Political Punch

Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper

« Previous | Main | Next »

Axelrod on Debates: Wonders if ‘McCain 7.0’ Will Show Up, Says Obama Has Learned McCain ‘Doesn't Like to Look at Him Very Often’

October 15, 2008 2:33 PM

The top adviser to Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., today contemplated whether Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., would introduce a new strategy at tonight's debate -- "McCain 7.0," he sneered -- and said the debates had clearly helped Obama rise in the polls.

"We've gained after each of these debates, including the VP debate, as I think people have gotten more familiar not just with the candidates but with the choice," said Obama's senior strategist David Axelrod.

"We're not in the business of reinventing ourselves from debate to debate," Axelrod told reporters as the Obama campaign plane flew from Toledo to New York City Wednesday afternoon. Axelrod said Obama's "consistency" throughout the debates, and the campaign in general, had helped him as he got to speak to 50-70 million of them without the filter of the media or his opponents' attack ads.

And what has Obama learned from these debates?

"He's learned that (McCain) doesn’t like to look at him very often," Axelrod said, noting the Republican's predilection for avoiding eye contact with his opponent. "I don't think it's of that much consequence" to Obama but "obviously, it was noted."

Axelrod added, "whatever the idiosyncrasies of Sen. McCain's debating style," Obama would focus on talking about issues. He said Obama was prepared for whatever questions or attacks might come his way this evening at Hofstra University at the third and final presidential debate, to be moderated by CBS News' Bob Schieffer. Obama intends to focus "on the future of the country" and focus on issues, hoping tonight's forum, with its focus on domestic issues, would allow the Democrat to talk more about energy, education and health care.

Tonight will be "the last chance for folks to see these candidates side by side and take the measure of them," said Axelrod, adding that this being the last debate would "accentuate the decision-making process for people still making their choices."

Axelrod said he personally thought Obama had impressed the American people.

McCain has suggested that since Obama remarked to ABC News' Charlie Gibson that McCain didn't make "to his face," in the last debate, any of the direct attacks on his character that his campaign had been making on the stump, he'd "assured" that McCain would at the very least raise Obama's relationship with former 60s radical William Ayers.

Axelrod disputed a reporter's characterization that Obama was "goad"ing McCain into raising the issue, saying Obama had merely been making "an observation." He said attacks like that "are not what the American people want to hear. ... There is such a seriousness of purpose among voters this year."

With all the talk of campaign tactics, and whether McCain can make a game-changing move tonight as Obama ascends in many polls, Axelrod said, "I think Sen. McCain's problem is fundamental, which is he's got a bad argument. He's essentially on the wrong side of history. He's arguing for a set of policies and an approach that have been discredited in a really dramatic way over the last eight years, and I’m not sure any stylistic change or approach in a debate can change that."

Obama has improved quite a bit as a debater since that first Democratic primary debate in South Carolina in April 2007, Axelrod said.

"He's honed his debating style over the course of these 25 debates," Axelrod said. "He's said before that the format of it wasn't always ... something that came naturally to him. I think he's mastered it very, very well."

ABC News pointed out that Obama was criticized for his response to a question in that first debate about what he would do immediately in response to another terrorist attack on U.S. soil.

Obama said then, "the first thing we'd have to do is make sure that we've got an effective emergency response, something that this administration failed to do when we had a hurricane in New Orleans."

That gave Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., and former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., the openings to say their first response would be to swiftly retaliate, and their campaigns said Obama's instincts were all wrong.

Axelrod seemed to acknowledge that Obama now gives more muscular responses to questions about terrorism, though "his views haven't changed."

-- Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

October 15, 2008 | Permalink | Share | User Comments (155)

User Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Really, Biden may make gaffes, but it's more due to spontaneity. When he's asked about things like policy issues, he's able to give detailed, intelligent answers that displayed his deep understanding. Palin, however, seemed to stick only to her talking points, at times did not answer the question at all, and just said "how mavericky" they were.

Emm, it was quite largely Bush's fault for bungling the hurricane response. Bush, for instance, rejected international aid offered by other countries, which would have greatly eased the burden on the workers. Not to mention he sent quite a fair bit of the National Guard which is responsible for responding to domestic crises to Iraq- thus they had less manpower- so that too, in its own way, played a part in this.

Posted by: Grey Matter | Oct 16, 2008 9:31:29 AM

Negative. It is the state and local authorities' responsibility and duty to foresee and prepare for natural disasters. FEMA is an afterthought to assist in cleanup/relocation/assistance (that part yes, was severely poorly managed).

Posted by: Emm | Oct 15, 2008 8:15:58 PM

"How about Biden saying during the last crash Roosevelt saw what was happening on TV although he wasn't President and TV hadn't been invented yet?"

"I can see Russia from my house!"

ROFLMAO!

Palin coming on the scene has brought great relief to Dan Quayle who had the previous dishonor of being known as the dumbest VP candidate in modern history.

Posted by: Ryan C | Oct 15, 2008 8:14:49 PM

"Palin is so dumb she called New Hampshire part of the NorthWest."

How about Biden saying during the last crash Roosevelt saw what was happening on TV although he wasn't President and TV hadn't been invented yet?

His undoing is his stupidity not his gender.

Posted by: thesame | Oct 15, 2008 8:08:27 PM

"the first thing we'd have to do is make sure that we've got an effective emergency response, something that this administration failed to do when we had a hurricane in New Orleans."

The Dems can't help but blame Bush for everything. It's amazing how blind there are. The failure was due to the state and local govt's inept leaders to foresee and prepare for Katrina, not Bush.

Posted by: Emm | Oct 15, 2008 8:02:19 PM

Palin is so dumb she called New Hampshire part of the NorthWest.

Her undoing is her stupidity not her gender.

Posted by: Ryan C | Oct 15, 2008 7:56:22 PM

"just keep drinking the Kool-aid"

S Adams,

You are the one repeating right wing bs even though you know they have lied to you.

Yet you still take their stories at face value. Why?

Posted by: Ryan C | Oct 15, 2008 7:41:27 PM

Ryan C--just keep drinking the Kool-aid. You will believe Obama not matter what, even if he has no proven record to go by. You go ahead and believe Obama who has flip-flopped on every single issue, that he hasn't lied time and again about every aspect of his life, that he has thrown numerous people under the bus, even his own grandmother for his political aspirations. Many top economist have looked at Obama's economic plan and health plan and said it doesn't add up. I tend to believe them over an inexperienced Chicago thug.
I've outlined what is wrong with Obama's plans, and I get more info from legitimate sources, not Daily Kos or Huffington post.

Posted by: S Adams | Oct 15, 2008 7:28:58 PM

veryoffensive--not only is ageism a problem in the Obama campaign, but they are also being sexist against Palin. I thought the sexist attacks against Hillary was bad, and I didn't even support her, but the attacks and lies against Palin are just unbelievable and vicious.

Quote from the great Ronald Reagan:" ...I will not make age an issue, I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponents youth and inexperience"

John McCain reminds me a lot of Ronald Reagan. Both worked with both parties to bring about change and unity.

Obama, in his own words, said he tends to not have much sway with the Republican party. How does he expect to get anything done for this country if he can't work both sides of the aisle?

Posted by: S Adams | Oct 15, 2008 7:16:57 PM

"when you follow the paper trail, it led right to the source of the problem"

S Adams,

But you're not following a paper trail.

You're following the right wing script which conveniently leaves out the lack of regulation or oversight.

The only regulation you reference is the toothless bill McCain eventually cosponsored that would have created a redundant oversight agency with FEWER oversight powers.

Posted by: Ryan C | Oct 15, 2008 7:09:47 PM

S Adams,

Why in the world would you believe the same right wing media that lied to you about Iraq when it comes to the cause of the recent economic meltdown?
Posted by: Ryan C | Oct 15, 2008 6:45:45 PM
-----------------------------
Ryan C--because I'm objective enough to see the truth, even if it's disagreeing with my own party. But the facts speak for themselves, and when you follow the paper trail, it led right to the source of the problem. I am not saying the Republicans were entirely innocent, but the Democrats benefitted the most from Fannie Mae, who tends to leans to the left when handing out high $$ contributions, and it was the Democrats who failed to take notice in 2006 when McCain warned them of the coming crisis.

Posted by: S Adams | Oct 15, 2008 7:02:51 PM

"Why should anyone strive to make a better life for themselves only to have a "robin hood" government that benefits those that don't have the ambition to be successful"

We have a progressive tax system as it is.

Are you seriously arguing that people will stop working because their income above a certain level will be taxed 4% more?

Posted by: Ryan C | Oct 15, 2008 6:47:25 PM

McCain 7.0?

Is that another nasty reference to his age? The ageism from Obama's campaign is appaling. Apparently racism is bad but discrimination based on age is good? After their offensive commercial implying McCain couldn't type at a computer because of his age although it's actually due to war injuries, I didn't think they would sink this low. Axelrod is doing a great job.

Posted by: veryoffensive | Oct 15, 2008 6:46:38 PM

S Adams,

Why in the world would you believe the same right wing media that lied to you about Iraq when it comes to the cause of the recent economic meltdown?

Posted by: Ryan C | Oct 15, 2008 6:45:45 PM

Ryan C-- Why should anyone strive to make a better life for themselves only to have a "robin hood" government that benefits those that don't have the ambition to be successful.

Posted by: S Adams | Oct 15, 2008 6:42:50 PM

Ryan C-- I did not agree with the Iraq war and I think it was the one big mistake in Bush's presidency, but we have the Democrats to blame for the economy. Starting way back with Jimmy Carter and his Reinvestment Act to medernize the FHA and expand access to more homebuyers. In 1994, Clinton, on behest of ACORN, re-wrote the act with new stipulations stating that Banks were to be given strict quotas to ensure more diversification in housing. May 5, 2006, McCain and 19 others, no Democrats, wrote a letter to Congress warning of the need to regulate Fannie Mae and they were blasted by the Democrats who accused them of being alarmists. Meanwhile, Dodd, Franks, even Obama, all had their hand in the cookie jar of Fannie Mae.

Our first 6 yrs of Bush, we had a sound economy, consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 yr high, gas was $2.19/gal, unemployment rates were 4.5%, Dow Jones hit a record high of 14,000+.
In 2006, a Democratic congress was voted in and consumer confidence plummeted, gas went up to $4.00/ gal, unemployment rate rose to 5.5%, and 1% of homes are in foreclosure.
The re-investment act finally caught up with the Banks who were pressured to make home loans to people who could not afford them then were left holding the bag.

Posted by: S Adams | Oct 15, 2008 6:35:22 PM

"Small business owners will suffer under Obama's plan. They have overhead costs, wages and benefits while having stay competitive to draw business in their market."

And Obama seeks to help them by making employee health benefits 50% tax deductible, incentives for new hires & no capital gains on small biz investment.

"$200,000 or $250,000 is not a lot of money for a business, and what about the areas that have a higher cost of living. $200,000 may be a lot for someone living in Texas or Louisiana, but it's not a lot in California or New York."

Having $250K+ a year income is alot no matter where you live.

And that is in income. Income is either part of overhead or profits or a combination of the two. It does not include biz expenses like payroll, benefits, materials costs etc.

Posted by: Ryan C | Oct 15, 2008 6:32:35 PM

Ryan C--Small business owners will suffer under Obama's plan. They have overhead costs, wages and benefits while having stay competitive to draw business in their market. $200,000 or $250,000 is not a lot of money for a business, and what about the areas that have a higher cost of living. $200,000 may be a lot for someone living in Texas or Louisiana, but it's not a lot in California or New York.
A plumber asked Obama yesterday why he would raise his taxes on his small business and Obama said, "Well, I'm not trying to punish you, I just want to make sure that people behind you are taken care of" That is a socialist point of view. Why does the plumber have to work hard and succeed to give to the person that doesn't want to work as hard?

Posted by: S Adams | Oct 15, 2008 6:24:51 PM

"And walk in clinics? We already have health clinics run by the government, they are sub-standard. I wouldn't take one step inside much less drag my kids in there."

I knew a right winger would fall for that.

That walk in clinic bit was a copy paste from the John McCain health plan.

Posted by: Ryan C | Oct 15, 2008 6:23:05 PM

"The government is responsible for the economic crisis we are in right now. Why would we want them to be in charge of our health care"

So the right wing strategy was to let Bush screw up the government so badly no one would ever trust it to run anything again?

Do you trust the government to run the military?

Posted by: Ryan C | Oct 15, 2008 6:21:18 PM

Post a comment





 

POLITICAL VIDEOS