his service as a community organizer..... because he was putting down HER experience as a mayor of a small town!
Quit the phoney caterwauling!
Posted by: america*centric | Sep 6, 2008 10:11:48 PM
"Palin hates earrmarks so much"
She requested $200M more in earmarks 2 months ago.
Young is being challenged because he is about to be indicted.
"Obama gave earrmarks to the hospital his wife works at and at the time all of a sudden her salary was doubled."
Michelle Obama got her raise on 2005.
Obama put in for an earmark in 2006 but it did not make the final budget bill.
The right wing lies.
Posted by: Ryan C | Sep 6, 2008 10:07:21 PM
The dems have all the control of congress.
Reid will have a filibuster proof majority in the senate.
Pelosi will have a huge majority in the house.
We need McCain there to veto there out of control spending.
Obama loves pork.
This election is so clear. We need a balanced government with McCain vetoing the out of control spending from reid and pelosi. Not with Obama and pelosi and reid.
We need balance. McCain has even said he would testify weekly before congress.
McCain is the CIC we need not Obama.
This election is so clear.
Posted by: To Eyes wide open we need McCain to veto spending from Pelosi and Reid | Sep 6, 2008 10:05:21 PM
Palin hates earrmarks so much she had her Lt governor run againsat don young because of all the earrmark money she took.
Don Young a 35 year institution in alaska and Palin showed the courage to take him on that is how much she hates earrmarks.
Obama on the other hand doesn't want to fix the earrmark process.
He is fine with attaching museums to flood control projects. He doesn't understand the system.
Obama gave earrmarks to the hospital his wife works at and at the time all of a sudden her salary was doubled.
Posted by: David | Sep 6, 2008 9:43:54 PM
"Engineers, for which Obama requested $33 million? How sad is it when a senator has to request money for a Federal Agency to be able to do its job properly."....
That WASN'T the biggest>
Look again!
Posted by: eyes open wide | Sep 6, 2008 9:14:17 PM
eyeswideopen: Learn to add. Illinois State University had $1.3 million in Obama earmarks.
And by the way people, did you notice that one of the biggest recipients of Obama earmarks was the Army Corps of Engineers, for which Obama requested $33 million? How sad is it when a senator has to request money for a Federal Agency to be able to do its job properly.
Posted by: JKM | Sep 6, 2008 8:35:53 PM
geevil: "Like obama's words regarding promising to take public financing?"
And what were Obama's words exactly? For instance, what did he say about outside groups (527s) and their role in the campaign and what McCain could do about that? And what was McCain's response about what he would or more exactly wouldn't do about those 527s?
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | Sep 6, 2008 8:30:22 PM
Yourgameletsplay: There are 670,000 people in Alaska. There are 12.8 million people in Illinois. Palin's earmarks average out to $676 per person for Alaskans. Obama's earmarks average out to $72 per person for residents of Illinois.
Hmm, who got more pork for their constituents?
Posted by: JKM | Sep 6, 2008 8:28:57 PM
McCain was stupid to select the Queen of Mean.
His entire message of being a moderate and ‘bipartisan’ Senator is totally in shatters: he belongs to the religious fringe. They have become the face of his campaign which was already totally paid for by Big Corp, that other fringe group Americans love to hate. The foreign policies of his campaign are dictated by the Neocons. These are the three fringes most associated with Bush/Cheney and Obama and Biden will have no problem pointing that out to the voters. When the race is over come election day, Palin-McCain will have polled in the lower thirties nationwide.
Being perceived as a moderate and a bipartisan was the entire reason the race was still close. The Palin-bump (pun intended) is already stalling. It can only go down for them. The more we learn about Palin, the more voters will turn away.
Palin-McCain don't have any prospect for expanding their ‘base’ right now. Their only hope is that their base will still be as blinded by Dominatrix as they are after just 1 week of Palin-hysteria. Anything that was supposed to be positive about the Dominatrix has been dumped on the American public in carefully scripted appearances. The negatives will be highlighted in the coming months.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | Sep 6, 2008 8:05:58 PM
"I mean, words mean something"
Like obama's words regarding promising to take public financing? or Obama's words promising to fillibuster and vote against FISA?
Words like G-Damn America?
Posted by: geevill | Sep 6, 2008 7:59:17 PM
"How wise was it for Sarah Palin to mock tens of thousands of people who work for little or no money?"
An Obama supporter's fantasy. Palin and Gulliani mocked "Community Organizer" Obama. WHAT? oh, someone who recruits union memebers and rounds up winos to vote on election days.
Posted by: geevill | Sep 6, 2008 7:50:42 PM
Moneyman:
I apologize for saying that Michele's employer, the University Of ILLinois Hospital, received $1,000,000. in earmarks from Bozo.
I was wrong!
Her employer received MEGA MILLIONs of dollars!
The Illinois State University, however, didn't fare a smidgeon as well.
So much for Political PORK!
Posted by: eyes open wide | Sep 6, 2008 7:41:14 PM
Post a comment


